長久以來七大工業國家 (簡稱G7)因物資需求與亞洲國家往來相當頻繁，隨著政經局勢的改變，G7國家與亞洲各國逐漸由殖民經濟轉變為市場供需為主的雙邊貿易模式。自2010年以來，世界貿易組織(簡稱WTO)歷經杜哈談判失敗後幾乎呈現停擺的狀態，使得WTO精神中最主要的「貿易多邊主義」受到衝擊，造成國與國之間「雙邊貿易協定」及鄰近區域之「區域貿易協定」發展更加快速。
本文將以引力模型探討 2004至2016 年間，東協(ASEAN)成員對G7國家的出口貿易關係是否因國與國之間FTA(Free Trade Agreement)生效、匯率、關稅而產生實質影響。本研究根據McCallum(1995)引力模型為基礎，實證結果顯示：東協會員國因有FTA的簽定，將對G7國家出口貿易產生助益，會員國之間並無明顯的因簽定FTA產生貿易相互排擠現象。G7國家關稅政策以及匯率政策對於東協會員國的出口貿易有顯著負向影響。東協會員國前期出口總額與當期出口呈現正向關係，顯示出口有持續性；G7國家實質匯率與東協各國出口呈現負向顯著相關，代表G7會員國的匯率波動將造成東協國家的出口貿易產生較大影響。

Over the past few decades, the group of seven (G7) contributed large amounts of trades with Asian countries for raw materials demands. With the changing of the political and economic environment, the G7 and Asian countries have transformed from colonial economy to become bilateral trade model following market supply and demands
Since 2010, the Doha round of trade talked failed; World Trade Organization (WTO) suffered serious challenge and” Trade Multilateralism” became hard to achieve. “Bilateral trade” and "Regional Trade Agreement"(RTA) have been highlights for entire world. We used the gravity equation to analyze exports flows and using dataset from ASEANstats(2004-2016). This subject we have tried to find out factors that have influenced on trade. We put variables in the gravity equation such like, exchange rate, tariff and Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and see the result. Base on McCallum's (1995) gravity equation and empirical analysis export data shows that ASEAN members took benefit from FTA once they signed and effect, especially export performance. We have looked for evidence about country signed FTA then caused other countries export trade reduction, there is no apparent evidence to show negative effect such like FTA created exclusion of trade in the ASEAN group. The results show the G7s’ tariff and currency strategy have a significant impact on the ASEAN members’ trade performance. ASEAN members’ exports performance has a positive effect with the pervious export performance, it means that ASEAN industry upgrading is ongoing; the G7s’ real exchange rate is a negative correlation with the ASEAN members’ export performance, it means the G7’s exchange rate fluctuations will become an impact on the ASEAN member.

中華民國僑務委員會(2016)，華僑經濟年鑑(105年版)
宇都宮溪 (2014)，東協在大國參與區域整合後之多邊主義策略。全球政治評論， 第47期，121-144頁
李斯媛 (2015)，貿易自由化對中國對外出口之影響。國立中央大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
李隆生(2006) ，以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合：從區域主義到全球化，亞太研究論壇，第33期，116-119頁
周琳雲 (2010)，歐洲聯盟與東南亞國協區域互動架構之形塑，淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文
邱冠瑋 (2005)，歐盟與東協合作發展之研究。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文
柯佩君(2010)，區域經貿組織與所得相似度的貿易效果－東協的實證研究。私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文
陳仲沂(2010)，從區域主義觀點論冷戰結束後歐盟與東協發展歷程之異同。台灣國際研究季刊，第7卷第1期，171-194頁
葉華容(2012)，東協對外發展FTA的戰略與進程。國際經濟情勢雙週報，第1760 期，5-12頁
聯合國貿易發展會議(2008)，世界投資報告
Agosin, M.R., Alvarez, R. and Bravo‐Ortega, C. (2012), Determinants of export
diversification around the world: 1962–2000, World Economy, 35(3), 295-315.
Baier, S.L. and Bergstrand, J.H. (2007), Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? , Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95.
Bernard, A. B. and Jensen, J.B. (2004), Why some firms export, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 561-569.
Bergstrand, J. H. (1985), The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–81.
Bobeica, E., Esteves P.S., Rua, A. and Staehr, K. (2016), Exports and domestic demand pressure: a dynamic panel data model for the euro area countries, Review of World Economics, 152(1), 107-125.
Choudhry, T. (2005), Exchange rate volatility and the United States exports: evidence from Canada and Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 19(1), 51-71.
Daquila, T.C. and Huy, L.H. (2003), Singapore and ASEAN in the global economy: The case of free trade agreements, Asian Survey, 43 (6), 908-928.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. and Rubinstein, Y. (2008), Trading partners and trade volumes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441–87.
Hausman, J.A. and Taylor, W.E. (1981), Panel data and unobservable individual effects, Econometrica, 49, 1377-1398.
Mahmood, F. and Jongwanich, J. (2018), Export-enhancing effects of free trade agreements in south Asia, Evidence from Pakistan, Journal of South Asian Development, 13(1), 24-53.
Melitz, M.J. and Ottaviano, G.I.P. (2008), Market size, trade and productivity, Review of Economic Studies, 75, 295–316.
Nandasiri, K. and Hur, J. (2008), FTA Influence on Trade Creation and Diversion by Regional Trading Blocs, The Journal of The Korean Economy, Vol. 9, No. 2,293-333
Pardo, H.C., Freund, C. and Ornelas, E. (2009), The ASEAN free trade agreement: Impact on trade flows and external trade barriers, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4960.
Soloaga, I. and Winters, L. (1999), Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?, CEPR Discussion paper, No. 2183.
Tadesse, B. and White, R. (2010), Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences? Applied Economics Letters, 17(2), 147-152.
Tang, D. (2003), The Effect of European Integration on Trade with the APEC Countries: 1981-2000, Journal of Economic and Finance, 27(2): 262-278.
UOB Global Economics & Markets Research, Quarterly Global Outlook 1Q2016, 15-19
Wong, K.N. and Tang, T.C. (2008), The effects of exchange rate variability on Malaysia's disaggregated electrical exports, Journal of Economic Studies, 35(2), 154-169.
Yang, S. and Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2014), A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area, China Economic Review, 29, 138-151.