| 研究生: |
廖沁蓉 Chin-Jung Liao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
系統化空氣品質管理制度之發展 The Development of Air Quality Management System through Systematic Approach |
| 指導教授: |
廖述良
Shu-Liang Liaw |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 環境工程研究所 Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 空氣品質管理 、系統化 、產品生命週期 、危害的管理與控制 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | air quality management, systematic, product life cycle, hazard management and control |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科學與工業的發展,事業單位利用毒性及關注化學物質來提升與改善生產製造的效率與效益已成為常見的案例,但不當的利用或製造毒性及關注化學物質將會直接對人類或生物造成致命的傷害,甚至若無有效的規範或管制,可能形成有害空氣污染物,透過空氣、水體、土壤或產出的產品、副產品、廢棄物等媒介,而對人類或生物的生命與健康造成負面的影響。為了落實降低有害空氣污染物對於人類或生物的生命與健康所造成的傷害,我國環保署於民國107年8月1日公告空氣污染防制法修正案,加強對於有害空氣污染物的管制,並於民國108年5月13日增訂「應設置空氣污染防制專責單位或專責人員及健康風險評估專責人員之公私場所」草案,優先納管有排放有害空氣污染物之虞的產業,並增訂應設置健康風險評估專責人員之公私場所規定。然而,既有的空氣品質管理制度,在管理工作與執法層面上,主要是採用熱點區域管制的概念,而缺乏整體性的考量,無法確實進行有害空氣污染物的管理與控制。因此,應基於系統的世界觀來發展一個系統化的空氣品質管理制度,依循產品生命週期的概念來盤查物質或有害物質在採擷、生產、運輸、使用、廢棄、處理及處置等活動當中可能產生危害的來源,並依循危害的作用機制來鑑別真正會對接觸者健康造成損害的空氣污染物與危害來源,以及分析危害會造成的發生機率與影響程度,以瞭解危害的發生過程,據此來探討空氣品質管理的工作事務與各政府機關單位的分工權責,以發展空氣品質管理的組織與運作機制,才能夠發展出維持與保護在接觸或使用環境資源過程中人類與生物其生命與健康的安全之管理制度。
With the development of science and industry, it has become a common case for public institutions to use toxicity and chemical substances of concern to enhance and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of manufacturing. However, improper use or manufacture of toxic and concerned chemicals will directly affect human health, and may even form hazardous air pollutants and cause chronic diseases to humans. On August 1, 2018, the Environmental Protection Agency announced an amendment to the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law to control hazardous air pollutants. After that, it has successively added many related control regulations, hoping to reduce the harm caused by hazardous air pollutants to the lives and health of humans or organisms. Nevertheless, the existing air quality management system mainly adopts the concept of hot spot control in terms of management and law enforcement. It lacks overall considerations and cannot reliably manage and control hazardous air pollutants. Therefore, a systematic air quality management system should be developed based on a systematic world view. Follow the concept of product life cycle to check the sources of possible hazards of substances or hazardous substances in the activities of picking, production, transportation, use, abandonment, processing and disposal. And follow the hazard mechanism to identify air pollutants and sources of hazards that actually cause harm to human or biological health. Then we can assess the probability and degree of the hazard affecting health. Based on this result, we will discuss the work affairs of air quality management and the division of powers and responsibilities of various government agencies, so as to develop the organization and operation mechanism of air quality management. In this way, we can develop a management system to protect human and biological health.
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Learn about Risk Assessment,https://www.epa.gov/risk/about-risk-assessment
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, What are Hazardous Air Pollutants,https://www.epa.gov/haps/what-are-hazardous-air-pollutants
3. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, Hazard and Risk, https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/hazard_risk.html
4. Colborn, T., et al. (1996). "Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence and Survival?--a Scientific Detective Story."
5. Smith, J. A. J. A. i. n. s. (1981). "The idea of health: A philosophical inquiry." 3(3): 43-50.
6. Huber, M., et al. (2011). "How should we define health?" 343.
7. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit, Houghton Mifflin.
8. Hutchins, G. (2018). ISO 31000: 2018 Enterprise Risk Management, Greg Hutchins.
9. Council, N. R. (1989). "Improving risk communication."
10. Willett, A. H. (1901). The economic theory of risk and insurance, New York: The Columbia University Press.
11. Council, N. R. (1994). "Science and judgment in risk assessment."
12. Paxton, A. and L. J. J. G. p. h. Frost (2018). "Using systems thinking to train future leaders in global health." 13(9): 1287-1295.
13. Singh, R. B., et al. (2020). Urban health risk and resilience in Asian cities, Springer.
14. Adam, T. and D. de Savigny (2012). "Systems thinking for strengthening health systems in LMICs: need for a paradigm shift." Health Policy and Planning 27(suppl_4): iv1-iv3.
15. Cabrera, D., et al. (2008). "Systems thinking." 31(3): 299-310.
16. Caffrey, L. and E. J. E. Munro (2017). "A systems approach to policy evaluation." 23(4): 463-478.
17. Sterman, J. D. J. A. j. o. p. h. (2006). "Learning from evidence in a complex world." 96(3): 505-514.
18. Ostrom, E. J. S. (2009). "A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems." 325(5939): 419-422.
19. Bar-Yam, Y. J. E. o. L. S. S., UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK (2002). "General features of complex systems."
20. Checkland, P. J. J. o. t. O. R. S. (1985). "From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s." 36(9): 757-767.
21. Mattila, T., et al. (2011). "Comparing priority setting in integrated hazardous substance assessment and in life cycle impact assessment." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(8): 788-794.
22. Oguzcan, S., et al. (2019). "Environmental impact assessment model for substitution of hazardous substances by using life cycle approach." Environmental Pollution 254: 112945.
23. Hellweg, S. and L. M. J. S. i Canals (2014). "Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment." 344(6188): 1109-1113.
24. 空氣污染防制法
25. 健康風險評估技術規範
26. 行政院環境保護署,空氣品質改善維護資訊網,臺灣空氣污染排放總量資料庫清冊系統(TEDS 11.0版),空氣污染排放量分類統計資料庫
27. 行政院環境保護署,固定污染源管理資訊系統,G32A0540羅東鋼鐵廠股份有限公司煉鋼廠
28. 職業健康與安全評估系統標準(2007)
29. 廖述良(2001)環境承載力系統動態模式及多目標管理模式之建立
30. 廖述良(2010)國家氣候變遷調適行動標準作業程序
31. 詹長權、鄭尊仁、黃嵩立、黃景祥、李崇德、何國榮、陳隆紀(1999)台灣空氣污染健康風險評估計畫先驅計畫
32. 行政院衛生署國民健康局(2004)「台灣健康報告-降低風險、促進健康」研討會大會手冊
33. 陳依琪、沈克鵬、蔡俊鴻、姚永真、楊炎勝、蔡欣汝、連彩綺、葉雯琪、蔡欣峰、邱正雄、莊易璇、周劍平、張瑞琪、蕭祥憲、吳佩玲、江鴻龍、賴怡潔、李彥儒、婁明煌、李文欽、鍾一伊、黃韻茹(2018)固定污染源有害空氣污染物管制暨消費性產品揮發性有機物管制計畫
34. 姚永真、沈克鵬、蔡欣汝、周佳靜、連彩綺、楊炎勝、吳信賢、周劍平、蕭祥憲、賴玫君、楊乃瑾、蔡俊鴻、李若暘、劉文治、婁明煌(2020)固定污染源有害空氣污染物管制及減量推動計畫
35. 劉明全(2002)焚化廠排放空氣污染物之健康風險評估-以鹿草焚化廠為例
36. 黃紅江(2021)台灣南部受工業影響之河流中重金屬污染之長期調查及健康風險評估
37. 陳冠伊(2016)有機液體物料儲槽空氣危害物之多介質健康風險評估
38. 黃琬淇 (2010). 環境資料系統化整合資料模式之發展, National Central University.
39. 王蕾晶 (2007). 以事件化系統物件資料模式探討環境資料庫體系之架構, National Central University.
40. 陳詩靜 (2009). 永續環境管理總量管理制度之探討, National Central University.
41. 胡晉綺 (2004). 永續發展虛擬圖書館之發展與建置, National Central University.
42. 劉坤山 (2007). 以系統思維組織管理原則探討環安衛管理系統之整合, National Central University.
43. 中央大學環境工程研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, 林. J. (2007). "永續環境管理之污染源管制制度研究." 1-79.
44. 中央大學環境工程研究所學位論文, 周. J. (2007). "系統思維組織管理評鑑制度之研究." 1-108.