| 研究生: |
張岸礕 An-pi Chang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以專案管理計分卡運用在建築專案執行之研究 A research on the utilization of project management scorecard in the implementation of a construction project |
| 指導教授: |
林志棟
Jyh-Dong Lin |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系在職專班 Executive Master of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 246 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 專案管理計分卡 、工程生命週期 、專案管理 、硬技術 、軟技術 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | construction lifecycle, project management |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:14 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本研究以接受交付對象委託工程顧問公司之工程專案管理技術服務總顧問為案例探討,本案例為某大型企業BOT開發案委託工程顧問公司負責建築工程專案管理技術服務總顧問之業務範疇。在整體建築專案生命週期各階段執行過程中,本研究個案工程專案管理組織能夠運用專案管理計分卡指標衡量工具,自我衡量執行與解決方案之成效。因此;本研究主要將探討如何以專案管理計分卡模式,運用於工程專案管理模式與成功提昇專案管理執行成效之研究。
本論文所應用之專案管理計分卡探討指標分別為:「衡量專案利害關係人滿意度、在專案期間衡量專案成員知識的差變、衡量專案的執行與進度、獲取專案管理資料的回饋、計算和詮釋業主投資的投資報酬率、獲取專案管理的無形指標以及監測專案管理的實際成本」。藉以對改善專案的執行與成果加以研析,並在現有的預算限制與資源下,尋求一個合理、合邏輯,且簡單、容易執行的方法。並配合案例中在主要執行專案內部與外部專案經理人與利害關係人(stakeholder)以問卷調查等方式獲取相關的衡量資訊,分析及彙整以瞭解評估關鍵指標,提供專案管理計分卡模式之運用,以瞭解並改善專案管理組織之運作流程,以達成業主所委託之專案管理模式效益提昇。
在建築專案管理模式的成功要件中,最重要的是執行專案的人員除了應具備專案管理的「硬技術」與方法,如專案知識、技能與工具外,還須特別要求需有「軟技術」的特質,如人際關係、政治與權利問題的處理,溝通、協調、談判的能力,衝突的化解、決策分析、人力資源的運用及專案領導的藝術。所以專案管理的知識與運用,必須要「軟硬兼施」,在生命週期各個不同的階段,達成受委託專案管理與技術顧問服務模式之整體績效提昇。
Abstract
In this research, we shall examine a case study of a construction consultant firm assuming the role of chief construction project management technical service consultant in a given construction project as requested in the contract. The case study involves a certain large corporation enlisting the expertise of a construction consultant firm in a BOT development project and covers all pertinent operations and responsibilities assumed by the firm as the chief construction project management technical service consultant in said project. The construction project management organization featured in the case study was able to utilize project management scorecard indicator as a tool for performance assessment throughout all phases of implementation in the entire construction lifecycle to self-assess performance and gauge the results of solutions. As such, this research will focus on the discussion on how the project management scorecard model may be deployed in a construction project management framework to successfully improve project management performance.
The indicators of project management scorecard presented in the case study that are relevant to the thesis include: measurement of project stakeholders’ satisfaction; measurement of variance in project members’ knowledge during the project; measurement of project implementation and progress; acquisition of feedback from project management data; computation and interpretation of ROI for investors; acquisition of intangible indicators for project management; and monitoring of actual costs incurred from project management. These indicators would be sufficiently analyzed based on their impact on project implementation and results. Given existing budget limitations and resources, this thesis will attempt to determine a solution that is reasonable, logical yet simple and easy to execute. Relevant measurement data from the case study has been obtained through means of a questionnaire completed by internal/external project managers and stakeholders in the case study, and these data has been duly analyzed and compiled to offer in-depth knowledge of key indicators that would be instrumental in the deployment of project management scorecard model. These indicators allow one to better understand and improve upon the operations of existing project management organization to achieve improvement in project management performance as expected by proprietors.
Amidst all criteria for success in construction project management, it is not only imperative for responsible personnel to be equipped with the “hard skill and methods” (i.e. professional knowledge, skills and tools involved in the project) required for project management but also the qualities for “soft skills” (i.e. the ability to handle issues relating to interpersonal relationships, politics and rights; the capacity to communicate, coordinate and negotiate; the skills to resolve conflicts, analyze decisions, utilize human resources; and the art of project leading). In other words, the application of both “hard” and “soft” skills are crucial to the acquisition and utilization of knowledge needed for project management throughout different phases of the construction lifecycle to achieve improvement in the overall performance of project management and technical consultant service as anticipated.
參考文獻
1. 熊培霖、范淼、黃哲明、周祥東、陸正平,專案管理基礎知識與應用實
務-專案管理入門寶典,博鴻國際專案管理顧問股份有限公司,2008。
2. 關柯、李小冬、關為泓譯,建築管理,Daniel W.Halpin & Ronald
W.Woodhead,中國建築工業出版社,P94~P95、P103~P104,北京,2004。
3. 泛華建設集團,建築工程項目管理服務指南,中國建築工業出版社,
P61,北京,2006。
4. 田振郁主編,工程項目管理實用手冊,中國建築工業出版社,P439,北
京,2007。
5. 王廷樹主編,建築工程項目管理,中國建築工業出版社,P270~P278,北
京,2007。
6. 許光華,專案管理知識體系的觀點,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,2006。
7. 劉孟華譯,專案管理計分卡,Jack J.Philips,PH.D.,Timothy W.
Bothell,PH.D.,and G Lynne Snead,臉譜出版社,2005。
8. 劉孟華譯,專案管理聖經,James P.Lewis,臉譜出版社,2004。
9. 先鋒企管出版部譯,成功專案的企劃與管理(初版),井野 弘 著,和昌
出版社,2006。
10. 林宜萱譯,專案管理溝通協調工作手冊,Nancy B.Cobb,McGraw-Hill
Education(Asia),2003。
11. 沈永年、潘煌鍟、許永豐,施工安全與環境管理,全華圖書股份有限公
司,P4-P8,2007。
12. 建築業與房地產企業工商管理培訓教材編審委員會編,國際工程管理,
中國建築工業出版社,P213~P214,北京,1998。
13. 公共工程委員會編著,委託專管理模式之工程進度及品質管理參考手冊
(第三版),P16~P17,民97年。
14. 李永然,工程爭議與解決法律實務,永然文化出版股份有限公司,P92,
2004。
15. 公共工程委員會編著,政府採購爭議處理事件案源及問題類型分析成果
報告(第一版),理律法律事務所,台北市,民93年。
16. 劉復苓譯,專案管理,Helen S.Cook,Karen Tate,McGraw-Hill Educ
-ation(Asia),P195~P205,P322~P327,2005。
17. 江麗美譯,有效專案管理(第一版),Peter Hobbs,智庫股份有限公司,
2001。
18. 仆振華、吳之昕,施工項目成本控制與合同管理,中國建築工業出版社,
P167~P171,北京,2004。
19. 張明正,中國大陸工程專案管理實務,詹氏書局,P159、P182~p185,
2006。
20. 先鋒企管出版部譯,問題解決專家(3刷),齊藤嘉則 著,和昌出版社,
2006。
21. 陳儀、戴至中譯,財務管理(初版二刷),Robert A.Cook,McGraw-Hill
Education(Asia),2007。
22. 張宏裕,團隊建立計分卡,梅林文化事業有限公司,民95年。
23. 劉復苓譯,成功專案管理手冊,Gary R.Heerken,McGraw-Hill Education
(Asia),2005。
24. 劉復苓譯,4-Step專案管理,Curtis R.Cook,McGraw-Hill Education
(Asia),P73,2005。
25. 強茂山主編,成功通過PMP,清華大學出版社,北京,2006。
26. 郭進龍譯,第五項修煉「學習型組織的藝術與實務」(第五版), Peter
M.Senge,天下遠見出版股份有限公司,P146、P158,2008。
27. PMI(2004),A guide to the project management body of knowledge
:PMBOK guide.-3rd ed.
28. Jack J.Philips,PH.D.,Timothy W.Bothell,PH.D.,and G Lynne
Snead(2002),The Project management scorecard,Elsevier(USA)。
29. PMI(2000),P6~P7,Construction Extension to A Guide to the
Management Body of Knowledge,PMBOK guide-2000 Edition。
30. Gary R.Heerkens(2005),Project Managemen,The McGraw-Hill Educ
-cation(Asia)。
31. Blackwell publishing (2007),Project Managemen in Construction
(Fifth Edition)。