跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 蔡孟諺
Meng-yan Cai
論文名稱： 一整合分析方法以建構模組化產品家族
An Integrated Method for the Construction of Modular Product Family
指導教授： 高信培
Hsing-pei Kao
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 工業管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Industrial Management
論文出版年： 2014
畢業學年度： 102
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 69
中文關鍵詞： 電動輔助自行車 、模組化產品 、協同開發 、產品平台 、產品家族 、品質機能展開 、設計結構矩陣 、解釋結構模型法
外文關鍵詞： Electric Assisted Bike, Modular Product, Collaborative Product Development, Product Platform, Product Family, Quality Function Deployment, Design Structure Matrix, Interpretive Structure Model
相關次數： 點閱：18  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 建立模組化產品家族可使產品上市前置時間縮短，減少開發成本，滿足不同市場區隔之客戶需求以及提升產品設計品質等優點。近年來，許多企業已不再追求高度垂直整合的商業模式，因為由供應鏈上的企業間協同開發新產品構成設計鏈將有助於提升模組化產品開發的效率與品質。
    本研究運用品質機能展開(Quality Function Deployment, QFD)將顧客需求轉換成規格需求，接者採用設計結構矩陣(Design Structure Matrix, DSM )及解釋結構模型(Interpretive Structural Model, ISM)等方法釐清零組件之間的關係進而達成製程優化
    現今環保議題當道，能源價格屢創新高。都市化造成大眾運輸系統不堪負荷，建立在傳統自行車以及電力能源輔助上的電動輔助自行車(Electric Assisted Bike)的需求應運而生，本文以該產業鏈為例，在協同設計的環境中，以整合模組化設計為架構，應用QFD、DSM及ISM方法進行分析與說明。

    Building up modular product family is able to reduce the cost and lead time of new product development, match to the customer needs and promote product quality. In recent years, high degree of vertical integration is no longer the main objective for many companies since design chain, the pattern to collaborate with supply chain partners, will improve the efficiency and quality of modular product development.
    This study utilizes Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to convert customer demands into design targets. Furthermore, we will adopt Design Structure Matrix (DSM) and Interpretive Structural Model(ISM) to clarify the relationship between components so as to improve the production process.
    Recently, owing to the awareness of green issues, energy price increasing, and public transportation overburdened, Electric Assisted Bicycle has become increasingly popular. This study will take it as an example to demonstrate the applications of QFD, DSM and ISM to design the modular product family in the collaborative environment.

     

    摘 要 I ABSTRACT II 誌 謝 III Table of Content IV List of Figure VI List of Table VII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivation & Objectives 2 1.3 Research Overview 2 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 New Product Development and Collaborate Design 4 2.1.1 New Product Development (NPD) 4 2.1.2 Collaborative Product Design 5 2.2 Product Platform and Product Family 7 2.2.1 Product Platform 7 2.2.2 Product Family 8 2.3 Product Architecture and Modularity 11 2.3.1 Product Architecture 11 2.3.2 Modularity 15 Chapter 3 Integrated Method for Construction of Modular Product Family 17 3.1 Decision Framework 17 3.2 Integrated Method for Design Modular products family 19 3.3 Methodology Framework 21 3.4 Overview of Methodology 24 3.4.1 Quality Function Deployment 24 3.4.2 Design Structure Matrix 30 3.4.3 Interpretive Structure Model 35 Chapter 4 Application 42 4.1 The Bicycle Industry 42 4.1.1 Scope of Bicycle Products and Industry Characteristics 44 4.1.2 The Structure of the Bicycle Industry in Taiwan 46 4.1.3 The Collaborative Mode of A-Team 47 4.2 Proposed Methodology: Analysis Phase 49 4.2.1 Market Analysis by STP 50 4.2.2 Modularization 52 4.3 Product Family Development 62 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future Research 68 5.1 Conclusion 68 5.2 Future Research 69 Reference 70

    Akao, Y., & Mazur, G. (1990). Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design.
    Akao, Y., & Mizuno, S. (1994). QFD: The Customer-Driven Approach To Quality Planning and Development. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, Japan.
    Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., Chang, H., & Lin, S. (2006). Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. Mis Quarterly, 30(2), 315-337.
    Bendoly, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Bharadwaj, S. (2012). Complementary Drivers of New Product Development Performance: Cross‐Functional Coordination, Information System Capability, and Intelligence Quality. Production and Operations Management, 21(4), 653-667.
    Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B., & Mukherjee, S. K. (2005). Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 43(17), 3671-3685.
    Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach. international journal of production economics, 103(2), 585-599.
    Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
    Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 48(3), 292-306.
    Calabrese, G. (1997). Communication and co‐operation in product development: a case study of a European car producer. R&D Management, 27(3), 239-252.
    Chan, L. K., & Wu, M. L. (2002). Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods. Quality Engineering, 15(1), 23-35.
    Choi, Y., Kim, K., & Kim, C. (2005). A design chain collaboration framework using reference models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(1-2), 183-190.
    Clark, K. B. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry: Harvard Business Press.
    Clark, K. B., & Wheelwright, S. (1995). Leading product development: Free Press, New York.
    Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business horizons, 33(3), 44-54.
    Cristiano, J. J., Liker, J. K., & White, C. C. (2000). Customer‐Driven Product Development Through Quality Function Deployment in the US and Japan. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(4), 286-308.
    Dahmus, J. B., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N. (2001). Modular product architecture. Design studies, 22(5), 409-424.
    Eng, T.-H., Ling, Z.-K., Olson, W., & McLean, C. (1999). Feature-based assembly modeling and sequence generation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(1), 17-33.
    Eppinger, S. D., & Browning, T. R. (2012). Design structure matrix methods and applications: MIT Press.
    Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1992). Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing—A comparison between two new product teams. Management Science, 38(3), 360-373.
    Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing science, 12(1), 1-27.
    Guinta, L. R., & Praizler, N. C. (1993). The QFD book: The team approach to solving problems and satisfying customers through quality function deployment: Amacom New York.
    Hauser, J. R., & Clausing, D. (1998). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3), 63-73.
    Hsiao, S.-W., & Liu, E. (2005). A structural component-based approach for designing product family. Computers in Industry, 56(1), 13-28.
    Huang, C.-C. (2000). Overview of modular product development. PROCEEDINGS-NATIONAL SCIENCE COUNCIL REPUBLIC OF CHINA PART A PHYSICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 24(3), 149-165.
    Im, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281-1296.
    Jiao, J. R., Simpson, T. W., & Siddique, Z. (2007). Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(1), 5-29.
    Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., & Alptekin, S. E. (2003). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44(1), 171-190.
    Kim, J. K., Hun, C. H., Choi, S. H., & Kim, S. H. (1998). A knowledge-based approach to the quality function deployment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35(1,2), 233-236.
    Lehnerd, A. P. (1987). Revitalizing the manufacture and design of mature global products (pp. 49-64): National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
    Liao, C. N., & Kao, H. P. (2014). An evaluation approach to logistics service using fuzzy theory, quality function development and goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 68, 54-64.
    Lockamy, A., & Khurana, A. (1995). Quality function deployment: total quality management for new product design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(6), 73-84.
    MacDuffie, J. P., Sethuraman, K., & Fisher, M. L. (1996). Product variety and manufacturing performance: evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Management Science, 42(3), 350-369.
    Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., & Sawy, O. A. E. (2005). Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. Mis Quarterly, 145-187.
    Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, A. P. (1997). The power of product platforms-building value and cost leadership New York: Free Press.
    Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2000). Developing product platforms:: analysis of the development process. Technovation, 20(11), 617-630.
    Muffatto, M., & Roveda, M. (2002). Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(1), 1-16.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Wallace, K., & Council, D. (1984). Engineering design (Vol. 984): Springer.
    Pessina, M. W., & Renner, J. R. (1998). Mass customization at Lutron electronics-A total company process. Agility and Global Competition, 2, 50-57.
    Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2003). A Model of Supplier Integration into New Product Development*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(4), 284-299.
    Pimmler, T. U., & Eppinger, S. D. (1994). Integration analysis of product decompositions: Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA.
    Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998). Platform product development. Sloan management review, 39(4), 19-31.
    Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman. Research policy, 24(5), 761-782.
    Sheriff, A. (1998). The evolving product platform in FIAT Auto. Paper presented at the 5th International Product Development Management Conference.
    Shirley, G. V. (1990). Models for managing the redesign and manufacture of product sets. Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management, 3(2), 85-104.
    Simpson, T. W. (2004). Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18(1), 3-20.
    Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R., & Mistree, F. (2001). Product platform design: method and application. Research in engineering Design, 13(1), 2-22.
    Sullivan, L. P. (1986). Quality Function Deployment. Quality Progress, June, 39-50.
    Toubia, O. (2008). forthcoming in Handbook of Technology Management. Columbia Business School.
    Troy, L. C., Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2008). Cross-functional integration and new product success: an empirical investigation of the findings. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 132-146.
    Tseng, Y. H., & Lin, C. T. (2011). Enhancing enterprise agility by deploying agile drivers, capabilities and providers. Information Sciences, 181, 3693–3708.
    Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research policy, 24(3), 419-440.
    Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development (Vol. 384): McGraw-Hill New York.
    Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.
    Warfield, J. N. (1973). Binary matrices in system modeling. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on(5), 441-449.
    Wilhelm, B. (1997). Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen—their effects on the assembly process Transforming automobile assembly (pp. 146-156): Springer.
    Yassine, A., & Braha, D. (2003). Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method. Concurrent Engineering, 11(3), 165-176.
    Yassine, A. A. (2004). An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method. Urbana, 51(9), 1-17.
    Zha, X. F., & Sriram, R. D. (2006). Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19(7), 524-543.

    QR CODE
    :::