跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 李永宏
Yung-Hung Lee
論文名稱： 管理型態與內在價值觀對於員工工作投入與滿意度影響之研究－以中國大陸員工為例
On Intrinsic Work Values and Management Practice: A Case of Employees' Job Involvement and Satisfaction in Mainland China
指導教授： 陳春希
Chun-Hsi Chen
口試委員:
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 管理學院 - 企業管理學系在職專班
Executive Master of Business Administration
論文出版年： 2014
畢業學年度： 102
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 53
中文關鍵詞： 管理模式 、內在價值觀 、工作滿意度 、工作投
外文關鍵詞： management practice, intrinsic work values, job satisfaction, job involvement
相關次數： 點閱：8  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究以中國大陸員工為研究對象，探討公司管理型態與員工內在價值觀對工作滿意度與工作投入的影響，本研究採用便利抽樣方式進行問卷調查，於研究期間發出400份問卷，收集了251份有效問卷。
    研究結果顯示：(1)管理型態與員工內在價值觀對工作滿意度與工作投入具有正向的影響關係; (2)工作滿意度與工作投入有正向的影響關係; (3)管理型態與員工內在價值觀，會經由工作滿意度的中介，正向影響個體對工作投入的程度。由於中國工作環境的特殊性，本研究將對此提供管理上的意涵與未來研究的建議。

    This study investigates the effects of corporate management practice and employees’ intrinsic work values on their job satisfaction and job involvement. It is found that management practice and individual intrinsic work values are positively related to employees’ job involvement. Employees’ job satisfaction is positively related to their job involvement. In addition, it is confirmed that job satisfaction would mediate the relationships between management practice and job involvement as well as intrinsic work values and job involvement. Recommendations and managerial implications are thus discussed.

    目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與研究動機.........................................................................................01 第二節 研究目的.............................................................................................................03 第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………………..………...04 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 管理型態.............................................................................................................05 第二節 內在價值觀.........................................................................................................10 第三節 工作滿意.............................................................................................................14 第四節 工作投入.............................................................................................................19 第五節 管理型態和內在價值觀對工作滿意度以及工作投入的關係.........................22 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構.............................................................................................................25 第二節 研究工具與研究對象.........................................................................................26 第三節 研究方法.............................................................................................................29 第四章 研究結果 第一節 敘述性統計分析.................................................................................................30 第二節 信度與效度.........................................................................................................32 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 研究結論與討論.................................................................................................37 第二節 研究結果與管理意涵……...…………..............................................................39 第三節 研究限制與對後續研究者的建議.....................................................................44 參考文獻...................................................................................................................................47 附錄問卷...................................................................................................................................50 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究流程圖.................................................................................................................04 圖3-1 研究架構圖.................................................................................................................25 表目錄 表 2-1 價值觀的定義….........................................................................................................12 表 2-2 工作投入的定義.........................................................................................................20 表 3-1 問卷題型摘要表.........................................................................................................26 表 4-1 研究樣本資料統計表................................................................................................ 31 表 4-2 Cronbach’s α信度分析表........................................................................................... 32 表 4-3 相關係數矩陣表........................................................................................................ 33 表 4-4 管理型態對工作投入的主要效果.............................................................................34 表 4-5 內在價值觀對工作投入的主要效果.........................................................................35 表 5-1 研究結果彙整表.........................................................................................................37

    一、中文部分
    1. 許士軍(1977)，「工作滿足個人特徵與組織氣候－文獻探討與實證研究」，國立政治大學學報，頁13-56。
    2. 黃國隆(1996)，「台灣與大陸企業員工工作價值觀之比較」，本土心理學研究第4期，頁92-147。
    3. 林功偉(1994)，「某科技公司台灣勞工與新加坡華裔勞工工作價值觀之差異研究」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    4. 翁珮雯(2006)，「人力資源專業人員角色、角色壓力與工作價值觀對工作投入之影響」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    5. 大前研一(2002)，「中國出租中」，許曉平譯，台北：天下財經出版。
    6. 高希均、林祖嘉、林文玲、許彩雪 (1997)，台商經驗，台北，天下出版社。

    二、英文部分
    1. Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, Relatedness and Growth: Human Needs in Organizational Settings. New York: Free Press.
    2. Arthur, J. B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel mini mills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488-506.
    3. Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670-687 .
    4. Boon, O.K., Arumugam, V., Safa, M.S., & Bakar, N.A. (2007). HRM and TQM: association with job involvement. Personnel Review, 36(6), 939-962.
    5. Borg, I. (1990). Multiple facetisations of work values. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39,401-412.
    6. Brooke, P.P., Russell, D.W., & Price, J.L. (1988). Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 139-145.
    7. Brown, S.P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin. 120(2), 235-255.
    8. Cheloha, R.S., & Farr, J.L. (1980). Absenteeism, job involvement, and job satisfaction in an organization setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 467-473.
    9. Crites, J.O. (1961). Factor analytical definitions of vocational motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 33-337.
    10. Delery, J. & Doty, D. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurations. Academy Of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
    11. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1988). Agency and institutional theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 488-511.
    12. Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 379-389.
    13. Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
    14. Fama, E.F. & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
    15. Farris, G.F. (1971). A predictive study of turnover. Personnel Psychology, 24, 311-328.
    16. Fishbein, M. (1967). Reading in Theory and Measurement. N.Y., Wiley.
    17. Gerhart, B. & Milkovich, G.T. (1990). Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 663-691.
    18. Hall, D.T., Goodale, J.G., Rabinowitz, S. & Morgan, M.A. (1978). Effects of top-down department and job change upon perceived employee behavior and attitudes: A natural field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(l), 62-72.
    19. Huselid, M.A. (1993). Estimates of the impact of human resource management practices on turnover and productivity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
    20. Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
    21. Ichniowski, G., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1994). The impact of human resource management practices on productivity. Columbia Business School working paper 15, Columbia University, NY.
    22. Jackson, S.E, Schüler, R.S., & Rivero, J.C. (1989), Organizational characteristics as predictors of personnel practices. Personnel Psychology, 42, 727-786.
    23. Khaleque, A. & Ralman, M.A. (1987). Perceived importance of job facets and overall job satisfaction of industrial workers. Human Relations, 40(7), 401-416.
    24. Locke, E.A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior, 4, 309-336.
    25. Locke, E.A. (1983). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette, (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1297-1349). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    26. Lodahl, T.M. & Kejnar. M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24-33.
    27. Lorence, J & Mortimer, J.T. (1985). Job involvement through the life course: A panel study of three age groups. American Sociological Review, 50, 618-638.
    28. Lund, D.B. (2003). Organizational culture and job satisfaction. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(3), 219-236.
    29. Mathieu, J.E. & Farr, J.L. (1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction.
    Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 127-133.
    30. Morrow, P.C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486-500.
    31. Ros, M. (1996), Basic individual values, work values, and the meaning of work.
    Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1999, 48 (1), 49-71.
    32. Mottar, C.J. (1985). The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 365-385.
    33. Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the
    Work force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    34. Terpstra, D.E. & Rozell, E.J. (1993). The relationship of staffing practices to organizational level measures of performance. Personnel Psychology, 46, 27-48.
    35. Pryor, K.G.L. (1987). Differences among differences- in search of general work preference dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 426-433.
    36. Kaplan, R.A., Boshoff, A.B., & Kellerman, A.M. ( 1991). Job involvement and job satisfaction of south African nurses compared with other professions. Curationis, 14, 1-10.
    37. Rabinowitz, S. & Hall, D.T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 84(2), 265-288.
    38. Rosenberg, M. (1957). Occupations and Values. Glencoe, 1L: Free Press.
    39. Saleh, S.D. & Hosek, J. (1976). Job involvement: concepts and measurements. Academy of Management Journal, 2(6), 213-224.
    40. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical, advance and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advertise in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
    41. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
    42. Seashore, S.E. & Taber, T.D.( 1975). Job satisfaction indicators and their correlates. The American Behavioral Scientist, 18, 333-368.
    43. Wollack, S., Goodale, J.G., Wijting, J.P. & Smith, P.C.(1971). Development of survey of work values. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 26-27.

    QR CODE
    :::