護理是一門科學，也是一門藝術，更是高壓力、高挑戰及高成就感的助人專業。護理工作具有高度專業與不可替性的特質，也因此臨床護理人員就算生病了或感覺身體不舒服，仍然會抱病出勤工作。本研究將針對護理人員勉強出勤、人格特質及醫療異常事件發生之間的相關性進行探討，採結構式問卷調查並以採羅吉斯迴歸進行資料分析，問卷共發250份問卷，有效問卷為225份。
本研究結果發現:
1.五大人格特質以勤勉審慎性，其勝算比為0.312，表示勤勉審慎性的程度愈高，出現醫療異常事件機率也愈低。
2.勉強出勤變項對醫療異常事件發生有顯著解釋效果。勉強出勤中第一題雖然生病了，還是勉強自己去工作」的迴歸係數為負向，其勝算比exp(B)值為0.24；勉強出勤第二題「雖然有身體不舒服症狀，例如:頭痛、背痛，還是勉強自己去工作的迴歸係數為正向，其發生醫療異常事件的機率是一般身體健康者的14倍。
3.在護理人員個人屬性中性別及所屬單位具有顯著水準，且一般病房發生醫療異常事件的機會高於急重症病房與門診。
本研究希望藉由了解護理人員勉強出勤、人格特質與醫療異常事件發生的相關性，提供醫院人力資源管理者在決策時之參考，共同為病人安全把關，並提升醫療品質。

As nursing is considered as a science and an art, it is also a helping profession with high stress, high challenge, and high achievement. Nursing work has a high degree of professionalism and irreplaceable trait. Even if clinical nursing staffs feel ill or have physically uncomfortable feelings, they may push themselves to keep the status of presenteeism. This study aimed to study the correlations among presenteeism, personality traits, and medical incident events in nursing staffs. A survey by using a structured questionnaire was conducted, and a total of 250 questionnaires were collected with 225 effective questionnaires. The logistic regression analysis was applied for statistical analysis.
Results:
1.Five personality traits were analyzed. Among them, a higher degree of conscientiousness personality was associated with lower probability of medical incident events (odds ratio [OR:] 0.312).
2.The status of presenteeism had a significant effect on explaining the occurrence of medical incident events. For the first question in the item of presenteeism: "Although I am ill, I will still push myself to work with difficulty", the regression coefficient (β) was negative (exp(β) [OR]: 0.24); For the second question in the item of presenteeism: “Although I feel symptoms of physical discomfort, such as headache or back pain, I will still push myself to work with difficulty”, the regression coefficient was positive, and the probability of medical incident events was 14 times higher than a heathy person.
3.In discussing the personal attributes, the gender and affiliated units had significant difference among nursing staffs, and the probability of medical incident events in general wards were higher than in emergent/critical care units and outpatient clinics.
By understanding the correlations among presenteeism, personality traits, and medical incident events in nursing staffs; this study aimed to provide a reference for hospital’s human resource managers in decision-making, in order to ensure patient safety and improve medical quality.

一、中文部份
毛義方、蔡忠融、徐雅媛、徐儆暉、毛鏡琪、盧士一、陳美蓮(2011)•我國醫院員工超工時與輪班研究•勞工安全衛生研究季刊，19(2)，223-246。
何慧菁、張淑惠、曹瑞雲、張梅芳、陳永煌、楊燦(2010)•醫院員工工作壓力與身心健康之相關研究•中華職業醫學雜誌，17(4)，239-252。
何信輝(2016)•探討領隊、導遊勉強出勤、工作價值觀與工作滿意度之關聯性研究•中國文化大學觀光休閒事業管理所學位論文•台北市。
吳秉恩(1986)•組織行為學•台北：華泰書局。
林惠彥(2013)•初探勉強出勤之相關因素•臺灣大學商學研究所學位論文•台北市。
林惠彥、陸洛(2013)•鞠躬盡瘁? 勉強出勤之跨文化理論模式建構•人力資源管理學報，13(3)，29-55。
林勤芳(2016)•勉強出勤與工作滿意及情緒耗竭之關聯—以主管支持與職場友誼為調節變項•臺灣大學商學研究所學位論文•台北市。
林智陞(2015)•上司－部屬關係、知覺組織支持、勉強出勤對科技業員工離職傾向之影響•國立高雄大學高階法律管理所學位論文•高雄市。
馬淑華(2015)•護理人員生涯承諾、出勤誘因對勉強出勤行為與工作滿足之影響•亞洲大學經營管理學系碩士在職專班論文•台中市。
梁亞文、黃立琪、尹裕君、陳文意、莊家綾、李卓倫(2010)•護理人力對病患結果影響之文獻探討•護理雜誌，57(5)，77-82。

陳怡如(2015)•工作不安全感與工作價值觀對於員工假性出席與工作滿意度關係之探討•中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文•桃園市。
陳維倫(2011)•訓練發展程序公平、調節焦點、專業承諾與積極出勤之研究•國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所學位論文•彰化市。
陳亞玲、張肇松、江惠英、林淑媛(2009)•比較有無發生醫療異常事件之護理人員在人格韌性及離職意願的差異•新臺北護理期刊，11(1)，39-49。
許慧玉(2005)•護理人員對給藥錯誤認知之探討•高雄醫學大學護理學系研究所學位論文•高雄市。
黃姿瑋(2013)•職場員工疲勞、病假、離職與假性出席之相關性研究•臺灣大學職業醫學與工業衛生研究所學位論文•台北市。
黃家齊(2011)•組織行為學•台北：華泰書局。
張秉宜(2005)•護理給藥錯誤之研究•臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所學位論文•台北市。
張耀聰(2012)•主觀健康抱怨與減效出席之關聯探討•臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所學位論文•台北市。
廖雲富(2018)•保全人員勉強出勤對身心健康與離職傾向關係之研究•中國文化大學勞工關係學系學位論文•台北市。
鄭紹宇、郭武憲、錢慶文、洪清福、朱子斌、吳鴻昇、邢世俊、劉禹葶、祝孔聖(2010)•人會出錯:建立一套更安全的健康照護系統•台北，合記。
鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禎、游朝舜(2011)• International English Big-Five Mini-Markers 之繁體中文版量表發展•管理學報，28(6)，579-615。
賴培倫(2017)•上司與部屬交換關係與角色期望差異性對假性出席之影響-以中部消防局外勤人員為例•亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理學系碩士在職專班論文•台中市。
臧文倩(2015)•組織支持與組織認同對員工工作滿意度及假性出席關係之探討•中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文•桃園市。
ETtoday新聞雲(2018，5月25日)•每天上工13小時身體亮紅燈護理師提前離職還得賠醫院6萬•取自https://www.ettoday.net/news/20190525/1452534.htm#ixzz5ssQ2TNF4
台灣病人安全通報系統2017年TPR年報(2019)•取自https://reurl.cc/OKW9g
二、英文部份
Aspden, P., Corrigan, J. M., Wolcott, J., & Erickson, S. M. (Eds.). (2004). Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. National Academies Press.
Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54(7), 502-509.
Aronsson, G., & Gustafsson, K. (2005).Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 47(9), 958-966.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.
Brborović, H., & Brborović, O. (2017). Patient safety culture shapes presenteeism and absenteeism: a cross-sectional study among Croatian healthcare workers. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 68(3), 185-189.
Bonoma, T. V., & Zaltman, G. (1981). Psychology for management. Boston: Kent Publishing Company.
Cooper, C. (1996). Hot under the collar. Times Higher Education Supplement, 21(June).
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 6(5), 407-423.
Cattell, H. B. (1989). The 16PF: Personality in Depth. Champaign, IL. Institute for Personality Assessment and Testing.
Dunn, D. (2003). Incident reports—correcting processes and reducing errors. AORN journal, 78(2), 211-233.
Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: a three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14(1), 50-68.
Grinyer, A., & Singleton, V. (2000). Sickness absence as risk-taking behaviour: a study of organisational and cultural factors in the public sector. Health, Risk & Society, 2(1), 7-21.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American psychologist, 14(8), 469.
Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 519-542.
Johansen, V., Aronsson, G., & Marklund, S. (2014). Positive and negative reasons for sickness presenteeism in Norway and Sweden: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ open, 4(2), e004123.
Lui, J. N. M., Andres, E. B., & Johnston, J. M. (2018). Presenteeism exposures and outcomes amongst hospital doctors and nurses: a systematic review. BMC health services research, 18(1), 985.
McKevitt, C., Morgan, M., Dundas, R., & Holland, W. W. (1997). Sickness absence and ‘working through’illness: a comparison of two professional groups. Journal of Public Health, 19(3), 295-300.
Olver, J. M., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and individual differences, 35(1), 109-125.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology.
Rosenman, R. H., & Friedman, M. (1981). Type A Behavior & Your Heart. Fawcett Books.
Runciman, W. B., Sellen, A., Webb, R. K., Williamson, J. A., Currie, M., Morgan, C., & Russell, W. J. (1993). Errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia and intensive care, 21(5), 506-519.