本文為評估半導體封裝產業中提供關鍵構裝用材料之載板廠的經營績效；載板佔封裝成本約30%，台灣載板產量目前佔全球約24%；平均毛利約30-40%；在電子產品輕薄短小且具備更多功能及家庭數位化的趨勢下，估計未來5年仍有高度的成長可期。
本研究聚焦在產業內競爭力分析，以效率值來比較各公司間競爭力的高低與各年度競爭力變化。財務報表中”經營能力”及”獲利能力”評估指標相當多，唯在比較每一指標時各公司的優劣與排名可能不同，讀完財務報表後能總結判讀那一家公司表現最好也常以較主觀的判斷，其結果可能因不同的專家依其認為的權重來做判讀；本研究以DEA方式針對多投入與產出來分析其效率值，以單一效率值為綜合性指標來做評量。如此優點為評估績效的方式統一，並且可做Bench　marking找出無效率公司其具體的改善方向，需要時也可給予權重值來發展企業本身成功的方程式。
在包絡分析法以固定規模報酬(DEA CRS)分析結果，在2005年排名南電>欣興>景碩>全懋>華通；在變動規模報酬下(DEA VRS)2005年排名為景碩>南電>欣興>全懋>華通。以標竿學習而言「景碩」被參考次數最多，表示景碩為其它公司學習對象。
以MPI (Malmquist)可比較各公司生產力效率及各公司的發展潛力，本研究顯示景碩各年度的追趕效率皆為最高，表景碩為五家公司中最具發展潛力者。以生產力指數優劣依序排名為南電>景碩>全懋>欣興>華通。
本研究以DEA及MPI分析方法的搭配來評估五家載板廠的經營績效，經分析後發現其結果與五家公司上市後的股價成顯著的正相關，相關係數0.86。

This study surveies the management performance evaluation of IC substrate manufacturers which provide the substantial material to assemble the IC package in semiconductor industry. IC substrate shares 30% of assembly cost and Taiwan IC substrate manufacturing currently has a global market share of 24% with 30-40% net profit. As there is a trendency towards lighter, finer, shorter and smaller electric products with multi-function and family digitization, it is expected to be highly growth industry in coming 5 years.
This study, focusing on competitiveness analysis, compares the competitiveness between companies in IC substrate industry and its variation along with years measured in efficiency. There are a great number of indices of management ability and profitability in financial reports, however, the discrimination between good and bad company might vary with the index we adopted. As we read through financial reports, it is a very subjective judement to conclude which company has best performance and the result might be varied accompany with the weight in different professionals’ opinions. This study will adopt DEA method to analyze the efficiency in accordance with mult-input/output and to assess it in single, integrated efficiency index. The advantage is not only unifying financial indices into one integrated efficiency index, but also using bench-marking to dig out the concrete improvement proposals for the companies with poor performance. If necessary, the weight could be set to develop a formula for successful business.
As a result of DEA CRS analysis, the ranking in 2005 is Nan-ya > Uimicron > Kinsus > PPt > Compeq. The analysis of DEA VRS results in Kinsus > Nan-ya > Uimicron > PPt > Compeq. With respect to the number of times been bench-marked, Kinsus is the most frequent, in other words, Kinsus is most popular target which other companies would like to be.
By MPI to compare productivity efficiency and development possibility, this study reveals that Kinsus got the highest catching-up in efficiency in past 5 years, that is, Kinsus got the most growth potencial possibility. The MPI analysis results in Nan-ya > Kinsus > PPt > Uimicron > Compeq.
This study applies DEA and MPI to evaluate the operating efficiency of 5 IC substrate manufacturers, the results show strong positive correlation, 0.86, between stock price and operating efficiency.

1. IT IS計劃（2001），「我國PCB產業對資訊產業發展之影響分析」，資策會MIC
2. 王媛慧/李文福（2005），「我國大學院校技術效率之研究-資料包絡分析法的應用」，輔仁管理評論/第十三卷第一期
3. 主流經紀部市研組（2006），「FC 載板快速崛起，蔚為市場」，統一證券集團投資週報
4. 司徒逹賢（2005），「策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法」，智勝文化事業
5. 吳家園（2001)，「電子構裝中重要性漸起的IC載板產業」，台證投顧
6. 周以琪（2001），「國內IC載板產業現況」，工研院經資中心
7. 拓璞產業研究所（2005）「IC載板需求旺，2005年底業者開始擴產」，TRI
8. 高子荃/陳振遠/周建新（2004），「台灣地區產險業經營效率之研究－資料包絡法與Malmquist生產力指數之應用」，輔仁管理評論/第十一卷第一期
9. 高全德（2001），「IC構裝材料技術及市場發展趨勢專題調查」，工研院IEK化材組
10. 產業報告（2006），「IC 載板—FLIP CHIP 產業展望」
11. 陳智逢（2006），「2006 IT日誌－台灣IC載板的喜與悲」， DigiTimes
12. 曾國雄（2005），「DEA評估基本模式之構建」，開南大學
13. 曾綜源,吳世森,劉特傑,陳裕明（2002），「台灣印刷電路板產業策略之比較分析」，華梵大學資訊管理系
14. 黃營杉/楊景傅（2004），「策略管理，第六版」，華泰文化
15. 楊雅嵐（2003），「全球封裝技術演進」，工研院經資中心IT IS計劃
16. 楊鎮源（2005），「2005年IC載板產業－晶片效能提升下之受惠者」，台證投顧
17. 電子組分析師（2005），「TSIA Industry Research 產業報告, IC基板產業評析－晶片效能提升下之受惠者」，台證投顧
18. 廖雪峰/研究部（2006），「IC載板—CSP產業展望」，金鼎理財網
19. 蕭傳議（2006），「全球IC載板市場」，工研院IEK-IT IS計劃
20. 顏嘉德（2006)，「以DEA與MPI模式評估非金控銀行之動態與靜態效率－電子商務與網路行銷觀點之經營績效評估」，國立台北大學合作經濟系
21. Antonella Basso and Stefania Funari Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata（2005）, , “Performance evaluation of ethical mutual funds in slump periods ”, Universit`a Ca’ Foscari di Venezia Dorsoduro 3825/E, 30123 Venezia, Italy
22. Berger, A.N and Humphrey, D.B. (1997), “Efficiency of financial institutions:International survey and directions for future research”, European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175-212.
23. Charles W. L. Hill / Gareth R. Jones（2004），「Strategic management - Theory and integrated approach, 6TH edition」，Houghton Mifflin
24. Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1963), “Deterministic equivalents for optimising and satisficing under chance constraints"” Operations Research 11,1 18-39.
25. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research 6, 429-444.
26. Cingi, S. and Tarim, A. (2000), “Turk Banka Sisteminde Performans Olcumu: DEAMalmquist TFP Endexi Uygulamasi, Turkiye Bankalar Birligi Arastirma Tebligleri Serisi, Eylul, No. 2000-02.
27. Drake, L.G. and Weyman-Jones, T. (1992), “Productive Inefficiencies in U.K. Building Societies: A comparison of Non-parametric and Stochastic Frontier Techniques”, The Manchester School, vol XIV, no 1, 22-37.
28. Farrell, M.J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) 120, 2, 253-281.
29. Grifell-Tatje, E. and Lovell, C.A.K. (1996), “Deregulation and Productivity decline: The case of Spanish savings banks”, European Economic Review 40, 1281-1303.
30. Jackson, P.M. and Fethi, M.D. (2000), “Evaluating the efficiency of Turkish commercial banks: An application of DEA and Tobit Analysis”, presented at the International DEA Symposium, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2-4 July, 2000.
31. Jackson, P.M., Fethi, M.D., and Inal, G. (1998), “Efficiency and productivity growth in Turkish commercial banking sector: a non-parametric approach”, presented at the European Symposium on: Data Envelopment Analysis – Recent Developments and Applications, Wernigerode, Germany, 16-18 October, 1998.
32. John H. Lau (2000), “Low Cost Flip Chip Technologies for DCA, WLCSP, and PBGA Assemblies”, McGrw-Hill Companies, Inc.
33. Kendrick, D.A. (1996), Chapter 6: Sectoral Economics in Hans M. Amman, David A. Kendrick, and John Rust (eds) Handbook of Computational Economics, volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 13, Elsevier: Amsterdam.
34. Land, K.C., Lovell, C.A.K, and Thore, S. (1993), “Chance-constrained Data Envelopment Analysis”, Managerial and Decision Economics 14, 541-554.
35. Lovell, C.A.K. (1993), Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency in H. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and H. Schmidt (eds) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
36. Mercan, M and Yolalan, R. (2000), “Turk Bankacilik sisteminde Olcek ve Mulkiyet Yapilari ile Finansal Performans Iliskisi”, Yapi Kredi Tartisma Tebligler Serisi No: 2000-01.
37. Meryem D. Fethi, Peter M. Jackson, Thomas G. Weyman-Jones（2001）, “ An Empirical Study of Stochastic DEA and Financial Performance : the Case of the Turkish Commercial Banking Industry ”，Management Centre/University of Leicester
38. Sherman, H.D. and Gold, F. (1985), “Bank Branch Operating Efficiency – Evaluation With Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Banking and Finance 9, 297-315.
39. William F. Bowlin（2003）, “Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) ” , Department of Accounting, University of Northern Iowa
40. Yeh, Q.J. (1996), “The application of Data Envelopment Analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation”, Journal of the Operational Research Society 47, 980-988.