環境快速變革、科技日新月異，許多創新技術及新興市場應運而生。為全球企業帶來新的機會，同時也產生前所未有的挑戰。在如此高度競爭的時代背景下，企業必須隨時保持創新，不斷超越自己、追求進步以防被市場淘汰。

創新的驅動力經常源於組織內部的員工。所謂的員工建言行為，是指員工對於組織當前的運作狀況，提出具前瞻性和改善性的積極建議。這樣的行為，是組織公民責任的重要的一環。通過員工的主動建言，可以有效引發組織內部的創新浪潮。這是因為建言來自於那些對企業的日常實務運作有深入了解的員工。他們的反饋和見解，對於組織來說是極其珍貴的，可以使組織及時地做出調整和方向上的修正。本研究旨在探究組織內創新氣候如何影響員工的兩種建言行為：促進性建言與抑制性建言，並進一步分析組織信任作為一個調節變項時，可能會產生的不同效應。

本研究以在臺灣企業任職的員工為主要研究對象，共回收了425份問卷。經資料清理後，共刪除37題重複填答、填答不全及無效數據（非在職員工等），共計388份有效問卷，問卷有效率約為91%。研究結果顯示，組織創新氣候對員工的促進性建言和抑制性建言都有正面影響。此外，組織信任對組織創新氣候在促進性建言方面並無顯著調節效果，而在抑制性建言則產生了正向調節效果。

In an era characterized by rapid environmental changes and constant technological advancements, numerous innovative technologies and emerging markets have emerged. In such a highly competitive landscape, businesses must maintain a culture of innovation, strive for progress, and avoid being phased out by the market.

The driving force behind innovation often stems from internal employees. Employee voice behavior, referring to proactive actions taken by employees to suggest improvements concerning the organization's current state, is considered a form of organizational citizenship behavior. This behavior effectively stimulates innovation within the organization because it comes from employees who best understand the practical operations of the business. These valuable feedback and opinions enable the organization to promptly make corrections and adjustments.

The objective of this research is to examine the effects of organizational innovation climate on two distinct forms of employee voice behavior: promotive and prohibitive. Additionally, it evaluates the moderating influence of organizational trust. The study targets in-service employees of Taiwanese enterprises, with a total of 425 questionnaires collected and 388 valid responses. The response rate was approximately 91%.

The research results indicate that organizational innovation climate has a positive impact on both promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors among employees. Additionally, organizational trust does not have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between organizational innovation climate and promotive voice behavior, but it does have a positive moderating effect on prohibitive voice behavior.

中文文獻
邱皓政(2000)。組織環境與創意行為—組織創新量表的發展與創新指標的建立。
何瑞枝、蔡啟通(2018)。不當督導與員工建言行為建言效能的中介與政治技能調節效果。管理學報，35(3)，355-382。
周麗芳、任金剛、林守紀（2013）。轉型領導與建言行為：文化價值觀的關鍵角色。組織與管理，6（2），115-159。
鄭仁偉、盧國銘、簡剛民與林宜蓁（2010）。人力資源管理滿意度與員工建言之關係－心理安全感的中介效果。中小企業發展季刊，16，109-131。
洪贊凱、曾鈺雯（2012）。從印象管理觀點探討組織個體政治技巧與建言行為之關係。人力資源管理學報，12（2），1-23。
游佳臻（2014）。員工建言行為回顧性研究。科技與人力教育季刊，1（2），20-32。
黃榮華、梁立邦（2005）。人本教練模式。台北：經濟新潮社。
熊欣華（2003）。組織間信任、組織行為研究在台灣：三十年回顧與展望。台北：桂冠。
熊欣華、蔡年泰與陳建安（2013）。員工意見表達行為：前因及其對主管績效評量之影響。臺大管理論叢，23（2），133-163。
蔡啟通、黃國隆、高泉豐(2001)，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報，18(4)，527-566
簡文娟(1999)，組織創新氣候評鑑表之鑑立－以高科技產業為實證對象。中央大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園。

英文文獻
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing
the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5),
1154-1184.
Amabile, T.M., Hill, K.G., Hennessey, B.A. and Tighe, E. (1994) The Work
Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational
Orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–67.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235–258.
Ashford, S. J. (1989). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 871-875.
Bharadwaj, S., & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovations happen in organizations individual creativity mechanisms,organizational creativity mechanisms or both?. The Journal of Product lnnovation Management, 17(6), 424-434.
Bryson, A. (2004). Managerial responsiveness to union and non-union worker voice in Britain. Industrial Relations Journal, 43(1), 213-241.
Chen, Z., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Constructive controversy, elaboration, and individual learning. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 729-742.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Forehand, G. A., & Gilmer, B. V. H.(1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior. Psycho- logical Bulletin, 62, 228-240.
Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.2307/258140
Hsiung, H. H. (2012). The relationships between organizational climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in the hospitality industry. *Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 36*(3), 358-397.
Huang, C. C., & Hsieh, H. H. (2015). The effects of trust in supervisor on employee voice: An inverted U-shaped relationship. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(7), 1113-1124.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Kopelman, R. E., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The Role of Climate and Culture in Productivity. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture (pp. 282-318).
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87-112.
Miao, R., Lu, L., Cao, Y., & Du, Q. (2020). The High-Performance Work System, Employee Voice, and Innovative Behavior: The Moderating Role of Psychological Safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041150
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don’t Communicate Upward and Why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191.
Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51*(6), 1189-1203.
Tagiuri, R. (1968). The Concept of Organizational Climate. In R. Tagiuri, & G. H. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational Climate: Exploration of a Concept (pp. 11-32). Boston: Harvard University Press.
Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J.L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 27-41.
Wood, S. (1999). Human Resource Management and Performance: Evidence from Small and Medium-Sized Firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(4), 652-678.