在這科技高速發展的時代中，學習的方法同樣與時俱進，數位學習成為現代學生不可或缺的一種學習方式。透過數位學習的方式，可幫助學習者找出學習的缺點，並引起學習者積極的學習動機。
本研究根據教育部桃竹苗區域教學資源分享之全國性服務平台計畫，創建了一個「台灣微積分題庫平台」，將「微積分」利用Maple TA這個數學專用的答題系統，稱為「Maple TA線上評量系統」，讓學生可以隨時隨地的測驗練習，觀看成績與測驗詳解，及時改正錯誤觀念。
而我們根據「教學評量」來解釋學習評量的概念，並指出其為系統地蒐集學生學習行為的資料，加以分析處理後，再根據預定之教學目標做價值判斷的歷程。本研究利用了多重對應分析、Pearson相關係數、因素分析法對學生行為作分析，從分析結果中，統整出該名學生學習動機、行為與學習成效之間的關係。
結果發現，學生行為大致可分為三種學習特點：學習意圖、時間管理、作業成績表現。若學生可以具備上述的「學習意圖」或是「時間管理」能力，又或是「寫作業」都對於學習有所幫助。且在學生作業成績表現分析中，發現「Maple TA線上評量系統」對於微積分的學習是有幫助的！另一方面，我們同樣發現Maple TA線上評量系統可以改進或增加的功能。

In this generation, science and technology develop very fast, so the ways of learning also change rapidly. E-learning becomes an indispensable way of learning for modern students. E-learning can help learners find out the shortcomings of their learning, and give learners positive motivation to learn.
Therefore, based on the service sharing platform plan of Regional Education Resource for Taoyuan Xinzhu Miaoli, in the research, a "Taiwan Calculus Item Pool Platform" is created. On this platform, students can use Maple TA Online Assessment System, for student to practice questions about calculus. This system not only allows students to do the assessment without any restrictions of time or location but also provides the correct answer for them; in addition, they also can see the procedure of calculating and receive their grades immediately.
And we explain the concept of learning assessment according to the "teaching assessment", and point out that learning assessment is a process that systematically collects the data of students' learning behavior, analyzes the data, and then evaluates the value according to the intended teaching goal. In this study, we use the multiple correspondence analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient, and factor analysis to analyze student behaviors, and to analyze the relationship among learning motivation, behavior and learning achievement.
The results show that student behaviors can be divided into three learning characteristics: learning intention, time management,and students’ homework. If the student can have the "learning intention", or "the ability of time management ", or "doing homework hard", it proves to be helpful for learning. According to the result of the student performance analysis, we found that "Maple TA Online Evaluation System" for calculus learning is helpful! On the other hand, we also found that Maple TA Online Evaluation System could be improved or add more functions.

參考文獻：
[1] 台灣微積分題庫平台：http://tzmarea.ncu.edu.tw/webs/-
[2] 多元入學管道：http://www.jbcrc.edu.tw/multi1.html
[3] 何榮桂（1990a）。電腦輔助教學系統中之測驗設計。教育部中等教育司：中等教育，41 卷，2 期，頁 29-34。
何榮桂（1990b）。電腦化測驗概述。現代教育，5(2)，頁 121-129。
[4] 何榮桂（1997）。從「測驗電腦化與電腦化測驗」再看網路化測驗。測驗與輔導， 144，頁 2972-2974。
[5] 何榮桂（1999）。量身定製的測驗- 適性測驗。測驗與輔導，(157)，頁 3288-3293。
[6] 何榮桂（2000a）。遠距測驗及其相關問題之探討。2000 網路學習理論與實務研 討會：23~33 頁。
何榮桂（2000b）。網路環境題庫與測驗之整合系統。科學發展月刊，第28卷第七期，頁 534~540。
[7] 余民寧（1997）。教育測驗與評量－成就測驗與教學評量。台北：心理出版社。
[8] 余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。南台科技大學，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報，民 96，39 卷，1 期，69~90頁。
[9] 沈凡筠(2015)大學生時間管理與學業成就之研究第三章第四節的多重對應分析。
[10] 周文正(1998)。WWW 上電腦輔助測試系統之研製。中華民國第七屆電腦輔助教學研討會(ICCAI’98)。
取自：http://thccx5.cc.nthu.edu.tw/wjchou/tecpaper/w3cat/
[11] 周倩、簡榮宏（1997）。網路評量系統之發展與研究。遠距教育，(4)，頁 12-15。
[12] 林裕集（2001）。適用於電腦教室之網路測驗系統：以國小英語科為例。臺中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文。
[13] 林璟豐(2001)。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。
[14] 邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
[15] 柯俊良(2003)。國立台中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文。
[16] 張春興(1996)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華書局。
[17] 楊錦潭（1999）。國中小教師網路題庫系統之開發經驗談。測驗與輔導，卷 157，頁3285- 3287。
[18] 劉長萱（1991）。紙筆測驗改用電腦施測對信度、效度的影響。測驗與輔導，卷95，頁1800-1811。
[19] 歐仁榮(2004)。家庭環境、家庭結構對高職生學業成就影響之研究-以臺南市高級職業學校為例。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
[20] Alexander, M. W., Bartlett, J. E., & Truell, A. D., & Ouwenga, K. (2001). Testing in a computer technology course: An investigating of equivalency in performance between online and paper and pencil methods. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 18, 69-80.
[21] Barron, B. J., Achwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J.,Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D.(1998). The cognition and technology group at Vanderbilt. Doing with understanding:Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the learning sciences, 7,271-311.
[22] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cooking, R. (2000). How people learn: mind, brain, experience and school, expand edition. Washinhton, DC: National Academy Press.
[23] Chen, C. H., & Tsai, D. C. (2007), How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Management, 28, 1115-1122.
[24] Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Macmillan.
[25] Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
[26] Holec H. (1981) Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning [M]. Oxford: Pergamon.
[27] Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023-1031. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
[28] Juchnowski, M., & Atkins, P. (1999). Online assessment: Let’s do it. Retrieved March 4, 2003, from Swinburne University of Technology, Australia Web site:http://www.swin.edu.au/indsci/assess/doit.htm
[29] Lai, S.L. (1998), “The effects of visual display on analogies using computer-based learning,” International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(2), 151-160.
[30] Littlewood W. Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts [J]. Applied L inguistics, 1999, 20, (1) : 71 – 94
[31] Morgan, C. & O’Reilly, M. (1999). Assessing open and distance learners. London: Kogan Page.
[32] Roblyer, M. D. (2004). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[33] Sanchis, R. R. (2001). Using web forms for online assessment. Mathematics and Computer Education, 35(2), 105 - 113.
[34] Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man.