抗菌胜肽在生命體的先天防禦系統中扮演著重要角色。目前已知抗菌胜肽可藉由在細胞膜上形成孔洞來造成微生物死亡。近年來因為抗生素的濫用，造成許多微生物產生抗藥性。因此研究抗菌胜肽可幫助克服微生物產生抗藥性的問題。
目前已知抗菌胜肽從水溶液中到膜面上形成孔洞有兩步驟：(1)由於抗菌胜肽本身帶有正電荷，會受到微生物細胞上帶有的脂多醣、肽聚醣等帶有負電荷的物質吸引而接近膜面近而吸附至膜面上，(2)當吸附上膜面的胜肽與脂質分子的濃度(P/L)達到門檻濃度((P/L)*)，胜肽將插入膜面，進而行成孔洞。目前已有不少微脂粒的螢光實驗及恆溫滴定微卡計來研究步驟(1)中的電荷效應，但抗菌胜肽吸附至脂膜後的電荷效應尚未被研究完全，本文中利用指向性圓二色光譜儀及多片層X光繞射技術來研究抗菌胜肽吸附至膜面上後，所形成孔洞所需之門檻濃度及抗菌胜肽造成膜厚度的改變量，並藉由膜的彈性模型來分析數據，藉以瞭解抗菌胜肽與脂膜間的電荷效應。
本實驗的結果顯示電荷效應使得門檻濃度稍微的提高，代表胜肽與膜的電荷效應主要作用在步驟(1)。在水溶液中，靜電作用將使得帶有正電的胜肽聚集在帶有負電的膜附近。因此，就算門檻濃度提高，膜附近的胜肽濃度也夠高，可輕易地跨越門檻，進而形成孔洞。

Antimicrobial peptides plays an important role in the innate defense systems of animals and plants. Antimicrobial peptides are known to kill the invading microbes by forming pores in the membrane. Recent years, many microbes exhibit drug resistances due to the overuse of antibiotics. The investigation on antimicrobial peptides should provide the solution to overcome the drug resistance.
There are two steps in the process of antimicrobial peptides binding to membrane to form pores (1) In aqueous solution, the antimicrobial peptides will be attracted by negative charged membranes composed of charged lipids (such as: lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, etc. ) and accumulate around the membrane. Then the peptides will bind to the membrane surface due to hydrophobic interaction. (2) When the concentration of binding peptides excess the threshold concentration ((P / L) *), a part of peptides will change their state to insert into the membrane and form pores. Currently, many fluorescence leakage and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments study the charge effect on the step (1), but the charge effect on the pore formation induced by antimicrobial peptide binding to the membrane has not been clarified. In this thesis, Oriented circular dichroism (OCD) is used to determined the threshold concentration (P/L)* of pore formation and lamellar-lamellar X-ray diffraction (LXD) is used to probe the thinning of membrane thickness due to peptides binding. We used the free energy model based on elastic theory to analyze the data to understand the charge effect on peptide-membrane interaction.
The result shows that the threshold concentration becomes slightly higher due to charge effect. That means the charge effect on peptide-membrane interaction in solution is dominated by step (1). In aqueous solution, the electrostatic interaction will force positive charged peptides to acuminate around the negative charged membrane. Consequently, the local concentration of peptides is high enough to excess the threshold easily even if the threshold is slightly higher.

[1] Singer, S. J., and Nicholson, G. L.. “The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes.” Science 175, pp. 720–731 (1972).
[2] Matanic, V.C.A. and V. Castilla. “Antiviral activity of antimicrobial cationic peptides against Junin virus and herpes simplex virus.” IJAA, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 382 – 389 (2004).
[3] Deng, B., et al. “Correlation of the antibacterial activities of cationic peptide antibiotics and cationic steroid antibiotics.” J. Med. Chem. 45, pp. 663 – 669 (2002).
[4] Robert E W Hancock. ”Cationic peptides effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials.” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Vol. 1, pp. 156 – 164 (2001).
[5] Kim A. Brogde. “Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?” Nature Reviews Microbiology 3, pp. 238-250 (2005).
[6] Zasloff, M. “Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms.” Nature 415 , pp. 389 - 395 (2002).
[7] Chothia, C., et al. “Structure of proteins: Packing of a-helices and pleated sheets.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, pp. 4130 - 4134 (1977).
[8] Giangaspero, A., et al. “Amphipathic ?-helical peptides. A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity.” Eur. J. Biochem. 268, pp. 5589 – 5600 (2001).
[9] Huang, H. W.. “Action of Antimicrobial Peptides: Two-State Model.” Biochem. 39, pp. 8347 – 8352 (2000).
[10] Ke He, et al.“Antimicrobial Peptide Pores in Membranes Detected by Neutron In-Plane Scattering.”Biochem. 34 ,pp. 15614 – 15618 (1995).
[11] Spaar, A., et al. “Conformation of peptides in lipid membranes studied by X-ray gazing incidence scattering.”Biophys. 87, pp. 396 – 407 (2004).
[12] Yang, et al. “Barrel-Stave Model or Toroidal Model? A Case Study on Melittin Pores.”Biophys. J. 81, pp. 1475 – 1485 (2001).
[13] Katsumi Matsuzaki, et al. “An Antimicrobial Peptide, Magainin 2, Induced Rapid Flip-Flop of Phospholipids Coupled with Pore Formation and Peptide Translocation.”Biochem. 35, pp. 11361 – 11368 (1996).
[14] David, I. C., et al. “Tryptophan- and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptides: Structures and mechanisms of action.” Biochim Biophys. Acta, Vol. 1758, Issue 9, pp. 1184 – 1202 (2006).
[15] Matanic, V.C.A. and Vivana, C. “Antiviral activity of antimicrobial cationic peptides against Junin virus and herpes simplex virus.”International Journal of Antimicrobail Agents, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 382 – 389 (2004).
[16] Daniel, P., et al. “Application of a novel analysis to measure the binding of membrane-translocating peptide penetratin to negatively charged lipid.” Biochem. 42, pp. 421 – 429 (2003).
[17] Habermann, E. “Bee and wasp venoms.” Science 177, pp. 314 - 322 (1972).
[18] Dempsey, C. E. “The actions of melittin on membranes.” Biochim Biophys. Acta 1031, pp. 143 - 161 (1990).
[19] Lee, M. T., et al. “Energetics of pore formation induced by membrane active peptides.” Biochemistry 43, pp. 3590 – 3599 (2004).
[20] Benachir, T. and Lafleur, M. “Study of vesicle leakage induced by melittin.” Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1235, pp. 452 - 460 (1995).
[21] Pawlak, M., et al. “Template-assembled melittin: Structural and functional characterization of a designed, synthetic channel-formingprotein.”Protein Sci. 3, pp. 1788 – 1805 (1994).
[22] Vogel, H. and Jahnig, F. “The structure of melittin in membranes.” Biophys. J. 50, pp. 573 – 582 (1986).
[23] Yili, W.. “Method of oriented circular dichroism.” Biophys. J., Vol. 57, pp.797 – 806 (1990).
[24] Wu , Y., et al. “X-Ray Diffraction Study of Lipid Bilayer Membranes Interacting with Amphiphilic Helical Peptides: Diphytanoyl Phosphatidylcholine with Alamethicin at Low Concentrations.” Biophys. J., Vol. 68, pp. 2361 – 2369 (1995).
[25] 陳方玉，黃惠文，「以X光多片層繞射研究生物薄膜」，科儀新知，18卷，六期， pp. 22 – 26 (1997).
[26] Blaurock, A. E.. “Structure of the nerve myelin membrane: Proof of the low-resolution profile.” J. Mol. Biol., Vol. 56, pp. 35 – 52 (1971).
[27] Torbet, J. and Wilkins, M. H. F.. " X-ray diffraction studies of lecithin bilayers." J. Theor. Biol., Vol. 62, Issue 2, pp. 447 – 458 (1976).
[28] Chen, F. Y., et al. “Evidence for Membrane Thinning Effect as the Mechanism for Peptide-Induced Pore Formation.”Biophys. J., Vol. 84, Issue 6, pp. 3751 – 3758 (2003).
[29] Rawicz, W., et al. “Effect of chain length and unsaturation on elasticity of lipid.” Biophys. J., Vol. 79, pp. 328 – 339 (2000).
[30] McIntosh, T. J. and Simon, S. A.. “Area per molecule and distribution of water in fully hydrated dilauroylphosphatidylethanol-amine bilayers.” Biochem. 25, pp. 4948 – 4952 (1986).
[31] Nagle, J. F. and Tristram-Nagle, S. "Structure of lipid bilayers." Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1469, pp. 159 – 95 (2000).
[32] Huang, W. C. and Chen, F. Y.. “The hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface of phospholipid membranes studied by lamellar X-ray.”Chinese J. of Phys., Vol. 41, pp. 85 (2003).
[33] Lee, M. T., et al. “Many-body effect of antimicrobial peptides: on the correlation between lipid’s spontaneous curvature and pore formation.” Biophys. J., Vol. 89, Issue 6, pp. 4006 – 4016 (2005).
[34] Lin, J. H. and Baumgaertner, A. “Stability of a melittin pore in a lipid bilayer: a molecular dynamics study.” Biophys. J., Vol. 78, pp. 1714 – 1724 (2000).