面對瞬息萬變的科技時代，大學的應變的速度永遠趕不上時代的脈動，大學應主動積極變革。大學校長與他的行政主管團隊之領導型態，對於如何因應變革，規劃發展自己的特色，提昇大學競爭力與晉身21世紀國際一流大學，具有決定性的影響。
基層行政人員是整個團隊的螺絲釘，缺少了他們政策無法推動與執行，所以本研究主要係針對國立中央大學行政人員為研究對象，以問卷調查的方法，運用Statistica 統計軟體進行因素分析、變異數分析、相關分析、典型相關、迴歸分析與Lisrel 線性關係模式等方法，來探討行政人員在面對主管更迭之領導型態其對組織變革與工作滿足的影響，與組織變革對工作滿足之影響。
根據研究結果顯示，轉換型領導對領導型態有顯著影響；電腦科技變革對組織變革有顯著影響；成就感與工作回饋對工作滿足具有顯著影響。由 Lisrel 線性關係模式顯示，領導型態對組織變革具顯著影響；領導型態對工作滿足具顯著影響；組織變革對工作滿足無顯著影響。亦即，主管為轉換型領導型態在推動組織變革之電腦科技變革最成功，同時也令部屬從工作中獲得成就感與主動對工作回饋以提高行政效率。

The reaction of national universities always can not catch the speed of era pulse coping with the competition of ever-changing technologies. The leader-style of the principals of national universities and their team-members definitely have deterministic impact on change reaction coping and characteristics planning in promoting the competition of university so as to uplift itself to the first-class university in 21 century.
In administrative group, the lacking of basic strategy of administrative staff will hinder the execution of the strategy. In this study, we aim at the administrative staff in national universities. We adopt questionnaires to acquire the real answers from the administrative staff to investigate the impact on those whom faces the constant administrator succession at the National Central University about the relationship of leadership style, organizational change and job satisfaction. The techniques that we utilize Statistica 6.0 to analyze the data sample include factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, pearson correlated analysis, cluster analysis, regression analysis, canonical correlation, linear structural relation path analysis, and so on. According to the research result, there are certain major findings in the research which can be stated as follows:
1.The transformational leadership significantly influences the leadership style.
2.The technological change (computerization of administration) significantly influences the organizational change.
3.The self-fulfillment and working feedback significantly influences the intrinsic satisfaction.
4.The leadership style significantly influences the organizational change.
5.The leadership style significantly influences the intrinsic satisfaction.
6.The intrinsic job satisfaction of administrative staff is not affected by the organizational change.
The computerization of the organizational change most successfully reformed by the transformational leadership of administrator inspires intrinsic job satisfaction of the staff.

一、中文部份
1.中山大學企業管理學系(2005)，管理學，前程企業管理有限公司。
2.方俊儒（2000），「領導行為、工作特性與工作滿足關係之探討--以我國大型會計師事務所為例」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所論文。
3.王亞萍（2003），「高中職校長轉型領導與學校組織變革關係之研究--以嘉義地區學校為例」，雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
4.史蒂芬.羅賓斯（2001），組織行為學，（李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯），台北：華泰書局(原著出版年：2001)。
5.吳定（2001），組織發展理論與技術，台北：天一圖書公司。
6.吳容輝（2002），「高階領導者更迭下員工認知及領導型態與組織承諾、士氣關聯性之研究」，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
7.李玫錦（2003) ，「組織變革對員工態度之影響 - 以某高科技產業多國籍企業在台子公司為例」，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班管理科學組論文。
8.周文賢（2002），多變量統計分析：SAS/STAT使用方法，智勝文化出版。
9.彼得.杜拉克（1999），杜拉克 經理人的專業與挑戰，（李田樹譯），台北：天下遠見（原著出版年：1998）。
10.林欽榮（2004），組織理論與管理，揚智文化事業公司。
11.施妤璇（2006），「轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
12.約翰.科特（2000），領導與變革，(李聖賢譯)，台北：中國生產力中心出版（原著出版年：1999）。
13.唐麗英、王春和（2005），Statistica 6.0 版與基礎統計分析，儒林圖書有限公司。
14.徐明珠（民94）之「落實大學自主強化競爭力」財團法人國家政策研究基金會/國改評論。
15.徐聯恩(1997)，大型企業領導者更迭之研究，台北：華泰文化。
16.張承（2002），管理實務與個案分析，鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。
17.張春興（1989），張氏心理學辭典，台北：東華書局。
18.張紹勳（2004），管理學，台中：滄海書局。
19.張德銳（1998），師資培育與教育革新研究，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
20.張慶動(1996) ，學校組織行為，台北：五南圖書出版公司。
21.許士軍（2003），管理學，台北：東華書局。
22.許慧雲（2002），「從學校組織變革談行政職員工作態度之研究 －以某私立技術學院為例」，南華大學非謍利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
23.郭惠雅（2002），「從事行政業務人員的工作特性、工作態度與工作績效之關係研究─以某國立大學為例」，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
24.陳清泉（2001）， 「學校組織衝突、抗拒、環境和個人特質對校長角色之探討研究」，義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
25.陳順宇(2004) ，多變量分析，華泰書局。
26.薛亞敏（2002），「非營利組織員工之組織文化及領導型態認知與其工作態度關聯性之探討—以財團法人製藥工業技術發展中心為例」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
27.謝安田(1992) ，企業管理，台北：五南圖書公司。
28.魏順炫 (2003) ，「由組織文化與領導行為來探討組織變革中員工的反應」，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
29.羅智丰(1997) ，「領導風格、工作滿足與離職傾向相關因素之探討」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部份
1.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership performance beyond expectation. New York：Academic Press, pp.181-223.
2.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J.(1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
3.Bass, B. M.,＆Avolio, B. J.(1994). Improving Organization Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, California：Sage Publication.
4.Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W.(1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier:The relationship between affect and employee citizenship,Academy of Management Journal,26, pp.587-595.
5.Birnbaum, R.(1971). Presidential succession: An interinstitutional analysis, Educational Record, 52, pp.133-145.
6.Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S.(1964). The managerial Grid. Houston:Gulf.(14).
7.Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E.(1970). Managerial Behavior, Performance, and effectiveness. New York：Mcgraw-Hill.
8.Carlson, R. O. (1961). Succession and Performance Among School Superintendents, Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, pp.210-227.
9.Carlson, R. O.(1962). Executive Succession and Organizational Change. Danville, Ill: Interstate Printers and Publishers.
10.Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N.(1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational setting, Academy of Management Review, 12, pp.637-647.
11.Dessler, G.(1980). Human Behavior Improving Performance at Work. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12.Drucker,P.F.(1998). On the Profession of Management. Harvard business review book series.
13.Dubrin, A. J.(1995). Human Relations for Career and Personal Success. 4th ed. Printice-Hall,Inc.
14.Ganz, H., & Hoy, W.(1977). Patterns of Succession of elementary principals and organizational change, Planning and Changing, 8 (2-3), PP.185-90.
15.Gorton, R. A., & Snowden, P. E.(1993). School Leadership and Administration. Brown and Benchmark,Madison,WI.
16.Greenblatt, M.(1978). Management succession：Bridge between two regimes, Psychiatric Opinion, 15, pp.36-40.
17.Grusky, O.(1960). Administrative succession in formal organization, Social Forces, 39, pp.105-115.
18.Grusky, O.(1964). Reply to scapegoat in baseball, American Journal of Sociology, 70, pp.72-76.
19.Guest, R.(1962). Managerial succession in complex organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 68, pp.47-50.
20.Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi G.(1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure, Academy of Management Review, 16, pp.719-738.
21.Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. J.(1994). Management. Addison- Wesley Publish Company, New York, pp.721
22.Helmich, D. L., & Brown, W. B.(1972). Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, pp.371-381.
23.Herzberg, F. I., Mwausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B.(1959). The Motivation to Work . New York: John Wiley and Sons.
24.House, R. J.(1971). A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness, AdinistrativeScience Quarterly, 16, pp.321-338.
25.House, R., & Shamir, B.(1993). Leadership theory and research perspectives and directions. PP 557-594, Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
26.Ingram, P. D.(1997). Leadership Behaviours of Principals in Inclusive Educational Settings, Journal of Educational Administration, 35(5), pp.411-427.
27.Kelly, J.(1980). Management transitions for newly appointed CEOs, Sloan Management Review, 22, pp.37-45.
28.Kotter, J. P., ＆Schlesinger L. A.(1979). Choosing Strategies for Change, Harvard Business Review, 57, pp.106-114.
29.Kotter,J. P.(1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail, Harvard Business Review, PP.1-24
30.Kotter, J. P.(1999). Leading Change, Harvard School Press, p.27.
31.Lewin, K.(1958). Readings in Social Psychology. N.Y.:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.(17).
32.Lippitt, R., Watson, J., & Wesley, B.(1958). Dynamics of Planned Change,Harcurt,Brace and World. Inc.,New York,N.Y.
33.Locke, E. A.(1973). Satisfactions and Dissatisfactions Among White Collar and Blue Collar Employee, Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, pp.67-76.
34.Lussier,R.N.(2000), Management Fundmentals, Thomson Learning,Inc.
35.Maslow A. H.(1943). A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review, 50, pp.370~396.
36.Maslow A. H.(1954). Motivation and Personality. New York:Harper and Row.
37.Ogawa, R. T. (1991). Enchantment, Disenchantment, and Accommodation: How a Faculty Made Sense of the Succession of its Principal, Educational Administration Quarterly,27(1), pp.30-60.
38.Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, R. T.(1995). Leadership as an organizational quality, Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2). pp.224-243.
39.Robbins S. P.(2003). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
40.Rosenberg, D.(1993). Eliminating Resistance to Change, Security Management, 37(1),pp.20-21.
41.Schermerhorn, J. R.,Hunt,J.G., & Osborn, R.N.(1996). Organizational Behavior. New York：John Wiley and Sons Inc.
42.Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D.(1975). Job Satisfaction Indicators and Their Correlates, American Behavioral Scientist , pp.333-368.
43.Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957). Leader behavior: Its Description and Measurement. No.88.Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
44.Tannenbaum, R., Weschler,I. R., & Massarik, F.(1961). Leadership and Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.Terry,G. R.(1960). Principles of Management 3rd(ed) , Homewood,III.:Richard D.Irwin.Pattern. pp.95-101.
46.Tushman, M., Virany, B., & Romanelli, E.(1985). Executive succession,strategic reorientations and organizational, Technology in Society, 7(130), pp.297-307.
47.Tushman, M., Newman, W. H., & Romanelli, E.(1986). Convergence and upheaval： Managing the unsteady pace of organizational evolution, California Management Review, 28(1), pp.8-20.
48.Vroom, V. H.(1964). Work and Motivation, New York, NY.
49.Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W.(1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
50.Waxley, K. N., & Yukl, G.A.(1977).Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology, Illinois: Homewood.
51.Weiber, M.(1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. (F Parsons,Trans.), New York:The free press (Original work publiched in 1924).
52.Weiner, N., & Mahoney, T.(1981). A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences, Academy of Management Journal, 24, pp.453-470.
53.Wiersema, M. F.(1992). Strategic consequences of executive succession within diversified firms, Journal of Management Studies, 29, pp.73-94.