本文介紹了台灣近期結構型商品市場的概況並用蒙地卡羅模擬法評價三檔固定配息結構型商品(Fixed Coupon Note，簡述為FCN)。第一檔及第三檔商品主要發行目的為募集資金，故設計機制上選擇相關係數較高，較低的出場價格，有利於提前出場。第二檔商品則偏重於向投資人購買保護性賣權，兩個標的在發行前偏向盤整，並且設計出場價格為999%期初價格，因相關係數偏低，屬於當市場行情大好才視為標的下行風險解除，幾乎不可能提前出場。總結而言FCN為發行商為募集資金或發行保護性賣權的結構型商品，適合高風險承受度的投資人交易。

This article provides an overview of the recent structured product market in Taiwan and evaluates three Fixed Coupon Notes using the Monte Carlo simulation method. The first and third products are primarily issued for fundraising purposes, so their design mechanism selects a higher correlation coefficient and lower exit prices, facilitating early exit. The second product focuses on offering protective put options to investors. The two underlying assets tended to consolidate before issuance, and the exit price is set at 999% of the initial price. Due to the lower correlation coefficient, it is unlikely to achieve an early exit unless the market performs exceptionally well, mitigating the downside risk of the underlying assets. In summary, FCNs are structured products issued for either fundraising or providing protective put options, suitable for investors with high risk tolerance.

1.江泰利. (2022). 多資產股權連結結構型商品之風險分析。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣科技大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2t49yz
2.吳允喬. (2015). 結構型商品評價與分析─以匯率連結商品為例。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6283e
3.吳晉賢. (2015). 隨機波動度下選擇權訂價模型之探討- 以股權及匯率結構型商品為例。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5n9552
4.林丙輝、張森林葉仕國、. (2016). 台灣衍生性金融商品定價, 避險與套利文獻回顧與展望. 臺大管理論叢, 頁 27.1: 255-304.
5.林秉洋. (2012). 結構型商品之評價與分析-以股權及利率連結商品為例﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/63mch4
6.林保宏. (2016). 結構型商品評價與分析─匯率與股權結構型商品。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bb4a9m
7.洪朝文. (2021). 探討理財專員銷售結構型商品的意願與績效關係之研究。. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/672jxu。
8.陳松男. (2004). 結構型金融商品之設計及創新. 陳松男.
9.陳凌鶴、蔡蒔銓、曾盟雅. (2010). 財務工程實務與個案探討.
10.楊月麗. (2013). 連結商品價格與利率之結構型商品：投資期間、計價貨幣與整體績效之實證分析﹝碩士論文。東海大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k56t4w
11.劉冠男. (2010). 結構型商品之評價與分析-多資產股權連動結構型商品以及外幣組合式結構型商品。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8bk5n4
12.蔡祥恩. (2021). 以Heston模型評價雙資產區間計息結構型商品。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣科技大學﹞. 擷取自 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統: https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6y6345
13.Bates S.D. (1996). Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options. The Review of Financial Studies, 頁 9(1), 69-107.
14.Black & Scholes, M.F.,. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of political economy, 頁 637-654.
15.Duan C.J. (1995). The GARCH option pricing model. Mathematical finance, 頁 5(1), 13-32.
16.GirsanovV.I. (1960). On transforming a certain class of stochastic processes by absolutely continuous substitution of measures. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 頁 5(3), 285-301.
17.Heston L.S. (1993). A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. The review of financial studies, 頁 6(2), 327-343.
18.Holton AG. (2002). History of value-at-risk.
19.Huynh T., & Soumare, IH. (2011). 於 Stochastic-Simulation-and-Applications-in-Finance-with-MATLAB-Programs (頁 57-60). John Wiley & Sons.
20.Longstaff A., & Schwartz, E. S.F. (2001). Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach. The review of financial studies,, 頁 14(1), 113-147.
21.Marek CapińskiKoppEkkehard. (無日期). The Black–Scholes Model.
22.Merton C.R. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of financial economics, 頁 3(1-2), 125-144.
23.Peter AdamkoSpuchľáková ,Katarína ValáškováErika. (2015). The History and Ideas Behind VaR. Procedia Economics and Finance, 頁 Volume 24 Pages 18-24.
24.Rockafellar T., & Uryasev, S.R. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of risk, 頁 2, 21-42.