跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 顏劭軒
Shao hsuan
論文名稱: 非財務型危機對台灣上市公司股價的影響
Non-financial crisis impact on the Taiwan-based listed company''s share price.
指導教授: 洪德俊
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 75
中文關鍵詞: 資訊不對稱異常報酬信號發射
外文關鍵詞: Information asymmetry, Abnormal returns, Signal Theory
相關次數: 點閱:6下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 信號發射理論說明了投資者可以藉由企業所發出的信號,做為財務預測的依據,消除企業與投資者間資訊不對稱的情況,然而企業所放出的好消息,未必代表企業將來表現的會更好,但企業出現壞消息、產生危機時,則表示企業目前的表現確實是被高估的,公司股價有被下修的必要。財務型危機,損失容易計算,投資者可依據公司發佈的相關財報對該公司做出投資決策的調整;但發生非財務型危機時,損失不易以金錢衡量,此時投資者資訊的來源來自媒體的相關報導。
    依據效率市場理論,在半強勢效率市場下,公司的股價會反應現有已公開資訊,即事件發生時,市場應立刻調整至最適價位,而DeBondt and Thaler(1985)提出的代表性(Representativeness)原則,指出投資者常常傾向於反應過度;Vijay Singal(2004)則提出了保守(conservation)的論點,發現投資者對於新資訊發生所做的調整速度非常緩慢,Andrew Lo and Craig Mackinlay(1988)的也認同上述的論點,其研究指出,一個好消息或壞消息不斷被宣告時,投資者無法認知到這眾多的資訊其實全是在描述同一件事情,使投資者在事件第一次宣告時,時常反應不完全,而且對之後的每一次宣告又再度做出回應,使市場股價的調整出現過度且緩慢慢反應的情況。而資訊的傳遞需要依靠媒體,當公司發生非財務型危機事件時,媒體大量的報導是否會造成投資者的過度反應,媒體對該事件的評價是否能左右股價的變動,這是本研究要探討的主題。
    本研究利用事件研究法,研究台灣上市公司在發生非財務型危機時,是否會產生負向的異常報酬,而產生的異常報酬和新聞報紙的報導是否關。
    而研究結果發現,非財務型危機事件發生,在事件日當天和事發後一天皆會產生負向的異常報酬;而報紙報導篇數較多的事件,得到的負向異常報酬亦高於篇數較少的事件;報紙的負面評價亦會影響公司的股價,負面評價比例高的事件,負向異常報酬高於比例低的事件,表示當危機發生時,媒體的報導對公司股價變動確實會有影響。


    Signaling theory tell us Investors based on information provided by enterprises to make investment decisions. With the release of the signal to reduce the information asymmetry between companies and investors. Enterprise release of good news, not necessarily represent the company''s future performance will be better. Enterprises have bad news, resulting in a crisis, said the company''s current performance is indeed overvalued, the company''s share price has been under repair necessary. Type of financial crisis, the loss is easily calculated, investors can be based on relevant company''s earnings report to make investment decisions adjustment; but non-financial type of crisis, the loss is not easy to measure, then investors can only rely on media reports to make investment decisions
    Based on efficient market theory, in the semi-strong efficient market, the company''s share price will reflect the public information that the event occurs, the market should immediately adjust to the optimal price. The DeBondt and Thaler (1985) proposed Representativeness principle that investors often tend to overreact; Vijay Singal (2004) proposed conservation, he thought that investors react slowly to new information. Andrew Lo and Craig Mackinlay (1988) also agree with the above point, the study pointed out that good news or bad news was announced, Investors are not understanding that a large number of information describing all the same thing, so Investors do response to any information, It make market share over-adjustment and slow reaction.Could media coverage result in investors'' overreaction? Could evaluation of the media make stock price changes? Which is the subject of this research to explore.
    This study use event study method to test the listed companies in Taiwan in the event of non-financial type of crisis, the impact of the media reports. The results showed that the more reports or more worse evaluations, generate more negative abnormal returns but also the more affected the longer the time.

    目錄 目錄………………………………………ⅰ 圖目錄……………………………………ⅱ 表目錄……………………………………ⅲ 第一章 緒論……………………………1 1.1 研究背景和動機………………1 1.2 研究目的……………………………2 1.3 研究流程……………………………3 第二章 文獻探討…………………………4 2.1 效率市場………………………………4 2.1.1 效率市場定義………………………4 2.1.2 效率市場實證…………………………5 2.1.3 效率市場反證…………………………6 2.2 信號發射理論……………………………7 2.3 危機管理…………………………………10 2.3.1 危機定義…………………………………10 2.3.2 企業危機類型……………………………12 2.3.3 危機溝通方式……………………………15 第三章 研究方法…………………………………17 3.1 研究架構……………………………………17 3.2 研究假說……………………………………18 3.3 樣本選取……………………………………19 3.4 分析方法……………………………………20 3.4.1 事件日選定………………………………20 3.4.2 異常報酬率(AR)之估計………………20 3.5 異常報酬檢定……………………………23 第四章 實證結果與分析…………………………25 4.1 總體異常報酬分析…………………25 4.2 分組異常報酬分析………………………32 4.2.1 依報導篇數分組…. ………………………32 4.2.2 依負面評價比例分組………………………45 4.2.3 依危機類別分組……………………………58 第五章 研究結論與建議……………………………71 5.1 研究結論…………………………………71 5.2 研究限制……………………………………72 5.3 研究建議……………………………………72 參考文獻……………………………………………73

    一、 中文部分
    1. 吳美慧(2002),「報紙推薦海週潛力股與股價關聯研究」,銘傳大學傳播學院傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
    2. 林宜勉、潘昭儀(1988),「股利變動資訊內涵與Tobin''s Q 理論」,管理學報,587-621頁。
    3. 吳宜蓁(2002),「危機傳播 – 公共關係與語藝觀點的理論與實證」,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    4. 朱延智(2002),「企業危機管理導論」,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    5. 吳佩玲譯(2001),「危機管理」,台北:天下遠見出版社。
    6. 許士軍(1994),「管理學」,台北市:東華書局。
    7. Robert A. Haugen著,郭敏華 譯(2001),「新財務:打破效率市場迷思」,臺北市 : 智勝文化。
    8. 洪榮華、陳佳儀(2003),「股利宣告對股價超常報酬的影響-以台灣集團與非集團上市公司為例」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 羅庚辛、楊永吉(2002),「財務預測宣告及其變項之實證研究」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    10. 陳祥、杜秋菁(2006),「企業危機事件與媒體報導之相關性研究」,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
    11. 簡金成,馬筱惠(1988),「公司品質對股利與融資政策之影響」,中山管理評論,第6卷第4期,1039-1055頁。
    12. 王居卿、朱德仁(2010),「企業危機事件與股價變化關係之研究」淡江大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    二、 英文部份
    1. Miller and Modigliani. (1961). Dividend policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business , 34, 411-433.
    2. Eugene F. Fama. (1991). Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46 , 1575-1617.
    3. Andrei Shleifer.(2001). Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance Marco Gundermann. The World Economy , 24 , 425-428.
    4. Working. (1934). A random difference series for use in the analysis of time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 29, 11-24.
    5. Kendall. (1953). The analysis of economic time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 96 , 11-25.
    6. Cootner. (1962). Stock Prices: Random vs. Systematic Changes. Industrial Management Review , 3 , 24-45.
    7. Osborne. (1962). Periodic Structure In the Brownian Motion in the Stock Prices. Operation Research, May/June , 345-379.
    8. Stephen A. Ross. (2009). Modern Financial Management(pp. 342-405). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education .
    9. Tara Westfall. (2010). Stock Split Announcements : A Test of Market Efficiency. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies, 15 , 59-66.
    10. Nick von Gersdorff and Dr. Frank Bacon. (2009). U.S. Mergers and Acquisitions: A Test of Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance and Accountancy , 1 , 1-8.
    11. Samuel et al. (1997). Do Dividend Omissions Signal Future Earnings or Past Earnings? The Journal of Investing Spring , 6 , 40-53.
    12. Baharuddin M Hussin, Abdullahi D Ahmed and Teoh C Ying. (2010). Semi-Strong Form Efficiency: Market Reaction to Dividend and Earnings Announcements in Malaysian Stock Exchange. IUP Journal of Applied Finance , 16 , 36-61.
    13. Lubos Pastor and Robert Stambaugh. (2002).Mutual fund performance and seemingly unrelated assets. Journal of Financial Economics , 63 , 315-349.
    14. Brad Barber and Terrance Odean. (1999).The courage of misguided convictions. Financial Analysts Journal , Nov/Dec , 41-56.
    15. De Bondt and Thaler.(1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? Journal of Finance, 40 , 793-805.
    16. Honghui Chen, Gregory Noronha and Vijay Singal. (2004). The Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions : Evidence of Asymmetry and a New Explanation. The Journal of Finance , LIX , 1901-1929.
    17. Andrew Lo and Craig MacKinlay. (1988). Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1 , 41-66.
    18. Poterba and Summers. (1988). Mean reversion of stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 22 , 27-59.
    19. Kalay. (1980). Signaling, information content, and the reluctance to cut dividends. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15 , 855-869.
    20. Bhattacharya. (1979). An Exploration Of Nondissipative Dividend-Signaling Structure. Journal of financial & Quantitative Analysis, 14 , 667-668.
    21. Aharony and Swary. (1980). Quarterly Dividend and Earnings Announcements and Stock Return: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance , 35 , 1-12.
    22. Banker, Das and Datar. (1993). Complemantarity of Prior Accounting Information: The Case of Stock Dividend Announcement. The Accounting Review , 68 , 28-47.
    23. Healy and Palepu. (1988). Earnings Information Conveyed By Dividend Initiations and Omissions. Journal of Finance Economics , 21 , 149-175.
    24. Madura and Akhigbe. (1995). Intra-industry effects of bank layoff announcements. Review of Financial Economics , 4 , 187-195.
    25. DeAngelo and Skinner. (1992). Dividends and losses. The Journal of Finance , 47 , 1837-1863.
    26. Miller and Rock. (1985). Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Finance , 40 , 1031-1051.
    27. Ravid and Sarig. (1991). Financial Signaling by Committing to Cash Outflows. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis , 26 , 165-180.
    28. Shrivastava and Mitroff. (1987). Strategic Management of Corporate Crises. Columbia Journal of World Bisiness , 22 , 5-11.
    29. Coombs. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the ‘apporpriate’ crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly , 8 , 447-476.
    30. Charles F.Hermann. (1969). Crisisin Foreign Policy(pp. 29). Indianpolis: Bobbs MCRRILL.
    31. Simon A. Booth. (1993). Crisis management strategy:Competition and change in modern enterprises(p86-88). London:T, J. Press Ltd.
    32. Beaver. (1966). Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure in Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies. Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research , 4 , 71-111.

    QR CODE
    :::