本研究首先進行臺灣目前對於道路巡查招標方式以及其效益進行探討，
目前依招標方式不同可分為最低標、評分及格最低標以及最有利標之方式
進行招標，探討此三種招標方式之成效後，最終評估對於提升道路鋪面工
程品質維護之招標方式，評估結果建議以最有利標之方式進行招標，並利
用前述針對各種招標方式之分析，決定道路巡查最有利標評分項目之選
定。
選定道路巡查最有利標評分項目後，本研究將利用層級分析法(ANP)
問卷調查進行各評分項目之配分標準分析評估，將道路巡查最有利標評分
項目分為七個主要構面，各構面下再分為數個指標進行ANP 問卷分析，將
此問卷對於專家學者進行訪談調查後，進行最終之分析評估，得到路巡查
最有利標評分項目之配分標準之，建議後續道路巡查可依據此準則進行最
有利標之招標，以達提升道路品質之目的。

This study firstly conducted a discussion on the method of the tendering
for the road inspection in Taiwan. At present, according to the different methods
of tendering, it can be divided into the lowest standard, Procurement of Different
Quality in Construction, and The Most Advantageous Tender. After exploring
the effects of the three types of tendering methods, The final evaluation is to
improve the tendering method for the quality maintenance of road. The
evaluation results suggest that The Most Advantageous Tender should be
conducted in the most favorable way, and the above-mentioned analysis of
various tendering methods is used to determine the selection of The Most
Advantageous Tender scoring items for road inspection.
After selecting The Most Advantageous Tender scoring items for road
inspection, this study will use Analytic Hierarchy Process (ANP) questionnaire
to analyze and evaluate the scores of each scoring project, and divide the most
favorable landmarks of road inspection into seven main facets. It is divided into
several indicators to analyze the ANP questionnaire. After conducting interviews
with experts and scholars, the questionnaire will be analyzed and evaluated. The
road survey will be the most favorable index for the scores. It is recommended
that follow-up road inspections can be based on this criterion. Carry out The
Most Advantageous Tender to achieve the purpose of improving road quality.

1. 林昆虎。「市區道路網級鋪面管理架構建立之研究 -以臺北市為例」。博士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2015。
2. 李正道。「工程異質採購最低標之研究-以道路鋪面養護工程為例」。碩士論文，國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所，2016。
3. 洪素雲。「公共工程異質採購最低標之優點缺點及改善建議」。碩士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，2016。
4. 卓聰洲。「工程異質採購最低標辦理成果之探討-以內政部營建署為例」。碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系在職專班，2016。
5. 林璇。「以預防性養護導入市區道路巡查維護作業之初擬-以臺北市為例」。碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2018。
6. ASTM D6433-16(2016) Standard Practice of Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys.
7. Directorate General of Highways， Highway management and maintenance information system , 2017.
8. Ying, L. and Salari, E., “Beamlet Transform-Based Technique for Pavement Crack Detection and Classification”, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 25, 572-280, (2010).
9. MathWorksWebsite2017/02/05:http://www.mathworks.com/help/vision/ug/camera-calibration.html?requestedDomain=www.mathworks.com
10. Pavement Services, Inc., “Pavement Condition Index Survey &Evaluation of the City of Veneta’s Street Network”, Veneta, February (2015).
11. Fankhauser, P., Bloesch, M., Rodriguez,D., Kaestner, R., Hutter, M., Siegwart, R., “Kinect v2 for Mobile Robot Navigation: Evaluation and Modeling” International Conference on Advanced Robotics(ICAR), Istanbul, July (2015).
12. New Construction office, Public Works Department, Taipei City Government Website:http://nco.gov.taipei
13. Mertz, C., Varadharajan, S., Jose, S., Sharma, K., Wander, L., Wang, J., “City-Wide Road Distress Montoring with Smartphones” Proceedings of ITS World Congress, September (2014).