跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳冠呈
Guan-Cheng Chen
論文名稱: 企業會計穩健性與供應鏈夥伴投資效率之影響- 以臺灣半導體產業為例
The Effect of Accounting Conservatism on supplies’ investment efficiency along the Supply Chain- An Example from the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan
指導教授: 王曉雯
Hsiao-Wen Wang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計研究所
Graduate Institute of Accounting
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 49
中文關鍵詞: 會計穩健性投資效率供應鏈垂直資訊移轉
外文關鍵詞: Accounting conservatism, Investment efficiency, Supply chain, Vertical information transfer
相關次數: 點閱:23下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現今社會商業競爭日益激烈,為了保持優勢的地位,企業除了必須擁有獨特的技術及產品外,在供應鏈中企業也需要建立穩定合作的夥伴關係,而如何進行更精確且有效的訊息傳遞來提升供應鏈中企業之競爭力,並幫助企業高階經理人制定更有利的決策,對提升供應鏈而言是一項重大議題。本研究以臺灣半導體產業作為研究對象,研究期間為2010到2018年,以會計穩健性(accounting conservatism)作為財務品質之代理變數,並利用Khan and Watts (2009) 修改Basu (1997) 之C_Score模型計算會計穩健性探討企業會計穩健性愈高的財務品質資訊,是否會影響企業之高階經理人對於投資決策的制定,進而造成投資效率(investment efficiency)之提升,本研究採用Biddle et al. (2009) 模型計算投資效率,為實際與預期投資之偏離程度,並探討在供應鏈當中是否會影響供應商之高階經理人對其企業投資決策之影響,做出有利的投資決策,同時驗證在供應鏈當中垂直資訊移轉之現象。
    本研究結論如下:(1)在半導體產業中,會計穩健性愈高的企業,愈能夠提升其投資效率;(2)在半導體產業之供應鏈當中,企業的會計穩健性愈高會提升其供應商的投資效率,證實資訊移轉之現象。本研究證實當供應商的高階經理人在決定未來投資方向及投資決策時,不單單只考慮下游客戶財務報表的會計盈餘來做決策,更會將下游客戶之整體財務品質是否符合會計穩健性納入考量,使得高階經理人做出對企業有利的投資決策,提升其投資效率。


    Recently, business competition is becoming increasingly drastic. In order to maintain its advantageous position, corporates should hold unique technologies and products; besides, corporates also need to establish stable and cooperative partnerships in the supply chain. For the supply chain, it’s an important issue that how corporates carry out more accurate and effective message transmission to enhance their competitiveness and to help executives to make better decisions simultaneously.
    Focusing on the semiconductor industry in Taiwan, this paper investigates Accounting Conservatism effect on supplies’ investment efficiency from 2010 to 2018. As to accounting conservatism, we adopt C_Score which Khan and Watts (2009) developed on the basis of Basu (1997) model. We investigate when executives make investment decisions, whether they would consider higher accounting conservatism, then improving firm’s investment efficiency. Regarding investment efficiency, we use a measurement from Biddle et al. (2009) model about the residuals for deviations from expected investment. We also investigate whether it would affect suppliers’ executives make better decisions of investment. Simultaneously, we verify the phenomenon of vertical information transfer in the supply chain
    To summarize, first, we find that using accounting conservatism can improve investment efficiency. Second, we find that downstream firms’ accounting conservatism is significantly related to investment efficiency of suppliers, with the phenomenon of vertical information transfer. This paper suggests that when executives make the decisions of investment, they will not only consider the figures financial statement of downstream firms, but also take downstream firms’ quality of financial statement into consideration. These enable executives to make better investment decisions and improved investment efficiency of firms.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii 致謝 iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 v 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第貳章 文獻探討與假說發展 5 第一節 會計穩健性 5 第二節 投資效率與會計穩健性 7 第三節 垂直資訊移轉 8 第參章 研究設計 11 第一節 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源 11 第二節 會計穩健性 13 第二節 投資效率 15 第三節 實證模型 18 第四節 變數定義 19 第肆章 實證結果 23 第一節 敘述性統計結果 23 第二節 實證分析結果 23 第三節 敏感性分析 24 第伍章 結論與建議 34 參考文獻 36

    一、中文文獻
    1.王貞靜、潘虹華與戚務君,2012,以 C-Score 衡量會計穩健性在臺灣的適用性,會計審計論叢,2卷(2期):頁1-31。
    2.汪瑞芝,2013,中國反資本弱化條款對臺商融資決策之影響,會計審計論叢,3卷(2期):頁81-125。
    3.陳育晟,2016,張忠謀才離開半年 台積電就迎來史上第三高營收衰退,遠見雜誌,
    (https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=55683; 2019/7/4)
    4.粘凱婷、金成隆、周濟群與汪戍安,2016,法人說明會資訊在供應鏈中之垂直資訊移轉效果:以台灣之半導體產業供應鏈為例,臺大管理論叢,26卷(3期):頁 1-34。
    5.黃瓊慧,李先莉與單騰笙,2009,管理當局盈餘預測與關聯產業資訊移轉,臺大管理論叢,19卷(2期):頁195-214。
    二、英文文獻
    1.Abel, A. 1983. “Optimal investment under uncertainty.”The American Economic Review 73 (1): 228-233.
    2.Ahmed, A. S., and Duellman S. 2011. “Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions.” Accounting & Finance 51 (3): 609-633.
    3.Baginski, S. P. 1987. “Intraindustry information transfers associated with management forecasts of earnings.” Journal of Accounting Research :196-216,.
    4.Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. “Earnings quality in UK private firms : comparative loss recognition timeliness.” Journal of accounting and economics 39 (1): 83-128.
    5.Basu, S. 1997. “ The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings.” Journal of accounting and economics 24 (1) : 3-37.
    6.Biddle, G. C.,Hilary, G., and Verdi, R. S. 2009. “How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?” Journal of accounting and economics 48 (2-3): 112-131.
    7.Bushman, R. M., and J. D. Piotroski. 2006. “Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting : The influence of legal and political institutions.” Journal of accounting and economics 42 (1-2): 107-148.
    8.Chen, F., Hope, K., Li, Q., & Wang, X. 2011. “Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets.” The Accounting Review 86 (4) : 1255-1288.
    9.Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. 2011. “ Government intervention and investment efficiency : Evidence from China.” Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (2): 259-271,.
    10.Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. “A simple approximation of Tobin's q.” Financial management : 70-74.
    11.Cohen, L., and A. Frazzini. 2008 “Economic links and predictable returns.” The Journal of Finance 63 (4): 1977-2011,.
    12.Dou, Y., Hope, O. K., & Thomas, W. B. 2013. “Relationship-specificity, contract enforceability, and income smoothing.” The Accounting Review 88 (5): 1629-1656,.
    13.Foster, G. 1981. “Intra-industry information transfers associated with earnings releases.” Journal of accounting and economics 3 (3): 201-232.
    14.Givoly, D., and C. Hayn. 2000. “ The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals : Has financial reporting become more conservative?” Journal of accounting and economics 29 (3): 287-320,.
    15.Iyengar, R. J., and E. M. Zampelli. 2010. “Does accounting conservatism pay?” Accounting & Finance 50 (1): 121-142.
    16.Khan, M., and R. L. Watts. 2009. “Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism.” Journal of accounting and economics 48 (2-3): 132-150.
    17.Khurana, I. K., and C. Wang. 2015. “Debt maturity structure and accounting conservatism.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 42 (1-2): 167-203.
    18.Kim, J. B., and L. Zhang. 2016. “Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk : Firm‐level evidence.” Contemporary Accounting Research 33 (1): 412-441.
    19.Kothari, S. P., and R. G. Sloan. 1992. “Information in prices about future earnings : Implications for earnings response coefficients.” Journal of accounting and economics 15 (2-3): 143-171.
    20.LaFond, R., and R. L. Watts. 2008. “The information role of conservatism.” The Accounting Review 83 (2): 447-478.
    21.Lara, J. M. G., B. G. Osma, and F. Penalva. 2016. “Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency.” Journal of accounting and economics 61 (1): 221-238.
    22.Liker, J. K., Collins, P. D., & Hull, F. M. 1999. “Flexibility and standardization : test of a contingency model of product design–manufacturing integration.” Journal of Product Innovation Management : An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association 16 (3): 248-267.
    23.MacKay, P., and G. M. Phillips. 2005. “How does industry affect firm financial structure?” The Review of Financial Studies 18 (4): 1433-1466.
    24.McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. 1990. “Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value.” Journal of Financial economics 27 (2): 595-612.
    25.McNichols, M. F., and S. R. Stubben. 2008. “Does earnings management affect firms’ investment decisions?” The Accounting Review 83 (6): 1571-1603.
    26.Olsen, C., and J. R. Dietrich. 1985. “Vertical information transfers : The association between retailers' sales announcements and suppliers' security returns.” Journal of Accounting Research : 144-166.
    27.Pandit, S., Wasley, C. E., & Zach, T. 2011. “Information externalities along the supply chain : The economic determinants of suppliers’ stock price reaction to their customers’ earnings announcements.” Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (4): 1304-1343.
    28.Porter, M. 1985. “Competitive Advantage”, Free Press, New York, NY.
    29.Qiang, X. 2007. “The effects of contracting, litigation, regulation, and tax costs on conditional and unconditional conservatism: Cross-sectional evidence at the firm level.” The Accounting Review 82 (3): 759-796.
    30.Rad, S. S. E., Embong, Z., Mohd-Saleh, N., & Jaffar, R. 2016. “Financial information quality and investment efficiency: evidence from malaysia.” Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance 12 (1).
    31.Raman, K., and H. Shahrur. 2008. “Relationship-specific investments and earnings management : Evidence on corporate suppliers and customers.” The Accounting Review 83 (4): 1041-1081.
    32.Richardson, S. 2006. “Over-investment of free cash flow.” Review of accounting studies 11 (2-3): 159-189.
    33.Watts, R. L. 2003. “Conservatism in accounting part II : Evidence and research opportunities.” Accounting horizons 17 (4): 287-301.
    34.Wittenberg-Moerman, R. 2008. “The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading : Evidence from the secondary loan market.” Journal of accounting and economics 46 (2-3): 240-260.
    35.Yoshikawa, H. 1980. “On the “q” theory of investment.” The American Economic Review 70 (4): 739-743.
    36.Zhang, J. 2008. “The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers.” Journal of accounting and economics 45 (1): 27-54.

    QR CODE
    :::