隨著世代的不斷演進，人們由農業社會進入工商社會後，生活型態、產業結構、消費行為及建築特性的變遷下，室內空氣品質問題應運而生。高層建築大樓之室內環境中，人員的活動、設備與化合物質的使用以及建物本身結構的問題，都可能成為室內環境污染的來源。
近年來，隨著國人對於室內環境（空氣）品質意識的抬頭，政府機關亦著手修訂國內室內空氣品質之相關政策，並持續推動及法令制定，而「室內空氣品質管理法」也於100年11月8日經立法院三讀通過，並於當年11月23日由總統公布實施。
本研究利用「辦公大樓室內空氣品質評估查核表」，先行針對使用空間進行室內空氣品質預測，結果顯示空氣品質「不良」與「差」的區域佔31.03 %，實地進行建築大樓各樓層使用空間的量測作業，二氧化碳濃度超過室內空氣品質標準的樓層數佔總樓層38 %；總碳氫化合物也有44%的樓層數超過室內空氣品質標準；部分樓層之PM2.5達到47.77 µg/m3，PM10也累積至77.91 µg/m3皆超過室內空氣品質標準。經由健康風險分析，大樓內的「呼吸系統」危害佔72.73 %，比「心血管系統」（7.27 %）與「眼睛」（3.64 %）都高出許多。
針對既有建築大樓在不變更空調系統與人員作業模式下，執行三項改善計畫，包括「空調循環系統改善」、「軟焊作業區改善」及「IAQ查核表改善」。改善成效皆能降低氣狀污染物與粒狀污染物的整體濃度，相對也降低人員的健康風險。

The indoor air quality problem arises in the wake of generation evolution, life style of human changed from agricultural oriented society to an industrial and business oriented society, and other changes like industrial structure, consumer behavior and architectural characteristics. Activities of people, the use of equipment and chemical substances, problems of building structure may become the root causes of pollution inside the high-riser.
With an awareness of indoor air quality among Taiwanese people in recent years, government manages to amend relevant policies of national indoor air quality and promotes the implementation of such a regulation. Hence, the law of indoor air quality was approved by the Legislative Yuan on Nov. 08, 2011 and announced execution by the President on Nov. 23 in the same year.
This study uses “Indoor Air Quality Assessment Checklist of Office Building” as a tool to predict the indoor air quality for space used. The result shows 31.03 % of areas are ranked as “not good” or “bad.” A field assessment of space used in high-risers shows 38% of floors, the CO2volume of whichexceeds the standard of indoor air quality. On 44% of floors, the total hydrocarbon volume of which also exceeds standard. On some floors, PM2.5reaches 47.77 µg/m3, while PM10 also accumulates up to 77.91 µg/m3, which all exceed indoor air quality standard. Through health risk analysis, the hazard for “respiratory system” within high-riser amounts to 72.73%, which is so much higher than that of “cardiovascular system (7.27%)” and “eye (3.64).”
Under the modes of no further changes of A/C system and personnel operation in existing high-risers, 3 improvement plans are to be implemented, including “improvement of A/C circulation system”, “improvement of welding area”, and “improvement of IAQ checklist.” The outcome of improvement shows the volume of gaseous pollutants and particulate pollutants can be reduced, which also reduces the health risk of personnel.

英文
 Atkinson R., ”Gas-Phase Tropospheric Chemistry of Organic Compounds:A Review.”,Atmospheric Environment, Vol.24a, pp1-41, 1990.
 Backman H., Haghighat F., “Indoor-air quality and ocular discomfort.” J. Am. Optom. Assol. 70, pp309-316,1999.
 Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health, 1989.
 Jones A.P., “Indoor air quality and health”, Atmospheric environment, Vol. 33, pp4535-4564, 1999.
 Koeck M., Pichler-Semmelrock F. P. and Schlacher R., “Formaldehyde Study of Indoor Air Pollution in Austria, Central European.”, Journal of Public Health, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp127-130, 1997.
 Levaggi D.A., andSia W., Gaseous toxics monitoring in the Sia Francisco Bay area: Areview and assessment of four years of data, 84thAnnual Meetingand Exhibition of Air and Waste Management Association, British Columbia, Canada, 1991.
 Levin H., “Commercial building indoor air quality an introduction to the problem.”Energy Efficiency Partnerships, Inc., 1999.
 MendellM.J., Naco G.M., Wilcox T.G., and Sieber W.K., “Building-related risk factors and work-related lower respiratory symptoms in 80 office building. “, Indoor Air 2002, Santa Cruz, CA, pp103-108, 2002.
 Pope C.A., Dockery D.W., Schwartz J.,“Review of epidemiological evidence of heath effects of particulate air pollution.” Inhalation Toxicology. 7:1-18, 1995.
 Raub J. A., MathieuNolf M., Hampson N. B., and Thom S.R., “Carbon monoxide poisoning- a public health perspective toxicology”, Toxicology, Vol. 145, pp1-14, 2000.
 Raymer J.H., Akland G., “Microenvironmental characteristics important for personal exposures to aldehydes in Sacramento, CA, and Milwaukee, WI”, Atmospheric Environment, 43(25) , pp3910-3917, 2009.
 Robertson D.S., “The rise in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide and the effects on human health.”, Medical hypotheses, Vol. 56, 2000.
 U.S. EPA., “Building air quality: A Guide for building owners and facilitymanager.”, EPA. Washington, DC, 1991.
 Yocom J.E., ClinkW.L., andCoteW.A., “Indoor-outdoor air quality relationships”, J Air pollution Control Assoc, pp251-259,1971.

中文
 內政部營建署，http://www.cpami.gov.tw/。
 中華民國勞動部，http//www.mol.gov.tw/。
 行政院主計總處，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/。
 行政院環保署，http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/epalaw/index.aspx。
 行政院環境保護署室內空氣品質資訊網，http://iaq.epa.gov.tw/indoorair/。
 李彥頤，「辦公空間室內空氣品質管制策略之研究」，成功大學建築系，博士論文，2004。
 李萬成，「某醫院室內空氣品質評估」，台北醫學院公共衛生研究所，碩士論文，1999。
 邵文政，Indoor Environment& Health, The National Institute of Public Health & The National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden/譯本，健康環境研究室，2008。
 涂玉峰，「醫學中心之室內空氣品質管理現況探討」，國立成功大學建築研究所，碩士論文，1999。
 曾傳銘，「室內空氣品質」，工業安全技術衛生月刊，8月號，17-28頁，2007。
 張耀鍾，「台北捷運、公車、長途客運之室艙空氣品質實地研究」，國立臺北科技大學環境規劃與管理研究所，碩士論文，2004。
 曾國書、陳瑞仁，「屏東都會區粗細懸浮微粒特性之研究」，國立屏東科技大學環境工程與科學研究所，碩士論文，2005。
 黃正義、陳王琨，空氣污染防制學，淑馨出版社，臺北，1997。
 鄭福田，「室內空氣品質面面觀－污染源」，安麗月刊，1998。
 劉征原、聶建新，「室內環境污染問題淺談」，北方環境，第二十九卷，第6期，59、60、69頁，2004。
 蘇慧貞、江哲銘，「室內空氣污染物健康風險評估與管制成本效益分析」，行政院環保署專題委託研究計畫，2004。
 衛生福利部國民健康署，http://tobacco.hpa.gov.tw/。
 蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，「室內空氣品質標準於不同建築物之試行評估及管制策略研究」，行政院環保署專題委託研究計畫，2000。
 蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，「室內空氣品值及其汙染源管制之法規策略分析」，環保署專題委研計畫，112-113頁，2001。
 蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，「室內空氣品質標準草案及管制策略探討」，行政院環境保護署研究報告，1999。
 龔聖佑、張嘉智、陳成裕，「談室內空氣品質」，勞工安全衛生簡訊，第103期，2010。