面對空氣中複雜的成分，本研究室研發了前濃縮儀（Thermo Desorption Unit, TD）進行痕量揮發性有機化合物（Volatile Organic Compounds, VOCs）的捕捉與濃縮。由於台灣潮濕的環境，在TD前加裝了除水儀（Dewater Unit, DW）以除去大氣樣品的水分，並能夠同時保留極性與非極性物種，不造成樣品的流失。這些珍貴的研究成果，在過去實驗室的分析中，成功的在DW-TD接上氣相層析儀（Gas Chromatography, GC）並搭載火焰離子偵測器（Flame Ionization Detector, FID）與質譜儀（Mass Spectrometry, MS），雖然GC-FID的數據品質十分的穩定且完整，相較之下，GC-MS本身的漂移與不穩定性卻是顯而易見的。本研究利用了維護保養容易、靈敏度高且相當穩定的電子捕捉偵測器（Electron Capture Detector, ECD）以測試本DW-TD的性能表現。ECD的另一項優勢為只使用氮氣（Nitrogen, N2）作為載流氣體及尾吹氣，使得利用GC-ECD進行實場監測，會比使用GC-FID還更加地方便與直接。我們利用了ECD對於大氣中的痕量級氟氯碳化合物（Chlorofluorocarbons, CFCs）十分靈敏且具有高度的選擇性，驗證自製DW-TD的性能，由於CFCs高生命期、大氣混和均勻與早已因蒙特簍議定書（Montreal Protocol）而被世界禁止大部分生產的緣故，其在以周或月為單位的短時間連續分析時，其變異性會小於大部分的GC分析精度，而會有一定的背景值，我們利用這些特點分析CFCs以評估自製儀器的穩定性。
在新竹科學園區持續一個月的DW-TD/GC-ECD線上連續分析中，被禁用的CFC-12濃度為489.70±0.38 ppt，CFC-113為68.17±0.12 ppt，其RSD分別為0.08%及0.18%；CFC-11及CCl4雖早已被禁用，但仍能在這次的連續採樣中偵測到許多的高值事件，因此懷疑在科學園區中可能有排放，選定濃度相對平穩的三天進行RSD的計算，分別為1.21%及0.96%。這些結果會與AGAGE線上連續分析的Medusa/GC-MS及NOAA離線式採樣GC-MS進行RSD的比較，並在後續的研究探討中討論誤差的來源，推論出可能與熱脫附的再現性與流量計的流量穩定度有很大的關聯。在連續分析時出現的高值事件，可以透過當時的風速風向資料，使用實驗室開發之風瑰圖及逆軌跡推移追溯排放源為何。
本研究的第二部份聚焦在GC-MS線上連續分析中，參考標準方法NIEA A715.16B，在連續分析數天後，每日中濃度查核超出允收範圍及連續分析的濃度失真，是由於原本的檢量線建立，會利用四支內標準品進行二次的校正，但離子源的感度持續衰退，每個物種對於離子源感度皆不相同，造成檢量線的偏移不可用。透過每次分析皆會施打固定濃度的內標準品與建構每日的中濃度檢量線標準品查核，可以得到4個內標準品感度的衰退趨勢線與標準品中的86個目標物種衰退趨勢線，透過這兩條趨勢線可以預測當離子源感度衰退時，每個物種在每一筆分析的衰退程度。利用數據後處理的方式，將這些偏離允收範圍的物種校正回更加精準的值，避免系統誤差造成數據報告的失準。此外，透過CFC-12在大氣中濃度固定，不會有劇烈的變化或高值事件發生的特點，將每日連續數據拉回到相對的準確值，避免後續數據報告時的爭議。

In the face of the complex composition of atmospheric pollutants, our laboratory has developed a Thermo Desorption Unit (TD) for capturing and concentrating trace-level volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air samples. Because of the humid climate, we further added a Dewater Unit (DW) before the TD to remove excess moisture from air samples, while retaining both polar and non-polar species to keep sample integrity. These achievements have been successfully utilized over the past few years by connecting the DW-TD units with gas chromatography (GC) equipped with flame ionization detection (FID) and mass spectrometry (MS). While the data quality from GC-FID was extremely stable and robust, the drift and thus instability in MS is significant by comparison. In this research, we attempted to use electron capture detection (ECD) to test the stability of the DW-TD units by exploiting ECD’s high sensitivity, stability, and the ease of operation. Another prominent advantage of ECD is that it only needs high-purity nitrogen gas as both the carrier and make-up gas. The deployment of GC-ECD in the field becomes much more straightforward than that of GC-FID. We exploited the highly sensitive and selective properties of ECD to measure trace-level atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) to demonstrate the performance of the self-built DW-TD apparatuses. Since CFCs have extremely long atmospheric lifetimes, and are well-mixed in the atmosphere due to the Montreal Protocol to ban them from most applications, they exhibit certain background mixing levels during a relatively short period of time, e.g., weeks or months, with variability smaller than most GC’s analytical precisions. We then utilized this property to assess the stability of our homemade instrument.
During the one-month continuous online analysis of DW-TD/GC-ECD at the Hsinchu Science Park, the concentration of the already banned CFC-12 was found to be 490±0.38 ppt (parts per trillion), and CFC-113 = 68±0.12 ppt, with RSD (Relative Standard Deviations) = 0.08% and 0.18%, respectively. Although CFC-11 and CCl4 have also been banned, they were still detectable in the continuous measurements, showing high-value events, suggesting emissions may still existed in this industrial park. By filtering out three consecutive days of data with relatively stable concentrations, the RSD for CFC-11 and CCl4 were found to be 1.21% and 0.96%, respectively. These results will be compared with the RSD from AGAGE's online data using Medusa/GC-MS and the off-line data of NOAA by GC-MS. Furthermore, in subsequent discussions, we also explored the sources of errors in measurements and inferred that the largest sources of error may be related to the stability of the heating coils and mass flow meters during continuous analysis. The occurrence of the high-value events during the month-long measurements can be traced back to emission sources by utilizing wind speed and direction data at the time, along with the laboratory-developed concentration wind roses and backward trajectory analysis.
The second part of research focuses on GC-MS online continuous analysis, following the standard method NIEA A715.16B. After several days of continuous analysis, deviations beyond the acceptance range of recovery in daily checks were observed. This is due to the original calibration curve establishment, which involved secondary calibration using four compounds as the internal standards. However, due to the rapid decline in ion source sensitivity, each species exhibits different responses, making calibration unreliable. By injecting an aliquot of internal standard for each analysis and conducting daily calibration check, we can determine the decreasing trends for both the four internal standards and the 86 target compounds in the standard mixture. By utilizing these two trend lines, we can predict the extent of degradation for each target species when the ion source sensitivity declines. Through post data processing, we can then correct these compounds deviating from the acceptance range to more accurate values, avoiding systematic errors in subsequent data reporting. Additionally, by using the fixed concentration of CFC-12 in the atmosphere, which does not experience significant variations, we can align the daily continuous data with the relatively accurate values to ensure the data robustness.

1. Farman, J. C.; Gardiner, B. G.; Shanklin, J. D., Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO x/NO x interaction. Nature 1985, 315 (6016), 207-210.
2. Palomera, M. J.; Álvarez, H. B.; Echeverria, R. S.; Hernández, E. G.; Álvarez, P. S.; Villegas, R. R., Photochemical assessment monitoring stations program adapted for ozone precursors monitoring network in Mexico City. Atmósfera 2016, 29 (2), 169-188.
3. 中華民國行政院環保署，空氣中有機光化前驅物檢測方法－氣相層析/火焰離子化偵測法。2014，NIEA A505.12B。
4. 中華民國行政院環保署，空氣中揮發性有機化合物檢測方法－不銹鋼採樣筒／氣相層析質譜儀法。2021，NIEA A716.16B。
5. 李冠均。自製新型除水及熱脫附濃縮裝置用於GC/MS 線上分析揮發性有機污染物。國立中央大學，2020。
6. Wang, C.-H.; Huang, C.-Y.; Yak, H.-K.; Hsieh, H.-C.; Wang, J.-L., Identifying an unknown compound in flue gas of semiconductor industry–Forensics of a perfluorocarbon. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128504.
7. Montzka, S. A. M., R. C.; Butler, J. H.; Elkins, J. W.; Cummings, S. O., Global tropospheric distribution and calibration scale of HCFC‐22. Journal of Geophysical Research 1993, 20 (8), 703-706.
8. Apel, E.; Hills, A.; Lueb, R.; Zindel, S.; Eisele, S.; Riemer, D., A fast-GC/MS system to measure C2 to C4 carbonyls and methanol aboard aircraft: NASA global tropospheric experiment transport and chemical evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P): Measurements and analysis (TRACEP1). Journal of geophysical research 2003, 108 (D20), GTE15. 1-GTE15. 15.
9. Goldan, P. D.; Kuster, W. C.; Williams, E.; Murphy, P. C.; Fehsenfeld, F. C.; Meagher, J., Nonmethane hydrocarbon and oxy hydrocarbon measurements during the 2002 New England Air Quality Study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2004, 109 (D21), doi:10.1029/2003JD004455.
10. Sturges, W.; Wallington, T.; Hurley, M.; Shine, K.; Sihra, K.; Engel, A.; Oram, D.; Penkett, S.; Mulvaney, R.; Brenninkmeijer, C., A potent greenhouse gas identified in the atmosphere: SF5CF3. Science 2000, 289 (5479), 611-613.
11. Simmonds, P.; O'Doherty, S.; Nickless, G.; Sturrock, G.; Swaby, R.; Knight, P.; Ricketts, J.; Woffendin, G.; Smith, R., Automated gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer for routine atmospheric field measurements of the CFC replacement compounds, the hydrofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons. Analytical Chemistry 1995, 67 (4), 717-723.
12. Lamanna, M. S.; Goldstein, A. H., In situ measurements of C2‐C10 volatile organic compounds above a Sierra Nevada ponderosa pine plantation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 1999, 104 (D17), 21247-21262.
13. Yokouchi, Y.; Noijiri, Y.; Barrie, L.; Toom-Sauntry, D.; Machida, T.; Inuzuka, Y.; Akimoto, H.; Li, H.-J.; Fujinuma, Y.; Aoki, S., A strong source of methyl chloride to the atmosphere from tropical coastal land. Nature 2000, 403 (6767), 295-298.
14. Prinn, R.; Weiss, R.; Fraser, P.; Simmonds, P.; Cunnold, D.; Alyea, F.; O'doherty, S.; Salameh, P.; Miller, B.; Huang, J., A history of chemically and radiatively important gases in air deduced from ALE/GAGE/AGAGE. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2000, 105 (D14), 17751-17792.
15. Miller, B. R.; Weiss, R. F.; Salameh, P. K.; Tanhua, T.; Greally, B. R.; Mühle, J.; Simmonds, P. G., Medusa:  A Sample Preconcentration and GC/MS Detector System for in Situ Measurements of Atmospheric Trace Halocarbons, Hydrocarbons, and Sulfur Compounds. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80 (5), 1536-1545.
16. Wang, C. J. L.; Blake, D. R.; Rowland, F. S., Seasonal variations in the atmospheric distribution of a reactive chlorine compound, tetrachloroethene (CCl2= CCl2). Geophysical research letters 1995, 22 (9), 1097-1100.
17. Wang, J. L., Calibration of CCl2FCCIF2 (CFC‐113) and its Effects on the Atmospheric Long‐Term Measurements. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 1997, 44 (1), 17-22.
18. Wang, J.-L.; Chang, C.-J.; Chang, W.-D.; Chew, C.; Chen, S.-W., Construction and evaluation of automated gas chromatography for the measurement of anthropogenic halocarbons in the atmosphere. Journal of Chromatography A 1999, 844 (1-2), 259-269.
19. Wang, J.-L.; Wu, C.-H., Construction and validation of a cryogen free gas chromatography–electron-capture detection system for the measurement of ambient halocarbons. Analytica Chimica Acta 2002, 461 (1), 85-95.
20. Wang, J.-L.; Din, G.-Z.; Chan, C.-C., Validation of a laboratory-constructed automated gas chromatograph for the measurement of ozone precursors through comparison with a commercial analogy. Journal of Chromatography A 2004, 1027 (1-2), 11-18.
21. Wang, C.-H.; Chang, C.-C.; Wang, J.-L., Peak tailoring concept in gas chromatographic analysis of volatile organic pollutants in the atmosphere. Journal of Chromatography A 2005, 1087 (1-2), 150-157.
22. Su, Y.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Wang, J.-L., Construction of an automated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry system for the analysis of ambient volatile organic compounds with on-line internal standard calibration. Journal of Chromatography A 2008, 1201 (2), 134-140.
23. Wang, C.-H.; Chiang, S.-W.; Wang, J.-L., Simultaneous analysis of atmospheric halocarbons and non-methane hydrocarbons using two-dimensional gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 2010, 1217 (3), 353-358.
24. Su, Y.-C.; Liu, W.-T.; Liao, W.-C.; Chiang, S.-W.; Wang, J.-L., Full-range analysis of ambient volatile organic compounds by a new trapping method and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 2011, 1218 (34), 5733-5742.
25. 曾柏勝。自製除水器及熱脫附儀用於線上 GC/MS/FID 揮發性有機污染物之分析。 國立中央大學，2021。
26. Woolfenden, E. A., Thermal desorption gas chromatography. In Gas chromatography, Elsevier: 2021; pp 267-323.
27. Woolfenden, E. A., Practical Aspects of Monitoring Volatile Organics in Air. In Quality Assurance in Environmental Monitoring 1995, 133-182.
28. Coker, D., Personal monitoring techniques for gases and vapours. Int. Environ. Saf. J 1979.
29. Coker, D.; Van Den Hoed, N.; Saunders, K.; Tindle, P., A monitoring method for gasoline vapour giving detailed composition. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 1989, 33 (1), 15-26.
30. Woolfenden, E., Sorbent-based sampling methods for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air: Part 1: Sorbent-based air monitoring options. Journal of Chromatography A 2010, 1217 (16), 2674-2684.
31. Harrison, P. T., Health effects of indoor air pollutants. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology 1998, 10, 101-126.
32. Phillips, M., Breath tests in medicine. Scientific American 1992, 267 (1), 74-79.
33. Gordon, S.; Szidon, J.; Krotoszynski, B.; Gibbons, R.; O'neill, H., Volatile organic compounds in exhaled air from patients with lung cancer. Clinical Chemistry 1985, 31 (8), 1278-1282.
34. Dallinga, J.; Robroeks, C.; Van Berkel, J.; Moonen, E.; Godschalk, R.; Jöbsis, Q.; Dompeling, E.; Wouters, E.; Van Schooten, F., Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath as a diagnostic tool for asthma in children. Clinical & Experimental Allergy 2010, 40 (1), 68-76.
35. Phillips, M.; Cataneo, R. N.; Condos, R.; Erickson, G. A. R.; Greenberg, J.; La Bombardi, V.; Munawar, M. I.; Tietje, O., Volatile biomarkers of pulmonary tuberculosis in the breath. Tuberculosis 2007, 87 (1), 44-52.
36. Van Berkel, J.; Dallinga, J.; Möller, G.; Godschalk, R.; Moonen, E.; Wouters, E.; Van Schooten, F., A profile of volatile organic compounds in breath discriminates COPD patients from controls. Respiratory Medicine 2010, 104 (4), 557-563.
37. Pandey, S. K.; Kim, K.-H., Human body-odor components and their determination. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2011, 30 (5), 784-796.
38. Gordon, S. M.; Wallace, L. A.; Callahan, P. J.; Kenny, D. V.; Brinkman, M. C., Effect of water temperature on dermal exposure to chloroform. Environmental Health Perspectives 1998, 106 (6), 337-345.
39. Gordon, S. M., Identification of exposure markers in smokers' breath. Journal of Chromatography A 1990, 511, 291-302.
40. Hayes, H. C.; Benton, D. J.; Grewal, S.; Khan, N., Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association conference on Vapor Intrusion. Evaluation of sorbent methodology for petroleum impacted site investigations 2007.
41. Panseri, S.; Giani, I.; Mentasti, T.; Bellagamba, F.; Caprino, F.; Moretti, V., Determination of flavour compounds in a mountain cheese by headspace sorptive extraction-thermal desorption-capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. LWT-Food Science and Technology 2008, 41 (2), 185-192.
42. Offermann, F. J., Ventilation and indoor air quality in new homes. PIER Collaborative Report 2009.
43. ISO, I., 16000–6: 2011 Indoor Air—Part. 6: Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor and Test Chamber Air by Active Sampling on Tenax TA Sorbent, Thermal Desorption and Gas Chromatography Using MS or MS-FID. Thermal Desorption and Gas Chromatography Using MS or MS-FID 2011.
44. ASTM, A., D7706-11, Standard Practice for Rapid Screening of VOC Emissions from Products Using Micro-Scale Chambers. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) International 2011.
45. Lor, M., Horizontal Evaluation Method for the Implementation of the Construction Products Directive (HEMICPD) WP1: state of the art report. Child. Serv. Soc. Policy Res. Pract 2010.
46. Hübschmann, H.-J., Handbook of GC-MS: fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons: 2015.
47. Lee, H. S.; Lee, H. J.; Yu, H. J.; Ju, D. W.; Kim, Y.; Kim, C. T.; Kim, C. J.; Cho, Y. J.; Kim, N.; Choi, S. Y., A comparison between high hydrostatic pressure extraction and heat extraction of ginsenosides from ginseng (Panax ginseng CA Meyer). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2011, 91 (8), 1466-1473.
48. Griffiths, D.; Robertson, G.; Birch, A.; Brennan, R., Evaluation of thermal desorption and solvent elution combined with polymer entrainment for the analysis of volatiles released by leaves from midge (Dasineura tetensi) resistant and susceptible blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars. Phytochemical Analysis 1999, 10 (6), 328-334.
49. Robertson, G.; Griffiths, D.; Smith, W. M.; Butcher, R., The application of thermal desorption‐gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry to the analyses of flower volatiles from five varieties of oilseed rape (Brassica napus spp. oleiferd). Phytochemical Analysis 1993, 4 (4), 152-157.
50. Barberio, J.; Twibell, J., Chemotaxonomy of plant species using headspace sampling, thermal desorption and capillary GC. Journal of High Resolution Chromatography 1991, 14 (9), 637-639.
51. Jansen, R.; Hofstee, J.; Wildt, J.; Verstappen, F.; Bouwmeester, H.; Posthumus, M.; Van Henten, E., Health monitoring of plants by their emitted volatiles: trichome damage and cell membrane damage are detectable at greenhouse scale. Annals of applied biology 2009, 154 (3), 441-452.
52. Kessler, A.; Baldwin, I. T., Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 2001, 291 (5511), 2141-2144.
53. Sneader, W., Drug discovery: a history. John Wiley & Sons: 2005.
54. Myers, R. L., The 100 most important chemical compounds: a reference guide. ABC-CLIO: 2007.
55. Montzka, S. A.; Dutton, G. S.; Portmann, R. W.; Chipperfield, M. P.; Davis, S.; Feng, W.; Manning, A. J.; Ray, E.; Rigby, M.; Hall, B. D., A decline in global CFC-11 emissions during 2018− 2019. Nature 2021, 590 (7846), 428-432.
56. Huggins, M. L., Bond energies and polarities1. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1953, 75 (17), 4123-4126.
57. Montzka, S. A.; Butler, J. H.; Myers, R. C.; Thompson, T. M.; Swanson, T. H.; Clarke, A. D.; Lock, L. T.; Elkins, J. W., Decline in the tropospheric abundance of halogen from halocarbons: Implications for stratospheric ozone depletion. Science 1996, 272 (5266), 1318-1322.
58. Elkins, J.; Thompson, T.; Swanson, T.; Butler, J.; Hall, B.; Cummings, S.; Fishers, D.; Raffo, A., Decrease in the growth rates of atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons 11 and 12. Nature 1993, 364 (6440), 780-783.
59. Hu, L.; Montzka, S. A.; Miller, B. R.; Andrews, A. E.; Miller, J. B.; Lehman, S. J.; Sweeney, C.; Miller, S. M.; Thoning, K.; Siso, C., Continued emissions of carbon tetrachloride from the United States nearly two decades after its phaseout for dispersive uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (11), 2880-2885.
60. Silverman, A., Feron Easy. PHOENIX New Times 1995.
61. Molina, M. J.; Rowland, F. S., Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature 1974, 249 (5460), 810-812.
62. Zehr, S. C., Accounting for the ozone hole: scientific representations of an anomaly and prior incorrect claims in public settings. The Sociological Quarterly 1994, 35 (4), 603-619.
63. EPA., Ozone: Good Up High, Bad Nearby. 2010.
64. West, S. K.; Duncan, D. D.; Muñoz, B.; Rubin, G. S.; Fried, L. P.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Schein, O. D., Sunlight exposure and risk of lens opacities in a population-based study: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. Jama 1998, 280 (8), 714-718.
65. de Gruijl, F. R., Impacts of a projected depletion of the ozone layer. Consequences 1995, 1 (2), 1-10.
66. Thomas, A., Whales showing more sun damage. ABC Science 2010.
67. Aggarwal, A.; Kumari, R.; Mehla, N.; Singh, R. P.; Bhatnagar, S.; Sharma, K.; Sharma, K.; Amit, V.; Rathi, B., Depletion of the ozone layer and its consequences: a review. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2013, 4 (10), 1990.
68. Izrael, Y. A.; Semenov, S.; Anisimov, O.; Anokhin, Y. A.; Velichko, A.; Revich, B.; Shiklomanov, I., The fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: Working group II contribution. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology 2007, 32, 551-556.
69. Council, N. R., Halocarbons: effects on stratospheric ozone. 1976.
70. Morrisette, P. M., The evolution of policy responses to stratospheric ozone depletion. Natural Resources Journal 1989, 793-820.
71. Sand, P. H., Protecting the ozone layer: The Vienna Convention is adopted. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 1985, 27 (5), 18-43.
72. Protocol, M., Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office 1987, 26, 128-136.
73. Staehelin, J.; Harris, N. R.; Appenzeller, C.; Eberhard, J., Ozone trends: A review. Reviews of Geophysics 2001, 39 (2), 231-290.
74. Rowlands, I. H., The fourth meeting of the parties to the Montreal protocol: report and reflection. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 1993, 35 (6), 25-34.
75. Heath, E. A., Amendment to the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer (Kigali amendment). International Legal Materials 2017, 56 (1), 193-205.
76. Secretariat, U. N. E. P. O., Handbook for the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. UNEP/Earthprint: 2006.
77. 行政院環境保護署。「近年參與國際組織及推動經貿外交之成果與未來策進作為」之書面說明。行政院環境保護署：立法院，2023。
78. 阮國棟。國際環境公約國內法治化現狀。環境工程會刊，2003.
79. Schwartz, S. E.; Warneck, P., Units for use in atmospheric chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure and applied chemistry 1995, 67 (8-9), 1377-1406.
80. Stone, K.; Solomon, S.; Kinnison, D.; Mills, M. J., On recent large Antarctic ozone holes and ozone recovery metrics. Geophysical Research Letters 2021, 48 (22), e2021GL095232.
81. Dhomse, S. S.; Kinnison, D.; Chipperfield, M. P.; Salawitch, R. J.; Cionni, I.; Hegglin, M. I.; Abraham, N. L.; Akiyoshi, H.; Archibald, A. T.; Bednarz, E. M., Estimates of ozone return dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2018, 18 (11), 8409-8438.
82. Ivy, D. J.; Solomon, S.; Kinnison, D.; Mills, M. J.; Schmidt, A.; Neely III, R. R., The influence of the Calbuco eruption on the 2015 Antarctic ozone hole in a fully coupled chemistry‐climate model. Geophysical Research Letters 2017, 44 (5), 2556-2561.
83. Solomon, S.; Ivy, D. J.; Kinnison, D.; Mills, M. J.; Neely III, R. R.; Schmidt, A., Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer. Science 2016, 353 (6296), 269-274.
84. Stone, K. A.; Solomon, S.; Kinnison, D. E., On the identification of ozone recovery. Geophysical Research Letters 2018, 45 (10), 5158-5165.
85. Yu, P.; Davis, S. M.; Toon, O. B.; Portmann, R. W.; Bardeen, C. G.; Barnes, J. E.; Telg, H.; Maloney, C.; Rosenlof, K. H., Persistent stratospheric warming due to 2019–2020 Australian wildfire smoke. Geophysical Research Letters 2021, 48 (7), e2021GL092609.
86. Solomon, S.; Stone, K.; Yu, P.; Murphy, D.; Kinnison, D.; Ravishankara, A.; Wang, P., Chlorine activation and enhanced ozone depletion induced by wildfire aerosol. Nature 2023, 615 (7951), 259-264.
87. Chipperfield, M.; Hegglin, M.; Montzka, S.; Newman, P.; Park, S.; Reimann, S.; Rigby, M.; Stohl, A.; Velders, G.; Walter-Terrinoni, H., Report on unexpected emissions of CFC-11. 978-92-63-11268-2 2021.
88. All, S. E. f. Chilling Prospects 2022: Ozone Treaties – a global partnership for more sustainable cooling; Chilling prospects-2022, 2022.
89. 林宥辰。開發氣相層析心切技術分析空氣中有害揮發性有機化合物。國立中央大學，2023。
90. 楊雅宜。線上熱脫附-氣相層析/質譜儀技術即時監測工業區空氣中有害揮發性有機化合物。國立中央大學，2022。
91. Lovelock, J. E., A sensitive detector for gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1958, 1, 35-46.
92. Langford, V. S.; Milligan, D. B.; Padayachee, D.; Prince, B. J.; McEwan, M. J., Real time analysis of United States EPA Method TO-14A compounds using SIFT-MS. 2015.
93. Pleil, J. D.; Oliver, K. D.; McClenny, W. A., Enhanced performance of Nafion dryers in removing water from air samples prior to gas chromatographic analysis. Japca 1987, 37 (3), 244-248.
94. Pollock, D. D., Thermoelectricity: theory, thermometry, tool. ASTM International: 1985.
95. Grob, R. L.; Barry, E. F., Modern practice of gas chromatography. John Wiley & Sons: 2004.
96. Jeffery, G., Quantitative chemical analysis. New York: 1989.
97. Moody, H. W., The evaluation of the parameters in the van Deemter equation. Journal of Chemical Education 1982, 59 (4), 290.
98. Harris, D. C., Quantitative chemical analysis. Macmillan: 2010.
99. Lake, R. How do small particle size columns increase sample throughput?; RESTEK, 2016.
100. Pavia, D. L.; Lampman, G. M.; Kritz, G. S.; Engel, R. G. Introduction to Organic Laboratory Techniques . Thomson Brooks/Cole; 0495280690; ISBN 978-0-495-28069-9: 2006.
101. Lee, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-H.; Hsu, P.-H.; Hsieh, H.-C.; Wang, J.-L., A wide range of toxic VOCs measured by dual-sorbent passive sampling with validation by field online measurements. Environmental Pollution 2022, 314, 120201.
102. Wang, J.-L.; Chang, C.-J.; Lin, Y.-H., Concentration distributions of anthropogenic halocarbons over a metropolitan area. Chemosphere 1998, 36 (10), 2391-2400.
103. Lovelock, J., The electron capture detector: Theory and practice. Journal of Chromatography A 1974, 99, 3-12.
104. Krejči, M.; Dressler, M., Selective detectors in gas chromatography. Chromatographic Reviews 1970, 13 (1), 1-59.
105. Pellizzari, E., Electron capture detection in gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1974, 98 (2), 323-361.
106. Lovelock, J. E.; Maggs, R. J.; Wade, R. J., Halogenated hydrocarbons in and over the Atlantic. Nature 1973, 241 (5386), 194-196.
107. Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Crouch, S. R., Principles of instrumental analysis. Cengage learning: 2017.
108. McWilliam, I.; Dewar, R., Flame ionization detector for gas chromatography. Nature 1958, 181 (4611), 760-760.
109. Harley, J.; Pretorius, V., A new detector for vapour phase chromatography. Nature 1956, 178 (4544), 1244-1244.
110. Murugan, A.; Brown, A. S., Review of purity analysis methods for performing quality assurance of fuel cell hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40 (11), 4219-4233.
111. Sparkman, O. D.; Penton, Z.; Kitson, F. G., Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry: a practical guide. Academic press: 2011.
112. Wang, J.-L.; Lin, W.-C.; Chen, T.-Y., Using atmospheric CCl4 as an internal reference in gas standard preparation. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34 (25), 4393-4398.
113. Montzka, S. A.; Dutton, G. S.; Yu, P.; Ray, E.; Portmann, R. W.; Daniel, J. S.; Kuijpers, L.; Hall, B. D.; Mondeel, D.; Siso, C., An unexpected and persistent increase in global emissions of ozone-depleting CFC-11. Nature 2018, 557 (7705), 413-417.
114. Dolan, J. W., Peak tailing and resolution. LC GC NORTH AMERICA 2002, 20 (5), 430-437.
115. 劉文治。以二維氣相層析監測空氣中氟氯碳化物及氫氟氯碳化物。國立中央大學，2008。
116. Western, L. M.; Vollmer, M. K.; Krummel, P. B.; Adcock, K. E.; Crotwell, M.; Fraser, P. J.; Harth, C. M.; Langenfelds, R. L.; Montzka, S. A.; Mühle, J., Global increase of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons from 2010 to 2020. Nature Geoscience 2023, 16 (4), 309-313.
117. Bennett, S., A history of control engineering, 1930-1955. 1993.
118. Wasserman, L., All of statistics: a concise course in statistical inference. Springer: 2004; Vol. 26.
119. Fisher, R. A., XV.—The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1919, 52 (2), 399-433.
120. 陳奇蔚。半導體製造業揮發性有機物污染防制成本探討。2007。
121. 行政院環境保護署。電子產業及特定行業空氣污染改善輔導示範推廣及管制標準研訂專案工作計畫。2001。
122. 經濟部工業局。國內半導體製造業及光電業之產業現況、製程廢氣污染來源與排放特性。產業製程清潔生產與綠色技術資訊網，行業製程減廢及污染防治技術。
123. 陳永枝；陳孝輝。新型半導體全氟化物廢氣電漿處理技術。科儀新知，2006，(154)，47-58。
124.劉世尹。半導體廠 PFCs 及 VOCs 廢氣排放處理之研究。國立中央大學，2008。
125. 中華民國行政院環保署。中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。2022。
126. McJimsey, B. A.; Cawley, D., Reliability of Heat Pumps Containing R410-A Refrigerant. 1998.
127. Geller, L.; Elkins, J.; Lobert, J.; Clarke, A.; Hurst, D.; Butler, J.; Myers, R., Tropospheric SF6: Observed latitudinal distribution and trends, derived emissions and interhemispheric exchange time. Geophysical research letters 1997, 24 (6), 675-678.
128. Zuas, O.; Budiman, H.; Hamim, N., Measurement of SF6 using gc-ecd: a comparative study on the utilization of CO2-N2 mixture and CH4-Ar mixture as a make-up gas. Chemistry & Chemical Technology 2017, 11(4), 420-429.
129. 俞振海。行政院環保署環境保護政策二十年回顧，檢討與展望。2009.
130. 蘇義淵。以國際氣候變遷法制觀點評論我國溫室氣體減量法草案。2010。