本研究使用加拿大麥基爾大學(McGill University)所發展之雷達回波外延預報系統(McGill Algorithm for Precipitation nowcasting using Lagrangian Extrapolation, MAPLE)結合中央氣象局(Central Weather Bureau, CWB)的整合最大回波資料，檢視及評估台灣地區的極短期(0~6小時)降水預報情形。其中MAPLE系統包含兩個程序，依序為：1.雷達回波變分追蹤法(Variational Echo Tracking, VET)決定降水系統的移動場；2.由半拉格朗日後推平流法(semi-Lagrangian backward advection)決定降水系統的預報場。
本研究選取兩種不同天氣型態的三個個案進行分析，分別為：1.南修(NAMTHEUN)颱風(2010年08月30日~31日)、2.鋒面系統(2012年06月11日~12日)與3.麥德姆(MATMO)颱風(2014年07月21日~23日)。首先對VET過程所使用的兩種參數──移動向量密度及回波資料時間間隔進行敏感度測試。接著，利用最佳化設定進行定量降水即時預報(Quantitative Precipitation Nowcasting, QPN)評估。整體而言，除系統生成或消散迅速之區域MAPLE預報掌握程度較為不足之外，1~3小時的累積降水量值評估和空間分佈情況，MAPLE即時預報系統具有相當程度的水準與能力。另外，藉由VET移動場與環境風場(ECMWF再分析風場)進行相關性分析。結果顯示，移動場會與不同天氣型態的環境風場產生不同程度的關聯，颱風系統相較於垂直結構複雜之鋒面系統，其移動場與環境風場有較高的關聯性。最後討論VET移動場與複雜地形之作用。當系統進入臺灣陸地時，移動速度大致都有下降情況，確實能夠反映出受到地形阻擋影響，減緩預報過程系統外延速率，接近短時間內的觀測資訊。但是主要影響外延預報能力隨時間下降的主因，依然為缺乏系統與地形交互作用下的生成和消散機制。

In this study, the McGill Algorithm for Precipitation nowcasting using Lagrangian Extrapolation (MAPLE) system developed by McGill University is used to evaluate the very short-term forecast of precipitation in Taiwan. There are two procedures in MAPLE system. First, the motion field of precipitation is determined by Variational Echo Tracking (VET) technique. Second, a radar map is advected by means of a semi-Lagrangian backward advection scheme to be a precipitation forecast.
By using composite radar data from Central Weather Bureau (CWB), three real cases are selected for this study: a typhoon event occurred during 30-31 August 2010 (Namtheun typhoon); a Mei-Yu front case occurred during 11-12 June 2012; and a typhoon event occurred during 21-23 July 2014 (Matmo typhoon). Firstly, sensitivity tests between two parameters--vector density of motion field and time difference between each radar map in VET procedure is to determine the best setting of VET parameters for forecast. Secondly, the Quantitative Precipitation Nowcasting (QPN) would be evaluated. In general, forecasts by MAPLE system provide a certain degree capability about values and spatial patterns of the accumulated rainfall except for some rapidly growth and decay regions. Thirdly, the correlation of the VET motion field and the ECMWF reanalysis wind field is examined. It is found that most motion fields have a good relation with wind fields at each level in typhoon events, because the horizontal wind structure at one level is similar to the others. Finally, we focus on those VET motion fields that rainfall echoes are moving into Taiwan. The decrease of motion speed over Taiwan area is a good sign for extrapolation forecast, because it captures the blocking effect by orography to a certain extent. Must pay attention that main reason for rapid decrease in forecast ability is lack of growth and decay mechanism.

唐玉霜、張保亮，2015：劇烈天氣系統(QPESUMS)發展與客製化服務。中央氣象局104
年天氣分析與預報研討會。
張惠玲、吳佳蓉、林允才、唐玉霜、黃葳芃、陳嘉榮，2015：臺灣自動即時預報系統(TANC)
之對流啟始預報評估。中央氣象局104年天氣分析與預報研討會。
Atencia, A. and I. Zawadzki, 2014: A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part I: Lagrangian Ensemble Technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142(11), 4036-4052.
Bellon, A., I. Zawadzki, A. Kilambi, H. C. Lee, Y. H. Lee and G. Lee, 2010: McGill algorithm for precipitation nowcasting by lagrangian extrapolation (MAPLE) applied to the South Korean radar network. Part I: Sensitivity studies of the Variational Echo Tracking (VET) technique. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 46(3), 369-381.
Bowler, N. E., C. E. Pierce and A. W. Seed, 2006: STEPS: A probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132(620), 2127-2155.
Chan, J. C. L., and W. M. Gray, 1982: Tropical cyclone movement and surrounding flow relationships. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 1354–1374.
Chang, P. L., P. F. Lin, B. J. D. Jou and J. Zhang, 2009: An Application of Reflectivity Climatology in Constructing Radar Hybrid Scans over Complex Terrain. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26(7), 1315-1327.
Dong, K., and C. J. Neumann, 1986: The relationship between tropical cyclone motion and environmental geostrophic flows. Mon. Wea. Rev., 114, 115–122.
Germann, U. and I. Zawadzki, 2002: Scale-dependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part I: Description of the methodology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130(12), 2859-2873.
Germann, U. and I. Zawadzki, 2004: Scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part II: Probability forecasts. J. Appl. Meteorol., 43(1), 74-89.
Germann, U., I. Zawadzki and B. Turner, 2006: Predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part IV: Limits to prediction. J. Atmos. Sci., 63(8), 2092-2108.
Golding, B.W., 1998. NIMROD: A system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteor. Applic., 5, 1–16.
Laroche, S. and I. Zawadzki, 1994: A Variational Analysis Method for Retrieval of 3-Dimensional Wind-Field from Single Doppler Radar Data. J. Atmos. Sci., 51(18), 2664-2682.
Laroche, S. and I. Zawadzki, 1995: Retrievals of Horizontal Winds from Single-Doppler Clear-Air Data by Methods of Cross-Correlation and Variational Analysis. J Atmos Ocean Tech, 12(4), 721-738.
Lee, H. C., Y. H. Lee, J. C. Ha, D. E. Chang, A. Bellon, I. Zawadzki and G. Lee, 2010: McGill algorithm for precipitation nowcasting by lagrangian extrapolation (MAPLE) applied to the South Korean radar network. Part II: Real-time verification for the summer season. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 46(3), 383-391.
Li, P. W. and E. S. T. Lai, 2004: Short-range quantitative precipitation forecasting in Hong Kong. J. Hydrol., 288(1-2), 189-209.
Lin, C., S. Vasic, A. Kilambi, B. Turner and I. Zawadzki, 2005: Precipitation forecast skill of numerical weather prediction models and radar nowcasts. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(14).
Mandapaka, P. V., U. Germann, L. Panziera and A. Hering, 2012: Can Lagrangian Extrapolation of Radar Fields Be Used for Precipitation Nowcasting over Complex Alpine Orography? Weather Forecast., 27(1), 28-49.
Mueller, C., T. Saxen, R. Roberts, J. Wilson, T. Betancourt, S. Dettling, N. Oien and J. Yee, 2003: NCAR Auto-Nowcast System. Weather Forecast., 18(4), 545-561.
Navon, I. M., and D. M. Leger, 1987: Conjugate-gradient method for large-scale minimization in meteorology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1479–1502.
Radhakrishna, B., I. Zawadzki and F. Fabry, 2012: Predictability of Precipitation from Continental Radar Images. Part V: Growth and Decay. J. Atmos. Sci., 69(11), 3336-3349.
Rinehart, R., and E. Garvey, 1978: Three-dimensional storm motion detection by conventional weather radar. Nature, 273, 287–289.
Roy, C. and R. Kovordanyi, 2012: Tropical cyclone track forecasting techniques - A review. Atmos. Res., 104, 40-69.
Seed, A. W., 2003: A dynamic and spatial scaling approach to advection forecasting. J. Appl. Meteorol., 42(3), 381-388.
Tsonis, A., and G. Austin, 1981: An evaluation of extrapolationtechniques for the short-term prediction of rain amounts. Atmos. Ocean, 19, 54–65.
Turner, B. J., I. Zawadzki and U. Germann, 2004: Predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part III: Operational nowcasting implementation (MAPLE). J. Appl. Meteorol., 43(2), 231-248.
Tuttle, J. D. and G. B. Foote, 1990: Determination of the Boundary-Layer Air-Flow from a Single Doppler Radar. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7(2), 218-232.
Velden, C. S. and L. M. Leslie, 1991: The Basic Relationship between Tropical Cyclone Intensity and the Depth of the Environmental Steering Layer in the Australian Region. Weather Forecast., 6(2), 244-253.
Wang, C. C., B. K. Chiou, G. T. J. Chen, H. C. Kuo and C. H. Liu, 2016: A numerical study of back-building process in a quasistationary rainband with extreme rainfall over northern Taiwan during 11-12 June 2012. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16(18), 12359-12382.
Wilson, J. W., N. A. Crook, C. K. Mueller, J. Z. Sun and M. Dixon, 1998: Nowcasting thunderstorms: A status report. B. Am. Meteoro.l Soc., 79(10), 2079-2099.
Xin, L. Y., G. Reuter and B. Larochelle, 1997: Reflectivity-rain rate relationships for convective rainshowers in Edmonton - Research note. Atmos. Ocean, 35(4), 513-521.