現今學生吸收新知的時候，常會利用網路上的豐富資訊以彌補
文本內容之不足，藉此解決疑惑、得到更完整的知識。但是有時在
網路上也找不到滿意的解答，又無法即時尋求有能力的親友協助的
話，那麼在論壇跟其他學生互相交流、一起討論找出答案也是一種
可行的方案。
　　但是由於論壇是獨立於文本而運作，因此針對特定文本內容
（例如針對某個章節的某個概念）的討論總是散落在茫茫文串之
中，即使用關鍵字搜尋也經常連帶找到其他不相關範圍的討論，必
須要進一步過濾才能找到有興趣的內容。此外，當學生提出了一個
新的問題，他就必須時時回去看看是否有人回答；或是想要繼續未
完的討論的時候，也得先從論壇裡把那些主題找出來。
　　在這種情況下追蹤問題的討論進度需要花費不少多餘的工夫，
也可能造成學生發問與討論的意願下降。因此我們提出把問題的追
蹤機制結合於文本之上的架構，讓學生在學習某個範圍的文本內容
的時候，總是能夠輕易地找到跟這些內容相關的討論，並且將有興
趣的討論串列管，以隨時獲得、或是去定義這些討論的一些狀態，
這樣就可以提醒自己哪裡可能有目前值得關注的討論內容。

Students usually turn to on-line information when they
study. Thus they can make up for the infertility of the
textbook contents, solving their questions and acquiring
more complete knowledge. However, sometimes students can
not find satisfying solution on the web, then except for
asking somebody in real-life, they can also post a
question on the forum and discuss with others in the forum
to come up with a proper answer.
　　However, because the forum is independent from the
textbook, discussions that aimed at some particular
concepts in the textbook is scattered all over the whole
forum. Even if students use keywords to search, they
always find other matterless discussions and have to spend
much time picking up useful discussion-threads they really
interested in. Moreover, when students post new questions,
they must frequently go back to the threads to check if
someone has answered their questions. And, when they need
to keep discussing with others in some threads, each time
they should search out the threads in the forum before
that.
　　Tracing the progression of discussion threads waste
much time and effort, inducing students’ unwillingness to
ask questions and discuss in an on-line forum. Hence we
propose a framework to combine Q&A management mechanism
with the textbook content. In such way, students can
easily find related discussions in the forum when they
read textbook, and they can subscribe interested threads
and monitor the status and progression of the threads.
These information help students to decide which thread is
worth reading in current context.

[1]邱聖霖，"以支持閱讀策略為基礎整合網路資源社群的紙本教科
　　書閱讀系統"，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2008。
[2]趙伯堯，"為研讀紙本教科書設計之線上學習支援系統"，國立中
　　央大學資訊工程研究所博士論文，2009。
[3]谷圳，"朝向無縫式的註記與發問學習輔助系統"，國立中央大學
　　資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2004。
[4]連啟宏，"以知識座標地圖為基礎之線上學習支援系統"，國立中
　　央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2003。
[5]鄭勝仁，"具學習支援及診斷之線上電子書學習系統"，國立中央
　　大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2003。
[6]范銘傑，"以概念圖為基礎的紙本教科書數位學習支援系統"，國
　　立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，2009。
[7] Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). 　　
　　Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of 　
　　the Intervention Studies. Review of Educational 　　　
　　Research Summer, 66(2), 181-221.
[8] Flammer, A. (1981). Towards a Theory of Question 　　　
　　Asking. Psychol Res, 43, 407-420.
[9] Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R. & Pearson, 　
　　D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on
　　reading comprehension instruction. Review of 　　　　　
　　Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
[10] Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Best 　　
　　Practices in Promoting Reading Comprehension in 　　　
　　Students with Learning Disabilities: 1976 to 1996. 　　
　　Remedial and Special Education, 18(4), 197-214.
[11] Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we 　　
　　asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist,
　　32(1) , 1 – 19.
[12] Gall, M. D. (1970).The use of questions in teaching.
　　Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 707-721.
[13] Hwang, W. -Y., Wang, C. -Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A
　　study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials.
　　Computers & Education, 48, 680–699.
[14] Marginalia. (n. d.). Retrieved June 27, 2010, from 　
　　http://www.geof.net/code/annotation
[15] Rau, P. -L. P., Chen, S. -H., & Chin, Y. -T. (2004).
　　Developing web annotation tools for learners and 　　　
　　instructors. Interacting with Computers, 16(2), 163-　
　　181.
[16] Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: A 　　
　　Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation. 　　　　　
　　Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2&3), 313 - 334.
[17] Imarkup. (n. d.). Retrieved June 27, 2010, from
http://www.softking.com.tw/soft/clickcount.asp?　　　　
　　fid3=2453
[18] Stifelman, L., Arons, B., & Schmandt, C. (2001). The
　　audio notebook: paper and pen interaction with 　　　　
　　structured speech. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI 　　　
　　conference on Human factors in computing systems, 　　
　　Seattle, WA, USA, 182-189.
[19] Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W. Answer Garden 2:
　　Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help.
　　In Proceedings of CSCW’96 (Boston MA, November 1996),
　　ACM Press, 97-105.
[20] Brush, A. J. B. (2002). Annotating Digital Documents
　　for Asynchronous Collaboration.Unpublished PhD Thesis,
　　University of Washington, Washington.
[21] Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion
　　through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of
　　the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437-470.
[22] Gomez, L. M., Fishman, B. J., & Pea, R. D. (1998). 　
　　The CoVis Project: Building a Large-Scale Science 　　
　　Education Testbed. Interactive Learning Environments,
　　6 (1&2), 59-92.
[23] Ryser, G. R., Beeler, J.E., & McKenzie, C. (1995). 　
　　Effects of a computer-supported intentional learning 　
　　environment (CSILE) on students'' self-concept, self-　
　　regulatory behaviour, and critical thinking ability. 　
　　Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(4), 375-
　　385.
[24] Komica. (n. d.). Retrieved June 27, 2010, from 　　　
　　http://www.komica.org
[25] Wolfe, J. (2008). Annotations and the collaborative 　
　　digital library: Effects　of an aligned annotation 　　
　　interface on student argumentation and reading 　　　　
　　strategies. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,
　　3, 141–164.
[26] Chen, G. –D., Liu, C. –C., Ou, K. –L., & Lin, M. –
　　S. (2001). Web learning portfolios : a tool for 　　　
　　supporting performance awareness. Innovations in 　　　
　　Education & Teaching International, 38(1), 19-30.
[27] Chen, G.-D., & Chao, P.-Y. (2008). Augmenting 　　　　
　　Traditional Books with Context-Aware Learning Supports
　　from Online Learning Communities. Educational 　　　　
　　Technology & Society, 11(2), 27-40.
[28] Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). "It is what one 　　
　　does": why people participate and help others in 　　　
　　electronic communities of practice. Journal of 　　　　
　　Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.