| 研究生: |
陳國財 Kuo-tsai Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
應用平衡計分卡分析台灣租賃產業的未來走向-以C公司為例 Using Balanced Scorecard to Analyze the Future of Taiwan Leasing Industry -Taking C Company for Example |
| 指導教授: |
鄭漢鐔
Hann-Tarn Jeng |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系在職專班 Executive Master of Finance |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 133 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 租賃產業 、平衡計分卡 、競爭策略 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Balanced Scorecard, Competition strategy, Leasing Industry |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:6 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究的目的有二。首先,本研究探討外在環境的變化對台灣租賃產業之產業結構與發展趨勢的影響;其次,利用平衡計分卡與策略地圖探討個案公司過去的競爭優勢、關鍵成功因素及其未來的因應策略。
本研究發現:
一、 台灣租賃產業之產業結構與現況如下:
(1) 租賃市場發展停滯不前,租賃產業缺乏成長機會;
(2) 強者恆強,中小租賃公司經營不易;
(3) 傳統租賃業務式微,唯營業性、專案租賃市場仍有可為;
(4) 多數租賃公司侷限於台灣島內市場。
二、 阻礙台灣租賃產業發展的因素包括:
(1) 行業定位不明,以及
(2) 因未加入聯合徵信中心而徵信資訊不足。
三、 經由五力分析、SWOT分析,以及平衡計分卡與策略地圖分析,個案公司未來的策略行動(Strategic initiatives)在於:
(1) 調整現有的關鍵績效指標(KPI)訂定方式;
(2) 平衡管理團隊並運用平衡計分卡於績效管理上;
(3) 提升營運效率,運用價格策略,創造新市場;
(4) 培養國際化人才以因應海外據點所需;
(5) 因應融資公司法之即將通過,應及早規劃準備。
The purpose of this study is twofold. First, it explores the factors which have impact upon the industrial structure and the trend of development of Taiwan leasing industry as the external environment changes. Second, it uses the balanced scorecard and strategy maps to analyze the strategic management of a case company of the leasing industry in Taiwan confronting the environmental changes.
The main findings of this study are as follows:
I. The development of leasing industry of Taiwan is hindered by
1. its ambiguous role and position of leasing industry in Taiwan; and
2. its information disadvantage for not being a member of the Joint Credit Information Center.
II. The industrial structure and the current condition of the industry are as follows:
1. The leasing industry is staggering.
2. Large leasing companies are dominating the market.
3. The financial leasing and special project leasing businesses are moderately growing while traditional leasing business is declining.
4. Companies confined themselves in the domestic leasing market in Taiwan.
III. Based on Porter''s Five Forces Model, SWOT analysis, and balanced scorecard and strategy map, this study suggests that the case company
1. adjust the rules of selecting key performance indicators;
2. balance the management team and implement balanced scorecard as the strategic management tool;
3. improve the operating efficiency and using the strategic pricing to create a new market;
4. train internationally capable employees for the overseas leasing markets; and
5. get ready to position the company in the Taiwan leasing market after the coming new Finance Company Act.
〔1〕Yin., The Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publication, CA.1987.
〔2〕壽華泰,「台灣租賃業對大陸台商營運可行性分析」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國92年。
〔3〕湯明哲,策略精論:基礎篇,一版,天下遠見出版股份有限公司,台北市,2003。
〔4〕Chandler, A.D., Strategy and Structure., Cambridge: Harvard University Press., 1962.
〔5〕Ansoff, H. I., Corporate strategy., McGraw-Hill., New York, 1965.
〔6〕Andrews., The concept of corporate strategy., Homewood, IL, Dow Jones- Irwin., 1971.
〔7〕Hofer, C. W., and Schendel, D. E., Strategic Formulation: Analytical Concepts., St. Paul: West Publishing, 1978.
〔8〕Porter, Michael E., Competitive Strategy., NY: Free Press: 34, 1980.
〔9〕Robbins, S.P., Organization theory structure, design and applications., 3rd. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1990.
〔10〕司徒達賢,策略管理,遠流出版事業股份公司,台北市,1995。
〔11〕吳思華,策略九說—策略思考的本質,初版,麥田出版社,台北市,1996。
〔12〕波特著,競爭策略,周旭華譯,天下遠見出版股份有限公司,台北市,2003。
〔13〕D. R. Daniel, “Management Information Crisis”, Harvard Business Review, Vol 39, pp.111-121, 1961.
〔14〕Rockart, J., “Chief Executives Defined Their Own Data Needs”, Harvard Business Review, 20, pp. 64-67, 1979.
〔15〕Hill&Jones, Strategic Management Theory:An Integrated Approach., 3/e, 1992.
〔16〕Asker David A., Strategic Market Management., (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Co., New York, 1984.
〔17〕Jorge, A. “The impact of key success factor on company per-formance”, Long Range Planning, 17 (2), pp. 23-32, 1988.
〔18〕Leidecker, J. K., & Bruno, A. V. “Identifying and using critical success factors”, Long Range Planning, 17 (1), pp. 23-32, 1984.
〔19〕Harvey, Donald F. Strategic Management and Business Policy., Merrill Publishing Co., 1988.
〔20〕Murdick, Robert G., R. Carl Moor, and Richard H. Eckhouse, Business Policy and Strategy:An Action Guide., Horizons Publishing Inc., 1989.
〔21〕Duncan, “Characteristics of Perceived Environments and Perceived Environmental Vncertainty”,Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 313-327, 1972.
〔22〕Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 76, January-February, 1996.
〔23〕Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Massachusetts”, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 52, 1996.
〔24〕吳安妮,「平衡計分卡觀念之靈活運用」,會計研究月刊,第138期,117-119頁,1997。
〔25〕Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton著,平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具,朱道凱譯,臉譜文化事業股份有限公司,台北市,1999。
〔26〕Kaplan and Norton, The Strategy Focused Organization., Harvard business School Press., Boston, Massachusetts, 2000.
〔27〕Corrigan, “The balanced scorecard-the new approach to performance measurement”, Australian Accountant, pp. 47-48, 1996.
〔28〕Arverson, “Measuring performance in government research gencies, The Balanced Scorecard Institute,” (http/www. balanced scorecard. org/), Working paper, 1998.
〔29〕Jackson,“Productivity and performance of public sector organizations”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol 17, No. 7/8, pp. 753-766, 1999.
〔30〕Booth, “Accountants do it by Proxy”, Management Accounting, pp. 48, 1996.
〔31〕Newing ,R. “Benefits of A Balanced Scorecard Accountancy” 114(1215): pp. 52-53, 1994.
〔32〕Chang & Chow, “The balanced scorecard: a potential tool for supporting change and continuous improvement in accounting education”, Issues in Accounting Education, 14 (3), pp. 395-412, 1999.
〔33〕Lingle, J. H. and Schiemann, W. A., “From Balanced Scorecard to Strategic Gauges: Is Measurement Worth It? ”, Management Review, Vol 85, No. 3, pp. 56-61, 1996.
〔34〕Petty & Guthrie, “Intellectual capital literature review Measurement, report and management”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol 1 No. 2, pp.155-176, 2000.
〔35〕Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker, “Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol 10, pp. 205-239,1998.
〔36〕Berman, S. J. “Using the balanced scorecard in strategic compensation”, ACA New, pp. 16-19, June 1998.
〔37〕Frigo & Krumwiede, “Ten ten ways to improve performance measurement systems”, Cost Management Update, 96(April), pp. 1-4, 1999.
〔38〕Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker, “Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol 10, pp.205-239, 1998.
〔39〕Hilton, R. W., M. W. Maher, and F. H. Selto, ”Using Lead and Lag Measures to Communicate, Motivate, and Evaluate”, Cost Management Strategies for Business Decisions, pp.54-61, 1999.
〔40〕MacStravic, Scott, “A Really Balanced Scorecard”, Health Forum, pp.64-67, May-June 1999.
〔41〕Olve, Nils-Goran, Roy, J., and Wetter, M., Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard., Chichester: John Willey& Sons., 1998.
〔42〕Hanson, J. “The balanced scorecard: Not just another fad”, Credit Union Executive, pp. 12-16, (Jan-Feb)2000.
〔43〕Bonnie P. S., and J. Teresa, “Building a balanced performance management system”, Sam Advanced Management Journal, Spring, pp.22-29, 2000.
〔44〕Rousseau, Y. and Rousseau, P., “Turning strategy into action in financial services”, CMA Management, pp. 25-29, December- January, 2000.
〔45〕Frigo & Krumwiede, “Ten ten ways to improve performance measurement systems”. Cost Management Update, 96(April), pp. 1-4, 1999.
〔46〕劉俐君,「航行於鴻海集團之價值領域-以平衡計分卡為導航器」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國92年。
〔47〕劉玉珍,「金融控股公司經營績效評估指標之建構」,世新大學,碩士論文,民國90年。
〔48〕陳振添,「平衡計分卡在電信產業應用之研究-以中華電信公司為例」,東海大學,碩士論文,民國90年。
〔49〕戴燈山,「平衡計分卡之規劃與設計--以合作金庫銀行為個案研究」,中國文化大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
〔50〕施志忠,「壽險公司實施平衡計分卡策略規劃之個案研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學,碩士論文,民國92年。
〔51〕吳政豫,「探討新產品創新研發之產品企劃階段的關鍵成功因素—以我國的電源供應產業為例」,輔仁大學,碩士論文,民國92年。
〔52〕甘錦添,「以平衡計分卡為策略管理工具之研究-以某印前系統供應商為例」,大同大學,碩士論文。民國92年。
〔53〕林昭仕,「平衡計分卡之研究-以國營事業自來水公司為例」,中華大學,碩士論文,民國95年。
〔54〕吳騏竹,「台灣設立融資公司之必要性與可行性分析」,國立台灣大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
〔55〕台北市租賃商業同業公會統計資料,民國95年。
〔56〕中租迪和股份有限公司2006年年報。
〔57〕中租迪和股份有限公司2004~2006年財務報告。
〔58〕于泳泓、陳依蘋著,平衡計分卡完全教戰守策,初版,梅霖文化事業有限公司,台北市,民國93年。
〔59〕波特著,競爭優勢(上),李明軒、邱如美合譯,天下遠見出版股份有限公司,台北市,2003。
〔60〕波特著,競爭優勢(下),李明軒、邱如美合譯,天下遠見出版股份有限公司,台北市,2003。
〔61〕林聖達,「台灣壽險業之競爭策略研究—以個案公司為例」,輔仁大學,碩士論文,民國92年。
〔62〕邱東泉,「策略管理工具-平衡計分卡之規劃與設計~以P公司為例」,國立雲林科技大學,碩士論文,民國91年。
〔63〕Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton著,策略校準,高子梅、何霖譯,臉譜文化事業股份有限公司出版,台北市,民國95年。
〔64〕Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton著,策略地圖:串聯組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具,陳正平等譯,臉譜文化事業股份有限公司,台北市,民國93年。
〔65〕吳銘鴻,「台灣租賃產業的現況與未來發展策略之探討---中租迪和股份有限公司個案分析」,東海大學,碩士論文,民國90年。