跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 潘謙儀
Chien-Yi Pan
論文名稱: 敘事化廣告之典型性與認知風格對品牌成效之影響
指導教授: 陳冠儒
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 敘事化廣告類型典型性認知風格類型廣告態度品牌態度購買意圖品牌信任度品牌黏著度
外文關鍵詞: narrative advertisement type, typicality, cognitive style, attitude toward the ad, attitude toward the brand, purchase intention, brand trust, brand attachment
相關次數: 點閱:10下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,敘事化逐漸的運用在廣告行銷領域當中,不同類別的品牌或是產品利用敘事化廣告來吸引消費者、降低傳統廣告所帶來的負面觀感。此篇研究以典型理論、分類理論、廣告不一致理論、基模觸發影響等等相關的理論基礎來定義敘事化廣告的典型性,並探究其對消費者行為所產生的影響。另外,在消費者認知風格方面本研究運用認知風格理論中的雙元認知風格來進一步探討理性認知風格與經驗性認知風格的消費者在接觸敘事化廣告的同時是否存在行為差異。
    本研究採實驗設計法,以敘事化廣告來做為實驗刺激物,針對240位國立中央大學大學部學生做調查。本研究為二因子實驗設計,由敘事化廣告的類型(典型vs.非典型)與認知風格類型(理性vs.經驗性)兩自變數設計出四個不同的研究組別,針對品牌效益相關概念(廣告態度、品牌態度、購買意圖、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度)的影響作分析研究。
    研究發現,不論是在典型或是非典型的敘事化廣告類別上,對於品牌相關概念效益基本都是經驗性認知風格的表現優於理性認知風格。理性認知風格只有在敘事化廣告是典型性時,品牌黏著度的表現才會優於非典型的敘事化廣告。本研究的理論貢獻是創立一套依據典型性對於敘事化廣告的分類概念以及其對消費者行為之影響。在實務上,研究結果建議必須先針對敘事化廣告的類別與消費者的認知風格類型做策略上的區別,以達到對於消費者的精準行銷。


    In recent years, many worldwide brands and companies are using narrative advertisements to attract consumers and reduce negative impression in the marketing field. Building on theories such as typical theory, category theory, ad incongruence theory, and schema triggered affect theory, this study conceptualizes typicality of narrative ads and explores how such ads shape consumer behavior. To further evaluate consumers’ behavioral differences, the dual-process view in consumer cognitive is applied to compare the advertising effectiveness between rational cognitive or experience cognitive consumers.
    A two-factor (narrative advertisement type: typicality vs. atypicality and cognitive style: rational vs. experience) between-subject experimental design method was employed to stimulate 240 National Central University students’ reactions including attitude toward the ad, attitude toward the brand, purchasing intention, brand trust, and brand attachment.
    The results showed that both typical and atypical narrative ads were more effective for experience cognitive consumers than rational cognitive consumers in terms of the brand outcomes. The rational cognitive consumers only performed better than experience cognitive consumers on brand attachment in the condition of typical ads. Therefore, the research findings suggest that narrative ad type and cognitive style must be taken into consideration when designing efficient strategies to target consumer segments.

    目錄 頁次 中文摘要 ..............................................i 英文摘要 ...............................................ii 目錄 ...............................................iii 圖目錄 ...............................................vi 表目錄 ..............................................vii 附錄目錄 .............................................ix 一、緒論 ..............................................1 1-1 背景資訊與研究動機 ................................1 1-2 研究預期貢獻 .....................................2 1-3 研究程序 .........................................4 二、文獻探討 ..........................................5 2-1 概論 ............................................5 2-2 敘事化廣告 (Narrative Advertising) ...............5 2-3 典型廣告與非典型廣告 ..............................7 2-4 沉浸性 (Transportation) ........................10 2-5 雙元認知風格 (The Dual-Process View) ............11 2-5-1 理性經驗性清單 [Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI-40)] ...................................11 2-6 品牌信任度 (Brand Trust) ........................13 2-7 品牌黏著度 (Brand Attachment) ...............14 2-8 態度和行為意圖 (Attitude And Behavioral Intention) 15 2-8-1 廣告態度 (Attitude Toward The Ad) ............16 2-8-2 品牌態度 (Brand Attitude) ....................16 2-8-3 購買意圖 (Purchasing Intention) ..............17 2-9 敘事化廣告與消費者的態度關聯性 ....................17 2-9-1 敘事化廣告典型性 vs. 品牌相關態度 ..............18 2-9-2 個人的認知風格 vs. 品牌相關態度 ...............18 2-10 研究假說 ......................................20 三、研究方法 .........................................22 3-1 研究架構 ........................................22 3-2 研究對象與材料 ..................................23 3-3 研究變數定義與衡量方法 ...........................23 3-3-1 自變數之操作定義與衡量 ........................24 3-3-2 個人的認知風格:理性認知風格 vs. 經驗性認知風格 25 3-3-3 應變數之操作定義與衡量 ........................27 3-3-4 共同變異數之操作定義與衡量 ....................31 3-4 研究設計 ........................................32 3-4-1 實驗設計 .....................................32 3-4-2 廣告前測 .....................................33 3-5 正式問卷與抽樣 ..................................35 四、研究結果 .........................................37 4-1 資料分析 ........................................37 4-2 統計方法 ........................................37 4-3 樣本特性分析 ....................................37 4-4 主要變數信度分析 ................................39 4-5 自變數的操弄檢定 ................................40 4-5-1 敘事化廣告典型性 .............................40 4-5-2 個人的認知風格 ...............................40 4-6 品牌相關變數之變異數分析 .........................41 4-6-1 廣告效果變異數分析 ............................41 4-6-2 品牌信任度變異數分析 ..........................44 4-6-3 品牌黏著度變異數分析 ..........................44 4-7 研究結果 ........................................45 五、結論與建議 .......................................47 5-1 結論概述 ........................................47 5-2 不同的敘事化廣告典型性對廣告效果、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度 之影響 ..........................................47 5-3 不同認知風格對廣告效果、品牌信任度與品牌黏著度之影響 48 5-4 不同的敘事化廣告典型性搭配不同認知風格對廣告效果、品牌信 任度與品牌黏著度之影響 ...........................50 5-5 總結 ...........................................50 5-6 建議 ...........................................51 5-6-1 行銷策略 .....................................51 5-6-2 研究限制 .....................................52 六、參考文獻 .........................................53

    〔1〕 Adaval, R., & Wyer Jr, R. S. (1998). The Role of
    Narratives in Consumer Information Processing.
    Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum
    Associates), 7(3), 207.
    〔2〕 Akinci, C., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2013). Assessing
    Individual Differences in Experiential (Intuitive)
    and Rational (Analytical) Cognitive Styles.
    International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
    21(2), 211-221. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12030
    〔3〕 Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The Effects
    of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making.
    Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 14-25.
    〔4〕 Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000).
    The Effects of Incongruity, Surprise and Positive
    Moderators on Perceived Humor in Television
    Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 1-15.
    〔5〕 Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive
    Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For
    Organizational Research. Journal of Management
    Studies, 33(1), 119-135. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-
    6486.1996.tb00801.x
    〔6〕 Armstrong, S. J., & Priola, V. (2001). Individual
    Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on
    Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work
    Teams. Small Group Research, 32(3), 283-312.
    doi:10.1177/104649640103200302
    〔7〕 Baek, T. H., & Morimoto, M. (2012). Stay Away From
    Me. Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 59-76.
    〔8〕 Baize, H. R., & Schroeder, J. E. (1995).
    Personality and mate selection in personal ads:
    Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection
    process. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,
    10(3), 517-536.
    〔9〕 Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective Responses
    Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal of
    Consumer Research, 13(2), 234-249.
    〔10〕 Belch, G. E. G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2004).
    Advertising and promotion : an integrated marketing
    communications perspective (6th ed ed.): McGraw-
    Hill/Irwin.
    〔11〕 Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of
    measurement (Vol. 15).
    〔12〕 Brumbaugh, A. M. (1993). Physical Attractiveness
    and Personality in Advertising: More than Just a
    Pretty Face? Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1),
    159-164.
    〔13〕 Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic
    information processing and the use of source versus
    message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
    doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
    〔14〕 Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process
    theories in social psychology. New York, NY, US:
    Guilford Press.
    〔15〕 Chang, C. (2008). Increasing mental health literacy
    via narrative advertising. Journal of Health
    Commun, 13(1), 37-55. doi:10.1080/10810730701807027
    〔16〕 Chang, C. (2009). "Being Hooked" By Editorial
    Content: The Implications for Processing Narrative
    Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(1), 21-34.
    doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380102
    〔17〕 Chang, C. (2012). Narrative Ads and Narrative
    Processing. In E. Thorson and S. Rodgers (Eds.),
    Advertising Theory (pp. 241-254). New York:
    Routledge.
    〔18〕 Chaplin, L. N., & John, D. R. (2005). The
    Development of Self-Brand Connections in Children
    and Adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research,
    32(1), 119-129. doi:10.1086/426622
    〔19〕 Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of
    attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion,
    and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 71(4), 810-832. doi:10.1037/0022-
    3514.71.4.810
    〔20〕 Cools, E., Van den Broeck, H., & Bouckenooghe, D.
    (2009). Cognitive styles and person–environment
    fit: Investigating the consequences of cognitive
    (mis)fit. European Journal of Work and
    Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 167-198.
    doi:10.1080/13594320802295540
    〔21〕 Dahlen, M., Lange, F., & Smith, T. (2010).
    Marketing Communications: A Brand Narrative
    Approach: John Wiley & Sons.
    〔22〕 Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989).
    Using Drama to Persuade. Journal of Consumer
    Research, 16(3), 335-343. doi:10.1086/209219
    〔23〕 Delgado-Ballester, E. (2002). Development and
    Validation of a Brand Trust Scale.
    〔24〕 Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Aleman, J. L., &
    Yague-Guillen, M. J. (2003). Development and
    validation of a brand trust scale. International
    Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 35-54.
    〔25〕 Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An
    Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller
    Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51.
    doi:10.2307/1251829
    〔26〕 Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive
    and the psychodynamic unconscious. American
    psychologist, 49(8), 709-724. doi:10.1037/0003-
    066X.49.8.709
    〔27〕 Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive‐Experiential Self‐
    Theory of Personality. In Handbook of psychology
    (pp. 159-184): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    〔28〕 Escalas, J. E. (1998). Advertising narratives: What
    are they and how do they work. Representing
    consumers: Voices, views, and visions, 267-289.
    〔29〕 Escalas, J. E. (2004a). Imagine Yourself in the
    Product: Mental Simulation, Narrative
    Transportation, and Persuasion. Journal of
    Advertising, 33(2), 37-48.
    〔30〕 Escalas, J. E. (2004b). Narrative Processing:
    Building Consumer Connections to Brands. Journal of
    Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 168-180.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19
    〔31〕 Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You Are
    What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on
    Consumers’ Connections to Brands. Journal of
    Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339-348.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_14
    〔32〕 Escalas, J. E., Moore, M. C., & Britton, J. E.
    (2004). Fishing For Feelings? Hooking Viewers
    Helps! Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence
    Erlbaum Associates), 14(1/2), 105-114.
    〔33〕 Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and
    Empathy: Emotional Responses to Advertising Dramas.
    Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566-578.
    doi:10.1086/346251
    〔34〕 Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: dual-
    process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive
    Sciences, 7(10), 454-459.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
    〔35〕 Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts
    of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition.
    Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255-278.
    doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
    〔36〕 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, Attitude,
    Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory
    and Research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-
    132.
    〔37〕 Fisher, R. J., & Dub, L. (2005). Gender Differences
    in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social
    Desirability Perspective. Journal of Consumer
    Research, 31(4), 850-858. doi:10.1086/426621
    〔38〕 Fiske, S. T. (2014). Schema-triggered affect:
    Applications to social perception. In Affect and
    cognition (pp. 65-88): Psychology Press.
    〔39〕 Fiske, S. T., & Linville, P. W. (1980). What does
    the Schema Concept Buy us? Personality and Social
    Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 543-557.
    doi:10.1177/014616728064006
    〔40〕 Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A Continuum
    of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to
    Individuating Processes: Influences of Information
    and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation. In
    M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
    Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74): Academic Press.
    〔41〕 Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-
    based versus piecemeal-based affective responses:
    Developments in schema-triggered affect. In
    Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations
    of social behavior. (pp. 167-203). New York, NY,
    US: Guilford Press.
    〔42〕 Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R.
    (1978). Some correlates of trust. J Psychol, 99(1st
    Half), 103-108. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447
    〔43〕 Gardner, M. P. (1985). Does Attitude toward the Ad
    Affect Brand Attitude under a Brand Evaluation Set?
    Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 192-198.
    doi:10.2307/3151364
    〔44〕 Goodstein, R. C. (1993). Category-Based
    Applications and Extensions in Advertising:
    Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing. Journal of
    Consumer Research, 20(1), 87-99.
    〔45〕 Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of
    transportation in the persuasiveness of public
    narratives. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.
    〔46〕 Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind's
    eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative
    persuasion. In M. C. Green, T. C. Brock, & J. J.
    Strange (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and
    cognitive foundations. (pp. 315-341). Mahwah, NJ,
    US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    〔47〕 Gunnell, J. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2010). When
    emotionality trumps reason: a study of individual
    processing style and juror bias. Behav Sci Law,
    28(6), 850-877. doi:10.1002/bsl.939
    〔48〕 Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive
    Style and its Relevance for Management Practice.
    British Journal of Management, 5(1), 53-71.
    doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00068.x
    〔49〕 Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The Role
    of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal
    and Visual Information: What is Incongruency?
    Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475-492.
    〔50〕 Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A.
    (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal
    Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7(11), 1097-
    1108. doi:10.1007/bf00287587
    〔51〕 Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming:
    Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 51(6), 1106-1115.
    doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1106
    〔52〕 Hogarth, R. M. (2005). Deciding analytically or
    trusting your intuition? The advantages and
    disadvantages of analytic and intuitive thought. In
    T. B. & S. Haberstroh (Ed.), The routines of
    decision making. (pp. 67-82). Mahwah, NJ, US:
    Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    〔53〕 Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. (2005). An Empirical
    Test of Cognitive Style and Strategic Decision
    Outcomes*. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2),
    417-448. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00502.x
    〔54〕 Jin, H. S., & Lutz, R. J. (2013). The Typicality
    and Accessibility of Consumer Attitudes Toward
    Television Advertising: Implications for the
    Measurement of Attitudes Toward Advertising in
    General. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 343-357.
    doi:10.1080/00913367.2013.803184
    〔55〕 Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002).
    Representativeness Revisited: Attribute
    Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In D. Griffin,
    D. Kahneman, & T. Gilovich (Eds.), Heuristics and
    Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp.
    49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    〔56〕 Kim, J.-E., Lloyd, S., & Cervellon, M.-C. (2016).
    Narrative-transportation storylines in luxury brand
    advertising: Motivating consumer engagement.
    Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 304-313.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.002
    〔57〕 Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). The
    Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding
    Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. Journal
    of Marriage and Family, 42(3), 595-604.
    doi:10.2307/351903
    〔58〕 Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to
    Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role
    of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor. Journal of
    Consumer Research, 26(2), 156-169.
    doi:10.1086/209557
    〔59〕 Lien, N.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2013). Narrative ads:
    The effect of argument strength and story format.
    Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516-522.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.016
    〔60〕 Lin, C.-H., & Chen, M.-Y. (2015). “Being hooked” by
    a brand story: a view of regulatory focus. European
    Journal of Marketing, 49(5/6), 692-712.
    doi:10.1108/EJM-07-2013-0381
    〔61〕 Loef, J. (2002). Incongruity between Ads and
    Consumer Expectations of Advertising. (Ph.D.
    thesis), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Retrieved
    from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/869 (EPS-2002-017-
    MKT)
    〔62〕 Loken, B., & Ward, J. (1990). Alternative
    Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of
    Typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2),
    111-126. doi:10.1086/208542
    〔63〕 MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E.
    (1986). The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a
    Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of
    Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing
    Research, 23(2), 130-143. doi:10.2307/3151660
    〔64〕 Mackenzie, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How Does
    Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and
    Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and
    Intentions? Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4),
    519-529.
    〔65〕 Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1982). The role of
    familiarity in determining typicality. Memory &
    Cognition, 10(1), 69-75. doi:10.3758/BF03197627
    〔66〕 Martín-Luengo, B., Luna, K., & Migueles, M. (2013).
    Memory for Radio Advertisements: the Effect of
    Program and Typicality. The Spanish Journal of
    Psychology, 16. doi:10.1017/sjp.2013.80
    〔67〕 Mattila, A. S. (2000). The Role of Narratives in
    the Advertising of Experiential Services. Journal
    of Service Research, 3(1), 35-45.
    doi:10.1177/109467050031003
    〔68〕 McDaniel, S. R. (1999). An investigation of match-
    up effects in sport sponsorship advertising: The
    implications of consumer advertising schemas.
    Psychology & Marketing, 16(2), 163-184.
    doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199903)16:2<163::AID-
    MAR6>3.0.CO;2-Y
    〔69〕 Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization
    of Natural Objects. Annual Review of Psychology,
    32(1), 89-115.
    doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
    〔70〕 Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema
    Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.
    Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54.
    doi:10.1086/209192
    〔71〕 Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models
    and the sense of trust: An exploration of
    interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209-
    1224. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
    〔72〕 Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment
    in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change:
    Guilford Press.
    〔73〕 Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The
    Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.
    Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
    doi:10.2307/1252308
    〔74〕 Murphy, G. L. (2004). The Big Book of Concepts: MIT
    Press.
    〔75〕 Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2009). The Fit of
    Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of
    Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational
    Cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 56-
    72. doi:10.1086/596026
    〔76〕 Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory:
    McGraw-Hill.
    〔77〕 Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of
    rational and experiential information processing
    styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the
    ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987.
    doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
    〔78〕 Padgett, D., & Allen, D. (1997). Communicating
    Experiences: A Narrative Approach to Creating
    Service Brand Image. Journal of Advertising, 26(4),
    49-62.
    〔79〕 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes
    and persuasion : classic and contemporary
    approaches: W.C. Brown Co. Publishers.
    〔80〕 Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Narrative and Self-
    Concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History,
    1(2-3), 135-153. doi:doi:10.1075/jnlh.1.2-3.04nar
    〔81〕 Polyorat, K., Alden, D. L., & Kim, E. S. (2007).
    Impact of narrative versus factual print ad copy on
    product evaluation: The mediating role of ad
    message involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 24(6),
    539-554. doi:doi:10.1002/mar.20172
    〔82〕Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985).
    Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112.
    doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
    〔83〕 Resnik, A., & Stern, B. L. (1977). An Analysis of
    Information Content in Television Advertising.
    Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 50-53.
    doi:10.2307/1250490
    〔84〕 Riding, R., & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of
    cognitive style and mode of presentation on
    learning performance. Br J Educ Psychol, 63 (Pt
    2), 297-307.
    〔85〕 Riding, R., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (1992). Type of
    Instructional Material, Cognitive Style and
    Learning Performance. Educational Studies, 18(3),
    323-340. doi:10.1080/0305569920180306
    〔86〕 Ritchie, W. J., Kolodinsky, R. W., & Eastwood, K.
    (2007). Does Executive Intuition Matter? An
    Empirical Analysis of Its Relationship With
    Nonprofit Organization Financial Performance.
    Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1),
    140-155. doi:10.1177/0899764006293338
    〔87〕Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family
    resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of
    categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
    〔88〕 Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976).
    Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of
    Experimental Psychology: Human perception and
    performance, 2(4), 491.
    〔89〕 Sadler-Smith, E. (1998). Cognitive style: Some
    human resource implications for managers. The
    International Journal of Human Resource Management,
    9(1), 185-202. doi:10.1080/095851998341260
    〔90〕 Schlinger, M. J. (1979). A profile of responses to
    commercials. Journal of Advertising Research,
    19(2), 37-46.
    〔91〕 Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two
    systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,
    119(1), 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
    〔92〕 Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and
    concepts: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
    〔93〕 Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974).
    Structure and process in semantic memory: A
    featural model for semantic decisions.
    Psychological Review, 81(3), 214-241.
    doi:10.1037/h0036351
    〔94〕 Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-Process
    Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology:
    Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying
    Memory Systems. Personality and Social Psychology
    Review, 4(2), 108-131.
    doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
    〔95〕 Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring
    Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions.
    Journal of Current Issues & Research in
    Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.
    doi:10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
    〔96〕 Stafford, T. F., & Stafford, M. R. (2002). The
    Advantages of Atypical Advertisements for
    Stereotyped Product Categories. Journal of Current
    Issues & Research in Advertising, 24(1), 25-37.
    doi:10.1080/10641734.2002.10505125
    〔97〕 Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual
    differences in reasoning: Implications for the
    rationality debate? In Heuristics and biases: The
    psychology of intuitive judgment. (pp. 421-440).
    New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
    〔98〕 Stern, B. B. (1994). Classical and Vignette
    Television Advertising Dramas: Structural Models,
    Formal Analysis, and Consumer Effects. Journal of
    Consumer Research, 20(4), 601-615.
    doi:10.1086/209373
    〔99〕 Stoltman, J. J. (1991). Advertising effectiveness:
    The role of advertising schemas. Marketing theory
    and applications, 2, 317-318.
    〔100〕Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer Knowledge: Effects on
    Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments.
    Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46.
    〔101〕Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to
    absorbing and self-altering experiences
    ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic
    susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,
    83(3), 268-277. doi:10.1037/h0036681
    〔102〕Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C.
    (2005). The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength
    of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands.
    Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77-91.
    doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
    〔103〕van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., &
    Wetzels, M. (2014). The Extended Transportation-
    Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents
    and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative
    Transportation. Journal of Consumer Research,
    40(5), 797-817. doi:10.1086/673383
    〔104〕Vance, C. M., Groves, K. S., Paik, Y., & Kindler,
    H. (2007). Understanding and Measuring Linear-
    NonLinear Thinking Style for Enhanced Management
    Education and Professional Practice. Academy of
    Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 167-185.
    〔105〕Wang, W.-C., Silva, M. M. S., & Moutinho, L.
    (2016). Modelling Consumer Responses to Advertising
    Slogans through Artificial Neural Networks.
    International Journal of Business and Economics,
    15(2), 89-116.
    〔106〕Wells, W. D., Leavitt, C., & McConville, M. (1971).
    A reaction profile for TV commercials. Journal of
    Advertising Research, 11(6), 11-18.
    〔107〕Whan Park, C., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J.,
    Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand
    Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual
    and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand
    Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.
    doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1

    QR CODE
    :::