| 研究生: |
李宜釗 I-Chao Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
去蕪學習與新產品發展績效相關之研究 A Research on Relationship between Unlearning and New Product Development Performance. |
| 指導教授: |
林明杰
Ming-ji Lin |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 組織學習 、去蕪學習 、忘卻學習 、知識應用 、新產品發展績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Organizational Learning, Unlearning, Knowledge Application, New Product Development |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:5 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
許多研究指出過去的經驗可能會限制組織學習,這就會導致組織變的脆弱,而去蕪學習(忘卻學習)能夠防止組織僵固,使組織能夠持續的獲得競爭優勢。然而有關去蕪學習的文獻,大多都侷限在理論探討或質性研究上,鮮少有實證的分析。因此本研究想補足在此方面研究之不足。
本研究以一些文獻作為基礎,將去蕪學習定義為組織淘汰既有的知識或習性,並且在營運上以改變觀點和程序來呈現。接著探討在新產品發展過程中,去蕪學習的重要性,尤其著重於當團隊觀點或程序改變時,對知識應用與新產品發展上的影響。
為了驗證去蕪學習與新產品發展績效的關係,係以中華徵信所「TOP5000傑出企業獎章」中109個製造業廠商為研究對象。研究結果顯示(1)團隊市場觀點改變或程序改變的程度,與知識應用的能力有相關性,並間接對新產品發展績效造成影響;(2)不同的去蕪學習對於知識應用的影響也不一樣;(3)去蕪學習和知識應用之間的關係會受到長期導向和資訊科技普及性的干擾。
具體而言,鼓勵組織成員改變市場觀點或組織程序,就更容易減少產品上市時產生的問題,新產品也就能更成功的發展和上市。更進一步發現,市場觀點改變的重要性大於組織程序的改變,因此企業應優先鼓勵員工重新檢視對市場的觀點,若有必要就必須捨棄原本的看法,重新了解顧客真正的需求。研究結果也指出,市場觀點的改變需要輔以組織在研發上長期的投資,以提高成員應用新知識的意願;組織若鼓勵員工多使用資訊科技,即使組織程序的改變程度很低也能夠有效的解決產品問題。
本研究提出去蕪學習能有效增加知識的應用,因此管理者可以藉由鼓勵組織成員改變對市場的觀點或以彈性的程序來管理,就能改善新產品發展績效。然而管理者鼓勵組織去蕪學習的同時,更要小心謹慎。因為沒有經過評估或考慮就捨棄既有的觀點和程序,有可能會造成知識的流失。
Many studies indicated that the experience of the past may be limited organizational learning, and lead to organization become weak. Unlearning prevents organizations fixed, so that competitive advantage can be sustained. However, the literatures about unlearning are mostly confined in the qualitative research, there has been little in empirical analysis. Therefore this study completes the research in this area.
In this study, unlearning is defined as an organization eliminated the existing knowledge or habits, as change in team beliefs and organizational routines. This research treats the important of unlearning in new product development (NPD) process. The results show that (a) changing team’s market beliefs or organizational routines correlates with knowledge application, and correlate indirectly with NPD performance; (2) the effects of different unlearning on knowledge application are not the same; (3) long-term orientation and information technologies moderate the relationship between unlearning and knowledge application.
If the organization encourages members to change team’s market beliefs or organizational routines, it will reduce problems of new product, and new products can be developed and launched successfully. We found that changing team’s market beliefs is more important than changing organizational routines, so firms should focus on re-scanning the market perspective, and if necessary we must abandon the original view, re-learn the real needs of customers. The results also pointed that high level of changing team’s market beliefs must be assisted by long-term orientation. Otherwise, the firm that has low level of changing organizational routines should enhance using flexible procedures for the management or encourage employees to use IT.
This study proposes that unlearning can effectively increase the level of knowledge application. That managers should encourage members changing team’s market beliefs or organizational routines will improve NPD performance. However, managers should be careful of unlearning, because changing team’s market beliefs or organizational routines without evaluation may lead to loss knowledge.
一、 中文部份
1. 亞默爾、普哈拉(2004)。競爭大未來。(顧淑馨譯)。臺北縣:智庫文化。
2. 許士軍(1982)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
3. 陳順宇(1998)。多變量分析第三版。臺北市:華泰書局。
4. 楊必立、劉水深(主編) (1988)。行銷管理辭典。臺北市:華泰書局。
5. 賴士葆(1990)。研究發展/行銷互動與新產品發展績效相關之研究。臺北市:中華民國管理科學學會。
二、 英文部分
1. Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., and Byrne, J. C. (2003). Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive Framework. Human Relations, 56(7), 839-868.
2. Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., and Byrne, J. C. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Unlearning in New Product Development Teams. Journal of product innovation management, 23(1), 73-88.
3. Alavi, M. (1997). KPMG Peat Marwick U.S: One Giant Brain. Harvard Business School (Case), 397-108.
4. Anand, V., Manz, C. C., and Glick, W. H. (1998). An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 796-809.
5. Anderson, P. (1999). Organizational Learning, Forgetting & the Hand of the Past. Hanover, MA: Dartmouth College, Amos Tuck School.
6. Andrew, H. G., Arvind, M., and Albert, H. S. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information System, 18(1), 185-214.
7. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
8. Barczak, G. (1995). New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(3), 224-234.
9. Bij, H. v. d., Song, M., and Weggeman, M. (2003). An Empirical Investigation into the Antecedents of Knowledge Dissemination at the Strategic Business Unit Level. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 163-179.
10. Cooper, R. G., and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). Success Factors in Product Innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(3), 215-223.
11. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. DeCarolis, D. M., and Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953-968.
13. Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 69-73.
14. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: a review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
15. Dröge, C., Claycomb, C., and Germain, R. (2003). Does Knowledge Mediate the Effect of Context on Performance? Some Initial Evidence. Decision Sciences, 34(3), 541-568.
16. Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.
17. Drucker, P. F. (1994). The theory of the business. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 95-104.
18. Freud, S. (1943). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Washington Square Press.
19. Frishammar, J., and Hörte, S. Å. (2005). Managing External Information in Manufacturing Firms: The Impact on Innovation Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 251-266.
20. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Gopalakrishnan, S., and Damanpour, F. (1997). A Review of Innovation Research in Economics, Sociology and Technology Management. Omega, 25(1), 15-28.
23. Greeno, J. G., James, C., and DaPolito, F. J. (1971). A cognitive interpretation of negative transfer and forgetting of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 331-345.
24. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191-215.
25. Griffin, A., and Page, A. L. (1993). An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 291-308.
26. Hedberg, B. (1981). How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47-71.
28. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
29. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Co..
30. Kiernan, M. J. (1993). The new strategic architecture: Learning to compete in the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 7-21.
31. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humphries.
32. Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 93-107.
33. Lusch, R. F., and Brown, J. R. (1996). Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 19-38.
34. Lynn, G. S., Reilly, R. R., and Akgün, A. E. (2000). Knowledge Management in New Product Teams: Practices and Outcomes. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 47(2), 221-231.
35. Matsuno, K., and Mentzer, J. T. (2000). The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 1-16.
36. Matusik, S. F., and Hill, C. W. L. (1998). The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 680-697.
37. McGill, M. E., and Slocum, J. W. Jr. (1993). Unlearning the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 67-89.
38. Meyers, P. W., and Wilemon, D. (1989). Learning in New Technology Development Teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6(2), 79-88.
39. Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational Market Information processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 318-335.
40. Moorman, C., and Miner, A. S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1-20.
41. Newstrom, J. W. (1983). The management of unlearning: Exploding the “clean slate” fallacy. Training and Development Journal, 37(8), 36-39.
42. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
43. Nonaka, I., Toyoma, R., and Byosiere, P. (2001). A Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation: Understanding the Dynamic Process of Creating Knowledge. In M. Dierkes et al. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge (pp. 491-518). New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12(4), 53-65.
45. Schein, E. H. (1993). How Can Organizations Learn Faster? The Challenge of Entering the Green Room. Sloan Management Review, 34(2), 85-92.
46. Sethi, V., and King, W. R. (1994). Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 40(12), 1601-1627.
47. Sheaffer, Z., Richardson, B., and Rosenblatt, Z. (1998). Early-warning-signals: a lesson from the Barings crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(1), 1-22.
48. Sherwood, D. (2000). The Unlearning Organisation. Business Strategy Review, 11(3), 31-40.
49. Siegal, W., Church, A. H., and Javitch, M. (1996). Understanding the management of change An overview of managers'' perspectives and assumptions in the 1990s. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(6), 54-80.
50. Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Marketing information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 35-45.
51. Sinkula, J. M. (2002). Market-Based Success, Organizational Routines, and Unlearning. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 253-269.
52. Slater, S. F., and Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.
53. Song, X. M., and Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical Development Activities for Really New versus Incremental Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124-135.
54. Song, X. M., and Parry, M. E. (1997). The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 64-76.
55. Song, M., Bij, H. v. d., and Weggeman, M. (2005). Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge-Based and Information-Processing Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 430-444.
56. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing New Product Innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
57. Souder, W. E., Sherman, J. D., and Davies-Cooper, R. (1998). Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(6), 520-533.
58. Spender, J. C. (1994). Dynamics of Competitive Strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 829-833.
59. Starbuck, W. H. (1996). Unlearning Ineffective or Obsolete Technologies. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7), 725-737.
60. Stein, E. W. (1995). Organizational memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management, 15(1), 17-32.
61. Takeuchi, H., and Nonaka, I. (1986). The new new product development game. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 137-146.
62. Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31(2), 193-224.
63. Tushman, M. L., and Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.
64. Walsh, J. P., and Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
65. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., and Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975-996.
66. Wasti, S. N., and Liker, J. K. (1997). Risky Business or Competitive Power? Supplier Involvement in Japanese Product Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(5), 337-355.