好的論文會明確地寫出目的及結論，且兩者之間應具有一致性及完整性，反之則會缺漏造成內容前後不一致，並造成使用者錯誤之引用，使用者搜尋論文主要是透過摘要來評定是否參考，摘要在論文架構中之功能為協助讀者快速理解論文內容，因此好的論文摘要能提升論文搜尋之正確性，摘要內容又以目的及結論為重，故本研究以臺灣碩博論文知識加值系統近六年來中央大學資訊管理系之碩士論文為實驗資料，以TextRank演算法萃取文章之特徵，採用ROUGE-1 做為評量依據評量論文之一致性及完整性，再以多文章之擷取式自動摘要技術TextRank、LexRank、Luhn與潛在語意分析 (Latent Semantic Analysis，LSA)四種方式產生正確性較佳之摘要，與原始摘要做特徵比對，進而評估正確性。
本研究目的為評論論文寫作邏輯之一致性，範圍之完整性及結論之正確性之結構水準，並將自動摘要附在原文摘要之後，藉此幫助查詢者提升論文搜尋之正確性，藉由實驗發現2013年及2015年一致性、完整性及正確性較佳，2014年及2017較差且發現論文具一致性、完整性及正確性因素之一為指導教授。具體貢獻(1)建立一個非監督式學習的驗證系統 (2)系統評估速度快，可立即評估該論文是否通過一致性、完整性及正確性(3)提供各項數據，供論文寫作者調整其結構達到一致性、完整性及正確性(4)讓指導教授以系統自動檢核論文減少人工審閱時間(5)提供自動摘要增加內容分辨力輔助提升查詢論文之正確性

A good Master’s thesis will clearly stating the purpose and conclusion. Between the purpose and the conclusion, there should be consistency and completeness. On the other hand, missing the above two points, the content will fall short and have contradictions, that will misguide the thesis readers to quote incorrectly. Generally, a reader defines a thesis worth takes references by abstract. The abstract helps the readers to understand the content in a quicker way. Therefore, a good abstract will elevate the correctness of giving a right thesis to meet the reader’s needs. The content of the abstract of a thesis values the purpose and the conclusion the most. This research takes the master’s thesis of the Department of Information Management of National Central University from National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations System in Taiwan as research data, using TextRank algorithm to extract the features of a thesis, applying ROUGE-1 as evaluation basis to measure the consistency and completeness of the thesis. Furthermore, with the help of the four algorithm of automatic multi-document extraction system TextRand, LexRank, Luhn, and potential semantic meaning analyzation system LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis) to make an abstract with a better correctness. Then, using this automatic summarization from the above technologies to compare with the original abstract to measure the correctness.
The purpose of this research is to comment on the consistency of the paper writing logic, the completeness of the scope, and the correctness of the conclusions, hopefully, after applying the auto- abstract to the original summary, there will be results with better correctness occurring from the thesis searching for the readers. From experiments, the consistency, completeness and correctness of 2013 and 2015 were found better, and 2014 and 2017 were found worse and the professor guidance has a great correlation about 3C structure . The contributions are: (1) Establishing a unsupervised verification system. (2) the consistency, completeness and correctness of the thesis can immediately be assessed pass or not. (3) Provide data for thesis writing to adjust its structure to achieve consistency, completeness and correctness. (4) Professors can automatically check thesis to reduce manual review task. (5) Provide automatic summaries to help improve the accuracy of query thesis.

英文文獻
Adline, A. L., Mahalakshmi, G. S., & Sendhilkumar, S. (2018). Graph Based Generation of Research Paper Summaries. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 15(4), 1106-1111.
Bazerman, C. (1984). Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social studies of science, 14(2), 163-196.
Boehm, B. W. (1984). Verifying and validating software requirements and design specifications. IEEE software, 1(1), 75.
Das, D., & Martins, A. F. (2007). A survey on automatic text summarization. Literature Survey for the Language and Statistics II course at CMU, 4, 192-195.
Davis, A. M. (1990). Software requirements: analysis and specification: Prentice Hall Press.
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6), 391.
Erkan, G., & Radev, D. R. (2004). Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. journal of artificial intelligence research, 22, 457-479.
Gong, Y., & Liu, X. (2001). Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Lin, C.-Y. (2003). ROUGE: Recall-oriented understudy for gisting evaluation. In.
Luhn, H. P. (1958). The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of research and development, 2(2), 159-165.
Mihalcea, R., & Tarau, P. (2004). Textrank: Bringing order into text. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing.
M. Witbrock and V. Mittal, Ultra Summarization: a Statistical Approach to Generating
Highly Condensed Non-extractive Summaries, Proceedings of the 22th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval (SIGIR), pp. 315–316, 1999
Ng, H. T., Goh, W. B., & Low, K. L. (1997). Feature selection, perceptron learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. Paper presented at the ACM SIGIR Forum.
Paice, C. D. (1990). Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects. Information Processing & Management, 26(1), 171-186.
Radev, D. R., Hovy, E., & McKeown, K. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Computational linguistics, 28(4), 399-408.
Sebastiani, F. (2002). Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 34(1), 1-47.
Sollaci, L. B., & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the medical library association, 92(3), 364.
Steinberger, J., & Jezek, K. (2004). Using latent semantic analysis in text summarization and summary evaluation. Proc. ISIM, 4, 93-100.
Sullivan, D. (2001). Document warehousing and text mining: techniques for improving business operations, marketing, and sales: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Witbrock, M. J., & Mittal, V. O. (1999). Ultra-summarization (poster abstract): a statistical approach to generating highly condensed non-extractive summaries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval.
Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. In: Springer.
Xiong, C., Li, Y., & Lv, K. (2017, June). Multi-documents Summarization Based on the TextRank and Its Application in Argumentation System. In International Conference on Emerging Internetworking, Data & Web Technologies (pp. 457-466). Springer, Cham.
Xiong, S., & Luo, Y. (2014, December). A new approach for multi-document summarization based on latent semantic analysis. In Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), 2014 Seventh International Symposium on (Vol. 1, pp. 177-180). IEEE.
Yeh, C.-L. (1991). Rule-based word identification for Mandarin Chinese sentences-A unification approach. Computer Processing of Chinese and Oriental Languages.
Yonghe, L., & Jianhua, C. (2014). Public opinion analysis of microblog content. Paper presented at the Information Science and Applications (ICISA), 2014 International Conference on.
Zowghi, D., & Gervasi, V. (2002). The Three Cs of requirements: consistency, completeness, and correctness. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality, Essen, Germany: Essener Informatik Beitiage.
Zowghi, D., & Gervasi, V. (2003). On the interplay between consistency, completeness, and correctness in requirements evolution. Information and Software Technology, 45(14), 993-1009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5849(03)00100-9
Zowghi, D., & Gervasi, V. (2004). Erratum to “On the interplay between consistency, completeness, and correctness in requirements evolution”. Information and Software Technology, 46(11), 763-779.
中文文獻
李俊宏、張興亞(2007)。一個以 Ontology 為基礎的 Web-Mining 技術應用於供應 鏈競爭分析之研究.電子商務學報，第九卷，第三期，頁 435-160。
李麗華、李富民、詹尚驥、周裕健(2009)。以學術部落格為主之個人化推薦系統.資訊科技國際期刊(IJAIT)，第 3 卷，Vol. 3，頁 56-75.
曾朝譽. (2017)。運用文字探勘評估碩士論文之一致性與完整性. 國立中央大學.
葉鎮源、柯皓仁、楊維邦. (2001)。文件自動化摘要方法之研究及其在中文文件的應用.
劉志明、于波、歐陽純萍、余穎、陽小華、翟雲. (2017)。基於主題的SE -Text Rank情感摘要方法. 情報工程, 3(3), 97-104.
謝育倫、劉士弘、陳冠宇、王新民、許聞廉、陳柏琳 (2016)。運用序列到序列生成架構於重寫式自動摘要