台灣信用交易市場於2003年6月由證券交易所設立「借券中心」，2007年7月，參與機構資格加入證券商及證券金融公司，台灣金融體系成員均納入證券借貸架構之中，對股市的影響亦逐漸擴大。本論文探討台灣借貸市場競價交易之借券費率，引用相關文獻中的影響因子，以台灣集中式借貸市場資料進行實證。
基於放空對股價影響、放空限制、證券借貸市場三方面文獻，本論文提出借券費率與放空限制及分歧意見程度為正相關，而與機構投資人持股比例、公司規模、淨值市價比為負相關之假說。以Pearson 積差相關、一因子變異數分析及迴歸分析等統計工具進行假說驗證，結果均呈現顯著，實證支持D’Avolio (2002)等學者對證券借貸市場之觀點。
在放空研究領域，放空成本為借券人付出的借券費，而放空限制可利用放空成本具體衡量，因此借券費率提供了資產訂價理論、投資組合模型加入放空限制假設基礎，藉以進行更符合金融市場實際交易狀況之研究。
在證券交易實務方面，證券借貸市場開放後產生兩項明顯影響，一項為放空成本的差異，一項為證券出借的收益，一般投資人可選擇成本較低的放空管道，亦能出借證券獲取出借收益，提高投資報酬率。市場參與者可利用本研究實證借券費率的基本特性，作為台灣證券借貸市場中交易競價的參考依據。

Taiwan Stock Exchange built 「Securities Borrowing and Lending System」（SBL System）in the Margin Market in 2003. In July of 2007, all members of financial system were subsumed into Taiwan Securities Borrowing and Lending Market. From that moment, the influence on stock market was getting more and more stronger. This study discusses about the topic of “Loan Fee Rate in SBL System Competitive Auction Transactions” and do the physical study based on data of SBL System.
According to literatures about the affect of short sale on stock price, short sale constraints and SBL market, the study proposes “short sale contraints and divergence of opinion are positively relative to loan fee rate” and “institutional ownership、size、book-to-market are negatively relative to loan fee rate”. All of these hypotheses are proven through statistics tests of Pearson correlation, One-Way ANOVA and linear regression in this study and support viewpoints proposed by D’Avolio (2002) and other researchers in the past.
In practical stock market, there are two obvious affects after SBL market releasing. One is the gap of short sale cost and the other is the benefit of security lending. For investors, they can get more higher return by choosing the way to short sale with low cost or getting benefit by lending security. Therefore, investors can refer to the findings of basic characters of loan fee rate in this study for trade in Taiwan SBL Market.

中文文獻
1.張哲章（1998），「融資融券餘額、成交量與股價指數之關聯性研究」，證券金融季刊第56期，1998.01，頁67-94。
2.王儷容、鄭思因（2001），「我國證券市場信用交易制度之檢討」，中華經濟研究院。
3.吳成俊（2002），「成立我國證券借貸中心之探討」，台灣證券交易所，證交資料479期，2002.03，頁2-29。
4.葉怡芬（2003），「信用交易之資訊內涵及其投資策略獲利性之研究」，國立成功大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
5.王良惠（2004），「融資融券及其綜合性指標與股票報酬關係之研究」，國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
6.廖士光、楊朝軍（2004），「證券市場賣空機制對股價影響的研究-來自臺灣市場的實證」，第四屆中國經濟學年會入選論文，第7頁，天津：南開大學。
7.王林弘（2005），「平盤以下不得放空政策對台灣股市報酬分配之影響」，臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文。
8.台灣證交所有價證券借貸制度介紹（2006），台灣證券交易所。
9.王鈺蕙（2006），「平盤以下放空限制解除探討：台灣經驗」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
10.柯如鳳（2006），「豁免融券賣出不得低於前一營業日收盤價對市場品質之影響-以臺灣50指數成分股為例」，國立中央大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
11.陳櫻儒（2006），「證券借貸市場簡介」，證券暨期貨月刊第24卷第9期，2006.09，頁4-14。
12.顏珮儒（2006），「放空限制、價格發現與市場效率公正性-以台灣50ETF為例」，國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
13.李宏達（2007），「有價證券借貸交易制度對認售權證避險功能之研究」，台灣證券交易所，證交資料539期，2007.03，頁24-46。
英文文獻
1.Asquith, Paul, and Lisa Meulbroek（1996）, “An empirical investigation of short interest”. Unpublished workingpaper, Harvard Business School.
Asquith, Paul, Parag Pathak, and Jay Ritter（2005）, “Short interest, institutional ownership, and stock returns”, Journal o f Financial Economics 78: 243-276.
2.Boehme, Rodney D., Bartley R. Danielsen, and Sorin M. 3.Sorescu (2006). “Short-Sale Constraints, Differences of Opinion, and Overvaluation”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41, 455-487.
4.Bris, Arturo, William N. Goetzmann, and Ning Zhu（2007）, “Efficiency and the Bear-Short Sales and Markets Around the World”. Journal of Finance 62: 1029-1079.
5.Carhart, Mark（1997）, “On the persistence in mutual fund performance”. Journal of Finance 52: 57-82.
6.Chen Joseph, Harrison Hong, Jeremy C. Stein（2002）, “Breadth of ownership and stock returns”. Journal of Financial Economics 66: 171-205.
7.D’Avolio, Gene.（2002）, “The Market for Borrowing Stock”. Journal of Financial Economics 66: 271-306
8.Danielsen, Bartley R. and Sorin M. Sorescu （2001）, ”Why do option introductions depress stock prices? Astudy of diminishing short-sale constraints”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36: 451-484.
9.Desai, H., Thiagarajan, S.R., Ramesh, K., Balachandran（2000）, ”An investigation of the informational role of short interest in the Nasdaqmarket”. Unpublished working paper, Southern Methodist University.
10.Diamond, D.W. and R.E.Verrecchia（1987）, “Constraints on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private information”.Journal of Financial Economics 18: 277-312.
11.Diether, Karl B., Christopher J. Malloy and Anna Scherbina（2002）, “Differences of opinion and the crosssection of stock returns”. Journal of Finance 57: 2113-2141.
12.Diether, Karl B., Kuan-Hui Lee and Ingrid M.Werner（2008）,“Short-Sale strategies and return predictability”, Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.
13.Duffie, Darrell,（1996）, “ Special repo rates”. Journal of Finance 51, 493–526.
14.Duffie, Darrell, Nicolae Garleanu and Lasse Heje Pedersen（2002）, “Securities lending Shorting and pricing”. Journal of Financial Economics, 66: 307-339.
15.Fama, Eugene and Kenneth French（1993）, “ Common risk factors in returns on stocks and bonds”. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 3-56.
16.Ferhat Akbas, Ekkehart Boehmer, Bilal Erturk and Sorin Sorescu（2008）, “Why do short interest levels predict stock returns？” Working Paper, Texas A&M University.
17.Figlewski, S.（1981）, “The informational effects of restrictions on short sales: some empirical evidence”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16: 463-476.
18.Geczy, Christopher C., David K. Musto and Adam V. Reed（2002）, “Stocks are special too：an analysis of the equity lending market”. Journal of Financial Economics, 66: 241-269.
19.Hong, H., Stein, J.,（1999）, “ Differences of opinion, rational arbitrage, and market crashes”. NBER Working Paper W7376.
20.Hong, H., Stein, J.,（2003）,“Differences of Opinion, Short-sales Constraints, and Market Crashes”. Review of Financial Studies, 19, 487-525
21.Jones, C. M., and Owen A. Lamont（2002）, “Short sale constraints and stock returns”. Journal of Financial Economics, 66: 207-239.
22.Miller, E.M.,（1977）,“Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion”, Journal of Finance 32, 1151-1168.
23.Ofek, Eli, Matthew Richardson, and Robert F. Whitelaw（2004）, “Limited Arbitrage and Short Sales Restrictions: Evidence from the Options Markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, 74：305-342.
24.Rubinstein, Mark（2004）, “Great moments in financial economics：III. Short-sales and stock prices”, Journal of Investment Management 2, 16–31.
25.Seneca, J.J.（1967）.“Short interest: bearish or bullish? ”Journal of Finance 22, 67–70.