| 研究生: |
蔡世祺 Shih-chi Tsai |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
發展一服務導向資訊系統以開發產品平台 A service-oriented information system for developing product platform |
| 指導教授: |
高信培
Hsing-pei Kao |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Industrial Management |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 37 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 服務導向架構 、物件導向方法 、資訊平台 、產品平台 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | object-oriented methodology, service-oriented architecture, information system, product platform |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
面對全球化競爭,產品平台在開發多樣化產品上,扮演著不可或缺的角色。儘管此新方法能協助製造商更有效地鎖定目標市場,關於產品平台生命週期的資訊與各種專業知識仍必須分享整合在執行產品族開發專案的過程中。此外近年來隨著企業間協同合作,跨地域與跨組織的策略聯盟共同進行產品開發已儼然成為一種趨勢。
在分散式運算環境下,產品開發可視為密切合作溝通的知識分享流程,本研究目的在提出一個服務導向的產品平台開發資訊系統協助專案經理控管產品平台開發專案,並協同產品設計團隊完成產品平台生命週期各階段須面對的任務。此資訊系統採用物件導向方法與服務導向架構,針對產品平台開發情境,以物件導向方法分析系統模型,應用服務導向架構為資訊系統架構。最後以電子閱讀器產品為案例,展示此資訊系統操作情境。
To compete in the global market, product platform development (PPD) plays a crucial role in developing multiple products. While this new approach benefits the manufacturer to target broader market more efficiently, a great amount of information and variety of expertise regarding the lifecycle of the product platform need to be shared and integrated along the PPD project implementation. In addition, as an emerging trend, PPD is often demands collaboration across business partners that are distributed geographically and organizationally.
Considering PPD as a knowledge sharing process with intensive cooperative communication in a distributed computing environment, this study proposes an information system to facilitate the project manager to control the PPD project and the design team to perform various tasks regarding the product platform’s lifecycle. To develop the information system, object-oriented methodology (OOM) and service-oriented architecture (SOA) are adopted and integrated in an analytical framework. Focusing on the PPD scenarios, OOM is to identify and classify businesses objects, and SOA is to prototype the information system. A case on electronic reading device development will be depicted to demonstrate proposed information system.
Derr, K. W. (1995) Apply OMT: A Practical Step-by-step Guide to Using the Object Modeling Technique. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Du, X., Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M. (2001) Architecture of Product Family: Fundamentals and Methodology, Concurrent Engineering , Vol.9, No 4, pp. 309-325.
Ericsson, A., & Erixon, G. (1999) Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms, New York: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
Freek, E., & K., V. (1997) Architectures for product families, Computers in Industry , Vol.33, No 2-3, pp. 165-178.
Guner, S. (2005) Service Oriented Architecture, Hamburg-Harburg: TU.
Ho, T. H., & Tang, C. S. (1998) Product Variety Management: Research Advances. Springer.
Lit, P. D., & Delchambre, A. (2003) Integrated Design of a Product Family and Its Assembly System, Springer.
Lublinsky, B. (2007) Defining SOA as an architectural style, Retrieved from IBM: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/architecture/library/ar-soastyle/
MacKenzie, C. M., Laskey, K., McCabe, F., Brown, P. F., & Metz, R. (2007) Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0. OASIS.
Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, A. (1997) The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership, Free Press.
Meyer, M. H., & Utterback, J. M. (1992) The product family and the dynamics of core capability. Sloan School of Management , Vol.77, No 92, pp. 15-18.
N., S. (1999) Introducing interface management in product family development. Journal of Production Innovation Management , Vol.16, No 1, pp. 40–51.
Papazoglou, M. P. (2003) Service-oriented computing: concepts, characteristics and directions, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on (pp. 3-12). Web Information Systems Engineering.
Papazoglou, M. P., Traverso, P., Dustdar, S., & Leymann, F. (2007) Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges, Computer , Vol.40, No 11, pp. 38-45.
Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998) Planning product platforms, Sloan Management Review , Vol. 39, No.4, pp. 19–31.
Rungtusanatham, M., & Forza, C. (2005) Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions: Part A: Topic motivation, performance implications, and article review process. Journal of Operations Management , Vol.23, No. 3-4, pp. 257 - 265.
Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families: The case of the Sony walkman. Research Policy , Vol. 24, No.5, pp. 761–782.
Simpson, T. W. (2004) Product platform design and customization: Status and promise, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing , Vol.18, No.1, pp. 3–20.
Simpson, T. W., & D’Souza, B. (2004) Assessing variable levels of platform commonality within a product family using a multiobjective genetic algorithm, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, pp. 119–130.
Simpson, T. W., Maier, J. R., & Mistree, F. (2001a) Product platform design: Method and application, Research in Engineering Design , pp. 2-22.
Suh, N. P. (2001) Axiomatic design: Advances and applications, New York: Oxford University Press.
Thevenot, H. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2005) Commonality indices for assessing product families, In T. W. Simpson, Z. Siddique, & J. Jiao, Product platform and product family design: Methods and applications (pp. 107–129), New York: Springer.
TSENG, M. M., JIAO, J., & MERCHANT, M. E. (1996) Design for mass customization, CIRP Annals , Vol.45, No.1, pp. 153–156.
Ulrich, K. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy , Vol.24, No.3, pp. 419–440.
Wilhelm, B. (1997) Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen– their effects on the assembly process, In U. J. K. Shimokawa, Transforming automobile assembly, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.