| 研究生: |
彭郁翔 Yu-Siang Peng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不同電腦模擬模式對於合作科學問題解決之影響:以眼動進行分析 The Effects of Different Computer Simulations’ Mode on Collaborative Science Problem Solving: An eye-tracking analysis |
| 指導教授: |
劉晨鐘
Chen-Chung Liu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 59 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電腦模擬 、科學學習 、合作問題解決 、眼動分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | computer simulation, science learning, collaborative problem solving, eye-tracking |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:14 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
合作問題解決能力(Collaborative problem solving,CPS)被視為21世紀重要核心能力之一,在學習上也使用合作問題解決活動讓學習者透過合作來學習。而在科學教育中,電腦模擬可以讓學習者透過調整變數來觀察模擬現象的變化,進而探究其科學概念。此外,在學習的分析上可以透過眼動追蹤的技術來了解學習者的學習歷程以及注意力分布的情形。因此本研究應用電腦模擬輔助學習者在合作科學學習活動進行學習,以眼動追蹤方式蒐集學習者在活動過程中的眼動資料,探討在不同合作模擬操控模式下,學習者合作問題解決能力以及共同注意力分布情況。結果顯示雖然不同的合作模擬操控模式對於學習者主觀感受上沒有影響,卻造成其共同注意力分布的不同,進而使學習表現有差異;這也顯示了應用眼動追蹤於學習分析中的方式,能夠有效地了解學生在學習過程中的狀況。最後,本研究依據結果提出對於未來研究的建議
Collaborative problem solving (CPS) is considered as a critical skill of the 21st century. Adopting CPS activities in instruction can help learners to learn through collaborating with peers. In science education, computer simulations can facilitate learners adjusting the variables and observing changes between different variables in order to explore scientific concepts. Additionally, the use of eye-tracking in learning analysis help understand how learners learn and their attention patterns during the learning process. This study designed a collaborative scientific learning activity based on a simulation to help learners learn. Using eye-tacking method to collect learners’ eye movement data in process of the learning activity to analyze learners’ CPS skills and joint attention in different collaborative simulation modes. The result shows that between two collaborative simulation modes, learners’ feeling about collaborating with peers in activity is not significantly different, but the learners’ joint attention is significantly different. Moreover, the different in joint attention also cause the significantly different in learning performance between two groups. This result also revealed that applying eye-tracking techniques in learning analysis is a useful way to understand learners’ behaviors in learning process. Finally, according to the result in this study, we provide some suggestions on future research.
邱秉誠(2016)。個人電腦模擬及合作電腦模擬對於合作科學問題解決之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
黃福坤(2006)。透過物理模擬動畫進行物理教學與學習-介紹簡易模擬動畫設計環境Easy Java Simulation。物理雙月刊,28,3,536-543。
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創 造力之關係。教育心理學報,39,127-149。
陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠(2010)。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),39-68。
柯華葳、陳明蕾、廖家寧(2005)。詞頻、詞彙類型與眼球運動型態:來自篇章閱讀的證據。中華心理學刊,47(4),381-398。
Beymer, D., Russell, D., & Orton, P. (2008, September). An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. In Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 2 (pp. 15-18).
Belenky, D., Ringenberg, M., Olsen, J., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013, June). Using Dual Eye-Tracking Measures to Differentiate between Collaboration on Procedural and Conceptual Learning Activities. Paper presented at The 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Madison, WI.
Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiu, B. C., Liu, C. C., Chiang, S. H. F., Wen, C. T., ... & Wu, S. W. (2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education, 114, 222-235.
Chang, C.-J., Liu, C.-C., Wu, Y.-T., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Chiu, B.-C., …Chang, C.-K. (2016, Dec). Students’ Perceptions on Problem Solving with Collaborative Computer Simulation. Chen, W. et al. (Eds.) (2016). Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computers in Education. India: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 34(4), 455-470.
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice. Clemson, SC: Springer.
Dodge, R., & Cline, T. S. (1901). The angular velocity of eye movements. Psychological Review, 8, 145-157.
Durán, M. J., Gallardo, S., Toral, S. L., Martínez-Torres, R., & Barrero, F. J. (2007). A learning methodology using Matlab/Simulink for undergraduate electrical engineering courses attending to learner satisfaction outcomes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(1), 55-73.
Esquembre, F. (2004). Easy Java Simulations: A software tool to create scientific simulations in Java. Computer Physics Communications, 156(2), 199-204.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and Approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Goldberg, J. H., Stimson, M. J., Lewenstein, M., Scott, N., & Wichansky, A. M. (2002, March). Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (pp. 51-58).
Hsu, C.-Y., Chiou, G.-L., & Tsai, M.-J. (2016, August). A pilot study on developing and validating a fixation-based scaffolding learning system. Poster presented at 2016 International Conference of East-Asian Association for Science Education. Tokyo, Japan.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12(4), 435-449.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology, 8(4), 441-480.
Jermann, P., Nüssli, M. A., & Li, W. (2010, September). Using dual eye-tracking to unveil coordination and expertise in collaborative Tetris. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (pp. 36-44).
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.
Liu, C. Y., Wu, C. J., Wong, W. K., Lien, Y. W., & Chao, T. K. (2017). Scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers & Education, 105, 44-56.
Marwan, N., & Kurths, J. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. Physics Letters A, 302(5-6), 299-307.
Marwan, N., Romano, M. C., Thiel, M., & Kurths, J. (2007). Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Physics reports, 438(5-6), 237-329.
National Research Council. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nüssli, M.-A. (2011). Dual eye-tracking methods for the study of remote collaborative problem solving. (Doctoral dissertation). doi: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-5232.
Petersen, A. C. (2012). Simulating nature: A philosophical study of computer-simulation uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice (pp. 6-9). Florida, FL: CRC Press.
Pietinen, S., Bednarik, R., Glotova, T., Tenhunen, V., & Tukiainen, M. (2008, March). A method to study visual attention aspects of collaboration: eye-tracking pair programmers simultaneously. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (pp. 39-42).
Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045-1060.
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153.
Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375-385.
Trey, L., & Khan, S. (2008). How science students can learn about unobservable phenomena using computer-based analogies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 519-529.
Villamor, M., & Rodrigo, M. M. (2017). Impact of Both Prior Knowledge and Acquaintanceship on Collaboration and Performance: A Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment. The 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, New Zealand.
White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 205.
Wang, C. Y., Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). Multimedia recipe reading: Predicting learning outcomes and diagnosing cooking interest using eye-tracking measures. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 9-18.
Winsberg, E. (2013). Computer simulations in science. Retrieved from https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/entries/simulations-science/