跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳承睿
Cheng-Rui WU
論文名稱: 醫院集團化對醫療品質的影響—市場競爭程度所扮演的角色
noen
指導教授: 陳啟禎
蔡栢昇
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所
Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 80
中文關鍵詞: 醫院集團醫療品質市場競爭程度
外文關鍵詞: multihospital system, healthcare quality, market competition
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 論文摘要:
    研究背景:隨著台灣醫療市場集團化趨勢日益明顯,醫院屬於集團醫院是否有助於提升病患醫療結果成為值得探討的議題。
    研究目的:本研究旨在探討台灣醫療市場中,醫院是否屬於集團體系對急性心肌梗塞(Acute Myocardial Infarction, AMI)病患接受到醫療品質之影響,並進一步分析市場競爭程度在其中所扮演之調節角色。
    研究方法:本研究的設計為重複橫斷性研究設計(repeated cross-sectional study design),採用1998年至2020年全民健康保險資料庫之全國性資料,觀察病患住院後七日、十四日、三十日內死亡情形與出院後三十日、六十日、九十日內再住院情形作為品質衡量指標;醫院集團的定義為研究者自行整理,集團醫院體系大致上分為法人型集團、醫學中心領導型集團、署立醫院體系。結合醫院是否為集團成員。調節變項為醫院所在地的市場競爭程度,以行政疆界法搭配賀芬達指標(Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, HHI)。採用廣義線性模型(與後面的分析模型一致),並控制病患特性(年齡、性別、社會經濟地位、合併症指標)、醫院特性(醫院權屬別、醫院所在地區)與地區特性(地區平均每人平均可支配所得),控制時間固定效果以及醫院群組變異數與共變異數矩陣。
    研究結果:本研究的實證結果顯示,在台灣的醫療市場環境下,集團醫院相較於非集團醫院而言有較低之死亡風險(七日內odd ratios [OR]值0.824;95% confidence interval [CI]:0.799-1.850、十四日內OR值0.862;95%CI:0.839-0.855、三十日內OR值0.908;95%CI:0.879-0.956)與再住院風險(三十日OR值:0.867;95% CI:0.848-0.887、六十日OR值0.849;95% CI:0.833-0.866、九十日OR值0.886;95% CI:0.869-0.902)。在市場集中度較高的地區也有較低之死亡風險(七日內OR值0.949;95%CI:0.912-0.987、十四日內OR值0.955;95% CI:0.923-0.988)與再住院風險(六十日OR值0.971;95% CI:0.947-0.996、九十日OR值0.955;95% CI:0.945-0.991)。此外在三十日死亡風險中市場競爭程度對集團醫院之品質影響具有修飾效果(OR = 1.067;95% CI:1.018–1.118),當市場越集中時,集團醫院與醫療品質之間的關係被減緩了。
    研究結論與建議:集團醫院在台灣醫療體系中具有相當影響力,其整合帶來的資源共享與規模經濟,確實有助於提升整體醫療品質。然而,市場競爭結構對於此一品質效果的調節作用僅在三十日死亡風險情形呈現明顯效果,其結果並非在所有品質指標間一致。此一現象顯示,集團化與市場競爭之間的互動關係,可能尚受到其他制度設計、醫院內部管理模式或病患組成等多重因素的影響,未來仍有進一步探討與驗證的空間。由於本研究採用重複橫斷性研究設計,無法精確的觀察某間醫院加入集團體系前後的差別,因此建議在可挑出幾間加入集團體系的醫院進行相關研究。


    Background: With the increasing trend of hospital consolidation in Taiwan’s healthcare market, whether affiliation with a multihospital system enhances patient outcomes has become a critical issue for investigation.
    Objective: This study aims to examine the impact of hospital affiliation with a multihospital system on the quality of care received by patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Taiwan and to further assess the moderating effect of market competition.
    Methods: Adopting a repeated cross-sectional study design, this research uses nationwide data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database spanning 1998 to 2020. Healthcare quality is measured by patient mortality within 7, 14, and 30 days of admission, and readmission within 30, 60, and 90 days after discharge. Hospitals affiliated with multihospital was compiled by the author and categorized into nonprofit hospital systems, academic medical center–led systems, and government-owned hospital networks. Market competition was measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) based on administrative boundaries. Generalized estimating equations were employed, controlling for patient characteristics (age, sex, socioeconomic status, comorbidity index), hospital characteristics (ownership type, location), regional characteristics (average disposable income), time fixed effects, and clustering by hospital group variance-covariance structures.
    Results: Empirical findings show that hospitals affiliated with a multihospital system are associated with lower risks of mortality (7-day OR = 0.824; 95% CI: 0.799–0.850; 14-day OR = 0.862; 95% CI: 0.839–0.885; 30-day OR = 0.908; 95% CI: 0.879–0.956) and readmission (30-day OR = 0.867; 95% CI: 0.848–0.887; 60-day OR = 0.849; 95% CI: 0.833–0.866; 90-day OR = 0.886; 95% CI: 0.869–0.902), compared to non-affiliated hospitals. In highly concentrated markets, mortality (7-day OR = 0.949; 95% CI: 0.912–0.987; 14-day OR = 0.955; 95% CI: 0.923–0.988) and readmission risks (60-day OR = 0.971; 95% CI: 0.947–0.996; 90-day OR = 0.955; 95% CI: 0.945–0.991) were also lower. Additionally, a significant interaction effect between market competition and hospital affiliation was found for 30-day mortality (OR = 1.067; 95% CI: 1.018–1.118), indicating that the quality advantage of multihospital system affiliation was reduced in more concentrated markets.
    Conclusion: Hospitals affiliated with multihospital systems play a vital role in Taiwan’s healthcare sector. Their integrated operations and scale economies indeed contribute to higher care quality. However, the moderating effect of market competition is not consistent, particularly in readmission-related indicators, where no stable pattern was observed. These findings suggest that the interaction between Hospitals affiliated with multihospital and competition may be influenced by institutional settings, hospital management models or patient case-mix. Further research is needed to clarify these mechanisms. Given the use of a repeated cross-sectional design, this study cannot track the before-and-after effects of hospitals joining a system. Future studies are recommended to focus on hospitals with observable system-entry events.

    目錄 中文摘要 ii Abstract iv 致謝 vi 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 水平整合和社會福利的理論 7 第二節 醫院水平整合對成本和效率的影響 9 第三節 醫院水平整合對品質的影響 12 第四節 市場競爭對醫療品質的影響 17 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 研究架構 21 第二節 研究假說 22 第三節 研究對象與資料處理流程 22 第三節 變項操作型定義 25 第四節 統計方法與實證模型 33 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節 描述性統計 36 第二節 醫療服務品質之廣義線性邏輯斯迴歸分析 42 第三節 市場競爭程度、醫院集團化與醫療品質的關係 51 第五章 討論 59 第一節 探討集團醫院與非集團醫院品質的差異 59 第二節 市場競爭程度對醫療品質的影響 60 第三節 市場競爭程度修飾集團醫院對醫療品質的影響 62 第六章結論與研究限制 63 第一節 結論與建議 63 第二節 研究限制 64 參考資料 65

    中文文獻
    何翊安(2023)。市場競爭對於醫材利用與醫療品質的影響 ——以冠狀動脈支架植入術病患為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。
    劉育昇(2009)。醫院集團之經濟分析研究(博士論文)。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。
    劉容華與江東亮(2001)。台灣小型醫院新設與歇業之影響。《台灣衛誌》,20,27–33。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH2001-20-01-04。
    劉亞明、羅德芬、粘毓庭(2017)。醫院退出市場因素之分析。《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,36(3),273–286。
    張瓊文(2000)。全民健保制度與醫院合作經營之研究。
    林恆慶、趙儷淨(2002)。整合性健康照護系統。《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,21(1),1–8。
    江東亮、文羽苹、謝嘉容(2014)。全民健康保險制度的發展與問題。《台灣醫學》,18(1)。
    江東亮(2007)。醫療保健政策:台灣經驗(第三版)。台北:巨流圖書公司。
    蔡偉德與劉育昇(2007)。健保十年,醫療服務產業的演化。《競爭政策與公平交易法研討會論文集》,291–312。
    蔡偉德與李一鑫(2002)。醫院非價格競爭與市場結構的關聯 —— 醫院購買高科技醫療儀器實證研究。《經濟論文》,30(1),57–78。
    謝育邦(2013)。醫院集團的醫療結果表現(碩士論文)。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所。
    鄭守夏(2005)。全民健康保險醫療費用總額支付制度問答輯。全民健康保險醫療費用協定委員會。
    陳端容(2002)。臺灣醫療產業的組織合作:不對等合作關係運作機制之探討。《臺灣社會學》,3,119–162。
    陽明醫聲(n.d.)。取自:https://ymmedmagazine.blogspot.com/
    盧瑞芬與謝啟瑞(2003)。台灣醫院產業的市場結構與發展趨勢分析。《經濟論文叢刊》,31(1),107–153。
    英文文獻
    Awoyemi, B. O., & Olaniyan, O. (2021). The effects of market concentration on health care price and quality in hospital markets in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 9, 1938895.
    Bayindir, E. E., et al. (2024). Hospital competition and health outcomes: Evidence from acute myocardial infarction admissions in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 349, 116910.
    Brekke, K. R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2017). Horizontal mergers and product quality. Canadian Journal of Economics, 50, 1063–1103.
    Brekke, K. R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2013). Hospital mergers: A spatial competition approach. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper.
    Calem, P. S., Dor, A., & Rizzo, J. A. (1999). The welfare effects of mergers in the hospital industry. Journal of Economics and Business, 51(3).
    Capps, C. (2005). The quality effects of hospital mergers.
    Cooper, Z., Gibbons, S., Jones, S., & McGuire, A. (2010). Does hospital competition save lives? Evidence from the English NHS patient choice reforms. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 16, 1–50.
    Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. (1995). Cost reductions or reputation enhancement as motives for mergers: The logic of multihospital systems. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 54–74.
    Freisinger, E., Sehner, S., Malyar, N. M., Suling, A., Reinecke, H., & Wegscheider, K. (2018). Nationwide routine-data analysis of sex differences in outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Clinical Cardiology, 41(8), 1013–1021.
    Freisinger, E., Möller, K., Dannenberg, L., Beyersmann, J., Michalski, F., Zeymer, U., Weidinger, F., Birkemeyer, R., & Zahn, R. (2018). Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction—A nationwide German real-life analysis from 2014 to 2017. European Heart Journal – Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 6(1), 94–102.
    Gaynor, M. (2006). What do we know about competition and quality in health care markets? NBER Working Paper No. 12301.
    Gaynor, M., & Vogt, W. B. (2003). Competition among hospitals. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(4), 764–785.
    Ingwersen, E. W., et al. (2023). Impact of merging two university hospitals on surgical outcome after esophagogastric and hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: Results from a retrospective study. Surgery Open Science, 12, 1–8.
    Jiang, H. J., Fingar, K. R., & Liang, L. (2021). Quality of care before and after mergers and acquisitions of rural hospitals. JAMA Network Open, 4(9), e2124662.
    Liao, C.-H., Lu, N., Tang, C.-H., Chang, H.-C., & Huang, K.-C. (2018). Assessing the relationship between healthcare market competition and medical care quality under Taiwan's National Health Insurance programme. European Journal of Public Health.
    Madison, K. (2004). Multihospital system membership and patient treatments, expenditures, and outcomes. Health Services Research, 39(4), 749–770.
    Mukamel, D. B., Zwanziger, J., & Bamezai, A. (2002). Hospital competition, resource allocation and quality of care. BMC Health Services Research, 2(1), 1–10.
    Romano, P. S., & Balan, D. J. (2011). A retrospective analysis of the clinical quality effects of the acquisition of Highland Park Hospital by Evanston Northwestern Healthcare. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 18(1), 45–64.
    Romano, P. S., & Mutter, R. (2004). The evolving science of quality measurement for hospitals: Implications for studies of competition and consolidation. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 4(2), 131–157.
    Shepherd, W. G. (1997). The economics of industrial organization: Analysis, markets, policies. Prentice Hall.
    Short, M. N., & Ho, V. (2020). Weighing the effects of vertical integration versus market concentration on hospital quality. Health Economics, 29(3), 282–293.
    Vakili, B. A., Kaplan, R. C., & Brown, D. L. (2001). Sex-based differences in early mortality of patients undergoing primary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 104(25), 3034–3038.
    Volpp, K. G., Williams, S. V., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). Market reform in New Jersey and the effect on mortality from acute myocardial infarction. Health Services Research, 38(2), 515–533.
    Zuckerman, H. S., & D’Aunno, T. (1990). Hospital alliances: Cooperative strategy in a competitive environment. Health Care Management Review, 15(2), 21–30.
    de la Llana, R. A., Marsney, R. L., Gibbons, K., Anderson, B., Haisz, E., Johnson, K., Black, A., Venugopal, P. S., & Mattke, A. C. (2021). Merging two hospitals: The effects on pediatric extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care, 10(3), 202–209.

    QR CODE
    :::