| 研究生: |
楊馥慈 Fu-Tzu Yang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
借券費率對未來股票報酬率之影響 |
| 指導教授: | 徐政義 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 39 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 借券費率 、借券餘額 、股票報酬率 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:16 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文主要探討借券費率對未來股票報酬率之關聯性,將台灣2013年1月至2017年12月上市(櫃)普通股,每月將股票借券費率取平均值或是中位數,依照排序分為三個投資組合: 「高借券費率」、「中借券費率」、以及「低借券費率」;依照每月月底股票借券餘額市值佔流通在外市值比率,分為三個投資組合: 「高借券餘額」、「中借券餘額」、以及「低借券餘額」,並且觀察各投資組合於後續兩個月(T+1、T+2)的月報酬率。研究發現,在高借券餘額投資組合中,高借券費率投資組合的未來報酬表現比中借券費率與低借券費率投資組合報酬率差,顯示在借券需求程度高時,放空成本高會造成股票被高估,進而造成後續表現不佳。
This paper examines the lending fee rate and stock returns during the period from 2013 to 2017. The result shows that the return of high lending fee rate portfolio performs worse than return of low lending fee rate portfolio. The paper then adds on open-interest factor to exam the portfolio return. However, portfolio with high lending fee rate and high open-interest tends to performs the worst. It shows that the stocks with high demand but hard to achieve won’t perform well compared with stocks with low costs.
中文文獻
1. 林崇英,我國證券借貸與信用交易制度概述,台灣證券交易所。
2. 張文毅,我國有價證券借貸市場的過去、現況與未來,台灣證券交易所。
3. 陳美齡,有價證券借貸之資訊皆露,台灣證券交易所。
4. 黃執敬 (2009),「台灣證券借貸市場借券費率之實證研究」,國立中央大學財務金融所碩士論文。
5. 陳家懿 (2012),「借券賣出與股價報酬率之實證研究」,國立中央大學財務金融所碩士論文。
6. 曾郁芳 (2015),「證券借貸市場借券費率決定因子:以台灣借券資料之實證」,國立中央大學財務金融所碩士論文。
英文文獻
Asquith, P., & Meulbroek, L. K. (1995). An empirical investigation of short interest.
Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
Asquith, P., Pathak, P. A., & Ritter, J. R. (2005). Short interest, institutional ownership, and
stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 243-276.
Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., & Zhang, X. (2008). Which shorts are informed? The Journal of
Finance, 63(2), 491-527.
Boehmer, E., Huszar, Z. R., & Jordan, B. D. (2010). The good news in short interest.
Journal of Financial Economics, 96(1), 80-97.
Boehmer, E., & Wu, J. (2012). Short selling and the price discovery process. The Review of
Financial Studies, 26(2), 287-322.
Bris, A., Goetzmann, W. N., & Zhu, N. (2007). Efficiency and the bear: Short sales and
markets around the world. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1029-1079.
Cohen, L., Diether, K. B., & Malloy, C. J. (2007). Supply and demand shifts in the shorting
market. The Journal of Finance, 62(5), 2061-2096.
D’avolio, G. (2002). The market for borrowing stock. Journal of financial economics, 66(2-
3), 271-306.
Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., Meulbroek, L., & Sloan, R. G. (2001). Short-sellers,
fundamental analysis, and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(1), 77-106.
Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1987). Constraints on short-selling and asset price
adjustment to private information. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(2), 277-311.
Diether, K. B., Lee, K. H., & Werner, I. M. (2008). Short-sale strategies and return
predictability. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 575-607.
Duffie, D., Garleanu, N., & Pedersen, L. H. (2002). Securities lending, shorting, and
pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(2-3), 307-339.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial
economics, 116(1), 1-22.
Figlewski, S. (1981). The informational effects of restrictions on short sales: Some
empirical evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16(4), 463-476.
Jones, C. M., & Lamont, O. A. (2002). Short-sale constraints and stock returns. Journal of
Financial Economics, 66(2-3), 207-239.
Kelley, E. K., & Tetlock, P. C. (2016). Retail short selling and stock prices. The Review of
Financial Studies, 30(3), 801-834.
Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. The Journal of
finance, 32(4), 1151-1168.
Reed, A. V. (2002). Costly short-selling and stock price adjustment to earnings
announcements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).