| 研究生: |
張雅筑 Chang-Ya Chu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
報酬與隱私風險對自我揭露意圖之影響 The impact of rewards and privacy risk on self-disclosure intention |
| 指導教授: |
陳炫碩
Shiuann-Shuoh Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 67 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 報酬 、隱私風險 、自我揭露意圖 、心理距離 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科技及大數據技術的興起,隱私問題越來越受到大眾關注,揭露隱私存在著潛在的風險,但人們還是選擇揭露個人的敏感性資訊,這之間的矛盾現象稱為隱私悖論,對於隱私問題的擔憂與自我揭露行為這之間的不一致性尚未被完全解釋,根據文獻指出人們在揭露個人訊息時會權衡於揭露隱私產生的風險及報酬,並最大化預期的收益及成本並作出決策。
根據Trope, Liberman, and Wakslak (2007)提出的CLT理論的心理距離會影響人內心的某個感覺,事件發生的時間離現在越遠或是事件發生的機率越低,在人的心理上感覺越遙遠,事件發生的時間離現在越近或是事件發生的機率越高,在心理上感覺越近,從CLT的觀點了解個人隱私感知與其行為之間的差距,應用在自我揭露的情境中,因此本研究發展一套架構及實驗,用以探討報酬、隱私風險與自我揭露意圖之關係,並且探討心理距離對於報酬、隱私風險與自我揭露意圖之影響。
With the rise of technology and big data technology, privacy issues have attracted more and more attention from the public. There are potential risks in revealing privacy. However, people still choose to disclose personal sensitive information. The gap between privacy concerns and privacy-related behavior is known as the "privacy paradox". The inconsistency between privacy concerns and self-disclosure behavior has not fully explained. The literature argue that when people disclose personal information, they will consider the risks and rewards of revealing privacy. According to the psychological distance of CLT theory proposed by Trope et al. (2007), it will affect a certain feeling psychologically. The greater the temporal or hypothetical from an event, the more distant it appears and the more abstractly. For example, an event is more psychologically distant as it takes place farther into the future, and as it is less likely to occur. Using a CLT perspective in the context of self-disclosure, we develop a framework and experiment to understand the relationship between rewards, privacy risks and self-disclosure intentions, and exploring the impact of psychological distance on rewards, privacy risks and self-disclosure intentions.
Acquisti, A. (2004). Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce.
Acquisti, A., & Grossklags, J. (2005). Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security & Privacy, 3(1), 26-33.
Ansari, A., & Mela, C. F. (2003). E-customization. Journal of marketing research, 40(2), 131-145.
Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research: Nelson Education.
Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9).
Bennett, C. J. (1995). The political economy of privacy: a review of the literature. Hackensack, NJ: Center for Social and Legal Research.
Budnitz, M. E. (1998). Privacy protection for consumer transactions in electronic commerce: why self-regulation is inadequate. South Carolina Law Review, 49, 847.
Campbell, J. E., & Carlson, M. (2002). Panopticon. com: Online surveillance and the commodification of privacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(4), 586-606.
Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in Person Perception1 Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 3-52): Elsevier.
Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A. K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83-108.
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80.
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.
Greene, K. (2000). Disclosure of chronic illness varies by topic and target: The role of stigma and boundaries in willingness to disclose. Balancing the secrets of private disclosures, 123-135.
Hallam, C., & Zanella, G. (2017). Online self-disclosure: The privacy paradox explained as a temporally discounted balance between concerns and rewards. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 217-227.
Hampson, S. E., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(1), 37.
Hann, I. H., Hui, K. L., Lee, S. Y. T., & Png, I. P. L. (2008). Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information-processing theory approach. .Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 13-42.
Hillsdale, N., & Erlbaum, L. (1978). Principles of Categorization. Cognition and categorization, 27-48.
Hui, K. L., Teo, H. H., & Lee, T. S. Y. (2007). The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 19-33.
Jiang, Z., Heng, C. S., & Choi, B. C. (2013). Research note—privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 579-595.
Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 287-297.
Laufer, R. S., & Wolfe, M. (1977). Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional developmental theory. Journal of social Issues, 33(3), 22-42.
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 25(1), 217-244.
Lee, H., Park, H., & Kim, J. (2013). Why do people share their context information on Social Network Services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users' behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk. International journal of human-computer studies, 71(9), 862-877.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 5.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 353-383.
Madden, M. (2014). Public perceptions of privacy and security in the post-Snowden era. Pew Research Center, 12.
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
Milne, G. R., & Gordon, E. M. (1993). Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2), 206-215.
Mullainathan, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2000). Behavioral economics. Retrieved from
O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2001). Choice and procrastination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 121-160.
Omarzu, J. (2000a). A Disclosure Decision Model: Determining How and When. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 174-185.
Omarzu, J. (2000b). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 174-185.
Petronio, S. (2012). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure: Suny Press.
Petronio, S., & Bantz, C. (1991). Research Note: Controlling the Ramifications of Disclosure:Don't Tell Anybody but. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10(4), 263-269.
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management science, 37(7), 770-786.
Preston, J. (2004). Judge strikes down section of patriot act allowing secret subpoenas of Internet data. New York Times, 30, 26.
Rachlin, H., Castrogiovanni, A., & Cross, D. (1987). Probability and delay in commitment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48(3), 347-353.
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233-244.
Schoeman, F. D. (1984). Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology: Cambridge University Press.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(4), 558.
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American economic review, 49(3), 253-283.
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989-1016.
Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473-482.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological review, 93(3), 239.
Trope, Y. (1989). Levels of inference in dispositional judgment. Social Cognition, 7(3), 296-314.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
Viswanathan, S., Kuruzovich, J., Gosain, S., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Online infomediaries and price discrimination: Evidence from the automotive retailing sector. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 89-107.
Wald, M. L. (2004). Airline Gave Government Information on Passengers. The New York Times, 16-16.
Weber, B. J., & Chapman, G. B. (2005). The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(2), 104-118.
Wheeless, L. R. (1976). Self‐disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: Measurement, validation, and relationships. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 47-61.
Xu, H., Luo, X. R., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision support systems, 51(1), 42-52.
Yuan, M. (2012). A private sphere: democracy in a digital age: Taylor & Francis.