隨著知識經濟時代的來臨，加速了訊息傳播的速度，而知識及技術創新的速度也較過去迅速，如何經由創新的過程將知識轉化成實質利益，以及如何透過產業群聚來提升其競爭力的各項議題亦引發各界討論。然而若僅是將等各項因子聚集成一個產業聚落，並不能保證一定能帶來成功的發展。因此，PORTER（1990《國家競爭優勢》）點出了聚落的發展不但會受到環境、文化等先天因素影響，國家（政府）亦為決定性的關鍵因素之一。成功的產業聚落背後必定有其成功的因素，因此本研究試圖探討聚落中各組織如何互動以創造良好的創新環境，進而提升當地的創新表現。
根據Lundvall及Edquist的研究指出，聚落中的組織及制度是創新聚落的核心，其對於創新的績效及能力具有關鍵性的影響。因此本文以國家創新系統的方法來觀察歐洲表現亮眼的芬蘭。在回顧分析該國的產業發展歷史之後，從聚落中組織及制度的角度切入，本研究發現其創新能量如此之高的關鍵並非擁有特定的組織機構或是制度，而是在於聚落內各組織之間經由互動學習的過程去產生、散佈和應用新的知識，進而激發出創新的火花；換言之，如何設立提高合作誘因的機制使知識得以散佈並廣泛被使用，進而促使產、官、學&研之間產生頻繁的互動以及合作，這才是其成功主因。

Along with the era of knowledge economy, it has not only accelerated the speed of information dissemination, but also accelerated the speed of knowledge and technological innovation. Issues about how to transfer knowledge into tangible benefits through innovation process and increase its competitiveness through industry cluster have been discussed widely. However, it can’t guarantee a successful development if only gathering all kinds of factors into an industry cluster. Therefore, Michael PORTER (1990) has pointed that the development of a cluster will not only be influenced by environmental, cultural, and other congenital factors; the government is also one of the key factors. There must be some elements behind a success industry cluster. So in this study, it attempts to explore how actors interact with each other to create a good innovation environment, then to enhance the performance of local innovation.
According to Lundvall and Edquist''s studies, they indicated that organizations and institutions are the cores if innovation clusters; they have key influences on innovation performance and ability. Hence in this study it adopted the national innovation system approach to observe Finland. After reviewing the history of Finland, in this study it found that the key of such a high level of creative energy is not due to have a particular organization or system, it’s because each organizations produce, spread and apply new knowledge through interactive learning process, and stimulate innovation sparks at the same time. In other words, the main reason of its success is to set up an incentive mechanism to improve co-operation to spread the knowledge and make it be used widely, then to stimulate the interaction and cooperation between each organizations.

英文文獻
〔1〕 ALI-YRKKÖ, J., PAIJA, L., REILLY, C. & YLÄ-ANTTILA, P.. "Nokia . A Big Company in a Small Country”, Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy (ETLA B 162), 1999
〔2〕 ALI-YRKKÖ, J., PAIJA, L, Catherine R., Pekka Ylä,A. “NOKIA –A Big Company In A Small Country”, (ETLA B 162)
〔3〕 ALI-YRKKÖ, J. and Raine Hermans, “Nokia: A giant in the Finnish innovation system”, 2002
〔4〕 ALI-YRKKÖ, J. and Raine Hermans, “NOKIA IN THE FINNISH INNOVATION SYSTEM”, ETLA Discussion Paper no. 811, 2002
〔5〕 Carl J. Dahlman, Jorma Routti, Pekka Ylä-Anttila “Finland as a Knowledge Economy- Elements of Success and Lesson Learned”, Knowledge for Development Program World Bank Institute, 2006
〔6〕 Christopher Palmberg, "Technological systems and competent procurers—the transformation of Nokia and the Finnish telecom industry revisited?", Telecommunications Policy 26,129–148, 2002
〔7〕 City of Helsinki Urban Facts, "Facts about Helsinki 2001", City of Helsinki Urban Facts, 2001
〔8〕 City of Helsinki Urban Facts, "Facts about Helsinki 2003", City of Helsinki Urban Facts, 2003
〔9〕 City of Helsinki Urban Facts, "Facts about Helsinki 2005", City of Helsinki Urban Facts, 2005
〔10〕 City of Helsinki Urban Facts, "Facts about Helsinki 2007", City of Helsinki Urban Facts, 2007
〔11〕 Dan Steinbock, "The Competitiveness of Finland’s Large Urban Regions", MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR FINLAND, 2007
〔12〕 Edquist, C., “System of Innovation: Perspective and Challenge”, Lund University TEARI working paper no. 7, October 2003.
〔13〕 Edquist, C. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (1993), “Comparing the Danish and Swedish Systems of Innovation”, with C. Edquist, in Nelson, R.R. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
〔14〕 European Commission , European Innovation Scoreboard, European Commission, 2004
〔15〕 European Commission , European Innovation Scoreboard, European Commission, 2003
〔16〕 European Regions Research and Innovation Network, ”The Finnish National Innovation System”, Helsinki University Press, 2005
〔17〕 EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators 2003, EUROPEAN COMMISSION , 2003
〔18〕 European Commission, Towards a European Research Area. Science, Technology and Innovation: Key Figures 2007, European Commission, 2007
〔19〕 Ellen Tuomaala, Satu Raak, Erkki Kaukonen, Jyrki Laaksonen, Mika Nieminen, Pekka Berg, "Research and technology programme activities in Finland", Technology Review 106, TEKES, 2001
〔20〕 Freeman, C. (1995b) “The National Innovation Systems in historical perspective”, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, 5-24, 1995
〔21〕 Freeman, C. (2002) “Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth”, Research Policy, 31, pp. 191-211, 2002
〔22〕 Heli Koski, Liisa Leijola, Christopher Palmberg, and Pekka Ylä-Anttila, "Innovation and Education Strategies and Policies in Finland", in Finland as a Knowledge Economy- Elements of Success and Lesson Learned, Knowledge for Development Program World Bank Institute, 2006
〔23〕 HELSINKI CITY URBAN FACTS OFFICE, "HELSINKI REGIONAL ECONOMY A Dynamic City in the European Urban Network", HELSINKI CITY URBAN FACTS OFFICE, 2005
〔24〕 Ilkka Susiluoto, "Effects of ICT on Regional Economic Efficiency", HELSINKI CITY URBAN FACTS OFFICE, 2003
〔25〕 ILKKA SUSILUOTO, "Portrait of the Helsinki Region", HELSINKI CITY URBAN FACTS OFFICE, 2003
〔26〕 JANNE TUKIAINEN, “ICT Cluster Study Helsinki Region", Helsinki City Urban Facts Office, 2002
〔27〕 Lundvall, B.-A°, “National Innovation System: Analytical Focusing Device and Policy Learning Tool”, ITPS Working Paper R2007:004, 2007
〔28〕 Lundvall, B.-A°, “National Innovation Systems – Analytical Concept and Development Tool”, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 95-119, February 2007.
〔29〕 Lundvall, B.-A°, “National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive learning”, 1992
〔30〕 Lundvall, B.-A°, “Why Study National System and National Style of Innovation?”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1998
〔31〕 Leo van den Berg, Peter Pol, Willem van Winden, Paulus Woets, "EUROPEAN CITIES IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY" ,CH 5, EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR COMPARATIVE URBAN RESEARCH, 2004
〔32〕 Mika Nieminen & Erkki Kaukonen, "UNIVERSITIES AND R&D NETWORKING IN A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY-A glance at Finnish developments", Sitra Reports series 11,pp 37, 2001
〔33〕 Mika Nieminen & Erkki Kaukonen, “Modeling the Triple Helix from a Small Country Perspective: The Case of Finland”, Journal of Technology Transfer 24, 173-183, 1999
〔34〕 MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY, ANNUAL REPORT 2005, MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY, 2005
〔35〕 Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) “National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis” (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1993
〔36〕 Nelson, R. R, “National Innovation System: A Retrospective on a Study ”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 1 ,No. 1, 1992
〔37〕 Olli Martikainen, “Finnish Telecom Cluster- Opportunities from disruptive technologies”, ETLA, 2005
〔38〕 OECD, “National Innovation Systems”, OECD, 1997
〔39〕 Palmberg Martikainen, Palmberg, C., and O. Martikainen. 2005. “The GSM Standard and Nokia as an Incubating Entrant.” Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice 7: 61–78.
〔40〕 PÄIVI OINAS, “Finland: A Success Story? ”, European Planning Studies Vol. 13, No. 8, 2005
〔41〕 Simona Frank, “R&D expenditure in the European regions”, European Communities, Statistics in focus ,SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , 2004
〔42〕 Simona Frank, “R&D personnel in European regions”, European Communities, Statistics in focus ,SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY , 2004
〔43〕 Sirkka Numminen,"National Innovation System: Pilot Case Study of the Knowledge Distribution Power of Finland", VTT, 1996
〔44〕 TEKES, TEKES ANNUAL REVIEW 2004, TEKES,2004
〔45〕 TEKES, TEKES ANNUAL REVIEW 2005, TEKES,2005
〔46〕 Ville Kaitila, Heli Koski, Jorma Routti, Paula Tiihonen, and Pekka Ylä-Anttila, Changes in the Economic and Institutional Regimes in Finland as a Knowledge Economy－Elements of Success and Lessons Learned, 2006
〔47〕 Willem van Winden, "ICT clusters in European cities: The cases of Helsinki, Manchester and The Hague", European Regional Science Association, 2002
中文文獻
〔48〕 薩克瑟尼安(Saxenian)著，區域優勢：矽谷與一二八公路的文化與競爭，彭蕙仙、常雲鳳譯，天下文化，1999。
〔49〕 波特(Porter)著，國家競爭優勢(上、下)，李明軒、邱如美譯，天下遠見，台北，1990。
〔50〕 經濟部(2002) ，「芬蘭科技產業策略」，北歐國家發展科技產業之策略及成效分析報告，第3章(pp23-48)
〔51〕 史坦巴克(Steinbock, Dan)著，NOKIA! : 小國競爭者的策略轉折路; 李芳齡譯，商智文化，2002
〔52〕 施建生著，偉大的經濟學家熊彼德，天下遠見出版股份有限公司，2005
〔53〕 張元杰和陳明惠，以知識觀點探討創新系統學派，國科會專題研究計畫，2004
〔54〕 謝中琮, 芬蘭科技產業成功之做法及其對我國之啟示, Economic Research, Vol. 7
官方報告
〔55〕 Steinbock, Dan (2004), What Next? Finnish ICT Cluster and Globalization, Ministry of the Interior Finland.
〔56〕 Mika Nieminen, Erkki Kaukonen, UNIVERSITIES AND R&D NETWORKING IN A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY－A glance at Finnish developments, Sitra Reports series 11
〔57〕 Ministry of Education. 2000. “Higher Education Policy in Finland.” Helsinki.
〔58〕 Ministry of Education 2003a. “The Finnish education system”.
網路文獻
〔59〕 http://www.research.fi
〔60〕 http://www.tekes.fi
〔61〕 http://fi.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/jmjg/zwglbm/200706/20070604759364.html
〔62〕 http://tc2tc.mojolingo.xuite.net/m2m-0000/www.finchi.cn
〔63〕 http://www.stat.fi/keruu/kotk/index_en.html
〔64〕 http://www.virtual.finland.fi/
〔65〕 http://www.pisa2006.helsinki.fi/finland_pisa/results/2006/2006.htm
〔66〕 http://www.uudenmaanliitto.fi/index.phtml?l=en&s=2
〔67〕 http://www.uudenmaanliitto.fi/
〔68〕 http://www.hel.fi/tietokeskus
〔69〕 www.hel2.fi/tietokeskus
〔70〕 www.culminatum.fi
〔71〕 http://www.nokia.com/