工作家庭平衡措施之支持程度對員工留任意願之影響—以組織承諾為中介變項

本研究主要探討工作家庭平衡措施之支持程度與員工留任之意願關係，以及組織承諾在兩者間的中介效果。
本研究採用問卷調查法，以台灣企業之員工為主要研究對象，取樣對象為27家公司，發出500份問卷，共回收397份有效問卷，有效回收率為79.4%，透過信度分析、迴歸分析，來研究變數之間的影響關係，以驗證本研究之假設。
研究結果顯示：
(1)工作家庭平衡措施之支持程度與員工留任意願有顯著的正向關係。
(2)工作家庭平衡措施之支持程度與員工組織承諾有顯著的正向關係。
(3)組織承諾對其兩者也有部份中介效果，所設定之假設驗證皆成立。
本研究之主要貢獻在於企業對工作家庭平衡措施之支持程度會確實影響員工的留任意願，且企業提供之不同面向（工作、家庭、健康）的措施對組織承諾也有正向的影響關係，透過研究驗證，可作為台灣企業在制訂工作家庭平衡不同面向政策之參考依據。

The study of impact of Work-Family Programs on employee Retention Intention – The Mediation effect of Organizational Commitment

This study focuses on whether Work-Family Program affects employee Retention Intention and the Mediation effect of Organizational Commitment on the relationships between these two factors.
In this study, the questionnaire survey method was adopted, employees as the main target, issued 500 questionnaires for 27 companies and 397 usable responses were obtained, got a response rate of 79.4 percent.
The analysis techniques are reliability analysis and regression analysis for verify the hypothesis of the research.
The research results are following：
1. Work-Family Program has significantly positive effect on employee Retention intention.
2. Work-Family Program has significantly positive effect on Organizational Commitment.
3. Both of Work-Family Program and employee Retention intention are partially mediated by Organizational Commitment, hypothesis is true.
Contribution of this study focus on Work-Family Program affect employee Retention intention, the different oriented action provided by company has significantly positive effect on Organizational Commitment, as implementing Work-Family Program’s reference for Taiwanese enterprises.

中文文獻：
1. 李元墩、鐘志明和林育理，「台灣企業員工組織承諾衡量模式建構之研究」，成大學報，第35卷人文社會篇，第133至157頁，民國89年。
2. 林町達，「工作家庭措施與工作家庭氣候對家庭工作衝突之影響-以組織支持感知為中介」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國103年。
3. 林佳蓉，「員工福利滿意對工作態度之影響─以知覺組織支持為中介變項」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國95年。
4. 林俊宏，「彈性福利制度對員工福利滿意度、工作投入和組織承諾的影響」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國97年。
5. 高鳳詩，「政府部門派遺勞工組織承諾之探討」，國立政治大學勞工研究所，碩士論文，民國96年。
6. 張力洋、張元泰和許吉慶，「正職與派遣員工公平認知對工作投入與留任意願之影響」，國立高雄海洋科技大學供應管理系，專題論文，民國104年。
7. 許永忠，「組織特性、員工福利、員工態度之關聯性研究─以北部地區服務業員工為實證對象」，中原大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。民國90年。
8. 許菁容，「員工福利措施對勞資關係影響之研究」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文。民國90年。
9. 陳家銘，「法定非法定工作家庭平衡措施對員工工作態度之影響-以C公司為例」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國99年。
10. 陳家銘，「工作家庭平衡措施滿意度對員工工作態度之影響─以知覺組織支持為中介變項」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國99年。
11. 黃煥榮，「運用友善家庭政策平衡工作與家庭－理論與經驗的初探」，人事月刊，第48期第1卷，2-18頁，民國97年。

12. 鄭麗嬌，「美國育嬰休假政策之探討」，政大勞動學報，第20期，49-96頁，民國95年。
13. 鍾錦季，「台灣地區企業福利制度之研究」，國立中正大學勞工研究所，碩士論文，民國90年。
14. 黃漢華：「遠見雜誌：台灣人 你的壓力破表了嗎？」。2015年7月，
取自：https://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_29151.html。
15. 行政院主計處：15歲以上民間人口之婚姻、年齡與勞動力狀況。2017年1月23日，取自：http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct_view.asp?xItem=40811&ctNode=3102。
16. 勞動部工作生活平衡網：工作悠活、家庭樂活、健康快活內容。2015年2月26日，取自：https://wlb.mol.gov.tw/Page/Content.aspx?id=38。

 
英文文獻：
1. Arnold＆Feldman,“A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology，Vol67(3),pp.359, 1982.
2. Baron, R.M.,& Kenny, D.A., ”The moderator-mediator variable distinction is social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6),1173-1182, 1986.
3. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMasgtro, V., “Perceived organizational support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3):500-507, 1990.
4. Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A. & Walters, S.,” Opportunities to Work at　Home in the Context of Work-Life Balance”, Human Resource Management Journal, 12(1): 54-76, 2002.
5. Frone, M. R., Yardley, J.K., & Markel, K.S., ”Developing and Testing an Integrative Model of the Work-Family Interface”, Journal of Vocational Behavior,50:145-167, 1997.
6. Genevieve, “Has it obstructed nursing’s view”, Nursing administration, Vol.14, pp.70-75, 1990.
7. Goodstein, J., “Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer　Involvement in Work-Family Issues”, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 350–82, 1994.
8. Grover, S.L & Crooker, K.J, ”Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: the impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents”, Personnel Psychology, 48(2):271-288,1995.
9. Hwang, Ing-San & Kuo , Jyh-Huei ,”Effects of Job Satisfaction and Perceived Alternative Employment Opportunities on Turnover Intention - An Examination of Public Sector Organizations”, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 8(2)：254-259, 2006.
10. Ingram, P. & Simons, T., ”Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(5):1466-1482,1995.
11. Kanter, R.M. ,”Commitment and social organization: Study of commitment mechanisms in utopian commitment”, American Sociological Review ,33,499-517, 1968.
12. Konrad, A.M. & Mangel, R, ”The impact of work-live programs on firm productivity”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(12):1225-1237,2000.
13. Konard, A.M. & Mangel, R., ”The impact of work: Life programs on firm
Productivity”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(12): 1225-1237, 2000.
14. Lincoln, J. & Kalleberg, A., ”Culture, Control, and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Artifacts in the United States and Japan”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
15. Lobel, S.A., ”Impacts of Diversity and Work-Life Initiatives in Organizations. In G.N. Powell (ed.)”, Handbook of Gender and Work (pp.453-476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,1999.
16. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Gellatly, I R.,” Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 710-720, 1990.
17. Osterman, P., ”Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 681-702,1995.
18. Reichers, A.E ,” A review and Reconceptualization of Organization Commitment”, Academy of Management Review, 10(3),pp.456-76, 1985.
19. Sheldon, M.E., “Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(2), pp.143-150, 1971.
20. Simkin, C. & Hiliage, J., “Family-friendly Working: New Hope or Old Hype?”, IMS report, no. 224, Brighton : Institute of Manpower Studies, 1992.
21. Steers, R.M., “Antecedents and Outcomes of organizational commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.220,March 1977.
22. Steven, J.M., Beyer, J.M. and Trice, H.M.,” Assessing Personal, Role and Organization Predictors of Managerial Commitment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.21 (1), pp.382,1978.
23. Suchman, M. C., “Managing Legitimacy : Strategic and Institutional Approaches”, Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610, 1995.
24. Tett &Meyer, “Job satisfaction organizational commitment”, New York: Simon &Schuster ,1993.
25. Thompson, C.A., Bearvais, L.L., & Lynees, K.S., ”When Work-Family Benefits Are Not Enough: The Influence of Work-Family Culture on Benefit Utilization, Organizational Attachment, and Work-Family Conflict” ,Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 392-415, 1999.
26. Wiener, Y., “Commitment In Organization: A Normative View”, Academy of Management Review, 7, 418-428, 1982.
27. Wood, S. J. Menezes, L. M. & Lasaosa, A., “Family-Friendly Management in reat Britain: Testing Various Perspectives”, Industrial Relations, 42(2): 221-250, 2003.
28. Wood, S., “Family-friendly management: testing the various perspectives”, National Institute Economic Review, 168: 99-116, 1999.