透過設計預防施工危害(Construction Hazard Prevention through Design，以下簡稱
CHPtD)是一個由建築師/技師在設計階段執行風險管理(包括辨識風險、評估風
險與建議風險控制措施)的程序，以便在他們進行設計標的永久特性之設計決策
時能明確地考慮到施工工人的安全與健康。藉由早期對工安的考量，危害能被
有效地消除或控制，以帶來設施設備施工、使用與維護時更安全的環境。然而，
台灣現今營造業的結構與文化阻礙了 CHPtD 的實行，進而使得在沒有將 CHPtD
具有從營造工地消除風險的優點加以考量的設計工作完成後，設計對營造工人
安全的衝擊仍交由施工廠商來處理與減輕。基於此一現在的實務情形，本研究
旨在探討如何擴大 CHPtD 在台灣建築業中的實行，並參考其他已經發展推動
CHPtD 法令的國家(如澳洲、英國) 的作法。本研究採用的研究方法包括對台灣
建築業的設計專家進行訪談與結構性的線上問卷調查，訪談與問卷之問題設計
則在瞭解受訪者對於 CHPtD 概念的知識、態度、實務與一般性應用的看法；受
訪者提供的回應經過分析後可幫助進一步瞭解他們對 CHPtD 與相關議題的想法。
調查的結果顯示多數的受訪者支持 CHPtD 的概念，但他們對 CHPtD的知識、態
度及實務應用仍待加強。根據專家訪談與問卷調查的結果，本研究提出了於台
灣營造業推動 CHPtD 的建議，主要包括知識、動機與態度等三點，每一點說明
了影響推動 CHPtD 的正向變革與使推動 CHPtD 的預期成果成為可能的基本需
要，且為了實現 CHPtD 的成功，本研究發現每一點皆需要以不同的方式加以落
實。

Construction Hazard Prevention through Design (CHPtD) is a process in which architects
and engineers (A/Es) perform risk management (including identifying risks, evaluating risks
and suggesting risk control measures) in the design stage to explicitly consider the safety and
health of construction workers as they make design decisions on the permanent features of the
design target. With early intervention, hazards can be effectively eliminated or controlled leading to safer sites during construction, use, and maintenance of the facility. However, the current structure and culture within the Taiwan construction industry inhibit the implementation of CHPtD. Consequently, the impacts of designs on construction worker safety are often left up to the constructor to address and mitigate after the design is complete which ignores the benefits CHPtD can provide to eliminate hazards from construction job-sites. Based
on part of this current practice, the study was initiated to explore how to diffuse and implement
CHPtD to the architecture industry in Taiwan. The research presented in this report looks outside of Taiwan to other countries like Australia, and the UK which have developed legislation for the implementing and diffusion of CHPtD in their construction industry since such legislation for CHPtD implementation doesn’t exist in the Taiwan architecture industry.
The approach chosen for conducting the research study utilized a combination of targeted,
expert interviews along with a structured on-line survey of design professionals within the
Taiwan’s architecture industry. The research questions posed in this study explored respondents: knowledge, attitude and practices, and general application of the CHPtD concept.
The responses provided by respondents were analyzed to further understand their perceptions of CHPtD and related issues. The majority of the respondents were supportive of the CHPtD concept, but their level of CHPtD knowledge, attitude and practices need to be improved. The recommendations made in this thesis were identified and fashioned based on the results obtained from the expert interview and the on-line survey conducted during the study.
Diffusion and implementation of CHPtD into the Taiwan construction industry require attention to three (3) key points: knowledge, motivation, and aptitude. Each point addresses a
fundamental need for affecting positive change and enabling anticipated outcomes of CHPtD implementation. The study findings reveal that each of the points needs to be fulfilled in some way to realize CHPtD success.

References
1. American Society of Civil Engineers [ASCE]. (2007). The Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025.
2. Behm, M. (2004b). “Establishing the Link between Construction Fatalities and Disabling Injuries and the Design for Construction Safety Concept.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Public Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
3. Behm, M. (2005). Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety Science, 43, 589−611
4. Behm, M. (2005a). Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety Science, 43, 589‐611.
5. Behm, M. (2005b). “Design for Construction Safety: An Introduction, Implementation Techniques, and Research Summary.” Professional Development Conference and Exposition, American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), New Orleans, LA, June 12‐15, 2005.
6. Behm, M. and Culvenor, J. (2011). “Safe Design in Construction: Perceptions of Engineers in Western Australia.” Journal of Health & Safety Research & Practice, 3(1), 9‐23.
7. CDM (1994). Construction (Design and Management) Regulations, SI 1994/3140 HMSO.
8. Christensen, W. (2011). “Prevention through Design: Long‐Term Benefits.” Professional Safety, Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), 56(4), 60‐61.
9. Construction Industry Institute [CII]. (2002). Prefabrication, Preassembly, Modularization, and Offsite Fabrication in Industrial Construction: A Framework for Decision-Making. Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 171-1 Austin, TX
10. Gambatese, J. A. (1996). Addressing construction worker safety in the project design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Washington
11. Gambatese, J. A. (1998). Liability in designing for construction worker safety.
12. Gambatese, J. A. (2000, June). Safety in designer's hands. Civil Engineering, 56−59.
13. Gambatese, J., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2005). “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 131(9), 1029‐1036.
14. Gambatese, J., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2005). “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 131(9), 1029‐1036
15. Gambatese, J.A. (1998). “Liability in Designing for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, ASCE, 4(3), 107‐112.
16. Gambatese, J.A. (1998). “Liability in Designing for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, ASCE, 4(3), 107‐112.
17. Gambatese, J.A. (2003). “Safety Emphasis in University Engineering and Construction Programs.” Special Issue on “Construction Safety Education and Training – A Global Perspective”, Ed.: Hinze, J., International e‐Journal of Construction, University of Florida, M.E. Rinker School of Building Construction, May 2003.
18. Gambatese, J.A. (2004). An Overview of Design‐for‐Safety Tools and Technologies. In: Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., and Weinstein, M. (Eds.), Designing for Safety and Health in Construction: Proceedings from a Research and Practice Symposium, September 15 – 16, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 109‐117.
19. Gambatese, J.A. (2004). An Overview of Design‐for‐Safety Tools and Technologies. In: Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., and Weinstein, M. (Eds.), Designing for Safety and Health in Construction: Proceedings from a Research and Practice Symposium, September 15 – 16, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 109‐117.
20. Gambatese, J.A. (2008). “Research Issues in Prevention through Design.” Journal of Safety Research, Special Issue on Prevention through Design, Elsevier and the National Safety Council, 39(2), 153‐156.
21. Gambatese, J.A. (2008). “Research Issues in Prevention through Design.” Journal of Safety Research, Special Issue on Prevention through Design, Elsevier and the National Safety Council, 39(2), 153‐156.
22. Gambatese, J.A., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2003). “Engineering Mandates Stipulated in OSHA Regulations.” Proceedings of the 2003 Construction Research Congress, Honolulu, HI, March 19‐ 21, 2003. Reston, VA: ASCE.
23. Gambatese, J.A., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2003). “Engineering Mandates Stipulated in OSHA Regulations.” Proceedings of the 2003 Construction Research Congress, Honolulu, HI, March 19‐ 21, 2003. Reston, VA: ASCE.
24. Gambatese, J.A., Hinze, J.W., and Haas, C.T. (1997). “Tool to Design for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, ASCE, 3(1), 32‐41.
25. Gambatese, J.A., Hinze, J.W., and Haas, C.T. (1997). “Tool to Design for Construction Worker Safety.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, ASCE, 3(1), 32‐41.
26. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Roca, X., and Fuertes, A. (2010). “Mitigating construction safety risks using prevention through design.” Journal of Safety Research, 41(2), 107–122.
27. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), (2007a), Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 – Baseline Study. Health and Safety Executive, HMSO, Norwich.
28. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), (2007b), Improving the effectiveness of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994: Establishing views from construction stakeholders on the current effectiveness of CDM. Health and Safety Executive, HMSO, Norwich.
29. Hecker, S. and Gambatese, J. A., (2003), Safety in design: a proactive approach to construction worker safety and health. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 18(5), 339-342.
30. Hecker, S., Gambatese, J., and Weinstein, M. (2005). “Designing for Worker Safety: Moving the Construction Safety Process Upstream.” Professional Safety, Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), 50(9), 32‐44.
31. Hinze, J., & Wiegand, F. (1992). Role of designers in construction worker safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(4), 677−684.
32. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 4(3) 107−112
33. Lam, P.T.I., Wong, F.W.H., and Chan, A.P.C. (2006). “Contributions of designers to improving buildability and constructability.” Design Studies, 27(4), 457–479.
34. Main, B.W. (2008). “Social Controls for Reducing Risks: Observations on U.S. & European Approaches.” Professional Safety, Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), 53(5), 41‐49, May 2008.
35. Safe Work Australia, (2006), Guidance on the principles of safe design for work. Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra.
36. Safe Work Australia, (2012a), Construction Industry Factsheet. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
37. Safe Work Australia, (2012b), Australian Work Health and Safety Strategy 2012-2022. Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra.
38. Safe Work Australia, (2012c), Safe Design of Structures Code of Practice. ISBN 978-0-642-78546-6, Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra.
39. Safe Work Australia, (2013), Jurisdictional progress on the model work health and safety laws. Retrieved from http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/model-whslaws/pages/jurisdictional-progress-whs-laws 25 November 2013.
40. Toole, T. M. & Gambatese, J., (2008), The Trajectories of Prevention through Design in Construction. Journal of Safety Research, 39(2), 225-230.
41. Toole, T. M. (2001). The technological trajectories of construction innovation. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 7(4), 107−114.
42. Toole, T. M., Hervol, N., & Hallowell, M. (2006). Designing for construction safety. Modern Steel Construction, 46(6), 55−59
43. Toole, T.M., Hecker, P., and Hallowell, M. (2013). “Policy Development: A Key Factor in Promoting CHPtD.” Professional Safety, Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), 58(1), 41‐47.
44. Weinstein, M., Gambatese, J., and Hecker, S. (2005). “Can Design Improve Construction Safety: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety‐in‐Design Process.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 131(10), 1125‐1134.
45. Workplace Safety Australia, (2013), National Safety Handbook – Australia & New Zealand. Edn. 10, Sydney, Australia.
46. WorkSafe Victoria, (2005), Designing safer buildings and structures. Victoria State Government, Australia.
47. WorkSafe WA., (2007), The National Standard for Construction Work – guidance for designers. Government of Western Australia, Australia.
48. WorkSafe WA., (2008), Safe Design of Buildings and Structures Code of Practice. Government of Western Australia, Australia.