跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 譚惇桓
Duong Huynh Dam
論文名稱： 越南湄公河三角洲營造安全績效評估之研究
EVALUATING CONSTRUCTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF MEKONG DELTA IN VIETNAM
指導教授： 王翰翔
Han-Hsiang Wang
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工學院 - 土木系營建管理碩士班
Master's Program in Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年： 2018
畢業學年度： 106
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 71
中文關鍵詞： 建設安全性能 、安全因素 、安全性能指數 、湄公河三角洲
外文關鍵詞： construction safety performance, safety factors, safety performance index, Mekong Delta
相關次數： 點閱：11  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 湄公河三角洲是越南第三大工業區, 僅次於Hồ Chí Minh的大都市區和Hà Nội.。建築業是該地區蓬勃發展的行業之一。地區繁榮的一個主要推動力是增加公共和私人對基礎設施的投資, 包括新道路、橋樑、港口和發電廠。另一個因素是房地產行業, 它引領著新的商業中心、辦公樓和住房專案的發展。然而, 建築業是最危險的產業之一，有許多建築損傷和事故發生,這意味著是財政和人力的損失。
    本研究旨在評估越南湄公河三角洲的建築安全性能。首先, 確定了研究問題, 並將研究的問題和研究的目標作為確定並研究解決問題的方向。其次, 通過文獻綜述, 編制差異安全績效指標。在工作于建築地盤的人士當中,對其進行直接訪問, 以確定這些指標的相對重要性。通過 SPSS (Statistical package for Social Science) 軟體, 通過Cronbach’s alpha coefficient和Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)對問卷的信度和效度進行測試, 收集、整合和使用了237條資料。在應用該方程進行實例研究之前, 應利用分析資料對基於文獻的 SPI (Safety Performance Index) 方程進行計算。
    已得出20項影響湄公河三角洲建築安全性能的因素。對三種建設項目方面的安全性能進行了評價, 並對 SPI 方程進行了測試。總的來說, 所有的項目都在安全性能方面得到了高度提升。

    Mekong Delta is the third largest industrial region in Vietnam after the metropolitan areas of Hồ Chí Minh City and Hà Nội. Construction is one of the industry sectors which are booming in this region. One major driver of the growth is increased public and private investment in infrastructure, including new roads, bridges, ports and power plants. Another driver is the real estate sector, which is leading the development of new commercial centers, office buildings and housing projects. However, construction is one of the most dangerous industries. Many constructional injuries and accidents have occurred and caused losses of finance and human lifes.
    This study aims at evaluating construction safety performance of Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Firstly, a research problem was determined, and then research objectives and research questions were recognized to be the target of solving determined research problem. Then, through a comprehensive literature review, the differences of safety performance indicators were compiled. Direct interviews with people on construction sites were conducted to identify the relative importance of these indicators. 237 interview results were collected, organized and used for testing reliability of scale and validity of questionnaire through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method by SPSS (Statistical package for Social Science) software. Analyzed data was used for applying SPI (Safety Performance Index) equation based on literature and then a case study was performed by using this equation.
    20 factors were identified that would affect construction safety performance in Mekong Delta. An evaluation of safety performance of three construction projects using the SPI equation were conducted. Generally, all the projects were assessed with high safety performance and the results correspond with the actual situations of the projects on sites, which proves the capability of the SPI equation for assessing safety performance of construction sites in Mekong Delta.

    摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv LIST OF TABLE viii LIST OF FIGURE x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENTS 2 1.3 RESEARCH AIM AND OBJECTIVES 3 1.4 SCOPE AND LIMITATION 3 1.5 RESEARCH FLOWCHART 4 1.6 THESIS ORGANIZATION 4 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION 6 2.2 HISTORY OF SAFETY 6 2.3 GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY PERFORMANCE SCENARIO 7 2.4 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY PERFORMANCES SCENARIO IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 9 2.5 SAFETY PROGRAM 11 2.6 FACTORS AFFECTING SAFETY PERFORMANCE 12 CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY 16 3.1 INTRODUCTION 16 3.2 RESEARCH PROCESS 16 3.3 RESEARCH LOCATION 16 3.4 PILOT STUDY 17 3.5 RESEARCH SAMPLING METHOD 18 3.6 MEASUREMENT SCALES 18 3.5.1 Worker factors (W) 20 3.5.2 Environmental factors (E) 20 3.5.3 Organizational factors (O) 21 3.7 DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 21 3.8 DATA ANALYSIS METHOD 21 3.8.1 Descriptive analysis 21 3.8.2 Reliability analysis 21 3.8.3 Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) 22 3.9 FORMATION EQUATIONS OF SPI 22 3.10 CASE STUDY METHOD 23 3.10.1 Definition 23 3.10.2 Advantages of case study 24 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS OF SPI EQUATION 25 4.1 INTRODUCTION 25 4.2 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 25 4.3 EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT SCALES 27 4.3.1 Cronbach Alpha Reliability Analysis 27 4.3.2 Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) 29 4.4 SPI EQUATION 32 4.4.1 Formation Equations 33 4.5 COMPENSATION METHOD IN THE EQUATION 34 4.5.1 Worker factor category 34 4.5.2 Environment factor category 35 4.5.3 Organization factor category 36 4.6 LEVEL OF SAFETY PERFORMANCE 38 CHAPTER 5: SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN MEKONG DELTA (SÓC TRĂNG PROVINCE, KIÊN GIANG PROVINCE AND CẦN THƠ CITY) 39 5.1 INTRODUCTION 39 5.2 TARGET 39 5.3 CONDUCTING DATA COLLECTION 39 5.4 DATA ALNALYSIS AND RESULTS 40 5.5 DISCUSSION 42 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 6.1 INTRODUCTION 43 6.2 CONSLUSIONS 43 6.3 RECOMMENDATIONS 44 6.2.1 General Recommendation 44 6.3.2 Recommended Future work 44 REFERENCES 45 APPENDIX 49

    1. [cited 2017 September, 20th]; Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mekong_Delta.
    2. Chua, D.K., and Goh, Y.M., Incident Causation Model for Improving Feedback of Safety Knowledge. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004. 130(4): p. 542-551.
    3. Teo, E.A.L., Ling, F.T.Y., Chong, A.F.W., Framework for Project Managers to Manage Construction Safety. International Journal of Project Management, 2005. 23 (4): p. 329-341.
    4. Tam, C.M., Zing, S.X., Deng, Z.M., Identifying Elements of Poor Construction Safety Management in China. Safety Science, 2004. 42(7): p. 569-586.
    5. Hinze, J., Making Zero Accidents a Reality., in CII Research Rep. 160-11. 2002, The University of Texas at Austin: EEUU.
    6. Vredenburgh, A.G., Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? Journal of Safety Research, 2002. 33(2): p. 259-276.
    7. Petersen, D., Techniques of Safety Management, ed. McGraw-Hill. 1971: Book Company.
    8. Fang, D., Huang, X., and Hinze, J., , Benchmarking Studies on Construction Safety Management in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004. 130(3): p. 424-432.
    9. Koehn, E., Kothari, R.K., and Pan, C-S.,, Safety in Developing Countries: Professional and Bureaucratic Problems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1995. 121(3): p. 261-265.
    10. Drewer, S., Construction and development: a new perspective, in Habitat International. 1980. p. 395-428.
    11. Chua, D.K.H., Goh, Y.M., Incident causation model for improving feedback of safety knowledge. American Society of Civil of Engineering, 2004. 130(4): p. 542-551.
    12. Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., Fong, D., Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. International Journal of Project Management 1999. 17(5): p. 309-315.
    13. Baig, M., Safety Assessment of Industrial Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia. 2001, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals: Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
    14. Reese, C.D., Occupational Heath and Safety Management: A Practical Approach. 2003: Lewis Publishers.
    15. Mohammed, K.A., Assessment of the Factors Affecting Safety Performance on Construction Projects in Gaza Strip, in Civil Engineering- Construction Management. 2009, The Islamic University – Gaza.
    16. W., H., Occupational Safety Management and Engineering, ed. Prentice-Hall. 1985, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffis.
    17. Kartam, N., Flood, Koushki, P., Construction Safety in Kuwait: Issues, Procedures, Problems, and Recommendations. Journal of Safety Science, 2000. 36(3): p. 163-184.
    18. Farooqi, R.U., Safety Performance In Construction Industry of Pakistan, in International Conference on Construction Education. 2008: Karachi, Pakistan.
    19. Neal, R., Managing International Construciton Projects: An overview, International Labour Office. 1995, Geneva.
    20. Zeng, S.X., Tan,V.W.Y.,Tam,C.M, Towards occupational health and safety systems in the construction industry of China. Safety Science, 2008. 46: p. 1155-1168.
    21. Rowlinson, S., Hong Kong construction —Safety management and the law, ed. S. Maxwell and Asia. 2003, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong.
    22. Huang, X., Fang, D., and Li, X., Construction accident losses: How much an accident costs, in Proc. 2000 Int. Symp. on Safety Science and Technology, C.I. Press, Editor. 2000: Beijing. p. 320-325.
    23. Farooqui, R.U., Ahmed, S.M., Panthi, K., Developing Safety Culture in Pakistan Construction Industry – An Assessment of Perceptions and Practices among Construction Contractors, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century: Accelerating Innovation in Engineering, Management and Technology (CITC IV 2007). 2007: Gold Coast, Australia. p. 420-437.
    24. Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, M.Z.A.M., Bachan Singh, Causes of Accident at Construction sites. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008. 20(2): p. 242-259.
    25. Aksorn, T.H., Bonaventura H. W., Measuring effectiveness of safety programmes in the Thai construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 2008. 26(4): p. 409-421.
    26. Hassanein., R., S H., Safety Programs in Large –Size Construction Firms Operating in Egypt. Jounal of SH&E Resarch, 2007. 4.
    27. Hinze, J.a.H., C.,, Safety programs in large construction firms. Journal of the Construction Division, 1981. 107(CO3): p. 455-467.
    28. Tam, C.M.a.F., I. W. H., Effectiveness of safety management strategies on safety performance in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 1998. 16: p. 49-55.
    29. Poon, W.F., Ma, C. H., Ho, K. L. Statistical analysis on factors in reducing construction site accident frequency rate in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Occupational Health and Safety Educators 2000 [cited 2006 20 October]; Available from: http://www.ic.polyu.edu.hk/oess/$publications.htm.
    30. Wu, T., Surveying safety performance in laboratories in universities and colleges. Chinese J Sci Educ 2005. 13(4): p. 465-482.
    31. Maryam, O., Mohamad, R A., An Empirical Study of Safety Performance Assessment. International Journal of Occupational Hygiene, 2014. 14: p. 200-208.
    32. Mathis, R., Jackson, JH., Human Resource Management. Vol. 8. 1997, USA: West Publishing Co.
    33. Burke, M. Training interventions for improving worker safety and health. Congressional briefing workplace & public safety: the role of behavioral research. 2007; Available from: www2.apa.org/science/DOB-Burke.ppt.
    34. Bollen, K.A., Structural equations with latent variables, ed. N.J. Wiley. 1989, New York.
    35. Sekaran, U., Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. 2006: Wiley India Pvt.
    36. Chi, N.T.M., Factors affecting Customer Satisfaction in Group Buying in Vietnam, in International School of Business. 2013, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City.
    37. Cooper, M., Phillips, R., , Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 2004. 35: p. 497-512.
    38. Glendon, A., Litherland, D.,, Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behavior in road construction. Safety Science, 2001. 39: p. 157-88.
    39. Hopkins, A., Safety, Culture and Risk: The Organizational Causes of Disasters. 2005, Sydney.
    40. Hudson, P., Implementing a safety culture in a major multinational. Safety Science, 2007. 45(6): p. 697-722.
    41. Kines, P., Andersen, L. P. S., Spangerberg, S., Mikkelsen, K. L., Dyreborg, J., Zohar, D.,, Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication. Journal of Safety Research, 2010. 41(5): p. 399-406.
    42. Levitt, R.E., Samelson, N. M.,, Construction Safety Management. 1987, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    43. Lingard, H., Rowlinson, S M.,, Occupational Health and Safety in construction project management. 2005: UK Taylor & Francis.
    44. Sunindijo, R.Y., Zou, P. X. W.,, How project manager’s skills may influence the development of safety climate in construction projects. International Journal of Project Organization and Management, 2012. 4(3): p. 286-301.
    45. Riham El-nagar, H.H., Hamed S Askar,, Development of a Safety Performance Index for Construction Projects in Egypt. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2015. 3(5): p. 182-192.
    46. Shirong Li, X.X., The Establishment of CauseSystem of Poor Construction Site Safety and Priority Analysis from Different Perspectives, in World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2011.
    47. Hakkinen, K., A learning-by-doing strategy to improve top management involvement in safety. Safety Science, 1995. 20(2-3): p. 299-304.
    48. Oh, J.I.H., Sol, V.M., The policy program improving occupational safety in the Netherlands: An innovative view on occupational safety. Safety Science, 2008. 46(2): p. 155-163.
    49. Maertens JA, P.S., Chen PY, Diehl M, Huang YH,. Physical capabilities and occupational health of older workers. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging ed. B.W. Hedge JW. 2012, New York: Oxford University Press.
    50. Reichers, A.R., Schneider, B.,, Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs, ed. B. Schneider. 1990: Organizational Climate and Culture.
    51. Pallant, J., SPSS Survival Manual, A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). 2005, Australia: NSW Crows Nest 2065.
    52. Thọ, N.Đ., Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh. 2011: NXB Tài Chính.
    53. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, ed. S. Publications. 1984, Calif: Beverly Hills.
    54. Zainal, Z., An Investigation into the effects of Discipline-Specific Knowledge, Proficiency and Genre on Reading Comprehension and Strategies of Malaysia ESP Students. 2003, University of Reading.
    55. Block, E., The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 1986. 20(3): p. 463-494.
    56. Hosenfeld, C., Case studies of ninth grade readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, ed. I.J.C.A.a.A.H. Urquhart. 1984, London.

    QR CODE
    :::