跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝元展
Yuan-chan Hsieh
論文名稱: 最適資本稅:考慮異質性勞工
指導教授: 陳韻旻
Yun-min Chen
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 50
中文關鍵詞: 最適租稅異質性
外文關鍵詞: Optimal taxation, heterogeneity
相關次數: 點閱:24下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在全球化與人口結構變遷的趨勢下,外籍低技術勞工已成為許多國家彌補勞動力缺口的關鍵來源。本文針對包含本國高技術勞工、低技術勞工與外籍低技術勞工的異質性勞動結構,建構一個無窮期的Ramsey 租稅模型,以探討社會制定者在追求社會福利最大化下,最適資本稅與勞動稅的設計。研究發現,勞工異質性與稅制限制導致最適資本稅率不再為零,且其大小與各類勞工之間的關係密切相關,並且當政府對外籍勞工施加稅後薪資下限等政策限制時,亦會對最適資本稅率產生實質影響,顯示資本稅在扭曲勞動市場結構下可能成為調節手段之一。


    In the context of globalization and demographic shifts, low-skilled foreign labor has become a crucial source for filling labor shortages in many countries. This paper constructs an infinite-horizon Ramsey taxation model incorporating a heterogeneous labor structure consisting of domestic high-skilled workers, domestic low-skilled workers, and low-skilled foreign workers. The aim is to explore the optimal design of capital and labor taxes under a social planner’s objective of maximizing social welfare. The study finds that labor heterogeneity and tax policy constraints lead to a non-zero optimal capital tax rate, which is closely related to the composition of the labor force. Moreover, government interventions such as wage floors for foreign workers can significantly influence the optimal capital tax rate. These findings suggest that capital taxation may serve as a policy tool to adjust for distortions inthe labor market structure.

    目錄 1 研究動機. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 文獻回顧. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 背景介紹. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4 模型設定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1 家計部門. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.2 外籍移工. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.3 政府部門. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.4 廠商. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.5 競爭均衡. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5 拉姆齊規劃(Ramsey plan) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.1 原始方法(Primal approach) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.1.1 家計部門. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5.1.2 外籍低技術勞工. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.2 稅率限制條件. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 5.3 拉姆齊稅制(Ramsey taxation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.3.1 最適勞動稅率. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.3.2 最適資本稅率. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6 延伸: 取消政策變數m 之效果. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7 數值分析. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 8 結論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 9 參考文獻. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 圖目錄 1 不同替代程度下的資本稅. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2 不同數值的外籍勞工 (n¯z) 的資本稅 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3 不同數值的外籍勞工 (n¯z) 對於本國勞工薪資變化 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4 不同社會福利權重(ν) 下的資本稅. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5 不同外籍勞工稅後薪資下限(m) 的資本稅. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 6 不同外籍勞動稅(τ n z ) 對於資本稅影響. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 表目錄 1 模型參數設定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 II

    1. Aiyagari, S. R. (1995). Optimal capital income taxation with incomplete markets,
    borrowing constraints, and constant discounting. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6),
    1158–1175.
    2. Atkeson, A., Chari, V. V., & Kehoe, P. J. (1999). Taxing capital income: A bad idea.
    Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 23(3), 3–17.
    3. Autor, D. H. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the
    “other 99 percent.”Science, 344(6186), 843–851.
    4. Barro, R. J., & Chari, V. V. (2024). Taxation of Capital: Capital Levies and Commitment
    (No. w32306). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    5. Chamley, C. (1986). Optimal taxation of capital income in general equilibrium with
    infinite lives. Econometrica, 54(3), 607–622.
    6. Chari, V. V., Nicolini, J. P., & Teles, P. (2020). Optimal capital taxation revisited.
    Journal of Monetary Economics, 116, 147–165.
    7. Chen, Y., Chien, Y., Wen, Y., Yang, C. C. (2021). Should capital be taxed?. Economics
    Letters, 200, 109746.
    8. Chien, Y., Wen, Y. (2022). Optimal Ramsey taxation in heterogeneous agent economies
    with quasi-linear preferences. Review of Economic Dynamics, 46, 124-160.
    9. Conesa, J. C., Kitao, S., & Krueger, D. (2009). Taxing capital? Not a bad idea after
    all! American Economic Review, 99(1), 25–48.
    10. Correia, I. H. (1996). Should capital taxation be abolished? A reassessment. Journal
    of Monetary Economics, 38(2), 277–295.
    11. Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E., & Rossi, P. E. (1997). On the optimal taxation of capital
    income. Journal of Economic Theory, 73(1), 93–117.
    12. Judd, K. L. (1985). Redistributive taxation in a simple perfect foresight model. Journal
    of Public Economics, 28(1), 59–83.
    13. Krusell, P., Ohanian, L. E., Ríos-Rull, J.-V., Violante, G. L. (2000). ”Capital-Skill
    Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis.” Econometrica, 68(5),
    1029–1053.
    14. Lindley, J., Machin, S. (2016). The rising postgraduate wage premium. Economica,
    83(330), 281–306.
    15. Mankiw, N. G., Weinzierl, M., & Yagan, D. (2016). Optimal taxation in theory and
    practice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 147–174.
    16. Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Pareto efficient and optimal taxation and the new welfare economics.
    In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics (Vol.
    2, pp. 991–1042). Elsevier.
    17. Straub, L., & Werning, I. (2019). Positive long-run capital taxation: Chamley–Judd
    revisited. American Economic Review, 110(1), 86–119.
    18. Tsai, Y. C., Yang, C. C., Yu, H. J. (2022). Rising skill premium and the dynamics of
    optimal capital and labor taxation. Quantitative Economics, 13(3), 1061-1099.
    19. Werning, I. (2007). Optimal fiscal policy with redistribution. Quarterly Journal of
    Economics, 122(3), 925–967.

    QR CODE
    :::