跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李健瑞
Robert Li
論文名稱: 以資料包絡分析法比較二十個國家科技
Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Evaluatingthe National Technology Competitiveness ComparingTwenty Countries
指導教授: 王弓
Kung Wang
薛琦
Chi Shiue
曾國雄
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所
Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 科技發展策略國家創新系統創新政策資料包絡分析競爭力
外文關鍵詞: S&T policy, Data, Innovation Policy, National Innovation Systems
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在知識經濟時代,科技創新競爭力,將是國家經濟發展最重要的成功關鍵因
    素之一。而科技發展策略的擬定與執行,前後有相當程度的時間落差,且對未來
    影響深遠,在瞬息萬變的市場競爭下,由於無法認知環境變遷要素為動態之變動
    狀態,使科技發展策略之決策與動態環境變動狀態間出現時間落差,或難以預
    測,導致原科技發展策略無法適時對應、效能降低。因此,本研究之目的,為分
    析20 個主要先進國家跨期科技相對效率之比較,以了解它們各國科技政策與績
    效。首先,採用瑞士洛桑國際管理學院(International Institute for Management
    Development of Lausanne, Swiss, 簡稱IMD)所提出的指標,作為本研究考量的基
    準,再以最適合的資料包絡分析(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA )模式,建構科
    技發展策略投入產出效率之分析模型,並針對台灣科技發展策略執行效率加以分
    析;其結果,以此作為政府資源運用與政策研擬之參考。


    Decision making and practice of S&T policy are crucially for both government
    and private sectors, but they usually suffer from high volatility in dynamic
    environment of international competition. The first objective of this research is to
    propose the Data Enve lopment Analysis model for efficiency measuring of Taiwan
    S&T policy.
    The second objective of this research is to develop an empirically based framework for
    formulating and selecting Innovation Policy. The government is usually facing complex
    decision scenarios. Traditional decision making methods are failed to satisfy the government’s
    need in this regard. Thus, a hierarchy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for
    evaluating the Innovation Policy is proposed in this study. Finally, in order to show the
    practicality and usefulness of this model, an empirical study of national innovation systems
    are demonstrated.

    第一章緒論… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 1 1.1 研究背景與動機… … … … … … … … … … … .… … 1 1.2 研究問題及目的… … … … … … … … .… … … … … 3 1.3 理論架構與研究方法… … … … … … … .… … … .... 4 1.4 研究內容… … … … … … … … … … … … … .… … 5 第二章國家科技政策之關鍵要因及其評估… … … .… … … ….6 2.1 國家競爭力介紹… … … … … … … … … … .… … … 6 2.2 國家科技競爭力之關鍵要因… … … … … … … … .… 11 2.2.1 國家創新系統… … … … … … … … … … .… … 11 2.2.2 創新政策… … … … … … … … … … … … … 13 第三章DEA 評估模式之構建… … … … … … … … … .… …14 3.1 理論緣起… … … … … … … … … … … … … … 16 3.2 基本概念… … … … … … … … … … … … … … ...18 3.3 使用程序… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 19 3.4 模式發展… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 21 3.5 CCR 模式… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 23 3.6 跨期效率分析MALMQUIST 指標分析… … … … … 27 第四章實證分析:以二十個主要國家科技政策為例… … .… .… 30 4.1 國際競爭環境的轉變… … … … … … … … … … … 30 4.2 評估資料之蒐集與說明… … … … … … .… .… … .… 31 4.3 DEA 評估模式之應用與結果分析… … ..… ..… .… 38 第五章提昇台灣科技競爭效率之因應對策… … … … … … 51 5.1 當今的課題與挑戰… … … … … … … … … … … .… 51 5.1.1 全球競賽的挑戰… … … … … … … … ...… ...… 51 5.1.2 大陸磁吸效應的衝擊… … … … … … ..… … … … 51 5.1.3 沉重的歷史包袱亟待改革… … … … … ..… … … .…52 5.2 綠色矽島之路… … ..… … … … … … … … … … … 52 5.3 結論與討論建議… … … … … ...… … … … … … 53 參考文獻… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 56 附錄… … … … … … … ...… … … … … … … … ..… 63 圖目錄 頁次 圖1 國家創新系統之構面… … … … … … … … … .… … 13 圖2 技術效率與價格效率圖… … … … … … ..… … .… ...18 圖3 DEA 與迴歸分析的比較圖… … … … … … .… … … … 19 圖4 DEA 理論的使用程序圖… … … … … … … .… … … 20 圖5 依規模報酬與導向區分的DEA 模式圖… … .… … … … . 21 圖6 Malmquist Productivity Index… … … … … … ....… 28 圖7 1994 年至2002 年的跨期DEA 圖表… … … … .… … ..…50 表目錄 頁次 表1 政府創新政策工具分類… … … … … … … … … .… …15 表2 DEA理論之主要文獻… … … … … … … … … … … … 22 表3 投入產出項… … … … … … … … … … … … … … 33 表4 1994 年分析的資料… … … … … … … … … … … … 34 表5 1994 年資料的統計量… … … … … … … … … … … .35 表6 2002 年的分析資料… … … … … … … … … … … … 36 表7 2002 年資料的統計量… … … … … … … … … … … 37 表8 1994年和2002 年相對效率值的比較… … … … … … … 39 表9 相同投入項不同產出項的效率分析(1994)… … … … … 40 表10 相同投入項不同產出項的效率分析(2002)… … … … ..…41 表11 二十個主要國家相對競爭效率值(2000 年)… … … ....…40 表12 二十個主要國家相對競爭效率值(1994 年)… ..… … … .43 表13 偏差值表列(1994 年)… … ..… … … … … … … ..…45 表14 偏差值表列(2002 年)… … … … … … … … … … … 46 表15 1994 年至2002 年的跨期DEA MALMQUIST 指標圖..… ..49

    Adam Smith (1776), “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
    Nations”.
    Adolphson, D.L., Cornia, G.C. and Walters, L.C. (1989), “Railroad Property Valuation
    Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Interface, Vol. 19, No.1, 18-26.
    Ali, A.L., Cook, W.D. and Seiford, L.M. (1991), “Strict vs. Weak Ordinal Relations
    for Multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis” Management Sciences, Vol. 37, No.
    6, 733-738.
    Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993), “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in
    Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 39, No. 10, 1261-1264.
    Banker, R.D., Conrad, R.F. and Strauss, R.P. (1986), “A Comparative Application of
    DEA and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production,”
    Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 30-44.
    Banker, R.D. (1984), “Estimating Most Productive Scale Size Using Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 17, No. 1,
    35-44.
    Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating
    Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis” Management
    Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, 1078-1092.
    Banker, R.D. and Morey, R.C. (1986), “The Use of Categorical Variables in Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 12, 1613-1627.
    Banker, R.D. and Thrall, R.M. (1992), “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 62, No. 1,
    74-84.
    Barro, Robert, J., Sala- i-Martinand, and Xavier (1995), “Economic Growth, ”
    Advanced Series in Economics. New York, London and Montreal: McGraw-Hill.
    Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J. and Regan, B. (1982), “An Application of
    Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent
    School District,” Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 12, 1355-1367.
    Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, No. 1,
    1-15.
    Bowlin, W.F., Charnes,A., Cooper, W.W. and Sherman H.D. (1985), “Data
    Envelopment Analysis and Regression Approaches to Efficiency Estimation and
    Evaluation,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2, 113-138.
    Brockett, P.L. and Golany, B. (1996), “Using Rank Statistics for Determining
    Programmatric Efficiency Differency in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management
    Science, Vol. 42, No. 3.
    Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. (1995), “On the Nature, Function and Composition
    of Technological System”, in Technological Systems and Economic Performance:
    The Case of Factory Automation, Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.
    Chang, K.P. and Kao, P.H. (1992), “The Relative Efficiency of Public versus Private
    Municipal Bus Firms: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” The Journal
    of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3,No. 1, 67-84.
    Chang, K.P. and Guh, Y.Y. (1991), “Linear Production Function and the Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, No. 2,
    215-223.
    Charnes,A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for
    Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder Boyd and Fare,” European Journal of Operational
    Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, 333-334.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M. (1997), Data Envelopment
    Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application, Third Printing, Massachusetts,
    Kluwer Academic Publish.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of
    Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 4,
    429-444.
    Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W.W. and Golany, B. (1985), “A Developmental Study
    of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units
    in the U.S. Air Forces,” Annals of Operation Research, Vol. 2, 95-112.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Morey R.C. and Rousseau, J. (1985),
    “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2,
    No. 2, 139-156.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Seiford L.M. and Stutz, J. (1983), “Invariant
    Multiplicative Efficiency and Piecewise Cobb-Douglas Envelopments,” Operations
    Research Letters, Vol. 2, No. 3, 101-103.
    Clarke, R.L. (1992), “Evaluating USAF Vehicle Maintenance Productivity Over
    Time: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Decision Science, Vol. 23,
    376-384.
    Chu, X., Fielding, G.J. and Lamar, B.W. (1992), “Measuring Transit Performance
    Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Transportation Research, Vol. 26A, No. 3,
    223-230.
    Doryan and Enduardo, A. (1993), “An Institutional Perspective of Competitiveness
    and Industrial Restructuring Policies in Developing Countries,” Journal of
    Economic Issue, Vol 27, No. 2, 451-58.
    Doyle, J. and Green, R. (1994), “Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA:Derivations,
    Meanings and Uses,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 45, No. 5,
    567-578.
    Dyson, R.G. and Thanssoulis, E. (1988), “Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data
    Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 39, No.
    6, 563-576.
    Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Ross P., “Productivity Changes in Swedish
    Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” The Journal of
    Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, No.1, 1992, 85-101.
    Farrell, M.J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, ” Journal of the
    Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, Vol. 120, Part 3, 253-281.
    Forsund, F.R. (1992), “A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Efficiency
    Measures: The Case of Norwegian Ferries,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis,
    Vol. 3, No. 1, 25-43.
    Freeman, C. (1982), “The Economics of Industrial Innovation”, MIT Press.
    Golany, B. and Roll, Y. (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” OMEGA, Vol.
    17, No. 3, 237-250.
    Hines, R.D. (1982), “The Usefulness of Annual Reports: The Anomaly Between the
    Efficient Markets Hypothesis and Share Holder Surveys,” Accounting and Business
    Research, 296-309.
    Jeffrey, D. and Hubbard, N.J., (1994) “A Model of Hotel Occupancy Performance for
    Monitoring and Marketing,” Vol.13, No. 1, 57-71.
    Kao, C. and Yang, Y.C. (1992), “Reorganization of Forest Districts Via Efficiency
    Measurement,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 58, 356-362.
    Kim, L. (1997), “Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological
    Learning,” Harvard Business School Press.
    Li, X.B. and Reeves, G.R. (1999), “A Multiple Criteria Approach to Data
    Envelopment Anaylsis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 115,
    507-517.
    Lim, Seok-Min (1996), “Round-the-world Service:The Rise of Evergreen and the
    Fall of U.S. Lines,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.23, No.2, 119-144.
    Lundvall, B.A. (1992), “National Systems of Innovations: Towards a Theory of
    Innovation and Interactive Learning,” Pinter Publishers.
    Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1867) “Capital Vols,” .Vol. 1.
    Milliken, F.J. (1987) “Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty about the Environment:
    State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.12,
    133-143.
    Nasierowski, W. and Arcelus, F.J. “Interrelationships among the Elements of National
    Innovation Systems: A Statistical Evaluation,” European Journal of Operational
    Research, Vol. 119, 235-253.
    Nelson, R.R. (1993), “National Innovation Systems- A Comparative Analysis,”
    Oxford University Press, New York.
    Porter, M.E. (1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press New
    York.
    Ricardo, D. (1817), “On the principles of Political and Taxation,”.
    Roll, Y. and Hayuth, Y. (1993), “Port Performance Comparison Applying Data
    Envelopment Analysis(DEA),” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 20, No. 2,
    153-161.
    Roll, Y., Golany, B. and Seroussy, D. (1989), ”Measuring the Efficiency of
    Maintenance Units in the Israeli Air Force,” European Journal of Operational
    Research, Vol. 43, 136-142.
    Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1981), “Industrial Innovation and Public Policy:
    Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s”, London: Frances Printer.
    Schefczyk, M. (1993), “Operational Performance of Airlines :An Extension of
    Traditional Measurement Paradigms,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14,
    301-317.
    Schive, C. (1988), “An Intra-firm Study of X-efficiency of Taiwan’s Sugar Industry,”
    Developing Economics, Vol. 26, No.2 ,161-171.
    Schumpeter, J.A. (1912), “Theory of Economic Development,”.
    Solow, R.M. (1956), “A contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly
    Journal of Economics, Vol, 70, 65-94.
    Solow, R.M. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,”
    Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312-320.
    Sueyoshi, T. (1997), “Measuring Efficiencies and Returns to Scale of Nippon
    Telegraph & Telephone in Production and Cost Analyses,” Management Science,
    Vol. 43, No. 6, 779-796.
    Sueyoshi, T. (1999), “DEA-discriminant Analysis in the View of Goal Programming,”
    European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 115, No. 2, 564-582.
    Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee C.T. and Thrall, R.M. (1990), “The Role of
    Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming,”
    Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 46, 93-108.
    Vassiloglou, M. and Giokas, D. (1990), “A Study of the Relative Efficiency of Bank
    Branches:An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Operational
    Research Society, Vol. 41, 591-597.
    Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of Bus iness Performance
    in Strategy Research:A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management
    Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 801-814.
    Yoffie and David, B. (1992), “Linking trade and technology policies :An International
    Comparison of the Policies of Industrialized Nations,” Series on Prospering in a
    Global Economy, 103-115, Washington, D.C. :National Academy Press.
    江勁毅、曾國雄(2000),「新的DEA 效率衡量方式:以模糊多目標規劃建立之效
    率達成度」,管理學報,第17 卷,第2 期。
    國科會(2001),2001 年中華民國科技與技術統計要覽,國科會。
    徐作聖(2000),創新政策概論,華泰書局。
    徐作聖(1999),科技政策與國家創新系統,華泰書局。
    徐作聖(1999),國家創新系統與競爭力,聯經出版社。
    陳敦基、蕭智文(1994),「公路客運總體績效DEA 評估模式建立之研究」,運輸
    計劃季刊,第23 卷,第1 期,頁11-40。
    黃旭男、張元哲、林進財(1997),「郵政總局分支機構經營效率及效率變動之評
    估」,交大管理學報,第17 卷,第2 期,頁125-144。

    QR CODE
    :::