為瞭解職安衛管理系統運作的成效，績效量測為不可或缺的一環，績效指標使用上可分為主動式績效指標與被動式績效指標二類，被動式績效指標無法協助事業單位瞭解事件與事故發生的真正原因，而主動式績效指標則是主動且積極的發掘可能潛在的職安衛缺失，協助事業單位採取必要的控制措施予以改善。
　　本研究探討主動式績效量測機制與OHSAS 18001主動式績效指標設計程序兩部分，主動式績效量測機制是以西澳礦業與資源產業協會所建立的主動式績效量測機制為依據，將事業單位作業場所的職安衛措施，分成三個階段進行量測，分別為輸入、程序及產出三類，且主動式績效量測機制於設計過程，考量了品質管理的概念，可確保投入的資源有效的運用，並檢視產出是否達到預期的目標。利用西澳礦業與資源產業協會所建議的主動式績效量測機制，可協助事業單位瞭解風險控制的狀況，及時採取必要的改善措施，達到持續改善的目的。
　　本研究探討OHSAS 18001主動式績效指標設計程序，考量OHSAS 18001和OHSAS 18002績效量測與監督的要求，及澳洲安全與職業傷害補償委員會所建議的主動式績效指標的發展與應用程序，協助事業單位選擇主動式績效指標有更詳細的考量事項。此外，本研究還提供主動式績效量測表，協助事業單位瞭解主動式績效量測的程序，及職安衛措施有待加強的地方。

In order to understand the operation of occupational safety and health management system effectiveness, performance measurement is the essential element. Performance indicators can be divided into leading and lag performance indicators. Lag performance indicators cannot explain the real cause of accidents for organization. Leading performance indicators are active and positive, they explore the potential weaknesses of OHS and assist organizations taking necessary control action.
This study discuss leading performance measurement mechanism and design process of OHSAS 18001 leading performance indicators. This study is based on leading performance measurement mechanism of Western Australian Minerals and Resources Industry. The occupational health and safety measures of workplace of organizations are divided to three measure stages, which are input, process and output. The design process of leading performance measurement mechanism considers the concept of quality management. The quality management can ensure efficiency of using resources, and check whether the results achieve the expected targets. In order to continuously improve OHS measures, this study use the leading performance measurement mechanism of Western Australian Minerals and Resources Industry, can help organizations understand the risk control and promptly take necessarily improved measures.
Assisting organizations choose leading performance indicators. This study discusses the design process of OHSAS 18001 leading performance indicators. Considering requirements of the performance measurement and monitoring of OHSAS 18001 and OHSAS 18002, and consider the development and application of leading performance indicators process of Australian Safety and Compensation Council. In addition, this study also provides leading performance measurement table to help organizations to understand design process of OHSAS 18001 leading performance indicators.

1. British Standards Institution, OHSAS 18001:2007-Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems-Requirements, London, 2007.
2. The Chamber of Minerals and Energy, Guide to Positive Performance Measurement in the Western Australian Minerals and Resources Industry, Australia, 2004.
3. British Standards Institution, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems-Guidelines for the Implementation of OHSAS 18001:2007, OHSAS 18002: 2008, London, 2008.
4. Health and Safety Executive, Successful Health and Safety Management, HSE Books HSG 65, UK, 1991.
5. Audit Commission, Aiming to Improve the Principles of Performance Measurement, London, 2000.
6. Minerals Council of Australia, Positive Performance Measure-A practical guide, Australia, 2003.
7. Australian Safety and Compensation Council, GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF POSITIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, Australia, 2005.
8. Joint Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand Committee SF-001, AS/NZS 4801:2001, Occupational health and safety management systems-Specification with guidance for use, Australia and New Zealand, 2001.
9. 行政院勞工委員會，臺灣職業安全衛生管理系統指導綱領，台灣，2007。
10. 內田治、陳耀茂，品質管理EXCEL使用手冊，鼎茂書局，台灣，2007。
11. 全面品質管理發展中心有限公司，全面品質管理，台灣。http://www.tqc.com.hk/big5/consulting/tqm.htm#Q-People
12. 戴久永，全面品質管理，蒼海書局，台灣，2005。
13. 魏上翔，落實安全績效管理之探討，工業安全科技，台灣，2008。
14. G.I.J.M. Zwetsloot, Prospects and limitations of process safety performance indicators, Safety Science, 47, pp.495-497, UK, 2009.
15. Standards Australia/Standard New Zealand, Risk Management Guidelines Companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004, New Zealand, 2004.
16. 經濟部工業局，績效量測技術手冊，台灣，2001。
17. Consultnet Limited, Safety Performance Measurement, UK, http://consultnet.ie/Safety%20Performance%20Measurement.htm
18. M. Kathryn, From reactive to proactive - Can LPIs deliver, Safety Science, 47, pp. 491-492, United Kingdom, 2009.
19. S.G. Erikson, Performance indicators, Safety Science, 47, pp.468, Netherlands, 2009.
20. Step Change in Safety, Leading Performance Indicators: Guidance for Effective Use, UK, 2003.
21. Australian Government, Positive Performance Indicators, Australia, 2008.
22. Measuring Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Performance Commission, Positive Performance Indicators, Australia, 2004.
23. Audit Commission, On Target: The Practice of Performance Indicators, London, 2000.
24. The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, Measuring Up, England and Wales, 1998.
25. Health and Safety Executive, A GUIDE TO MEASURING HEALTH AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE, UK, 2001.
26. S. Ian, Using Positive Performance Indicators to Evaluate OHS Management System Effectiveness, Australia Post (NSW/ACT) OH&S Section, Sydney, 2002.
27. Energy Networks Association, Energy Networks Association Industry Guideline on Measuring OHS Performance, Australia, 2008.
28. P. Maxwell, Safety Management System, Division of Human Resources, Australia, 2008.
29. 經濟部工業局，安全衛生績效管理實務手冊，台灣，2005。
30. 李旭華，品質管理，蒼海書局，台灣，2005。
31. 蘇守謙，績效衡量的整合模型，叡揚資訊，台灣，2007。http://www.gss.com.tw/index.php/eis/263
32. Department of Labour, Measuring health and safety performance, New Zealand, http://www.dol.govt.nz/publications/research/good-sense/good-sense_04.asp
33. 蘇美如，職業安全衛生管理績效指標量測與應用，國立中央大學環境工程研究所碩士論文，台灣，2010。
34. L. Nemeth, THE OHS STRATEGIC PLANNING MODEL AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION, Sydney, 1994.
35. Australian Safety and Compensation Council, GUIDANCE FOR SMALL BUSSINESS ON THE USE OF POSITIVE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, Australia, 2005.