跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江建宏
JIAN-HONG JIANG
論文名稱: 公司治理與租賃融資關係探討
Corporate Governance and Lease Financing
指導教授: 黃鴻明
Hong-Ming Huang
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系
Department of Finance
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 49
中文關鍵詞: 租賃融資公司治理反購併條款
外文關鍵詞: Corporate governance, Anti-takeover provisions, Lease financing
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 根據過去文獻以及資訊不對稱理論,當公司內部人與外部投資人資訊不對稱越嚴重時,會導致企業外部融資成本的提高以及傾向利用外部治理來約束管理者。然而,租賃融資除了在公司的融資決策上扮演重要的融資工具之外,在公司治理方面租賃融資也是減緩負債代理成本以及外部融資成本的機制。公司治理機制主要分成外部和內部治理,而本研究從外部治理的控制權市場角度來看,利用IRRC提供的反購併條款以及股東保護條款,探討反購併條款和租賃融資之間的關係。本研究樣本期間從1990年至2006年,並發現在這段期間反購併條款設立的多寡與租賃融資呈現負相關,也就是說當公司傾向利用外部市場來監督管理者時,反購併條款設立越少的企業(即G-index越低)傾向使用租賃融資來降低外部融資成本。


    According to information asymmetry theory and related research, firms facing greater information asymmetry have higher cost of external fund and tend to be confined by market disciplines. However, lease financing is not only an important financing instrument for corporations, but also a mechanism for reducing agency cost of debt and external funding cost. Corporate governance primarily includes internal and external governance mechanisms. Using various anti-takeover and shareholder protection provisions provided by Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC), this study investigates the relationship between lease financing and corporate governance from the view of external governance mechanism. This study finds a negative relationship between lease financing and corporate governance (as measured by G-index). That implies that the firms with lower G-index tend to use more lease financing to reduce external funding cost when firms are more confined by market disciplines.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 4 2-1 租賃相關文獻 4 2-2 公司治理相關文獻 6 第三章 研究方法 10 3-1 研究假說 10 3-2 樣本選擇 10 3-3 變數說明與定義 11 3-4 研究模型 17 第四章 實證結果 20 4-1 資本租賃 20 4-2 營業租賃 21 4-3 總租賃 22 4-4 小結 22 第五章 結論 24 參考文獻 26

    【1】 Arellano, Manuel, and Olympia Bover, 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68, 29-51.
    【2】 Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond, 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economics Studies 58, 277-297.
    【3】 Barclay, Michael J., and Clifford W. Smith, JR., 1995. The Priority Structure of Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Finance 50, 899-916.
    【4】 Bebchuk, Lucian, Alma Cohen, and Allen Ferrell, 2009. What Matters in Corporate Governance ? Review of Financial Studies 22, 783-825.
    【5】 Berkovitch, Elazar, Michael Bradley, and Naveen Khanna, 1989. Tender Offer Auctions, Resistance Strategies, and Social Welfare. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 5, 395-412.
    【6】 Berkovitch, Elazar, and Naveen Khanna, 1990. How Target Shareholders Benefit from Value-Reducing Defensive Strategies in Takeovers. Journal of Finance 45, 137-156.
    【7】 Bhagat, Sanjai, and Brian Bolton, 2009. Sarbanes-Oxley, Governance and Performance. Working Paper.
    【8】 Borokhovich, K. A., K.R. Brunerski, Y. Herman, and J. B. Kehr, 2005. Dividends, Corporate Monitors and Agency Costs. Financial Review 40, 37-65.
    【9】 Cai, Jie, Yixin Liu, and Yiming Qian, 2009. Information Asymmetry and Corporate Governance. Working Paper.
    【10】 DeAngelo, H., and E. Rice, 1983. Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 11, 329-360.
    【11】 Easterbrook, Frank H., and Daniel R. Fischel, 1982. Corporate Control Transactions. Yale Law Journal 91, 698-737.
    【12】 Fama, Eugene F., and Michael C. Jensen, 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
    【13】 Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard, Bruce C. Petersen, Alan S. Blinder, and James M. Poterba, 1988. Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1988, 141-206.
    【14】 Gillan, Stuart L., Jay C. Hartzell, and Laura T. Starks, 2004. Explaining Corporate Governance: Boards, Bylaws, and Charter Provisions. University of Texas Working Paper.
    【15】 Gilson, Ronald J., 1981. A Structural Approach to Corporations: The Case against Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers. Stanford Law Review 33, 819-891.
    【16】 Gilson, Ronald J., 1982. Seeking Competitive Bids versus Pure Passivity in Tender Offer Defense. Stanford Law Review 35, 51-67.
    【17】 Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick, 2003. Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 107-155.
    【18】 Graham, John R., Michael L. Lemmon, and James S. Schallheim, 1998. Debt, Leases, Taxes, and the Endogeneity of Corporate Tax Status. Journal of Finance 53,131-162.
    【19】 Jarrell, G., and A. Poulsen, 1987. Shark Repellents and Stock Prices: The Effects of Antitakeover Amendments since 1980. Journal of Financial Economics 19, 127-168.
    【20】 Jarrell, Gregg A., James A. Brickley, and Jeffry M. Netter, 1988. The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 49-68.
    【21】 Jensen, M., and Meckling W., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
    【22】 Jensen, Michael C., and R. Ruback, 1983. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50.
    【23】 Jiraporn, P., J. C. Kim, Y. S. Kim, and P. Kitsabunnarat, 2008. Does Corporate Governance Affect Capital Structure? Working Paper.
    【24】 Klock, Mark S., Sattar A. Mansi, and William F. Maxwell, 2004. Does Corporate Governance Matter to Bondholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming.
    【25】 La Porta Rafael, Florencio L., Andrei S., and Robert V., 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3-27.
    【26】 Litov, Lubomir P., 2004. Corporate governance and financing policy: New evidence. Manuscript, Stern School of Business, New York.
    【27】 Mahoney, James M., Chamu Sundaramurthy, and Joseph T. Mahoney, 1996. The Differential Impact on Stockholder Wealth of Various Antitakeover Provisioins. Managerial and Decision Economics 17, 531-549.
    【28】 Myers, S. C., 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147-175.
    【29】 Myers, Stewart C., and Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
    【30】 Pound, John, 1987. The Effects of Antitakeover Amendments on Takeover Activity: Some Direct Evidence. Journal of Law and Economics 30, 353-367.
    【31】 Rechner, Paula L., Chamu Sundaramurthy, and Dan R. Dalton, 1993. Corporate Governance Predictors of Adoption of antitakeover Amendments: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 12, 371-378.
    【32】 Robicheaux, Sara H., Xudong Fu, and James A. Ligon, 2008. Lease Financing and Corporate Governance. Financial Review 43, 403-437.
    【33】 Sharpe, Steven A., and Hien H. Nguyen, 1995. Capital market imperfections and the incentive to lease. Journal of Financial Economics 39, 271-294.
    【34】 Smith, Clifford W. Jr., and Jerold B. Warner, 1979. Bankruptcy, Secured Debt, and Optimal Capital Structure: Comment. Journal of Finance 34, 247-251.
    【35】 Smith, Clifford W. Jr., and L. Macdonald Wakeman, 1985. Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy. Journal of Finance 40, 895-908.
    【36】 Stulz, René M., and Herb Johnson, 1985. An analysis of secured debt. Journal of Financial Economics 14, 501-521.
    【37】 Yan, An, 2006. Leasing and Debt Financing: Substitutes or Complements ? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41, 709-731.

    QR CODE
    :::