21世紀是數位遊戲學習的時代，隨著網路科技與多媒體的發展與進步，數位遊戲扮演的不再只是娛樂的功能，在許多研究中證實數位遊戲有許多益處，因此也逐漸受到教育界的重視。過去有關數位遊戲的教學研究，大多是將設計好的遊戲成品對學生進行教學實驗，鮮少從教學設計的角度出發探討如何引領學生學習製作數位遊戲，而良好的教學設計能導引成功的教學。數位遊戲設計是屬於特殊的學習領域，因此數位遊戲設計教學模式的發展更顯得重要。
本研究發展交替式同儕教導與漸進式專題導向學習之教學策略，將其運用於數位遊戲製作之課程設計，進行教學實驗研究。本教學實驗在某國立大學「電腦輔助教學之設計」課程中進行，研究時間為期四個月，實驗對象為修習教育學程的大學生與研究生共20名，遊戲製作工具為Game Maker遊戲製作軟體。教學歷程中收集量化及質化研究資料，量化資料包括：遊戲製作心流量表、Game Maker學習自我效能量表、教學意見調查表；質化資料包括：研究者觀察記錄、教學訪談、數位遊戲專題製作學習歷程檔案等。實驗結束後將資料進行分析與討論，藉由分析結果驗證本研究所發展之教學策略，並建構數位遊戲設計之教學模式，將研究結果供未來數位遊戲教學與課程發展研究之參考。

Digital game-based learning is the mainstream learning of 21st century. With the development and progress of Internet technologies and multi-media, many researches show that digital games not only provide entertainment but also have many benefits in education. Therefore, more and more educators pay attention to digital games and believe that they have great influences on learning. In previous researches of digital games in learning and instruction, the majority of experiments are taken the designed games on learners, but few focus on game design instruction. As we know, well-designed instruction can lead to effective learning. Digital game design is a special domain so to develop exclusive game design instruction model is important.
In order to guide students into learning game design, we develop alternative peer tutoring (APT) and the progressive project-based learning (PPBL) strategies in Computer-Assisted Learning course. The experiment worked for four months. The subjects are 20 students consisted of undergraduates and masters who take professional education courses. The game design tool is “Game Maker”. We have collected quantitative and qualitative data in students’ learning processes. The quantitative data include self-efficacy questionnaire of “Game Maker”, game design flow questionnaire and the opinion of instruction questionnaire. The qualitative data include the observations of researchers, interview, learning portfolios, etc. After that, we analyze the data and interpret the meaning of the data. According to the results, we verify the mentioned instructional strategies and construct digital game design instructional model for learning game design and hope it can contribute to the development of digital game design courses.

一、 中文部分
吳鐵雄（民77）。電腦軟體遊戲帶來的影響。第三波，66期，64-71頁。
郭生玉（民80）。心理與教育研究法。台北：精華書局。
吳芝儀、李奉儒等譯（Michael Quinn patton 著）（民84）。質的評鑑與研究。台北：桂冠圖書。
張霄亭（民87）。教學媒體與教學新科技。台北：心理。
張靜嚳（民84）。何謂建構主義？。建構與教學，第三期。
陳秀娟（民87）。生命的心流：追求忘我專注的圓融生活 (譯自 Finding Flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi)。台北：天下文化出版社發行。
黃瓊慧（民89）。從沉浸理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
劉旨峰、周倩、林珊如（民90）。以網路心流理論為基礎探討台灣大學生網路沉迷之相關因素。中正大學：2001年台灣區學術網路研討會暨網路學習與繼續專業教育國際會議(TANet 2001 & ELCPE 2001)。
徐新逸（民90）。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手？網路專題導向學習與教學創新。台灣教育，607期，25-34。
黃明信（民91）。國小網路專題式教學模式之設計。淡江大學教育科技系碩士論文。
洪蘭（民91）。講理就好.Ⅲ, 知書達理。台北：遠流。
遊戲為何重要？（民91）。中國網友報。http://www.cnii.com.cn/20020808/ca81216.htm
謝國忠（民92）。認知型態與訓練方法對電腦態度、電腦自我效能 與學習績效之影響。中央大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
洪國勳（民92）。線上遊戲式學習系統之建置─以科技學習為例。台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
林東和（民93）。遊戲製作—使用Game Maker(系列書籍)。台北：碁峰資訊。
許晉龍（民93）。線上遊戲使用者行為研究。台灣科技大學資訊管理系博士論文。
簡幸如、劉旨峰（民93）。從網路心流理論探討電腦遊戲教學。第八屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會。香港。
簡幸如、劉旨峰（民93）。國中生網路遊戲與心流經驗相關因素之初探。台東大學：2004年台灣網際網路研討會。
簡幸如、劉旨峰（民94）。網路遊戲心流經驗問卷與心理模式建構之初探：以大專校園學生為例。2005電子商務與數位生活研討會。
簡幸如、劉旨峰（民94）。漸進式專題導向學習教學模式之建構---以遊戲製作為例。第九屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會。夏威夷。
二、 英文部分
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Crawford, C. (1982). The Art of Computer Game Design, Peabody, S. 1997
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly, 19, 189-211.
Dempsey, J. V., Lucassen, B., Haynes, L., & Casey M. (1996). Instructional applications of computer games. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394500).
Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). “Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction”. Journal of Psychology, 128(4). pp. 381-391.
Gray, T., & Halbert, S. (1998). Team teach with a student: New approach to collaborative teaching. College Teaching, 46(4), 150-153.
Jones, K. (1998). What happens when students design and run their own simulations? Simulation and Gaming, 29(3), 342-347.
Kafai, Y. B., Ching, C. C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as Designers of Educational Multimedia Software. Computers and Education, 29(2-3), 117-126.
Levin, T. & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer Use, Confidence, Attitudes, and Knowledge: A Causal Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 125-146.
Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York, NY: Academic Press.Mager, R. (1968). Developing attitudes toward learning. Palo Alto, CA: Fearon.
McKenna, K., & Lee, S. (1996). “A Love Affair with MUDs：Flow and Social Interaction in Multi-User Dungeons”. http://www.uni-koeln.de/~am040/muds/ipages/mud.htm
Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. OR: International Society for Technology in Education Books and Courseware Department.
Nanjappa, A. (2001). Educational games: learners as creators. The University of Memphis.
Novak, T. P., and Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the Flow Experience Among Web Users. Project 2000 Working Paper.
http://elab.vanderbilt.edu/research/papers/pdf/manuscripts/Flow-MeasuringFlowExpJul1997-pdf.pdf
Olmscheid, C. (1998). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in the elementary grades. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 430 959)
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reigeluth, C. (1983). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Volume I). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosas, R., Nussbaum, M., Cumsille, P., Marianov, V., Correa, M., et al. (2003). Beyond Nintendo: design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40 , 71-94.
Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (19 87). Skill is not enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, .623-637
Seidman, I.E. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research : A Guide for Researchers in Education and Social Sciences(2nd ed ). New York : Teachers College Press.
Simon, H. (1998). What We Know About Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 343-349.
SRI International (2000). The Challenge 2000 Multimedia Project. http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/index.html
Thiagarajan, S. (1994). How I Designed a Game - And Discovered the Meaning of Life. Simulation & Gaming, 25(4), 529-537.
Thomsen, S. R., Straubhaar, J. D. and Bolyard, D. M. (1998). Ethnomethodology and the study of online communities: exploring the cyberstreets. Information Research, 4(1).
http://www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications
Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. http://www.bie.org/tmp/research/researchreviewPBL
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in a society. Cambridge: Harvard University of Chicago Press.
Webster, K. L. Trevino, & Ryan, L. ( 1993). “The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human computer interactions”. Computer in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426.