| 研究生: |
李雅璇 Ya-hsuan Li |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以巴菲特選股模式建構基本面投資組合:在台股之實證研究 Constructing a Fundamental Portfolio by Buffett's Stock Selection Model:Evidence from Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
何中達
Chung-da Ho |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 55 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 價值型投資 、巴菲特價值型選股 、基本面指數 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Value investment, Warren Buffet’s value stock selection, Fundamental indexation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:6 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
市值加權股票投資組合的成分股在股價漲跌時,各股權重會有相當大的起伏變化,因此當任何價格偏離真實價值時,以價格或市值加權編制的指數結構往往會加碼高估或減碼低估,但基本面加權或均等權重指數因為非價格導向,故較為貼近真正的價值。而近年來投資實務界中,以投資績效優於市場報酬率著稱的基金經理人在選股的方式中,通常以價值型投資作為其投資策略。價值投資法重視公司在營運基本面的績效表現,而非短期股價的起伏或是市場行情的波動走勢,透過對公司營運績效的分析,包括獲利能力、成長性及財務風險的價值的分析,可以找出公司的真實價值。因此本研究將使用巴菲特價值型選股方式做投資組合,再結合基本面加權之理論建構出另一種基本面投資組合,並應用在台灣的股票市場上,藉此探討此種選股與建立投資組合的方式是否能打敗大盤或市值加權組合。本研究結果顯示巴菲特價值型選股方式之報酬表現明顯優於大盤;而巴菲特基本面投資組合相較於市值加權平均超額報酬約有17.75%,代表此種投資組合的建構方式明顯打敗市值加權組合。
The weights of the market capitalization-weighted portfolio will be ups and downs with the changing of the stock price. Therefore, when the prices deviate from the true value, the indexes which compile with market prices or market capitalization would be overvalued or undervalued. Due to the non-price-oriented characteristic of the fundamental weighted indexation as well as the equal-weighted indexation, they are closer to the real value. In recent years, the fund managers usually use the value investment as their investment strategies. The value investment strategy emphasizes the performance of the companies in operating fundamental aspect, instead of the short-term fluctuations in stock prices or the trend of the market condition. With the analysis of the company's operating performance, including the profitability, growth, and the value of financial risk, we can find out the true value of the company. Therefore, this paper first uses the Warren Buffet’s value investment method to construct a portfolio, and then combines it with the fundamental weighted method to construct another portfolio, to see whether these two portfolios would beat the market index or the market capitalization-weighted portfolio in Taiwan market. The empirical result shows that the performance of Warren Buffet’s value investment portfolio is significantly better than the market index. And the Warren Buffet’s fundamental portfolio, compared to the market capitalization-weighted portfolio, has average excess return about 17.75%, which represents that the Warren Buffet’s fundamental portfolio obviously beats the capitalization-weighted portfolio.
國內文獻
[1.] 王志能,「巴菲特投資哲學於台灣股市之應用買進持有策略與本益比調整策略」,國立中興大學,碩士論文,2006年。
[2.] 洪瑞泰,巴菲特選股魔法書,台北:智富出版社,2004年。
[3.] 俞濟群譯,Benjamin Graham 著,智慧型股票投資人,台北:寰宇出版社,2002年。
[4.] 黃元裕,「價值投資法於台灣股市之運用」,國立交通大學,碩士論文,2003年。
[5.] 張淑芳譯,Warren E. Buffet & Lawrence A. Cunningham 著,巴菲特寫給股東的信,台北:財訊出版社,2002年。
[6.] 孫逸寰,「基本面指數化策略之實證研究:以台灣股市為例」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2008年。
[7.] 鄭義、湯雲鶴,「基本面加權指數:台灣市場TWFI100指數驗證」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,第59期,pp. 9-19,2006年。
[8.] 鄧安鎮,「巴菲特價值型選股模式在台股應用之研究」,逢甲大學,經營管理碩士在職專班論文,2007年。
國外文獻
[1] R. D. Arnott, J. Hsu, and P. Moore, “Fundamental Indexation.” Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 83-99. 2005.
[2] B. Arshanapalli, T. D. Coggin, and J. Doukas. “Multifactor asset pricing analysis of international value investment strategies.” Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol. 24, pp.10-23, Summer 1998.
[3] W. S. Bauman, C. M. Conover and R. E. Miller, “Growth versus Value and Large-Cap versus Small-Cap Stocks in International Markets,” Financial Analysts Journal, 75-89, March/ April, 1998.
[4] C. Capual, I. Rowley, and W. F. Sharpe “International value and growth stock returns.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49, pp.27-36, Jan/Feb 1993
[5] R. G. David , J. Elvis, “International Equity Funds, Performance, and Investor Flows: Australian Evidence.” Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Feb. Vol. 14 Issue 1, p81-95, 2004.
[6] J. C. Hsu and C. Campollo “An Examination of Fundamental Indexation.” Journal of Indexes, Journal of Indexes, Vol. 58, pp. 32-37, January/February 2006.
[7] J. Hemminki and V. Puttonen “Fundamental Indexation in Europe” Journal of Asset Management, 8(6), 401–405, 2007.
[8] C.H. Jason “CAP-WEIGHTED PORTFOLIOS ARE SUB-OPTIMAL PORTFOLIOS.”, Journal of Investment Management, Vol.4, No.3,Third Quarter 2006.
[9] E. Javier, “Fundamental Indexation and International Diversification.”, Journal of portfolio Management, Vol.34, No 3,Spring 2008.
[10] T. H. Joel, M. Jeff, S. Oliver, “Performance comparison Between Exchange-Traded Funds and Closed-End Country Funds.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, Apr. Vol. 16 Issue 2, p104-122, 2006.
[11] James P. O’Shaughnessy, “What Works on Wall Street: A Guide to the Best- Performing Investment Strategies of All Time.” McGraw-Hill: New York, 1996.
[12] J. Lakonishok, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny “Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, pp.1541-1578, Dec 1994.
[13] G. Malkei “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991.” Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572, 1995.
[14] A. F. Perold, “Fundamentally Flawed Indexing” Financial Analysts Journal, 63, 31-37, 2007.
[15] M. Ramaswami , “Return Enhancement Through Size and Style Management, Blending Quantitative and Traditional Equity Analysis” CFA Institute, 950103, 1994.
[16] Siegel, Jeremy J. , “The Noisy Market Hypothesis.” Wall Street Journal, A14, 2006.
[17] E. H. Sorensen, K. L. Miller and V. Samak, “Allocating Between Active and Passive Management.” Financial Analysts Journal 54, 5 (September/October): p18-31, 1998.
[18] H. Tamura and Y. Shimizu, “Fundamental Indices, Do they outperform market-cap weighted indices on a global basis??” Research White Paper, Nomura Securities, 2005.