在過去，學生總是由老師出題目給學生“考試”，且這是一種行之多年的評量方式，也是老師慣常使用的複習方法與教學過程，目的是為了檢核學生學習狀況，作為改進教學的依據。然而“透過學生出題”來達到學習目的這方面的研究卻很少，而學生出題可以讓他們經歷創意、澄清及反思的歷程以進行較高層次的思考，並且在擬題的過程可以有讓學生獲得問問題的訓練。這篇論文主要描述一個支援學生出題、評題的系統，透過這個系統，學生可以在其中進行出題的學習活動，並且產生的題目再透過一個同儕評題的機制，讓學生從中練習評估他人的作品，透過彼此的回饋，幫助學生更了解一個觀念。倘若這樣的歷程在傳統課堂上來實行的話，勢必會浪費大量資源、且需要花較長的時間才能夠完成整個出題、評題的流程，透過出題互評系統的支援可以消除以上的障礙，讓學生進行學習活動，且老師也可以得到一個學生的題庫，並且從中得到資訊以診斷學生的學習狀況，幫助其在教學上的應用。

Traditionally, teachers are always playing the role of examiners, and students always examinees to take the examination of which questions are designed by teachers. This is the common approach for teachers to evaluate the ability of their students and help their students to review what they have learned. However, “To have students themselves design questions” is rarely surveyed in education. In fact, having students design their own questions can make them retrospect and clarify their knowledge learned before, which is a meaningful learning process. And by doing this, student can acquire the benefits of posing questions which are discussed in many researches. This thesis describes a system to support the students to design their own questions and a peer-review procedure is applied to the student-designed items for filtering bad items after the items are collected. Thus the ratio of correct items is enhanced. During the peer-review procedure, the authors of questions might get feedbacks from the other reviewers, which could deepen their understanding on both sides. If these activities were realized in real world, it would be a resource- and time-consuming process.

[1]比爾‧蓋茲、納桑‧米佛德、彼得‧雷諾生（1996）。擁抱未來。遠流出版社
[2]林育珮（2000）。全球網上決戰，台灣在哪裡？。「天下雜誌」2000年教育特刊， 29期，46-51
[3]余民寧（民86）。教育測驗與評量－成就測驗與教學評量。心理出版社
[4]許澤基、劉長萱（民81）。試題作答理論簡介。台北：中國行為科學社
[5]邱淵、王鋼、夏孝川、洪邦玉、龔偉民、李亞玲（民78）。教學評量。台北：五南
[6]劉旨峰、林姍如、袁賢民（2001）。“網路同儕互評系統：評分員自動分發演算法的設計與考量”。Proceedings of the GCCCE 2001, vol. 2, 705-711.
[7]周宜興、高子漢、劉旨峰、袁賢明（2001）。智慧型同儕互評助教專家系統實作之初探性研究。Proceeding of GCCCE/ICCAI 2001, Vol 2, 712-719
[8]梁淑坤（1994）。「擬題」的研究及其在課程的角色。國民小學數學科新課程概說（低年級），台灣省國民學校教師研習會編，.152-167
[9]劉旨峰、卓宜青、袁賢明（1999）。網路互評系統的學生群組分析。TANET’99會議
[10]林盈達（1998）。中學生資訊科技之網路學習與評量系統之研究─子計畫二：網路化創造性學習環境之可行性研究(1/3)。執行機關：交通大學資訊科學系
[11]Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick(Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays inhonor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 121-138
[12]Eric Zhi-Feng Liu, Chi-Huang Chiu, Sunny S. J. Lin, &Shyan-Ming Yuan, “Student participation in computer science courses via the Network Peer Assessment System (NetPeas)”. Proceedings of the ICCE ’99, vol. 1, p. 744-747
[13]Keith Topping (1998). “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities”. Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, 249-276
[14]Millman, J., & Arter, J. A. (1984). Issues in item banking. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol 21, 315-330.
[15]Ying-Dar Lin, Wen-Chun Sun, Chien Chou, Huan-Yun Wei (2001). “DIYexamer: A Web-based Multi-Server Testing System with Dynamic Test Item Acquisition and Discriminability Assessment”. Proceedings of the ICCE 2001, vol. 2,. 1512-1520.
[16]“Educational Resources Information Center”. http://www.askeric.org/ (Accessed on July, 2001)
[17]“EduCities”. http://www.educities.edu.tw (Accessed on July, 2001)
[18]Chiu, Chi-Huang, Wang, Wei-Ren & Yuan, Shyuan-Ming.(1998). Web-based Collaborative Homework Review System. Proceedings of ICCE ’98, vol. 2, 474-477.
[19]Zhao, Yong (1998). “The Effects of Anonymity on Computer-Mediated Peer Review”. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, vol.4, 311-345
[20]Polya, G.(1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning, Vol. 1 & 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
[21]Edward A. Silver (1993). “On Mathematical Problem Posing”. Porceedings of the 7th International Conference, I-66-85
[22]Barbara Moses, Elizabeth Bjork E.Paul Goldenberg (1990.). "Beyond Problem Solving: Problem Posing.". In Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s, 1990 Yearbook of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, edited by T.J. Cooney and C.R. Hirsch, 82 91. Reston, Va.: The Council
[23]Riley, S. M. (1995). “Peer responses in an ESL writing class: Student interaction and subsequent draft revision”. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 3031
[24]“DIYexamer System”. http://speed.cis.nctu.edu.tw/~diy (Accessed on June, 2001)
[25]Isaacs, G. (1998) Brief briefing: Peer and Self Assessment. Conference Effective Assessment at University, Brisbane, November.
[26]劉旨峰、周宜興、林姍如、袁賢明（2001）。科技英文編修課程推行網路同儕互評的實例：學生態度實例分析。Proceedings of the GCCCE 2001, vol. 2, 1405-1051.
[27]Falchikov, N.(1995). Peer feedback marking- Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-187.
[28]Bangert-Drowns, R. L.., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238