跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張勝原
Sheng-Yuan Chang
論文名稱: 增值型指數基金在台灣股市之績效研究
The Performance of Enhanced Index Fund in Taiwan
指導教授: 何中達
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系
Department of Finance
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: 自建標竿指數追蹤誤差增值型指數基金台灣加權股價指數
外文關鍵詞: Taiwan stock index, tracking error, enhanced index fund, benchmark
相關次數: 點閱:15下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用Lo(2008)所使用的五大策略類別,包括:價值、成長、動能、獲利及技術指標策略作為選股篩選的依據。在控制追蹤誤差於2%以下,求得使預期報酬Z-score極大化的資產配置,並在1999年3月到2009年12以月頻率建構使用不同策略的增值型指數基金。本研究目標除了檢視各種策略所建構的增值型指數基金在台灣市場的績效表現,同時也提供給未來有意發行此被動操作型態基金的證券商作為參考依據。其相關結論如下:除了價格動能策略,以傳統價值策略、相對價值策略、歷史成長策略、獲利趨勢策略、銷貨加速策略、價格反轉策略及小公司策略所建構的增值型指數基金年化平均報酬率優於台灣加權股價指數。在考量風險後,檢視各策略夏普比率,傳統價值策略、相對價值策略、價格反轉策略及小公司策略同時優於台灣加權股價指數及自建標竿指數。各策略資訊比率最高前三名依序為價格反轉策略、傳統價值策略及小公司策略。新的合成策略績效表現在年化平均報酬率優於台灣加權股價指數2.41%,各策略Z-score因等權重加總而弱化其預測性的現象並不顯著。


    In this paper, We adopt Lo(2008) using simple factors, include value, growth, profitability, momentum, and technical factors, to rank stocks and standard methods for constructing enhanced index funds based on these rankings. The investment goal of enhanced index funds is to acquire more returns than benchmark and restrict the tracking error less than 2 percent. The portfolios using different strategies rebalance on a monthly basis. The empirical results show that: (1) Except for the price momentum strategy, the performance of enhanced index funds built from traditional value factor, relative value factor, historical growth factor, profit trends factor, accelerating sales factor, price reversal factor, and small size factor do better than Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index(TWSI) and the benchmark we construct in the paper in average yearly returns. (2) Examining the Sharp ratio of all strategies, we find traditional value factor, relative value factor, price reversal factor, sales accelerating factor and small size factor do better than TWSI and the benchmark which we construct. (3) Considered the information ratio, The top three are the enhanced fund built from price reversal factor, traditional value factor and small size factor. (4) The average yearly return from the enhanced index built from composite strategy is higher than TWSI by 2.41 percent .

    目    錄 中文摘要 ………………………………………………………… i 英文摘要 ………………………………………………………… ii 誌謝 ………………………………………………………… iii 目錄 ………………………………………………………… iv 圖目錄 ………………………………………………………… v 表目錄 ………………………………………………………… vi 一、 緒論…………………………………………………… 1 1-1 研究動機……………………………………………… 1 1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………… 3 1-3 研究架構…………………………………………………… 3 二、 文獻回顧……………………………………………… 4 2-1 增值型指數基金…………………………………………… 4 2-2 指數型基金的建構方法…………………………………… 8 三、 研究方法……………………………………………… 9 3-1 研究對象與資料來源……………………………………… 9 3-2 變數選取及處理方法……………………………………… 9 3-3 增值型指數基金之建構與再調整………………………… 17 3-4 績效評估指標……………………………………………… 18 四、 實證結果分析………………………………………… 21 4-1 策略績效表現……………………………………………… 21 4-2 價值因子群組……………………………………………… 22 4-3 成長因子群組……………………………………………… 26 4-4 獲利因子群組……………………………………………… 28 4-5 動能因子群組……………………………………………… 32 4-6 技術面因子群組…………………………………………… 34 4-7 合成策略…………………………………………………… 38 4-8 小節………………………………………………………… 41 五、 結論與建議…………………………………………… 42 5-1 結論………………………………………………………… 42 5-2 後續研究建議……………………………………………… 43 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 44

    參考文獻
    1.Alex Frino, David R. Gallagher, Teddy N. Oetomo, The index tracking strategies of passive and enhanced index equity fund, 2005, Australian Journal of Management,30.
    2.Andrews, C., D. Ford & K. Mallison, 1986, The design of index funds and alternative replication, The Investment Analysis, October, 16-23.
    3.Arnott, R., J. Hsu, and P. Moore, 2005, Fundamental indexation, Financial Analysts Journal 61, 83-99.
    4.Collins, B. M. and F. J. Fabozzi (1989), Portfolio and Investment Management, Probus Publishing Company, 183-200.
    5.DiBartolomeo, D., 2000, The enhanced index fund as an alternative to indexed equity management. Working paper, Northfield Information Services, Boston, MA.
    6.Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. Das and M. Hlavka, 1993, Efficiency with costly information: a reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios, Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1), 1-22.
    7.Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth, R. French ,1996, Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies, Journal of Finance, 51, 55-84.
    8.Grinold, R. and R. Kahn, 2000. Active Portfolio Management (McGraw-Hill, New York).
    9.Hsu, Jason, 2006, Cap-Weighted Portfolios are Sub-optimal Portfolios, Journal of Investment Management, 4(3), 1–10.
    10.Meckel, T. S. and T. Miller (1999), Beating index funds with derivatives, Journal of Portfolio Management, 25 (5), 75-87.
    11.Jensen, Michael C., 1968,The performance of mutual funds in the period of mutual fund 1945-1964 , Journal of Finance 23, 389-416.
    12.Jorion, P. , 2002, Enhanced index funds and tracking error optimization, Working paper, University of California at Irvine.
    13.Jorion, P. , 2003, Portfolio optimization with tracking-error constraints, Financial Analysts Journal, 59 (5), 70-82.
    14.Lee, C. and S. Rahman, 1990, Market timing,selectivity, and mutual fund performance:an empirical investigation, Journal of Business, 63, 261-278.
    15.Lo, Andrew W., and Pankaj N. Patel, 2008, 130/30: The new long-only, Journal of Portfolio Management 34, 12-38.
    16.Malkiel, B. G. ,1995, Returns from investing in equity mutual funds, 1971-1991,Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572.
    17.Patel, P., H. Barefoot, S. Yao, and R. Carlson, 2007a, Achieving higher alpha,Technical report, Credit Suisse Quantitative Equity Research.
    18.Patel, P., H. Barefoot, S. Yao, and R. Carlson, 2007b, Achieving higher alpha (Part 2),Technical report, Credit Suisse Quantitative Equity Research.
    19.Rudd, A. ,1980, Optimal selection of passive portfolios, Financial Management, 4, 57-66.
    20.Parvez Ahmed, Sudhir Nanda, 2005, Performance of enhanced index and Quantitative Equity Funds, The Financial Review 40(4), 459-479.
    21.Riepe, M. and M. Werner, 1998, Are enhanced index mutual funds worthy of their name?Journal of Investing, 7(2), 6–15.
    22.朱岳中, 2006, The performance of enhanced return index fund, 國立中正大學財務金融研究所博士論文.

    QR CODE
    :::