全球化時代下，科技輔助教育的普及與應用，隨著教材應用以及同儕之間學習過程的互動，彼此之間的溝通模式也存在多樣化，藉此拉近人與人之間的距離，現今第二語言習得的重要性日漸劇增，在台灣英語教育從國小三年級就開始扎根，而在學習者學習的過程中，較多研究著重於外語學習環境對於學習者的影響，但較少探討同儕之間合作能力的影響，因此，本研究想要探討國小學生透過同儕自評與互評導入Web 2.0英語合作學習環境，了解學生是否能夠提升彼此合作意識，學習如何與同儕合作，藉以改善合作的狀況，以及探討學生對於英語學習任務的投入與動機的影響。
參與者來自台灣某國小，21位三年級以英語為第二外語的學生，進行約7個月的創作英語繪本的合作學習活動，研究設計包含實驗組與控制組，在差異分析的結果發現，學生在導入同儕自評與互評的活動後，學生在合作學習的初始階段，自我評價與組員評價分數較低，表示學生的合作狀況不佳，但隨著長時間活動，學生的合作意識漸漸的提升，發現透過此活動能夠有效改善學生的合作狀況，並使學生學習到如何與同儕合作，而在學習投入的初始階段，會因同儕給予的意見而有下降的趨勢，但隨著合作意識的提升，學生的心流狀態會穩定的復甦，而在學習動機的結果中發現，學生導入同儕自評與互評的情況下，除了合作意識提升並改善合作狀況，在學生學習投入會隨著長時間活動有上升的趨勢，並會影響學習者的內在、外在動機、工作價值等學習動機。

The era of globalization, technology support education is universal. With materials applied between peer learning interactions, there have most diversify communication mode in each other, so as to shorten the distance between people and people, in this age the significance of second language acquisition has been increased. In Taiwan, students started to learn English in school since they were in the third grade, and the most of research were focus on the effect of foreign language learning environment, but less research focus on the learning collaborate ability in learning process. Therefore, this study wants to explore the elementary school students through self and peer assessment into the web 2.0 English collaborative learning environment, to realize the students collaborate awareness, learning how to collaborate with peer, thereby improving the collaborative status, and this research also explore the effect of Flow and the motivation in English learning task.
The participants from Taiwan 21 elementary school third grade, English as a second language students, for almost 7 months learning activity. This research has content experiment group and control group. The analysis between two group find that the beginning of student’s collaborative assessment was not well after applying the self and peer assessment activity, but with the long-term activity, the student’s collaborative status was improved and the assessment gradually increase, indicate that self and peer assessment can assist student’s collaborative awareness increase to improve the collaborative status. The research find that student’s Flow states was affected in the initial stage after applying the self and peer assessment, and with the long-term activity, the student’s Flow states was stable recovery. And find the Student’s Motivation was affected after applying the self and peer assessment, the Intrinsic goal orientation, Extrinsic goal orientation and Task value part of motivation were not distinct variety, indicate that the student’s motivation in learning process must be consider after applying self and peer assessment in the Web 2.0 English collaborative learning environment.

中文文獻
王品卿 (2014)。Web2.0 英語學習活動之學生心流與學習動機歷程研究。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文。
王妤 (2015)。英語熟練程度對於學生於Web2.0英語學習環境之學習投入與策略之影響。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文。
呂冠賢 (2012)。導入同儕互評於數位故事創作。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-113。
李杰駿 (2014)。Web2.0英文學習環境之學習成效及心流研究: 男女生的比較。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文。
陳中民 (2012)。故事結構鷹架對於學童創作經驗之影響。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文。
曾國鴻 (2011)。以電子書支援親子共讀。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-85。
蕭伊茹 (2013)。基於建造主義導入數位說故事於英語學習之研究。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文。
英文文獻
AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education,58(1), 231-239.
Barra, E., Aguirre Herrera, S., Pastor Caño, J. Y., & Quemada Vives, J. (2014). Using multimedia and peer assessment to promote collaborative e-learning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 20(2), 103-121.
Berry, R. (2005). Entwining feedback, self, and peer assessment. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 225-230.

Butler, Y. G. (2015). Parental factors in children’s motivation for learning English: a case in China. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 164-191.
Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., Liang, C., & Yan, C. F. (2013). The influence of perceived convenience and curiosity on continuance intention in mobile English learning for high school students using PDAs.Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 373-386.
Carreira, J. M., Ozaki, K., & Maeda, T. (2013). Motivational model of English learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 41(3), 706-719.
Carreira, J. M. (2011). Relationship between motivation for learning EFL and intrinsic motivation for learning in general among Japanese elementary school students. System, 39(1), 90-102.
Chen, L., Zhang, R., & Liu, C. (2014). Listening strategy use and influential factors in Web‐based computer assisted language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 207-219.
Chen, N. S., Quadir, B., & Teng, D. C. (2011). Integrating book, digital content and robot for enhancing elementary school students’ learning of English. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 546-561.
Chung, I. F., & Huang, Y. C. (2010). “English is not easy, but I like it!”: an exploratory study of English learning attitudes amongst elementary school students in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 36(4), 441-445.
Conde, M. Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., Alier, M., Casany, M. J., & Piguillem, J. (2014). An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0 tools. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 188-204.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge university press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness. Random House.
den Exter, K., Rowe, S., Boyd, W., & Lloyd, D. (2012). Using Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative learning in distance education—Case studies from an Australian university. Future Internet, 4(1), 216-237.

Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., Rejón-Guardia, F., Messeger-Artola, A., & Rodríguez-Ardura, I. (2016). Students’ Flow Experiences in Virtual Learning Environments: A Consumer Behaviour Perspective. In Let’s Get Engaged! Crossing the Threshold of Marketing’s Engagement Era (pp. 81-82). Springer International Publishing.
Fagerlind, A. C., Gustavsson, M., Johansson, G., & Ekberg, K. (2013). Experience of work-related flow: does high decision latitude enhance benefits gained from job resources?. Journal of Vocational Behavior,83(2), 161-170.
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315-325.
Hou, H. T., & Chou, Y. S. (2012). Exploring the technology acceptance and flow state of a chamber escape game-Escape The Lab© for learning electromagnet concept. ICCE 2012, 38.
Hsu, Y. C., Ching, Y. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2014). Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 747-758). Springer New York.
Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 248-267.
Krause, J. E., & Popovich, N. G. (1996). A group interaction peer/self assessment process in a pharmacy practice course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 60(2), 136-145.
Laru, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2012). Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 29-38.
Liu, C. C., Wang, P. C., & Tai, S. J. D. (2016). An analysis of student engagement patterns in language learning facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 28(02), 104-122.
Lin, J. W., Mai, L. J., & Lai, Y. C. (2015). Peer interaction and social network analysis of online communities with the support of awareness of different contexts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(2), 139-159.
Meyer, A., Klingenberg, K., & Wilde, M. (2016). The Benefits of Mouse Keeping—an Empirical Study on Students’ Flow and Intrinsic Motivation in Biology Lessons. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 79-90.

Ministry of Education. (2004). The guideline of downward extension of primary school English lesson to third graders. Taipei, Taiwan: Author. [in Chinese]. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from http:// teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/detail.php?Item=&ID=3084.
Nugultham, K. (2012). Using Web 2.0 for Innovation and Information Technology in Education Course. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4607-4610.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving Framework: OECD
Publishing.Park, S. W. (2013). The potential of web 2.0 tools to promote reading engagement in a general education course. TechTrends, 57(2), 46-53.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Sturm, M., T. Kennell, R. McBride, and M. Kelly. 2009. The pedagogical implications of Web 2.0. In Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning, ed. M. Thomas, 367–84. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third‐year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 343-353.
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611-633.
Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363-374.
Svalberg, A. M. L. (2012). Peer interaction, cognitive conflict, and anxiety on a grammar awareness course for language teachers. Language Awareness,21(1-2), 137-155.
Takeda, S., & Homberg, F. (2014). The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: an analysis through self‐and peer‐assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 373-396.
Wang, Y. H., Young, S. S. C., & Jang, J. S. R. (2013). Using Tangible Companions for Enhancing Learning English Conversation. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 296-309.