| 研究生: |
吳冠毅 Kuan-Yi Wu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
社經變數與社會規範對台灣民眾回收行為之影響 |
| 指導教授: |
劉錦龍
Jin-Long Liu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所 Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 76 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 環境顧志耐曲線 、每人每年回收量 、鄉鎮回收率 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Environmental Kuznets curve, recycling quantity per capita, recycling rate |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:7 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文旨在探討影響台灣民眾回收行為的因素,利用五個研究課題去分析民
眾的回收行為。
(1) 每人每年回收量與鄉鎮回收率之 EKC 實證模型。
(2) 非強制社會規範與政治變數對每人每年回收量與鄉鎮回收率的影響。
(3) 第一階段垃圾強制分類政策實施成效之實證模型。
(4) 第一階段垃圾強制分類政策示範鄉鎮或強制參與鄉鎮是否存在顯著差異。
(5) 鄉鎮市丟棄回收物之方便程度是否對於民眾之回收行為構成影響。
資料蒐集民國 89 年至 97 年間和 101 年台灣各鄉鎮之回收與相關鄉鎮變數年資料。
實證結果發現無論是以每人每年回收量或是鄉鎮的回收率作為回收指標,皆顯
著驗證了 EKC 曲線的存在。而慈濟功德會組織的設立能有效提升民眾的回收行為,且鄉鎮丟棄回收物越方便,則對於民眾回收意願會增加。
另一部分,第一階段垃圾強制分類政策對於實施之鄉鎮具有成果,而若將實施
鄉鎮區分為示範鄉鎮與強制參與鄉鎮,則發現示範鄉鎮之回收成果不及於強制參與
鄉鎮。
This essay is aimed to discuss the reasons that influence recycling behavior in Taiwan.
We analysis the recycling behaviors of people by five issues.
(1) The EKC model of the recycling quantity per capita and recycling rate.
(2) The impact of non-mandatory social norms and political variables on the recycling
quantity per capita and recycling rate.
(3) The effects of the First stage of mandatory recycle policy.
(4) The effects between the example towns and the mandatory towns in the First stage of
mandatory recycle policy.
(5) The impact of the convenient extent to discard recycling on the recycling quantity per
capita and recycling rate.
We collect the township recycling data and socio-economic data from 2000 to 2008 and 2012.
The empirical results show whether the recycling quantity per capita or the recycling rate are significant to verify the existence of EKC. Tzu-Chi foundation can improve
recycling behavior significantly. And the more convenient to discard recycling, the willingness for people to increase recycling behaviors .
On the other hand, the First stage of mandatory recycle policy for the township has
implemented significant results, but if the implementation towns are divided into the
example towns and the mandatory towns, the results of the recycling behaviors are less
than the mandatory towns.
1. 國外文獻
Allers, Maarten A. and Corine Hoeben. 2010. " Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing:
A Differences-in-Differences Approach" Environ Resource Econ,45:405-28.
Ashenmiller, Bevin. 2009." Cash Recycling, Waste Disposal Costs and the Incomes of
the Working Poor: Evidence from California." Land Economics,85(3):539-51.
Ashenmiller, Bevin. 2010." Externalities from Recycling Laws: Evidence from Crime
Rates." American Law and Economics Review, 12(1):245-61.
Chen, Chung-Chiang and Yi-Tui Chen. 2006. "Income Effect Or Policy Result: A Test
of the Environmental Kuznets Curve." Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (1):59-65.
Cole,M.A, A.J. Rayner and J.M. Bates.1997. "The environmental Kuznets curve: an
empirical analysis." Environment and Development Economics,2(4):401-16
Dinda, Soumyananda. 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey"
Eological Economics,49(4):431-55
Gawande, Kishore, Alok K. Bohara, Robert P. Berrens and Pingo Wang. 2000."Internal
Migration and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for US Hazardous Waste Sites."
Ecological Economics, 33(1): 151-66.
Grossman, Gene M. and Alan B. Krueger. 1995."Economic Growth and the
Environment." Quarterly Journal of Economics,110 (2):353-77.
Hung, Ming-Feng and Shaw, Daigee. 2004."Economic growth and the environmental
kuznets curve in taiwan: A simultaneity model analysis," in Michele Boldrin,
Been-Lon Chen and Ping Wang, eds., Human capital, trade and public policy in
rapidly growing economies: From theory to empirics,Academia Studies in Asian
Economies; Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass.:; Elgar:269-90.
Huang, Ju-Chin; Halstead, John M.; Saunders, Shanna B. 2011. " Managing Municipal Solid Waste with Unit-Based Pricing: Policy Effects and Responsiveness to Pricing"
Land Economics,87(4):645-60.
Mazzanti, Massimiliano, Montini, Anna and Zoboli, Roberto. 2009. " Municipal waste
generation and the EKC hypothesis new evidence
exploiting province-based panel data " Applied Economics Letters, 16:719–725.
Selden, Thomas M. and Daqing Song.(1994) "Environmental Quality and
Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?" Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management, 27 (2):147-62
Wooldridge.2009. " Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach", 4th
Michigan
Viscusi, W. Kip, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell. 2011. " Promoting Recycling:
Private Values, Social Norms , and Economic Incentives" American Economic Review:
Papers & Proceedings , 101:65–70
Viscusi, W. Kip, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell. 2013. " Discontinuous Behavioral
Responses to Recycling Laws and Plastic Water Bottle Deposits" American Law and
Economics Review,15(1):110-55
Yang, Hai-Lan, and Robert Innes. 2007. “Economic Incentives and Residential Waste
Management in Taiwan: An Empirical Investigation,” Environmental and Resource
Economics,37:489–519.
2. 國內文獻
劉翠溶(1999),「論廢棄物資源制度的演進」,台灣社會問題研究學術研討會論文
張祖恩(1994),「都市垃圾問題及其對策之探討」, 《環境保護與產業政策》,
492-510
吳麗敏(2004) ,「考慮所得不均度之經濟發展與環境污染之關係-台灣環境顧志耐
曲線的再驗證」,台灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文
郭敏華(2007),「台灣垃圾強制分類政策的成效實證分析」,政治大學財政研究所碩士論文
汪志忠和鄭雅云(2011),「空間、治理、政治競爭性與縣市長選舉投票率」,《中
國行政評論》,18,91-112
何修賢(2008), 「顧茲耐曲線之實證研究—以台灣家用垃圾製造量為例」,中央大
學產業經濟研究所碩士論文
梁雙蓮(2005) ,「慈濟功德會在台灣永續發展中的角色」,《研考雙月刊》, 29 , 103-9