| 研究生: |
李逸泓 Ih-Hung Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
台灣IC設計公司新產品發展流程與績效之個案研究 |
| 指導教授: |
羅庚辛
Keng-Hsin Lo 高信培 Hsing-Pei Kao |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 83 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | IC設計 新產品發展流程 、新產品上市策略 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以台灣的IC設計公司為研究對象,主要針對台灣IC設計產業特質、台灣IC設計公司產品發展流程、台灣IC設計公司的產品成功因素、IC設計公司產品上市後與競爭對手的競爭互動等議題進行研究。研究的方法採用個案研究法,由台灣目前的前十大IC設計公司中,挑選出瑞昱公司、凌陽公司、揚智公司為研究的個案,並設計開放式的問卷,對以上三家公司進行實地的採訪,除了以上的初級資料外,另外收集相關文獻等次級資料做參考,最後綜合以上的初級與次級資料,將台灣IC設計公司實際的產品發展流程、產品成功因素、產品上市後與競爭對手的競爭互動等,與文獻理論做比較與相互驗證,最後得到以下的研究結論,以作為台灣IC設計公司與相關研究的參考:
一、IC設計公司的產品在發展過程中,大致可以區分為產品規劃、產品發展、
產品測試、產品量產上市等四大階段。而在各不同的階段,分別強調不同部門人員的整合,其中在產品規劃階段,行銷/研發部門人員的整合最重要,在產品發展階段,行銷/研發/製造部門人員的整合最重要,在產品測試階段,研發/製造部門人員的整合最重要,在產品量產上是階段,製造/行銷部門人員的整合最重要。
二、當IC設計公司採用高新穎程度的產品策略時,若有市場成長率高的環境條件相配合,將會有好的產品績效表現。且若IC設計公司採用高新穎程度的產品策略時,其必須搭配產品發展速度較競爭公司快速的條件,才能較其競爭公司先攻佔市場,才能有好的產品績效表現。
三、當IC設計公司採用低價的產品策略時,若有市場成長率高的環境條件相配合,將會有好的產品績效表現。且若IC設計公司採用低價的產品策略時,其必須搭配公司的規模較小,競爭公司的規模較大的條件,才能以低價產品搶佔競爭公司原有的市場,才能有好的產品績效表現。
四、當IC設計公司產品推出的該市場成長率較低時,競爭公司間彼此的威脅較高,IC設計公司若採用產品的高新穎程度策略或低價策略,將對競爭對手的競爭回應速度與強度產生正效果。
五、當產品推出的IC設計公司規模較大時,對競爭公司的威脅較高,IC設計公司若採用產品的高新穎程度策略或低價策略,將對競爭對手的競爭回應速度與強度產生正效果。
一、中文部份
高信培(民92) ,電子化與企業流程管理,卓越雜誌232期
司徒達賢(民92),策略管理新論,智勝出版社
湯明哲(民92),策略精論,天下文化
蔡均典(民92),『系統單晶片之軟體發展流程』,國立交通大學電機資訊學院資訊學程碩士論文
楊國樞(民90),社會及行為科學研究法,東華出版社
鍾志明(民88),『新產品開發過程之資源配置與績效之關係-以國內製造業為例』,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文
劉美慧(民88),『不同創新類型下新產品發展階段跨部門互動之探討』,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
Michael E. Porter(1980),競爭策略,天下文化
Michael E. Porter(1985),競爭優勢,天下文化
Richard A. D’Aveni(1998),超優勢競爭,遠流
二、英文部份
Barczak, G.(1995), “New Product Strategy, Structure, Process, and Performance in the Telecommunications Industry”, Journal of
Product Innovation management , 12(2) , pp.224-234.
Biggadike, ER. Corporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,1979
Calantone, R., Vickery, S. and Droge, C.(1995), “Business Performance and Strategic New Product Development Activities: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Product Innovation management , 12(3) , pp.214-223.
Chen MJ.et al “Action Characteristics as predictors of competitive responses”. Management Science Vol38,No 3,March 1992
Chen MJ.et al “Competitive attack,retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 15,85-102(1994)
Choffray, JM and Lilien, GL. Strategies Behind the Successful Industrial Product Launch. Business Marketing 82-95(1984)
Chuck Tomkovick.Perspective-Riding the wind: managing new product development in an age of change. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2000;17:413-23
Cooper, R. G.. How Product Strategies Impact on Performance Journal of Product Innovation Management(1984)
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschrnidt E. J.(1986), ”An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps, Deficiencies and Impact”,Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 3, No.2,pp.71-85
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschrnidt E. J.(1988),”Resource Allocation in the New Product Process”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.17, pp.249-262.
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschrnidt E. J.(1996),”Winning Business in Product Development : the Critical Success Factors”, Research-Technology Management, Vol.39, Jul/Aug, pp.18-29
Crawford, CM. Protocol: New Tool for Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2: 85-91(1984)
Cusumano, M.A. and Nobeoka, K(1992), “Strategy, Structure and Performance in Product Development: Observations from the Auto Industry”, Research Policy, 21(3): pp. 265-293
Debruyne Marion.et al. “The impact of new product launch strategies on competitive reaction in industrial markets”. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2002)159-170
Ferrier WJ. The role of competitive action in market share erosion, and industry dethronement: a study of industry leaders, and challengers. Academy of Management Journal 1999;42(4):372-88
Garvin David A.(2002),General Management Process and Action,McGraw-Hill Press
Glazer, A. The Advantages of Being First. American Economic Review 75: 473-480(1985)
Green,DH and Ryans, AB. Entry strategies and Market Performance: Causal Modelling of a Business Simulation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7: 45-58(1990)
Griffin, A. and Page, A.L. (1993),” An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4): pp. 291-308
Griffin A. PDMA research on new product development practice: updating trends, and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1997; 14:429-58
Gupta, A. K. and Wilemon, D. L. (1990), “Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products”, California Management Review, 32(2): pp.24-44
Hauptman, Oscar(1990),”The Different Roles of Communication in Software Development and Hardware R&D: Phenomenologic Paradox or Atheoretical Empiricism?”, Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, Jul, pp. 49-71
Heil OP, Walters RG.Explaining competetitive reaction to new products: an empirical signaling study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1993: 10: 53-65
Hopkins, D.S.(1980),”New Products Winners and Losers”, The Conference Board Report, No.773. New York.
Hultink EJ, Griffin A, Hart S, Robben HSJ.Industrial new product launch strategies and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1997; 14: 243-57
Hultink EJ, et al.”Launch decisions and competitive reactions: an exploratory market signaling study”. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(2002)199-212
Joseph P. Guiltinan. Launch strategy, launch tactics, and demand outcomes. Journal ofproduct innovation management 1999;16:509-529.
Kuczmarski, T.D. (1992), Managing New Product:The Power of Innovation, 2nd., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,N.J.
Lambkin, M. Order of Entry and Performance in New Markets. Strategic Management Journal 9: 127-140(1988)
Macmillan Ian “Competitors’ Responses to Easily Imitated New Product- Exploring Commercial Banking Product Introductions”. Strategic Management Journal,Vol 6, 75-86(1985)
Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C. and Ruekert, R.W.(1995), “Organizing for Effective New Product Development: the Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness”, Journal of Marketing, 59(January): pp.48-62
Otum, B. D. and Moore, W. L.,(1997), “The Role of Market Information in New Product Success/Failure”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), pp.258-273
Sbragia, Roberto(1984),”Clarity of Management Roles and Performance of R&D Multidisciplinary Projects in Matrix Structures”, R&D Management, pp.113-126
Song, X.M. and Parry, M.E. (1997), “The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), pp.64-76.
Song, X.M., Thieme, R.J. and Xie, J. (1998a), “The Impact of Cross-Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: an Exploratory Study”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15: pp.289-303.
Souder, W.E., Sherman, J.D. and Davies-Cooper, R. (1998), “Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15: pp.520-533