跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 呂盈萱
Ying-Hsuan Lu
論文名稱: 高績效工作系統與工作動機之研究-以組織文化為調節變項
The Relationship Between High Performance Work System And Work Motivation: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture
指導教授: 房美玉
Meiyu Fang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 60
中文關鍵詞: 高績效工作系統工作動機組織文化
相關次數: 點閱:17下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近二十年來高績效工作系統是人力資源管理領域裡不斷被進行探討的議題。高績效工作系統廣泛包含人力資源管理眾多措施,主要概念在藉由人力資源系統內部高度連結,並與組織策略理念相符,進而提升組織績效。然而研究探討高績效工作系統時多琢磨在如何影響最終組織績效,較少探討過程中如何影響員工的動機與行為。又,公司在實施政策時,執行成效或多或少會受到組織文化的影響,畢竟組織文化是無法輕易屏除的內部影響因素。因此本研究探討當組織強調不同文化時,高績效工作系統如何影響員工工作動機,以及其關聯性如何受組織文化調節影響。
    本研究採問卷調查方式,以台灣企業105間公司的人力資源部門作為研究對象,用相關及迴歸模型分析高績效工作系統對內在工作動機的影響,並探討組織文化的調節效果。
    研究結果顯示,高績效工作系統對員工的內、外在工作動機皆存在正面影響。在組織強調支持性文化時會增強高績效工作系統對員工內在工作動機之關聯性。若組織強調獎酬文化時會減弱高績效工作系統對員工內在工作動機之關聯性。


    The effect of high performance work system (HPWS) has been empirically examined for years. It included different human resource practices proposed by many researchers. The HPWS, aligning with company’s strategy, is beneficial to organization’s goal. However, research in the field often focused on the outcomes of HPWS utilization and organizational performance, rather than on how HPWS influenced employee’s motivation and behavior. On the other hand, organizational culture acted as potential and important factor of the success to execute company policies. Therefore, this research attempts to test the effect of HPWS on employee’s motivation, particularly when organization is emphazing one specific type of organizational culture.
    This research used questionnaire to investigate the moderating effect of organizational culture between HPWS and employee’s motivation. A survey of 54 companies in Taiwan focused on employees in human resource department. Correlation analysis and regression analysis are performed to test the effect of HPWS on employee’s motivation, and the moderating role of organizational culture.
    This study found that HPWS did have a positive effect on intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. When company is more supported organizational culture alike, the implementation of HPWS would have a positive effect on employee’s intrinsic motivation. On the other hand, when company emphasizes on rewards, the implementation of HPWS would have a negative effect on employee’s intrinsic motivation.

    第一章 序 論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 高績效工作系統 4 第二節 組織文化 6 第三節 工作動機 9 第四節 高績效工作系統與工作動機 12 第五節 組織文化與高績效工作系統 14 第六節 組織文化與工作動機 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究變項測量工具 20 第三節 資料分析法 22 第四章 研究結果 23 第一節 敘述性統計 23 第二節 相關分析 25 第三節 組織文化對高績效工作系統和工作動機之調節效果 27 第五章 結果討論 33 第一節 研究結論 33 第二節 研究討論 34 第三節 管理實務之參考 37 第四節 研究限制與建議 39 第六章 參考文獻 40

    1. 房美玉(民91)。台灣半導體產業之組織文化對於內外工作動機與工作績效及工作滿意度間關連性的影響。管理評論,3, 69-96。
    2. 張瑞明(民89年10月18日)。「遽變時代下的人力資源管理」。工商時報。
    3. 孫淑芬(民90)。工作動機對工作滿意, 個人績效及組織公民行為的影響-探索組織文化的干擾效果(未出版碩士論文)。 國立中央大學,桃園市。
    4. 盧良文、林文政(民100)。高績效工作系統於轉換型領導與員工工作績效間之角色-跨層級調節效果之觀點。東吳經濟商學學報,73,29-66。
    5. 盧建中、張純華(民99)。高績效工作系統、人力資源技能與組織績效之探討。中小企業發展季刊,16,183-207。
    6. Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & Truss, C. (2012). The link between perceived HRM practices, performance and well‐being: the moderating effect of trust in the employer. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 409-427.
    7. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
    8. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
    9. Arthur, J.B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. The Academy of Management, 37, 3, 670–687.
    10. Bailey, T. (1993). Organizational innovation in the apparel industry. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 32(1), 30-48.
    11. Barney, J.B. (1995). Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(4): 49-61.
    12. Battistelli, A., Galletta, M., Portoghese, I., & Vandenberghe, C. (2013). Mindsets of commitment and motivation: interrelationships and contribution to work outcomes. The Journal of psychology, 147(1), 17-48.
    13. Becker, B., & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of management journal, 39(4), 779-801.
    14. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In Research in personnel and human resource management.
    15. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business Press.
    16. Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2004). Managing Human Resource (13th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
    17. Bossidy, L., Charan, R., & Burck, C. (2011). Execution: The discipline of getting things done. Random House.
    18. Bowen, D., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.
    19. Cameron, K. S. (1985). Cultural Congruence, Strength, and Type: Relationships to Effectiveness. ASHE 1985 Annual Meeting Paper.
    20. Cameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation—A limited phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 29-42.
    21. Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst,24(1), 1.
    22. Campbell, D. J., & Pritchard, R. (1976). Motivation theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 63–130). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
    23. Chow, I. H. S. (2012). The roles of implementation and organizational culture in the HR–performance link. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(15), 3114-3132.
    24. Chang, P. C., & Chen, S. J. (2011). Crossing the level of employee's performance: HPWS, affective commitment, human capital, and employee job performance in professional service organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(04), 883-901.
    25. Chavez, Sergio Moises Afcha. (2014). An exploration of the relationship between high performance work systems and job satisfaction. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra, 7(2), 147(19).
    26. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
    27. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
    28. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 580.
    29. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.
    30. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
    31. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
    32. Denison, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational dynamics, 13(2), 5-22.
    33. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
    34. Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41-52.
    35. García-Chas, R., Neira-Fontela, E., & Castro-Casal, C. (2014). High-performance work system and intention to leave: a mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(3), 367-389.
    36. Gerhart, B., Rynes, S. L., & Fulmer, I. S.(2009). Pay and Performance: Individuals, Groups, and Executives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 251-315.
    37. Glisson C., & James L. R. (2002). The Cross-Level Effects of Culture and Climate in Human Service Teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, 767-794.
    38. Guest, D. E. (1994). Organizational psychology and human resource management: Towards a European approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(3), 251-270.
    39. Guest, D. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: Building the worker into HRM. Journal of Industrial relations, 44(3), 335-358.
    40. Guthrie, J.P. (2001). High-involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1, 180–190.
    41. Hartog, D.N.D., & Verburg, R.M. (2004). High Performance Work Systems, Organizational Culture and Firm Effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14, 1, 55–78.
    42. Herbert, T.T. (1976). Dimensions of organization behavior. New York: Collier Macmillan.
    43. Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    44. Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (1982). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (2nd 4.). New York: Random House
    45. Huselid, M.A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. The Academy of Management, 38, 3, 635–672.
    46. Jiang, J. X., Stanford, M. H., & Xie, Y. (2012). Does it matter who pays for bond ratings? Historical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 607-621.
    47. Jones, G. R., & Wright, P. M. (1992). An economic approach to conceptualizing the utility of human resource management practices. Research in personnel and human resources management, 10, 271-299.
    48. Kaur Mahal, P. (2009). Organizational culture and organizational climate as a determinant of motivation. The IUP Journal of Management Research, 8(10), 38-51.
    49. Koestner, R., & Losier, G. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being internally motivated: a closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
    50. Kopelman, R. E., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The role of climate and culture in productivity. Organizational climate and culture, 282, 318.
    51. Lawler, E. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-involvement Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
    52. Ledford GE Jr, Gerhart B, & Fang M. (2013). Negative effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation: more smoke than fire. WorldatWork J. 22(2):17–29
    53. Levine, D. (1995). Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employers Can Both Win. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    54. Lim, B. (1995). Examining the organizational culture and organizational performance link. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 16(5), 16-21.
    55. Maier, N. R. F. (1955). Psychology in industry (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    56. Martinaityte, I. (2014). Leveraging employee creativity through high performance work systems: a multilevel perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Aston University).
    57. Macky, K. and Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between high-performance work practices and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4): 537–567.
    58. Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: implications for firm performance. Human Resource Manage, 49(2): 241-264.
    59. O'Reilly III, C. A. (1989). Corporations, Culture and Commitment: Motivation and Social Control in Organizations/Корпорации, культура и приверженность: мотивация и социальный контроль в организациях}. California Management Review}, 31, 9-25.
    60. O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 487-516.
    61. Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D.E. (2000). Moving HR to a High Level, HR Practices and Organizational Effectiveness. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds. K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 211–266.
    62. Parker C P, Boris B Baltes, Scott A Young et al. (2003). Relationships Between Psychological Climate Perceptions and Work Outcomes: A Metaanalytic Review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 4, 389-416.
    63. Pinder, W. C. C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    64. Pinder, W. C. C. (2011). Work motivation in organizational behavior. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    65. Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organizations. California Management Review, 40, 96–124.
    66. Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J.F. (1998). The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    67. Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J.F. (1999). Putting People First for Organizational Success. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 2, 37–48.
    68. Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. III. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
    69. Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass.
    70. Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326-344.
    71. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    72. Schein, E.H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    73. Sun L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K.S. (2007). High performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 558–577.
    74. Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405.
    75. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The culture of work organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    76. Ulrich, D., & Lake, D. G. (1990). Organizational capability: Competing from the inside out. John Wiley & Sons.
    77. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley
    78. Way, S. A. (2002). High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. Journal of management, 28(6), 765-785.
    79. Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of management, 28(3), 247-276.
    80. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of management, 18(2), 295-320.
    81. Zhang, M., Fan, D., & Zhu, C. J. (2014). High-Performance Work Systems, Corporate Social Performance and Employee Outcomes: Exploring the Missing Links. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3): 423-435.

    QR CODE
    :::