受到新冠肺炎COVID-19疫情的影響，已對全球經濟造成了結構性的巨大改變，產業面對數位轉型趨勢已刻不容緩，然傳統產業屬於勞動力密集的市場，技術性高本傳承就不易，再加上年輕人多嚮往高科技產業不願進入傳統產業，造成產業面臨著一系列挑戰，包括技術性高傳承不易、人才培訓困難、環境複雜艱苦以及知識斷層等問題，少了人力庫和知識庫，何談數位轉型。
此研究主要探討在勞力密集的傳統產業，如何透過師徒技術傳承順應時勢結合知識管理方式，來強化企業的組織競爭力。因此透過個案Ｐ公司台灣廠及大陸廠員工參與線上記名問卷，總計收回260份，再從中抽7 組分三個階層依序進行員工晤談計畫，透過質性訪談探討員工動機及知識分享意願度，以瞭解如何利用師徒技術傳承和知識管理來促進組織發展及提高競爭力。
研究結果發現：(1)員工普遍肯定師徒制對職涯發展的益處，但對個性差異影響學習效果有顧慮，需個性化教學。(2)師徒制能提升工作成就感及建立人脈，員工期待情感支持和鼓勵，有些偏向實踐中學習和創新，有些認為模仿資深者有助系統化學習。(3)感知組織支持存在差異，需增加對個人貢獻的認可和表揚。分享意願依賴主管期望及工作文化，強調合作與支持氛圍。(4)知識庫的建立與應用、系統性訓練課程和線上學習平台被認為有效。員工對新知識的吸收、內化與應用有較高期望，強調知識和技術的創新應用及知識傳承的重要性。因此，以傳統師徒傳承結合知識管理，進而可強化組織競爭。

The COVID-19 pandemic has induced significant structural changes in the global economy, necessitating urgent digital transformation across industries. Traditional industries, characterized by their labor-intensive nature, face substantial challenges in this regard. These include difficulties in transferring high-level technical skills, training talent, dealing with complex and strenuous work environments, and bridging knowledge gaps. Without a robust labor and knowledge pool, digital transformation becomes increasingly difficult.
This research focuses on how labor-intensive traditional industries can enhance organizational competitiveness through the mentor-apprentice model combined with knowledge management strategies. Utilizing a case study of Company P, involving employees from its Taiwan and China plants, the study collected 260 responses via an online survey. Seven groups across three hierarchical levels were then selected for detailed interviews to explore employee motivation and willingness to share knowledge. The goal is to understand how the mentor-apprentice model and knowledge management can drive organizational development and boost competitiveness.
Key findings include:
1.Employees generally acknowledge the benefits of the mentor-apprentice system for career development. However, concerns about the impact of personality differences on learning effectiveness suggest a need for personalized teaching approaches.
2.The mentor-apprentice system can enhance job satisfaction and build professional networks. Employees expect emotional support and encouragement, with some preferring practical, innovative learning, and others favoring systematic learning through imitation of senior colleagues.
3.Perceived organizational support varies, indicating a need for increased recognition and appreciation of individual contributions. Knowledge-sharing willingness depends on managerial expectations and the work culture, highlighting the importance of a collaborative and supportive environment.
4.The establishment and application of knowledge bases, systematic training programs, and online learning platforms are seen as effective. Employees have high expectations for acquiring, internalizing, and applying new knowledge, underscoring the importance of innovative applications of knowledge and technology and effective knowledge transfer.

一、 中文部分
1. 司徒達賢 (2011，4月13日)。以知識管理取代師徒傳承。天下雜誌，406期。 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5002297
2. 何榮柱 (2016)。品管圈活動。師徒制及知識管理與技術知識傳承成效關連性之研究-以中鋼公司為例 (Doctoral dissertation，撰者)。
3. 吳竺君 (2019，9月30日)。中鋼人才培育及企業文化的守護與傳承。放．新聞。https://www.fountmedia.io/article/35800
4. 吳美欣 (2021，6月25日)。找直屬主管做 mentor，不是好的選擇！師徒制的成功關鍵是？。經理人。https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/63132
5. 林文寶、吳萬益 (2004)。以組織學習觀點探討知識整合及運作特性對核心能力影響之研究。臺大管理論叢，15(2)，165-197。
6. 林東清 (2003)。知識管理，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
7. 林澄貴、溫金豐 (2001)。中鋼導入知識管理的策略及實務探討。2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集，526-537。
8. 林錦郎 (2016)。從計畫行為理論探討數位學習平台知識分享行為。全球商業經營管理學報，(8)，43-55。
9. 夏松明 (2017，6月9日)。師徒制，企業有效且成功培育產品經理的致勝關鍵。專案經理雜誌。https://www.pm-mag.net/Article/Article_content.aspx?Tid=177
10. 常致泰 (2002)。從企業競爭優勢的觀點探討知識管理模式的建構：以中鋼公司為例 (Doctoral dissertation，撰者)。
11. 張彥文 (2019)。打造不老企業》中鋼建立師徒導師制，一對一傳承。哈佛商業評論，2019年3月。
12. 陳建丞( 2008)。員工知覺的組織支持與工作績效間的中介模型研究。管理學報，25(3)，309-331。
13. 陳家聲, 方文昌, & 蔡儀華. (2005). 企業員工知識分享效能之質性研究-以知識接收者的觀點. 人力資源管理學報, 5(1), 29-51。
14. 蔡淳如 (2009)。師徒制與師徒功能對員工創新行為之影響-以知識分享為中介變數。國立高雄師範大學人力與知識管理研究所，高雄市。
1.

二、 英文部分
1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
2. Aryee, S., Lo, S., & Kang, I. L. (1999). Antecedents of early career stage mentoring among Chinese employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 563-576.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2.
4. Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1997). Self-efficacy (pp. 4-6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76.
6. Bozionelos, N. (2004). Mentoring provided: Relation to mentor’s career success, personality, and mentoring received. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 24-46.
7. Crossan, M. M. (1996). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation.
8. Cole, M., Ho, M., Jones, M., Von Ins, C., Coppel, C., Julien, T. (2017, November). Mentoring Matters: Developing Talent With Formal Mentoring Programs. Association for Talent Development.　 https://d22bbllmj4tvv8.cloudfront.net/f2/2a/7d44cae54e4f89dc8b94a6a81792/research17-mentoring-matters-rr-56917-whitepaper.pdf
9. De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.
10. Drucker, P. (2012). Managing in a time of great change. Routledge.
11. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500.
12. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
13. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100.
14. Hu, C., Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2011). Measurement invariance in mentoring research: A cross-cultural examination across Taiwan and the US. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 274-282.
15. Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625.
16. Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. University Press of America.
17. Liebowitz, J., & Frank, M. (Eds.). (2016). Knowledge management and e-learning. CRC press.
18. Martin, G. F., Reed, G. E., Collins, R. B., & Dial, C. K. (2002). The road to mentoring: Paved with good intentions. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 32(3), 11.
19. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
20. Rice, M. B., & Brown, R. D. (1990). Developmental factors associated with self-perceptions of mentoring competence and mentoring needs. Journal of College Student Development, 31:293–299..
21. Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 169-174.
22. Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251-265.
23. Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2004). Validity of Scandura and Ragins ‘(1993) Multidimensional Mentoring Measure: An Evaluation and Refinement Stephanie L. Castro Department of Management College of Business.
24. Turban, D. B., & Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 688-702.
25. Turban, D. B., & Lee, F. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships. The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice, 9, 21-50.
26. van Wijk, R., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2000). Creating the N-form corporation as a managerial competence. Available at SSRN 370825.
27. Waters, L. (2004). Protégé–mentor agreement about the provision of psychosocial support: The mentoring relationship, personality, and workload. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 519-532.
28. Zey, M. G. (1985). The Mentor Connection, 1st. Homewood, IL: Dow Jone-Irwin.