多深度微水試驗(MLST)是在井中不同深度進行微水試驗，以獲得水力
傳導係數的垂直分布K(z)。由於MLST 的測試段長度小於含水層厚度，MLST 引起的地下水流為部分貫穿情況。扁平比(井半徑/測試段長度)和部分貫穿比(測試段長度/含水層厚度)會影響部分貫穿井附近的地下水流流場，但是以往討論含水層儲蓄效應時只提到扁平比的影響；當微水試驗中扁平比大於0.08 時受壓含水層的儲蓄效應可以忽略。本研究的目的為探討扁平比和部分貫穿比與含水層儲蓄效應的關係，並找出何種情況下含水層儲蓄效應可以忽略。同時利用暫態(考慮儲蓄效應)模式和類穩態(忽略儲蓄效應)模式於受壓和非受壓含水層中，並以暫態和類穩態模式進行比較，將比較結果區分為高滲透性和低滲透性，得出含水層儲蓄效應可以忽略(1)當高滲透性受壓含水層中部分貫穿比小於0.03 且扁平比小於5;(2)高滲透性非受壓含水層中扁平比小於5 且儲蓄效應的影響與部分貫穿比無關。對於低滲透
性含水層，無論是受壓或非受壓，儲蓄效應皆不可忽略，且儲蓄效應的影響與部分貫穿比無關。

The multilevel slug test (MLST) is to conduct a number of depth-specific slug tests at various depths in a well for the determination of the vertical distribution of hydraulic conductivity, K(z). The test length of each depth-specific slug test is set less than aquifer thickness, so the flow induced is under a partially penetrating condition. It is known that both the aspect ratio (well radius / the test
section length) and the partial penetration ratio (the test section length/ aquifer thickness) play important roles in affecting the flow field close to a partial penetrating well. However, only the aspect ratio has been taken into account when assessing the influence of aquifer storage for MLSTs; that is, aquifer storage can be neglected when the aspect ratio is larger than 0.08 for a slug test in a confined aquifer. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the aspect ratio and the partial penetration ratio on the negligence of aquifer storage. A transient model with aquifer storage effect and a
quasi-steady-state model neglecting aquifer storage are developed for both the confined and unconfined aquifers. The comparison of these two models under high–K and low-K conditions reveals that aquifer storage can be neglected when (1) the aspect ratio is less than 5 and the partial penetration ratio is less than 0.03 in high-K confined aquifers, and (2) the partial penetration ratio is less than 5 in high-K confined aquifers, regardless of the aspect and partial penetration ratios.For either confined or unconfined aquifers of low-K condition, aquifer storage
can’t be neglected. regardless of the aspect and partial penetration ratios.

參考文獻
﹝1﹞ Audouin, O. and Bodin, J.,“Analysis of slug-tests with high-frequency oscillations”, Journal of Hydrology, 334, 282-289, 2007.
﹝2﹞ Audouin, O. and Bodin, J., ”Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer”, Journal of Hydrology, 348, 510-523, 2008.”
﹝3﹞ Barker, J. A., “A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock”, Water Resource Research, 24(10), 1796-1804, 1988.
﹝4﹞ Bouwer, H. and Rice, R. C., “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells ”, Water Resource Research, 12(3), 423-428, 1976.
﹝5﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr., The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests., Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers., 1998.
﹝6﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr., “A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells”, Ground Water, 40(3), 2003.
﹝7﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr. and Zhan X.,“Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resource Research, 40, 2004.
﹝8﹞ Chen C. S. and Wu C. R., “Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Ground Water, 44(3), 472-477,2006.
﹝9﹞ Chen C. S., “An analytic data analysis method for oscillatory slug tests”, Ground Water, 44(4), 604-608, 2006.
﹝10﹞ Chen J. S., Wu C. L. and Liu C. W., “Analysis of contaminant transport towards a partially penetrating extraction well in an anisotropic aquifer”, Hydrological Processes. 24, 2010.
﹝11﹞ Chirlin, G. R., “A critique of the Hvorslev method for slug test analysis:the fully penetrating well”, Ground Water Monitoring review, 9(2),130-138, 1989.
﹝12﹞ Churchill, R. V., Operational Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York,1972.
﹝13﹞ Cooper, H. H. Jr., Bredehodft, J. D. and Papadopulos, I. S. and Bennett,R. R., “The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves ”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 70, 3915-3926, 1965.
﹝14﹞ Cooper, H. H., Jr., Bredehodft, J. D. and Papadopulos, I. S., “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water”, Water Resource Research, 3(1), 263-269, 1967.
﹝15﹞ Hantush, M. S., Hydraulics of Wells, In advances in Hydrosciences. Vol.1, Academic, San Diego, Calif, 1964.
﹝16﹞ Hvorslev, M. J., Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations., US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin No. 36, Mississippi, USA, 1951.
﹝17﹞ Hyder, Z., Butler, J. J., Jr., McElwee, C. D., and Liu W. Z., “Slug tests in partially penetrating wells”, Water Resources Research, 30(11),2945-2957, 1994.
﹝18﹞ Hyder, Z. and Butler J. J. Jr.,“Slug tests in unconfined formation : An assessment of the Bouwer and Rice technique”, Ground Water, 33(1), 1995.
﹝19﹞ Kipp K. L., “Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test”, Water Resources Research, 21(9), 1397 – 1408, 1985.
﹝20﹞ Mathias, S. A., and A. P. Butler, “An improvement on Hvorslev’s shape factors”, Geotechnique, 56(10), 705-706, 2006.
﹝21﹞ Mathias, S. A., and A. P. Butler, “Shape factors for constant-head double-packer permeameters” , Water Resources Research, 43, W06430.,2007.
﹝22﹞ McElwee, C. D., “Improving the analysis of slug tests”, Journal of Hydrology, 269, 122-133, 2002.
﹝23﹞ McElwee, C. D. and Zenner M. A., “A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data”, Water Resources Research, 34(1), 55-66, 1998.
﹝24﹞ McElwee, C.D., Bohling G. C. and Butler J. J., Jr., “Sensitivity analysis of slug tests Part1 : The slugged well”, Journal of Hydrology, 164, 53-67,1995.
﹝25﹞ Pasandi M., Samani, N. and Barry, D. A., “Effect of wellbore storage and finite thickness skin on flow to a partially penetrating well in a phreatic aquifer”, Advances in Water Resources, 31: 383– 398, 2008.
﹝26﹞ Rehbinder, G., “The double packer permeameter with Narrow packers.Analytical solution for non steady flow”, Applied Scientific Research, 56, 255–279, 1996.
﹝27﹞ Rehbinder, G., “Relation between non-steady supply pressure and flux for a double packer conductivity meter: An approximate analytical solution”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 74, 1 – 20, 2005.
﹝28﹞ Springer, R. K., and Gelhar, L. W., Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response., Cape Cod, Massachusetts. U.S.Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4034, 3-40, 1991.
﹝29﹞ Van der Kamp, G., “Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case”, Water Resources Research, 12(1), 71-77, 1976.
﹝30﹞ Widdowson, M. A., Molz, F. J., and Melville, J. G., “An analysis technique for multilevel and partially penetrating slug test data”. Ground Water, 28(6), 937-945, 1990.
﹝31﹞ Zemansky, G. M. and McElwee, C. D., “High-resolution slug resting”, Ground Water, 43(2), 222-230, 2005.
﹝32﹞ Zenner, M. A.,“Analysis of slug tests in bypassed wells”, Journal of Hydrology, 263, 72-91, 2002.
﹝33﹞ Zlotnik, V., Interpretation of slug and packer tests in anisotropic aquifers, Ground Water. 32(5), 761-767, 1994.
﹝34﹞ Zlotnik, V. A. and McGuire, V.L., “Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations:1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model”, Journal of Hydrology, 204, 271-282, 1998.
﹝35﹞ Zlotnik, V. A. and Zurbuchen, B. R.,“Field study of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer: Comparison of single-borehole measurements using different instruments”, Water Resource Research,39(4), 1101, 2003.
﹝36﹞ Zlotnik, V.A., Goss, D. and Duffield, G. M., “General steady-state shape factor for a partially penetrating well”, Ground Water,48(1), 111-116,2010.
﹝37﹞ Zurbuchen, B. R., Zlotnik, V.A. and Butler, J. J., Jr., “Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resource Research, 38(3), 1025, 2002.