本論文以Leslie Feinberg的小說《石牆藍調》（Stone Butch Blues）與日本的耽美辯論作為案例研究，探討1990年代「再現」與「未來性」如何影響酷兒身份的形成與塑造。透過Amiee Bahng的未來性理論以及Lee Edelman對生殖未來主義的批判，本文批判了酷兒進步的線性敘事，並揭示了當下生活經驗如何被對未來的投射所宰制。
本文指出，《石牆藍調》呈現了激進女性主義運動與Butch身份之間的張力，揭露非規範性酷兒表達在女性主義論述中的邊緣化現象。同樣，日本的耽美辯論揭示了女性對男性同性戀浪漫幻想與同性戀者現實鬥爭之間的矛盾。兩組文本均反映出新自由主義與全球酷兒規範性的壓力，這種壓力將多元的酷兒表達限制在狹隘的包容性與「尊重性」框架內。
本文最終主張重新想像酷兒的未來性，超越單一化與同質化的敘事框架。通過重新審視過往酷兒鬥爭的多樣性，本文旨在挖掘尊重酷兒存在複雜性的替代性抵抗與團結模式。

This thesis examines the interplay between representation and futurity in shaping queer existence and movements during the 1990s through an analysis of two distinct cases: Leslie Feinberg’s novel Stone Butch Blues and the Japanese yaoi debates during 1992-1996. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from Amiee Bahng’s conceptualization of futurity and Lee Edelman’s critique of reproductive futurism, the study critiques the linear narratives of queer progress and the subjectification of lived experiences to speculative futures.
The analysis reveals how Stone Butch Blues portrays tensions between radical feminist movements and butch identity, highlighting the marginalization of non-conforming queer expressions within feminist discourses. Similarly, the yaoi debates expose the conflicts between female fantasies of male-male romance and the realities of gay men’s struggles for visibility and rights in Japan. Both texts reflect the pressures of neoliberalism and global queer normativity, which constrain diverse expressions of queerness into narrow frameworks of inclusion and respectability. When approached by contemporary readers, both texts become embodiments of a neoliberal reflexivity, which not only advocate a settled future within their narratives, but also serve as historical evidences that validate the justice of the neoliberal futurity.
The thesis ultimately advocates for a reimagining of queer solidarity that transcends singular, homogenized readings. By revisiting the multiplicity of past queer struggles, it seeks to uncover alternative modes of resistance and solidarity that honor the complexities of queer existence.

Altman, D. (1996). On Global Queering. Australian Humanities Review, Issue 02.
Azuma, H. (2009). Otaku: Japan’s database animals (English ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
Azuma, H. (2017). 観光客の哲学 [A Pholosophy of the Tourist]. Genron.
Bahng, A. (2018). Migrant futures: Decolonizing speculation in financial times. Duke University Press.
Bloom, A., & Breines, W. (Eds.). (2003). “Takin’ it to the streets”: A sixties reader (2. ed). Oxford Univ. Press.
Charis Circle (Director). (1993, September). Leslie Feinberg Celebrating Stone Butch Blues at Charis Books 1993 [Video recording]. https://youtu.be/ogGZFcujkvI?si=jDJqIrSL5nju4U2Y
Delany, S. R. (1999). Times Square Red, Times Square Blue. New York University Press.
Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men Possessing Women. Putnam.
Edelman, L. (2007). No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Duke University Press.
Feinberg, L. (2005). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman (Nachdr.). Beacon Press.
Feinberg, L. (2010). Stone butch blues (Optimized ReadHowYouWant ed). Accessible Publishing Systems PTY Ltd.
Halberstam, J. (2018a). Toward a Trans* Feminism. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/jack-halberstam-towards-trans-feminism/
Halberstam, J. (2018b). Trans*: A quick and quirky account of gender variability. University of California press.
Hartley, B. (2015). A Genealogy of Boys Love. In M. McLelland, K. Nagaike, K. Suganuma, & J. Welker (Eds.), Boys Love Manga and Beyond (pp. 21–41). University Press of Mississippi. https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781628461190.003.0002
Ichikawa, E. (1993). ゲイ・ステレオタイプ批判としての「ヤオイ論争」 ["Yaoi Debates" as a Criticism to Gay Stereotype]. CHOISIR, 29, 1–11.
Irokawa, N. (1992). いつも「女がいちばんかわいそう」か？ [Is it true that “women are always the most pitiful”?]. CHOISIR, 21, 18–21.
Itō, U. (2020). 同性愛文学の系譜：日本近現代文学におけるLGBT以前／以後 [The Genealogy of Same-Sex Love Literature: Past and Future of LGBT in Japanese Contemporary Literature]. Bensei Shuppan.
Kurihara, C. (1993a). しかるべき反論のための反論　[A Proper Counter-Argument for the Purpose of Rebuttal]. CHOISIR, 30, 12–18.
Kurihara, C. (1993b). 駆け込み寺としてのやおい [Yaoi as a Temple Refuge]. CHOISIR, 32, 19–23.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1994). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law (9. printing). Harvard Univ. Press.
Mizoguchi, A. (2016). BL Shinka Ron. Rye Field Publications.
Moses, C. (1999). Queering Class: Leslie Feinberg’s “Stone Butch Blues.” Studies in the Novel, 31(1), 74–97.
Nobi, N. (1994). やおい少女の解剖学 [The Anatomy of Yaoi Girls]. CHOISIR, 34, 26–32.
Phillips-Fein, K. (2017). Fear city: New York’s fiscal crisis and the rise of austerity politics (First edition). Metropolitan Books.
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.1086/493756
Sagawa, T. (2024). JUNEの時代: BLの夜明け前 [The Era of JUNE: Before the Dawn of BL]. 亜紀書房.
Sato, M. (1992a). ヤオイなんて死んでしまえばいい [All Yaoi Shall Die]. CHOISIR, 20, 7–9.
Sato, M. (1992b). 少女マンガから失われつつあるもの [What is Missing in Shojo Manga]. CHOISIR, 23, 16–18.
Sato, M. (1993). ファンタジーと現実 [Fantasy and Reality]. CHOISIR, 31, 31–33.
Sato, M. (1994). 少女マンガ時代 [The Era of Shojo Manga]. CHOISIR, 33, 14–17.
Spade, D. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law (Revised and expanded edition). Duke University Press.
Takamatsu, H. (1992). 「敵ー味方」論の彼方へー見ようとすること、見えてくること　[To the Other Side of "Friends/Enemies Relation“—What We Want to See and What We Can See]. CHOISIR, 20, 10–13.
Takamatsu, H. (1993). 性的ファンタジーは誰のものか [To Whom Does Sexual Fantasy Belong to]. CHOISIR, 29, 12–15.
Welker, J. (2015). A Brief History of Shonen’ai, yaoi, and Boys’ Love. In M. McLelland, N. Kazumi, S. Katsuhito, & J. Welker (Eds.), Boys Love Manga and Beyond: History, Culture, and Community in Japan (pp. 42–75). University Press of Mississippi.
Yoneyama, L. (2005). Liberation under Siege: U.S. Military Occupation and Japanese Women’s Enfranchisement. American Quarterly, 57(3), 885–910.