| 研究生: |
康家豪 CHIA-HAO KANG |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台之開發與初步評估 Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Self-direct Learning E-Portfolios Platform for Science Inquiry |
| 指導教授: | 吳穎沺 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 119 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 專題導向學習 、自主學習 、自我導向學習 、科學探究 、學習歷程 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自主學習在 108 年新課綱中加入後,成為了一門重要的高中課程,其目的是為了培
養學生的自發性並達到終生學習的理念,而自主學習對於學生而言也是未來生活、工
作的重要基礎能力。根據文獻與實際的教學場域經驗的觀察,發現自主學習、科學探
究與學習歷程是具有很多的困難與問題,因此本研究開發「自我導向科學探究學習歷
程平台」,提供學生專案管理的工具,可以更有規劃性的按照階段完成專題,並且回
顧學習歷程檔案達到自我的反思與調節,加上合適的鷹架與互動工具,提供學生更好
的線上專題學習環境,進而提升學習成效。在上述平台開發完成後,本研究採用「問
卷調查法」對系統進行的初步評估,針對 43 位高中學生進行問卷資料蒐集,藉此評估
學生對於「自我導向科學探究學習歷程平台」之「科技接受度」、「鷹架功能與互動
工具的知覺有用性」並蒐集受測者的建議與回饋。對實驗後的問卷資料進行統計分析
與討論,根據統及分析的結果得以發現受測之學生對於本研究之研究問題皆為正向回
應,最後透過學生給予的建議與回饋,在進一步改善系統,使系統更加符合教學現
場。
After 108 curriculum guidelines had published, self-direct learning became an important
course in high school. The aimed to train student’s driven themselves and achieved lifelong
learning. Besides, self-direct learning is important base skills for student in future life.
According to literature review and high school teacher’s experience, we found that self-direct
learning, science inquiry and portfolio had many difficulties and problems. Thus, in this
research’s we develop a self-direct platform, SDLI. In this platform, we provided project
management tools to help students planning their project’s schedule and provided e-portfolios
to help students reviewed their learning portfolios in order to make reflection. Also supported
suitable scaffolds and tools, provides students a better learning environment. After SDLI was
developed, this research would use questionnaire to survey 43 high school students, then
evaluated the technology acceptance of SDLI and the observed usefulness of scaffolds and
tools on SDLI. The analyses and results show that most of participants gave positive feedback
in this survey. Through the suggestions and feedback, we would improve the SDLI and made
it more suitable in reality.
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北:教育部。
吳茹茜(2021)。高中生自主學習現況與問題之探討─以丹鳳高中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
陳又齊(2022)。以想法為中心的多維度跨域專題學習平台之開發與初步評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學網路學習研究所。
蔡宛庭(2016)。支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學網路學習研究所。
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Berger, F., Schreiner, C., Hagleitner, W., Jesacher-Rößler, L., Roßnagl, S., & Kraler, C. (2021). Predicting Coping With Self-Regulated Distance Learning in Times of COVID-19: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 701255-701255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701255
Cavaller, V. (2011). Portfolios for entrepreneurship and self-evaluation of higher education institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.005
Chiang, C.-L., & Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 709-712. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779
Council, N. R. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
Council, N. R. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/9596
Cudney, E., & Kanigolla, D. (2014). Measuring the Impact of Project-Based Learning in Six Sigma Education. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 4(3), 272-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488289.2014.930546
Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 45(8), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248
Hovey, K. A., & Ferguson, S. L. (2014). TEACHER PERSPECTIVES AND EXPERIENCES: Using Project-Based Learning With Exceptional and Diverse Students [Article]. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 16(1/2), 77-90. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tfh&AN=99392000&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting Students “Partially” Involved in Note-Taking Using Graphic Organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R. A., SWANSON, R., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. na.
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2 ed., pp. 275-297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of research in science teaching, 43(7), 607-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20141
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self‐regulated learning. New directions for teaching and learning, 1995(63), 3-12.
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Chapter 10 - The Development of Academic Self-Regulation: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp. 249-284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: Graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.455
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Sale, D. (2020). Creative Teachers: Self-Directed Learners. Springer Singapore Pte. Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3469-0
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010
Väljataga, T., & Fiedler, S. (2009). Supporting students to self-direct intentional learning projects with social media. Educational technology & society, 12(3), 58-69.
Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance education, 34(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific journal of teacher education, 36(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802232779
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Chen, F. (2018). Effects of a mobile self-regulated learning approach on students' learning achievements and self-regulated learning skills. Innovations in education and teaching international, 55(6), 616-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1259080
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Chapter 2 - Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2