跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李宗達
Tsung-Ta Lee
論文名稱: 員工分紅入股制度與工作投入之關聯-以心理契約為中介變項
The Relationships of Profit Sharing and Job Involvement-Psychological Contract as a Mediator
指導教授: 劉念琪
Nien-Chi Liu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
Executive Master of Human Resource Management
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 分紅入股工作投入心理契約
外文關鍵詞: profit sharing, psychological contract, job involvement
相關次數: 點閱:17下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著分紅費用化的法令外在因素改變以後,組織已無法再使用這種成本相對低廉且非常有效果的獎酬工具,對於員工除了在財務上是一大損失,是否也對組織的心理契約程度造成影響。而當組織願意增加營運的成本來回饋給員工時,顯示組織確實重視員工的價值以及與員工的關係,相對的員工也會以工作績效的貢獻來回報給組織。透過這樣措施,組織可以強化員工的心理契約,進而增加員工工作投入的程度。因此本研究想要研究在分紅費用化前後公司分紅之差距是否會透過心理契約並進而影響員工在工作投入上的表現。研究結果顯示增加費用化前後平均員工分紅差異的金額會強化員工的關係型心理契約,讓員工想要回報組織,因此可以加深員工和組織之間長期關係的建立,進而強化員工工作投入,而為組織創造更多的價值。


    Organization can no longer use the compensation tool of profit sharing by stock easily due to the regulations had been changed. It impacts employees not only financial income but also the psychological contract. And would this change effect employee job involvement mediated by psychological contract, especially relational psychological contract?
    This study used the difference between the average of 2 years amount of cash bonus and stock bonus of each employee after the regulation changed and 2 years before the regulation changed as independent variables. The data were collected from Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) during 2007 to 2010. The mediation variable was relational psychological contract; the dependent variable was job involvement.
    This study found that the increasing the amount of profit share after the regulation changed had positive effect employee job involvement which mediated by relational psychological contract.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 第一節 員工分紅入股 3 第二節 心理契約 5 第三節 工作投入 8 第四節 員工分紅入股、心理契約與工作投入之關係 10 第三章 研究方法 15 第一節 研究架構 15 第二節 變數操作型定義與研究工具 17 第三節 研究樣本及資料蒐集 19 第四節 資料分析方法 19 第四章 研究結果與討論 22 第一節 敘述統計分析 22 第二節 因素分析 25 第三節 相關分析 26 第四節 迴歸分析 28 第五章 結論與建議 33 第一節 結論 33 第二節 管理意涵 35 第三節 研究限制與建議 36 第六章 參考文獻 38

    一、 中文部份
    1. 朱鴻薇(2004),教師僱用身分與人格特質對心理契約實現與組織公民行為關係之影響,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    2. 林俊宏(2008),彈性福利制度對員工福利滿意度、工作投入和組織承諾的影響,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 范姜如萱(2001),台灣電子資訊公司分紅入股措施對員工生產力之影響, 中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    4. 洪淳涵(2000),銀行保險行銷激勵制度對工作投入及工作績效之關聯探討,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    5. 高瑞新(2011),工作價值觀與服務導向組織公民行為之研究─以警專學生為例探討心理契約與專業承諾之中介效果,中央大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    6. 陳怡君(2011),部屬認知之管理教練技能對部屬個人工作投入的影響—以工作滿足為中介變項,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    7. 陳馥瑜(2004),員工分紅入股制度與組織離職率、生產力及獲利率之關聯性探討,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 趙曉鈴(2002),員工分紅入股制度對組織績效的影響,中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    9. 許美鳳(2003), 員工僱用身分對其工作態度及行為的影響,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    10. 黃春頻,員工分紅費用化及新頒解釋函令研討,中區國稅局審查一科。
    11. 鄭芷琳(2010) ,心理契約對工作結果之影響—組織氣候中介效果與他人回饋調節效果分析,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    12. 鍾振文(2003),薪酬滿足知覺、薪酬設計原則對於員工工作態度與績效之影響,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    13. 謝怡甄(2006),員工決策參與及財務參與與組織績效之關聯,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    14. 鐘心淇(2007),心理資本、薪資水準與工作努力程度關係之研究:以某跨國企業為例,中央大學經濟學系碩士論文。
    二、 英文部分
    1. Argyris, C. (1960) , Understanding Organizational Behavior, Homewood, IL:Dorsey Press.
    2. Bard Kuvaas (2008), An exploration of how the employee-org relationship affects the linkage between perception of developmental HR and employee outcomes, Journal of Management Studies 45:1
    3. Brooke, P.P., Russell, D.W. and Price, J.L. (1988), Discriminate, validation of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 75, No.2, pg.139-145
    4. Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996), A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, pg. 358-368.
    5. Brown, S.P. (1996), A meta-analysis and review of organizational researching Job Involvement, Psychological Bulletin, vol.120, pg. 235-255
    6. Coyle-Shapiro. & Shore (2007), The EOR relationship _where do we go from here
    7. Denise M. Rousseau (2004), Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in China: Investigating Generalizability and Instrumentality, Journal of Applied Psychology 2004. Vol. 89. No. 2, pg. 311-321
    8. Denise M. Rousseau and Snehal A. Tijoriwala (1998), Assessing Psychological Contracts: Issues, Alternatives and Measures, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 19, pg. 679-695
    9. Elloy, D. F., Everett, J. E., & Flynn, W. R. (1991), An examination of the correlates of job involvement. Group and Organization Studies, pg.160-177
    10. Ho, Violet T;Rousseau, Denise M;Levesque, Laurie L (2006), Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligation, Human Relations; Apr 2006; 59, 4; ProQuest, pg. 459
    11. Kanungo, R. N. (1982), Work alienation: A integrative approach. NY: McCrew-Hil1.
    12. Kanungo, R. N. (1982), Measurement of job and work involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (3), pg. 341-349.
    13. Kaur, R., & N. K. Chadha (1988) A Study of Job Stress with Job Involvement and Job Satisfaction.Indian Journal of Behavior, pg.34-40.
    14. Lawler, E. E. & Hall D. T. (1970), Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement satisfaction and intrinsic motivation, Journal of Applied Psychology
    15. Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965), The definition and measurement of job involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology, pg. 24-33.
    16. Paul R. Sparrow & Cary L. Cooper(2003), The Employment Relationship Key Challenges for HR
    17. Peter Cappelli, Martin J. Conyon (2011), Stock Option Exercise and Gift Exchange Relationships: Evidence for a Large U.S. Company.
    18. P. Matthijs Bal, Paul G.W. Jansen, Mandy E.G. van der Velde, Annet H. de Lange, Denise M. Rousseau (2010),The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers, Journal of Vocational Behavior 76, pg. 474–486
    19. Porter, L.W., & Lawler E.E. (1968), Managerial attitudes and performance, Homewood Ⅲ:Richard D. Irwin, pg. 163-165
    20. Robbins, S. P. (2006), ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 11th edit, NJ:Prentice Hall.
    21. Robinowitz, S. & Hall, D.T.(1977). Organizational research on job involvement, Psychological Bulletin, 84, pg. 265-288.
    22. Rousseau, D.M. and McLean Parks, J. (1993), The contracts of individuals and organizations. In L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Volume 15. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pg. 1–47.
    23. Rousseau (2004, )Mutuality and Reciprocity in the Psychological Contracts of Employees and Employers
    24. Rousseau et (2011), Inducements, contributions, and fulfillment in new employee psychological contracts, Human Resource Management, March–April 2011, Vol. 50, No. 2, pg. 201-226
    25. Ruillermo E. Dabos, Denise M. Rousseau (2004), Mutuality and Reciprocity in the Psychological Contracts of Employees and Employers, Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, vol. 89, pg. 52-72
    26. Russell W. Coff (1997), Human resource and management dilemmas: coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory, Academy of Management Review vol. 22, No. 2, pg. 374-402
    27. Sels, L., Janssens, M., Van den Brande, I. and Overlaet, B. (2002), Assessing the nature of psychological contracts: conceptualisation and measurement. Research Report Department of Applied Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    28. Shore et (2009), Social and economic exchange in the employee-organization relationship: the moderating role of reciprocation wariness
    29. Vroom, V.H. (1964), Work and Motivation, NY: John Wiley& Sons.

    QR CODE
    :::